|
Post by geostorm on Sept 3, 2016 19:41:03 GMT -5
"How might the standings be different if each team had held onto its original players without dealing them away over the years?... In the absence of any high-pressure, high-leverage series to pick apart, we have time to look into something a little more, let’s say, unconventionally relevant: How might the standings be different if each team had held onto its original players without dealing them away over the years? Thanks to data from The Baseball Gauge, we can take a stab at that question. The site tracks how many wins above replacement (WAR) have been produced by players who were originally drafted (or otherwise acquired) by each franchise, which can be easily converted into wins and losses. Here’s how each division would look if teams were stocked exclusively with homegrown players:..." fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-the-mlb-standings-would-look-if-teams-stuck-with-whoever-they-drafted/
|
|
|
Post by bluechip on Sept 7, 2016 8:12:06 GMT -5
That is an interesting article. Note that the Red Sox actually would have a much better record (best in the majors). Interestingly, the Yankees would have a winning record and the Rays a .500 record. I'm not sure if this speaks more to quality of amateur scouting or the ability of teams to scout their own talent... I guess it speaks to both.
|
|
|
Post by sox fan in nc on Sept 7, 2016 9:07:37 GMT -5
Doesn't a lot of this boil down to team needs at deadlines. Everyone on the planet knows you overpay for specific areas of need. I suppose sometimes it's a "coveting" thing as with A-Gon & Theo. I couldn't pull up the link, but if you had, say 3 good CF'ers in your system, & need a closer, wouldn't it be prudent to trade one?
|
|