SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Adrian Beltre and other Red Sox "What-ifs"
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Sept 12, 2016 11:16:05 GMT -5
Latest update, bWAR plus offensive clutch, measured yet another way. I'm just using FanGraph's measure this time, because I was double-counting SB value the way I was doing it before. I'm going to take a closer look later at how best to incorporate WPA into bWAR, and at whose BaseRunning metric is the best. 8.9 Trout 7.6 Beltre (! Under the radar, much? 10th in bWAR, 2.0 wins of clutch.) 7.5 Betts 6.6 Donaldson 6.6 Machado 6.6 Altuve 6.2 Seager Could say that the bold is a pretty apt description of his career, really.
|
|
|
Post by threeifbaerga on Sept 12, 2016 12:08:17 GMT -5
Latest update, bWAR plus offensive clutch, measured yet another way. I'm just using FanGraph's measure this time, because I was double-counting SB value the way I was doing it before. I'm going to take a closer look later at how best to incorporate WPA into bWAR, and at whose BaseRunning metric is the best. 8.9 Trout 7.6 Beltre (! Under the radar, much? 10th in bWAR, 2.0 wins of clutch.) 7.5 Betts 6.6 Donaldson 6.6 Machado 6.6 Altuve 6.2 Seager Could say that the bold is a pretty apt description of his career, really. Ain't that the truth. Quick peek at active bWAR leaders, Beltre is behind only A-Rod and Pujols and the gap between Beltre and 4th is as big as the gap between 4th and 11th.
|
|
|
Post by brianthetaoist on Sept 12, 2016 12:39:10 GMT -5
Beltre should be a surefire Hall of Famer, but he's not really talked about like that. Except for his lost years in Seattle, he's been consistently great.
And one of the bigger "what ifs?" in recent Sox history.
|
|
nomar
Veteran
Posts: 10,682
|
Post by nomar on Sept 12, 2016 12:42:21 GMT -5
Beltre will be a Hall of Famer if I had to guess. Over the past couple of years more and more people have noticed this as well.
|
|
|
Post by DesignatedKyle on Sept 12, 2016 13:18:35 GMT -5
Beltre should be a surefire Hall of Famer, but he's not really talked about like that. Except for his lost years in Seattle, he's been consistently great. And one of the bigger "what ifs?" in recent Sox history. For sure. Always has been one of my favorite players and I loved him when he was on the Sox. Hopefully we hold on to the Mookster and this issue of "what ifs?" won't be a problem
|
|
ericmvan
Veteran
Supposed to be working on something more important
Posts: 8,909
|
Post by ericmvan on Sept 12, 2016 13:21:05 GMT -5
Beltre should be a surefire Hall of Famer, but he's not really talked about like that. Except for his lost years in Seattle, he's been consistently great. And one of the bigger "what ifs?" in recent Sox baseball history. You have no idea. And I bet you're not thinking of what I'm thinking of, which is why I FIFY. I'm pretty sure that the Mariners did not make the largest offer to Beltre the first time he was a free agent. What I do know is that Theo "tried really hard" to sign him ... Theo did not add "but we got outbid," hence I believe we had a larger offer. We wanted him to play SS in 2005 and then move back to 3B when Bill Mueller's contract was up. I'm not sure whether Beltre balked at that, or whether he just wanted to stay on the West Coast. Imagine Beltre's career with 5 years of him hitting in Fenway replacing the 5 years in Seattle. We wouldn't be talking about whether he belongs in the Hall. We'd be debating him versus Mike Schmidt. The ripple impact on the Sox is pretty straightforward. They don't sign Edgar Renteria, which means they need to send someone other than Andy Marte to Cleveland in the Coco Crisp trade. And if they make the same Beckett deal, they give away Mike Lowell after taking on his contract -- something they tried to do, so that Youkilis could play 3B, but none of the offers were more attractive than keeping Lowell and seeing what he'd do. It's also possible that the deal is structured differently, with more going to Florida, but at the time I was comfortable with the idea of giving Lowell away.* *True story: before the trade we were looking for a 1B, and my first recommendation was to deal for a fading top prospect named Adrian Gonzalez, whom I was convinced was the real deal. I remember Josh Byrnes e-mailing me and asking for a version of my rationale in a nutshell*, so I know they took the idea seriously (they also later took a flier on my second choice, Carlos Pena). The Rangers traded him to the Padres six weeks after the Beckett trade; I spent the whole time in between hoping we could unload Lowell and get AGon. So there's another irony in the whole "Which Adrian?" dilemma from 2010 and 2011: the Sox might have had Beltre in 2005 or Gonzalez in 2006. *I thought his year in the PCL at age 23 was still very promising -- and in retrospect, Davenport has him at a .298 Peak Translation, so my rough calculations were in a similar range.
|
|
|
Post by brianthetaoist on Sept 12, 2016 14:47:12 GMT -5
Yeah, I remember that Theo wanted to sign him to play SS, but I always figured that was a no-go for Beltre ... don't know why else he would've signed with Seattle. It always seemed a little too tenuous to really go through the permutations of what-ifs.
But, not to derail this thread completely, it probably doesn't come close to my top 5 what-ifs in Sox history. Off the top of my head: what if they kept Babe Ruth? What if they had signed Willie Mays? What if they had gotten Pee Wee Reese instead of giving in to Joe Cronin? What if Tony C hadn't been beaned? Any of a series of late-70s what-ifs (Fisk, Lynn, or even Dick O'Connell at the base of it all) ...
|
|
|
Post by Guidas on Sept 12, 2016 16:00:10 GMT -5
I think we hated this out a bit after the Nick Punto trade. I was of the mind that if they resigned Beltre and made the trade for Gonzalez, there would've never been a Carl Crawford acquisition and perhaps not even a melt down in 2011. You would've also had peak minor league Will Middlebrooks as an additional trade chip, the Crawford money and opportunity therein that came from his non-acquisition, and the bargain price (in retrospect) Texas signed Beltre for. Also, of course, no Panda and likely no Hanley. It was a real domino effect decision.
Then again, there are no random events in history.
|
|
ericmvan
Veteran
Supposed to be working on something more important
Posts: 8,909
|
Post by ericmvan on Sept 12, 2016 16:05:40 GMT -5
I think we hated this out a bit after the Nick Punto trade. I was of the mind that if they resigned Beltre and made the trade for Gonzalez, there would've never been a Carl Crawford acquisition and perhaps not even a melt down in 2011. You would've also had peak minor league Will Middlebrooks as an additional trade chip, the Crawford money and opportunity therein that came from his non-acquisition, and the bargain price (in retrospect) Texas signed Beltre for. Also, of course, no Panda and likely no Hanley. It was a real domino effect decision. Then again, there are no random events in history. They did get Swihart and JBJ with the two Beltre compensation picks ...
|
|
|
Post by bigpupp on Sept 12, 2016 16:33:34 GMT -5
This is basically what OOTP was created for. Anyone want to spend about a dozen hours with it and report back?
|
|
|
Post by brianthetaoist on Sept 12, 2016 16:35:46 GMT -5
I think we hated this out a bit after the Nick Punto trade. I was of the mind that if they resigned Beltre and made the trade for Gonzalez, there would've never been a Carl Crawford acquisition and perhaps not even a melt down in 2011. You would've also had peak minor league Will Middlebrooks as an additional trade chip, the Crawford money and opportunity therein that came from his non-acquisition, and the bargain price (in retrospect) Texas signed Beltre for. Also, of course, no Panda and likely no Hanley. It was a real domino effect decision. Then again, there are no random events in history. They did get Swihart and JBJ with the two Beltre compensation picks ... True, but they also gave up a pick to get Crawford, which maybe they wouldn't have done with Beltre in the mix. Or maybe so, hard to know. Maybe they sign Crawford since they did need OF help and don't do the Gonzalez trade, keeping Anthony Rizzo in the system (and Casey Kelly, the headliner who is now the second piece in that trade).
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 15,632
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Sept 12, 2016 16:41:36 GMT -5
Yeah, I remember that Theo wanted to sign him to play SS, but I always figured that was a no-go for Beltre ... don't know why else he would've signed with Seattle. It always seemed a little too tenuous to really go through the permutations of what-ifs. But, not to derail this thread completely, it probably doesn't come close to my top 5 what-ifs in Sox history. Off the top of my head: what if they kept Babe Ruth? What if they had signed Willie Mays? What if they had gotten Pee Wee Reese instead of giving in to Joe Cronin? What if Tony C hadn't been beaned? Any of a series of late-70s what-ifs (Fisk, Lynn, or even Dick O'Connell at the base of it all) ... One of the biggest what ifs in Red Sox history is what if the Red Sox had signed Jackie Robinson when they had a chance?
|
|
|
Post by brianthetaoist on Sept 12, 2016 16:58:05 GMT -5
Yeah, I remember that Theo wanted to sign him to play SS, but I always figured that was a no-go for Beltre ... don't know why else he would've signed with Seattle. It always seemed a little too tenuous to really go through the permutations of what-ifs. But, not to derail this thread completely, it probably doesn't come close to my top 5 what-ifs in Sox history. Off the top of my head: what if they kept Babe Ruth? What if they had signed Willie Mays? What if they had gotten Pee Wee Reese instead of giving in to Joe Cronin? What if Tony C hadn't been beaned? Any of a series of late-70s what-ifs (Fisk, Lynn, or even Dick O'Connell at the base of it all) ... One of the biggest what ifs in Red Sox history is what if the Red Sox had signed Jackie Robinson when they had a chance? Yep, although that and Mays could probably be grouped under, "what if they weren't such racists?" On individual moves, I'd say: 1) What if they hadn't sold Ruth? 2) What if they had signed Mays? 3) What if they had signed Robinson? 4) What if Tony C hadn't gotten beaned? 5) What if they had ignored Cronin's personal insecurity and bought Louisville (I think it was) to get Pee Wee Reese? I'm not exactly a Sox historian, but those seem like the really significant ones ... and running O'Connell out - while vital - as an off-field move probably shouldn't qualify. Maybe I'm showing some bias by only including older events, though ... could argue that Beltre was similar to Reese, I guess. But the top 3 seem obvious. Franchise-defining in so many ways for decades.
|
|
|
Post by adamoraz on Sept 12, 2016 18:03:14 GMT -5
What if they hadn't traded Bagwell?
What if they HAD traded for Arod?
|
|
|
Post by DesignatedKyle on Sept 12, 2016 18:58:48 GMT -5
Just imagining Williams, Mays and Robinson on the same team... gracious
|
|
ericmvan
Veteran
Supposed to be working on something more important
Posts: 8,909
|
Post by ericmvan on Sept 13, 2016 1:57:44 GMT -5
A few of these what-ifs are pretty unlikely. The Jackie Robinson tryout was for show; there was no chance of signing him. Their racism did very possibly cost them Mays, though.
My favorite as yet unmentioned one: what if they had taken the advice of the scout who had found him, and kept Ken Brett as an OFer? I find it very credible that he was as at least as good a hitter as his brother. George always said Ken was better.
When George Brett got to 172 pro PA at age 18, he was in the middle of a .291 / .369 / .419 season in advanced rookie ball.
When Ken got to the same point in his experience seeing professional pitching, at age 21, he had a .314 / .364 / .569 line ... in MLB.
While there's almost certainly some SSS air in that figure, when he stopped getting regular PA as a pitcher, he still had a 101 career OPS+ ... and he had had 464 total pro PA over 10 years. George has seen that many pro pitches by the middle of his second year in the minors. We think of Mookie as a fast-learning prodigy, but he hit that number of PA on May 18 of his year with Greenville.
|
|
|
Post by bluechip on Sept 13, 2016 3:18:22 GMT -5
Here is an interesting one. on April 9, 1916, the seed Sox coming off a 100 win season traded 28 year old Tris Speaker for Sad Sam Jones following a contract dispute. They obviously did win two more World Series after this trade, but Speaker continued to produce through the 20s.
|
|
|
Post by bentossaurus on Sept 13, 2016 5:53:09 GMT -5
They did get Swihart and JBJ with the two Beltre compensation picks ... True, but they also gave up a pick to get Crawford, which maybe they wouldn't have done with Beltre in the mix. Or maybe so, hard to know. Maybe they sign Crawford since they did need OF help and don't do the Gonzalez trade, keeping Anthony Rizzo in the system (and Casey Kelly, the headliner who is now the second piece in that trade). This is pretty much it, in that offseason I was convinced we needed to sign Beltre and Matt Holliday. That means we would/could have had Beltre and Rizzo manning the corners and avoided the Crawford/Fried Chicken saga as well as the Sandoval debacle. AND we'd still have a load of prospects coming up through the system. Holliday wouldn't be looking good in these later years, but he was a force for a while.
|
|
|
Post by brianthetaoist on Sept 13, 2016 6:52:55 GMT -5
What if they hadn't traded Bagwell? What if they HAD traded for Arod? Ah, of course ... two good ones. But the ARod one, especially. Remember, Theo had a secondary move lined up, trading Nomar for Magglio Ordonez, who was a very good player at the time and was, incidentally, a big Hugo Chavez guy down in Venezuela, ended up mayor somewhere.
|
|
|
Post by borisman on Sept 13, 2016 8:54:31 GMT -5
Speaking of what ifs.....when Duquette had the following players agree to terms: Sammy Sosa, Kevin Appier and John Wetteland.
|
|
|
Post by sox fan in nc on Sept 13, 2016 11:14:07 GMT -5
A few of my favorite trades....Cecil Cooper for George Scott....Sparky Lyle for DANNY CATER!!...Fred Lynn for Tanana/Rudi...Ojeda for Shiraldi....on paper those last 2 looked OK, just turned out horrible.
|
|
|
Post by adamoraz on Sept 13, 2016 18:41:10 GMT -5
Here is an interesting one. on April 9, 1916, the seed Sox coming off a 100 win season traded 28 year old Tris Speaker for Sad Sam Jones following a contract dispute. They obviously did win two more World Series after this trade, but Speaker continued to produce through the 20s. Unfortunately I think we can answer the what if on this one. If they hadn't traded Speaker in 1916, then he would have kept hitting well for them, but then Harry Frazee would have sold him to the Yankees a couple of years later like he did with everyone else on that team. Here's another one. What if they hadn't listened to Pedro and never signed David Ortiz after he was released by the Twins?
|
|
|
Post by brendan98 on Sept 13, 2016 20:21:34 GMT -5
I find myself thinking this one a lot the last couple of years- What if Ryan Westmoreland's career hadn't heartbreakingly ended before it even began? There is no way to know for sure how good he would have been, but Man he was a true 5 tool player, who would be in his prime right about now, with all of this young talent.
|
|
|
Post by bluechip on Sept 13, 2016 21:09:18 GMT -5
Here is an interesting one. on April 9, 1916, the seed Sox coming off a 100 win season traded 28 year old Tris Speaker for Sad Sam Jones following a contract dispute. They obviously did win two more World Series after this trade, but Speaker continued to produce through the 20s. Unfortunately I think we can answer the what if on this one. If they hadn't traded Speaker in 1916, then he would have kept hitting well for them, but then Harry Frazee would have sold him to the Yankees a couple of years later like he did with everyone else on that team. Here's another one. What if they hadn't listened to Pedro and never signed David Ortiz after he was released by the Twins? Imagine how many RBIs prime Ruth would have had hitting behind Speaker in the early 1920s (if they had kept that squad together).
|
|
|
Post by scottysmalls on Sept 13, 2016 21:50:19 GMT -5
The Rizzo one strikes me as one we could really be looking at in a couple years.
|
|
|