|
|
Post by iakovos11 on Oct 10, 2016 13:19:16 GMT -5
I remember that the NYT article released 103 names while claiming that 88 players had tested positive for a banned substance. That means 15 names were on that list in error, roughly 15% of the total. A huge margin of error. Do I misremember? I can't remember the exact numbers, but no, you don't misremeber. |
|
