SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
What would it take for you to trade Mookie?
|
Post by larrycook on Nov 1, 2014 1:33:57 GMT -5
I have three untouchables, bogey, betts and swihart.
However I do wonder what happens when pitchers learn how to pitch to betts. Can he make adjustments in order to keep hitting because god knows Bradley and bogey did not.
Bradley is absolutely frozen by anything on the inner third of the plate and bogey keeps trying to pull pitches on the outside third of the plate instead of using right field .
|
|
|
Post by bigpapismangosalsa on Nov 1, 2014 8:24:22 GMT -5
First off, thanks to Jmei and others for their reply on FanGraphs and using some other advanced statistics, I really appreciate it. Like Chris and others, I love the way that BB-ref quantifies their splits, and I also firmly admit that I love their similarity scores pages and links. I haven't been able to find anything like that on FanGraphs in looking it over the past couple of days (but I do love their valuation score translated to free agent dollars).
Larry, that's kind of exactly the point I'm making on Betts. Major League pitchers (and advanced scouting) will almost assuredly catch up to him at some point - and that will likely come fairly early in the season as there is more of a book on what he's done in the majors. That will likely cause him to struggle, and while we hope it wont be as bad as Bogaerts went through this year, I was illustrating the struggles of some other very talented young players to give support to how normal this is.
Also, I disagree with you a bit on saying Bogaerts wasn't able to make adjustments. I don't mean this to come off as condescending (so forgive me if it does) but did you watch a lot of the games after the All-Star break or even into the end of the season? It was often tough baseball to watch, so you might have not watched as closely as the beginning of the year. If not, you might have missed his turn-around to end the year. He really had five distinct portions to his season: His first 60 games (approximately 240PA) where he was arguably the most consistent offensive performer on the team. An awful stretch of about 25games June 7th - the All-Star break where he looked run down. After that four day break, he had a very good stretch of about another 15 or so games lasting until the end of July. He then had an abysmal 18 games in August before getting hit in the head by Hernandez. Following that week or so off, he went on an absolute tear for the last 25 games of his season where he hit approximately .313/.317/.490/.806 for an RC+ of 120 over that time frame. I don't quite buy into the "he's too mentally weak to handle a move to 3b" argument since he was, you know, a stud there in the most-pressure he's likely ever been under last October. What I do buy into is the look of a supremely talented kid who came up and was able to be a very good MLB hitter, until adjustments were made to him. He then struggled for three weeks, but adjusted and had another good two weeks. Adjustments were made, and he struggled mightily before getting some time off to make adjustments back, and then he was great again for a month. Pretty darn typical.
While I realize this isn't a thread about Bogaerts, I think this is relevant because with he and Betts you have similar players (very talented, highly graded by scouts, advanced approaches to the game, kids who seem to have good mental make-up and poise). Struggles are what young players go through - it's normal, and will likely happen to Betts too, so nobody should start re-evaluating him after he experiences some struggles next season. I also want to make clear that I'm not stating you have re-evaluated Bogaerts in that we agree between he and Betts (and Swihart) there are really very few players whom we'd trade them for - most of whom aren't available anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Nov 2, 2014 0:18:53 GMT -5
They do have game logs-- under the game logs tab. But the B-Ref game log interface, particularly the minor league one, is simply phenomenal. It's almost too good - I end up going down the arbitrary endpoints rabbit hole for a lot longer than I should. The method of highlighting a series of games is just so easy, particularly for someone like me who isn't super tech-savvy. I agree that Fangraphs collection of useful advanced stats is far, far superior. This. I meant that B-Ref's game logs are far more useful than Fangraphs'. Should've been clearer, sorry.
|
|
|
Post by larrycook on Nov 2, 2014 21:20:56 GMT -5
First off, thanks to Jmei and others for their reply on FanGraphs and using some other advanced statistics, I really appreciate it. Like Chris and others, I love the way that BB-ref quantifies their splits, and I also firmly admit that I love their similarity scores pages and links. I haven't been able to find anything like that on FanGraphs in looking it over the past couple of days (but I do love their valuation score translated to free agent dollars). Larry, that's kind of exactly the point I'm making on Betts. Major League pitchers (and advanced scouting) will almost assuredly catch up to him at some point - and that will likely come fairly early in the season as there is more of a book on what he's done in the majors. That will likely cause him to struggle, and while we hope it wont be as bad as Bogaerts went through this year, I was illustrating the struggles of some other very talented young players to give support to how normal this is. Also, I disagree with you a bit on saying Bogaerts wasn't able to make adjustments. I don't mean this to come off as condescending (so forgive me if it does) but did you watch a lot of the games after the All-Star break or even into the end of the season? It was often tough baseball to watch, so you might have not watched as closely as the beginning of the year. If not, you might have missed his turn-around to end the year. He really had five distinct portions to his season: His first 60 games (approximately 240PA) where he was arguably the most consistent offensive performer on the team. An awful stretch of about 25games June 7th - the All-Star break where he looked run down. After that four day break, he had a very good stretch of about another 15 or so games lasting until the end of July. He then had an abysmal 18 games in August before getting hit in the head by Hernandez. Following that week or so off, he went on an absolute tear for the last 25 games of his season where he hit approximately .313/.317/.490/.806 for an RC+ of 120 over that time frame. I don't quite buy into the "he's too mentally weak to handle a move to 3b" argument since he was, you know, a stud there in the most-pressure he's likely ever been under last October. What I do buy into is the look of a supremely talented kid who came up and was able to be a very good MLB hitter, until adjustments were made to him. He then struggled for three weeks, but adjusted and had another good two weeks. Adjustments were made, and he struggled mightily before getting some time off to make adjustments back, and then he was great again for a month. Pretty darn typical. While I realize this isn't a thread about Bogaerts, I think this is relevant because with he and Betts you have similar players (very talented, highly graded by scouts, advanced approaches to the game, kids who seem to have good mental make-up and poise). Struggles are what young players go through - it's normal, and will likely happen to Betts too, so nobody should start re-evaluating him after he experiences some struggles next season. I also want to make clear that I'm not stating you have re-evaluated Bogaerts in that we agree between he and Betts (and Swihart) there are really very few players whom we'd trade them for - most of whom aren't available anyway. Would you do a cespedes and betts for staton trade?
|
|
radiohix
Veteran
'At the end of the day, we bang. We bang. We're going to swing.' Alex Verdugo
Posts: 6,194
Member is Online
|
Post by radiohix on Nov 26, 2018 23:11:52 GMT -5
Going through this thread was quite entertaining I got say
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 2,752
|
Post by mobaz on Nov 28, 2018 11:25:09 GMT -5
Sadly, sounds like some folks want to resurrect! I still say there's no scenario where equal or commensurate value will be attained, and you work to sign Mookie up until the ink is wet on a contract. Keep him. Pay him market value. Profit.
|
|
|
Post by dmaineah on Dec 17, 2018 21:06:10 GMT -5
Lets get crazy;
If Mookie keeps it going, after his 2020 season he might command $500 million so, Sign Harper now for 12yrs/350m, trade Mookie, Vazquez & Chavis to S.D. for Fernando Tatis Jr, Luis Urias & Francisco Mojia.
|
|
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Dec 18, 2018 11:12:13 GMT -5
Lets get crazy; If Mookie keeps it going, after his 2020 season he might command $500 million so, Sign Harper now for 12yrs/350m, trade Mookie, Vazquez & Chavis to S.D. for Fernando Tatis Jr, Luis Urias & Francisco Mojia. Doubt the Padres do it. Two years of control for Mookie and they give up all those years of control for those top level prospects? It's not like Mookie is the difference between making the playoffs or not making the playoffs for the Padres. Given where both teams are I don't think either one would make that deal. The Sox are looking to win now. Those two years of Mookie are extremely valuable.
|
|
|