SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
|
Post by jimed14 on Oct 25, 2016 9:01:09 GMT -5
How can you possibly know how bad his development is screwed up if it is at all before he's done developing? His value is at catcher. They tried to convert him to LF when the bat really doesn't profile there (or at first). He lost a year of defensive work between that and blowing up the ankle. Not only did they stall his development they greatly diminished his current trade value. I really hate blaming the team for injuries so I don't do it. He just has easily have gotten just as hurt at catcher and there isn't anything anyone can do about it. So if Swihart comes back and becomes the catcher that everyone hoped for, what did they do to screw him up more than anyone else in recent memory? So far, it is an unknown.
|
|
|
Post by Guidas on Oct 25, 2016 11:20:40 GMT -5
His value is at catcher. They tried to convert him to LF when the bat really doesn't profile there (or at first). He lost a year of defensive work between that and blowing up the ankle. Not only did they stall his development they greatly diminished his current trade value. I really hate blaming the team for injuries so I don't do it. He just has easily have gotten just as hurt at catcher and there isn't anything anyone can do about it. So if Swihart comes back and becomes the catcher that everyone hoped for, what did they do to screw him up more than anyone else in recent memory? So far, it is an unknown. And if he does then I will be completely wrong. Til then, what is known is he was converted to LF taking away a year of work behind the plate and, while playing that position, he ran and slid full speed into a wall, seriously damaging his ankle. Everything else - whether he'll be moved back to catcher, whether he will shake off the lost year of work, as well as the "he could've gotten just as hurt at catcher" is speculative.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Oct 25, 2016 13:24:16 GMT -5
So you wouldn't fault the manager if he pinch runs a pitcher and he gets injured? Sure Swihart might have got injured playing catcher, but he wouldn't have gotten the injury he did playing catcher.
Just because Swihart could still become a good catcher doesn't mean they didn't mess up his development. A full year catching last year should have put in position to compete for a job on major league team. Now he is going to need a half season or more in minors working on catching before he is ready. You also have to wonder what his confidence level is at playing catcher.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Oct 25, 2016 15:07:49 GMT -5
The comment was "But if you're saying here that the Sox have screw-up Swihart's development more than any other player in their system in the last 15 years, sure, I'll agree with that."
You don't even know if his development is screwed up at all because you still have no idea what he's going to turn into.
And no, I don't blame Farrell for Wright getting hurt. There was literally no one else to run unless you want to leave Papi in when his feet were really hurting. Pomeranz was the only other possibility, but he could have pitched if it went to extra innings because it was his throwing day and he hadn't thrown yet. Imagine if Papi got hurt instead of Wright because he didn't PR for him.
I do blame the team for how they dealt with injuries. They really screwed up bringing Wright back before he was ready and without a rehab start while Buchholz was pitching well. But if you're going to figure out how to blame the team for every injury, you're going to be pretty unhappy all the time. Did anyone blame the Yankees for Mariano Rivera shagging fly balls in the outfield when he tore his ACL? They shouldn't have.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Oct 25, 2016 19:13:10 GMT -5
Are people forgetting that Swihart missed a month and a half while playing the catching position in 2015?
|
|
|
Post by soxpatsceltics on Oct 26, 2016 8:20:56 GMT -5
Are people forgetting that Swihart missed a month and a half while playing the catching position in 2015? Yes, and Vazquez missed more than a year because of injuries behind the plate. All of you are missing the point. Swihart is a well above average hitting catcher, with average defense, and fringe average framing at the moment. He also is 24, and has very little experience catching or hitting at a level above AAA, and was unfairly demoted and told to move positions. As a former top 10-15 bone fide superstar prospect, Swihart hasn't just been the most screwed up Red Sox asset the last 15 years, he's probably the biggest screw up in the entire league. To bench AND tell a superstar prospect, who succeeded IN THE MAJORS at a young age when rushed, to move positions from the most valuable position in the league to the least to accommodate a player who will never be a starter because he can't hit is both mind boggling and unprecedented. The person who threw up projections for Vazquez based on his minor league numbers is completely misusing projections. Scout the player. There is no way Vazquez comes even close to his minor league numbers. When pitchers realize that you have no ability to hit a fly ball or hit any mistake in the zone for power, they start pounding you in the zone and the BB rate plummets and the K rate rises. AA and AAA pitchers don't have the command to punish Vazquez for that. In the Majors, it's a whole different world for him. If Vazquez ever hit for over .240/.300/.320 in a season ever again, I would be shocked.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Oct 26, 2016 8:35:57 GMT -5
Are people forgetting that Swihart missed a month and a half while playing the catching position in 2015? Yes, and Vazquez missed more than a year because of injuries behind the plate. Stop right there and you'll see that we aren't missing the point. The catching position is the most demanding position in the league by far and you even provided another example to further my point in Vasquez. Swihart had just as good of a chance to get injured catching all year versus playing in the outfield in a month and "getting all screwed up." Swihart's development at catcher will have to do with all the work he's doing in the off season and spring training. Xander did this in the off season in 2015 and became a plus defender that year. There's no reason to think one month of baseball away from the catching position will screw up Swihart. In fact, if Swihart was this weak minded of a player to be affected by this, I wouldn't want him here anyways. He's not though and he'll be fine. You'll get your wish of seeing Swihart "develop" more in AAA next season because Vasquez and Leon are out of options. It's either Swihart develops into a catcher from this point or not. Sick of everyone trying to blame the Sox for trying to win by putting Swihart at a different position, which happens all the time to a lot of players in baseball by the way. It's up to Swihart to get there, and I think he will get there.
|
|
|
Post by soxpatsceltics on Oct 26, 2016 9:02:24 GMT -5
It's either Swihart develops into a catcher from this point or not. Sick of everyone trying to blame the Sox for trying to win by putting Swihart at a different position, which happens all the time to a lot of players in baseball by the way. It's up to Swihart to get there, and I think he will get there. That's the problem... Swihart doesn't need to develop or prove he's an MLB catcher, he already has. After returning from his thumb injury, he was statistically a top 5 catcher in the entire league as a rushed to the majors rookie. I've already advocated for Swihart to play other positions when he doesn't catch. 3B and 1B make the most sense given the relative weakness the Sox have at those positions and Swihart's familiarity with the infield. Saying that Swihart had an equal chance injuring himself in LF compared to anywhere else is just wrong. Throwing a career catcher and infielder into the outfield after less than 1 month of learning the position is just asking for trouble. Add in the fact that Fenway left field and its contours make it arguably the most difficult corner outfield to play in the majors, the move had all of the warning signs for disaster. Just ask Hanley Ramirez and his shoulder from 2015.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Oct 26, 2016 9:32:41 GMT -5
Swihart played the outfield back in High School. It wasn't a completely different position to him and he had the athleticism to handle the job. What happened to Swihart was unfortunate, but it could of indeed happened anywhere else.
|
|
|
Post by soxpatsceltics on Oct 26, 2016 9:50:12 GMT -5
Swihart played the outfield back in High School. It wasn't a completely different position to him and he had the athleticism to handle the job. What happened to Swihart was unfortunate, but it could of indeed happened anywhere else. And like I said before, it's all moot. Swihart was a top 5 catcher post-injury as a rookie. Moving to LF shouldn't have even been a thought process.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Oct 26, 2016 9:59:10 GMT -5
Swihart played the outfield back in High School. It wasn't a completely different position to him and he had the athleticism to handle the job. What happened to Swihart was unfortunate, but it could of indeed happened anywhere else. And like I said before, it's all moot. Swihart was a top 5 catcher post-injury as a rookie. Moving to LF shouldn't have even been a thought process. You keep saying it, but it's not true at all.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Oct 26, 2016 9:59:35 GMT -5
Swihart played the outfield back in High School. It wasn't a completely different position to him and he had the athleticism to handle the job. What happened to Swihart was unfortunate, but it could of indeed happened anywhere else. And like I said before, it's all moot. Swihart was a top 5 catcher post-injury as a rookie. Moving to LF shouldn't have even been a thought process. Leon had a great year and the Sox wanted to see what they had in Vasquez. That and the fact that LF was a waste land in 2016.
|
|
|
Post by soxpatsceltics on Oct 26, 2016 10:32:02 GMT -5
And like I said before, it's all moot. Swihart was a top 5 catcher post-injury as a rookie. Moving to LF shouldn't have even been a thought process. You keep saying it, but it's not true at all. Are you dense? He was statistically the 4th best catcher in the league after the all star break in 2015 as a rushed rookie. He framed better than Salvador Perez, Realmuto, McCann, Yan Gomes, Weiters, and several veterans who have caught their entire lives. Those aren't narratives I'm making up, those are facts. www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=c&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=0&type=8&season=2015&month=31&season1=2015&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0Leon having a great year had no impact on Swihart. Swihart was injured June 4th, and Sandy Leon was added to the 40 man roster the next day. If Swihart doesn't play left field last year, Leon plays the entire year for Pawtucket. Vazquez is a backup catcher.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Oct 26, 2016 10:42:33 GMT -5
And the Sox wouldn't of had the kind of outstanding production that Leon brought in the middle of last season...no way does anyone do or come close to what Leon brought when he was called up to the big leagues. The Sox believe in Vasquez, I think he's a backup catcher too but he was definitely worth a long look to see if he was anything more than that.
|
|
|
Post by soxpatsceltics on Oct 26, 2016 10:46:35 GMT -5
Sox catchers were worth 2.2 fWAR last year. Seeing that Swihart was worth 1.4 fWAR in 168 2nd half PAs as a rookie, I think he would have definitely exceeded Leon's impact.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Oct 26, 2016 10:51:49 GMT -5
You keep saying it, but it's not true at all. Are you dense? He was statistically the 4th best catcher in the league after the all star break in 2015 as a rushed rookie. He framed better than Salvador Perez, Realmuto, McCann, Yan Gomes, Weiters, and several veterans who have caught their entire lives. Those aren't narratives I'm making up, those are facts. www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=c&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=0&type=8&season=2015&month=31&season1=2015&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0Leon having a great year had no impact on Swihart. Swihart was injured June 4th, and Sandy Leon was added to the 40 man roster the next day. If Swihart doesn't play left field last year, Leon plays the entire year for Pawtucket. Vazquez is a backup catcher. Most of that is based on his .391 BABIP during that time, which is not sustainable. And 40 games of defensive stats is too small of a sample to even pay attention to. Leon is not going to play in Pawtucket next year because he has no options and would have to be waived. Vazquez has no options either. You're in for disappointment.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Oct 26, 2016 10:54:56 GMT -5
Well by June or July if Leon isn't really producing, then I can see Leon being waived and Swihart being called up.
The Sox need catching depth that has minor league options this off season because I suspect that the Sox will lose Leon at some point.
|
|
|
Post by Coreno on Oct 26, 2016 11:52:45 GMT -5
Yeah, arguing that Swihart established himself as a proven top 5 catcher based on 44 games is really reaching for anything to confirm your opinions.
So with that same line of thinking, Derek Norris was in a similar position on that list (including a high babip). Norris should have been great this year after establishing himself as a proven top 5-10 catcher in the game after a strong showing in his final 62 games last year, right? Norris hit .186 this year and had a negative WAR.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Oct 26, 2016 13:28:36 GMT -5
Swihart played the outfield back in High School. It wasn't a completely different position to him and he had the athleticism to handle the job. What happened to Swihart was unfortunate, but it could of indeed happened anywhere else. No he doesn't get that injury playing catcher and that's the whole point!
|
|
|
Post by James Dunne on Oct 26, 2016 13:40:32 GMT -5
Swihart played the outfield back in High School. It wasn't a completely different position to him and he had the athleticism to handle the job. What happened to Swihart was unfortunate, but it could of indeed happened anywhere else. No he doesn't get that injury playing catcher and that's the whole point! Do you seriously need to respond to every single person who makes the non-controversial comment that baseball players get hurt at every position? We get it! You think he got hurt directly because he was playing left field! Some disagree! And it's okay to disagree, but if you're not going to bring the conversation forward then just let it go.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Oct 26, 2016 14:02:10 GMT -5
No he doesn't get that injury playing catcher and that's the whole point! Do you seriously need to respond to every single person who makes the non-controversial comment that baseball players get hurt at every position? We get it! You think he got hurt directly because he was playing left field! Some disagree! And it's okay to disagree, but if you're not going to bring the conversation forward then just let it go. How can you disagree? Sure maybe he gets injured, but he doesn't get that injury playing catcher.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Oct 26, 2016 14:22:06 GMT -5
Do you seriously need to respond to every single person who makes the non-controversial comment that baseball players get hurt at every position? We get it! You think he got hurt directly because he was playing left field! Some disagree! And it's okay to disagree, but if you're not going to bring the conversation forward then just let it go. How can you disagree? Sure maybe he gets injured, but he doesn't get that injury playing catcher. You're right. Too bad he has to hit and run too, which he can absolutely hurt a ankle with.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Oct 26, 2016 14:55:06 GMT -5
Do you seriously need to respond to every single person who makes the non-controversial comment that baseball players get hurt at every position? We get it! You think he got hurt directly because he was playing left field! Some disagree! And it's okay to disagree, but if you're not going to bring the conversation forward then just let it go. How can you disagree? Sure maybe he gets injured, but he doesn't get that injury playing catcher. Catchers in general get hurt a lot more often than left fielders. This is like blaming someone for calling you and you hurt yourself when grabbing your phone. Ridiculous.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Oct 26, 2016 15:55:59 GMT -5
How can you disagree? Sure maybe he gets injured, but he doesn't get that injury playing catcher. You're right. Too bad he has to hit and run too, which he can absolutely hurt a ankle with. Did he get hurt when he was hitting or running the bases?? Nope. It's very rare that a player would hurt his ankle as badly as Swihart did running bases or hitting. When playing outfield you run distances that are much longer than running the bases. Add that he has hardly played the OF, thus he hasn't come close to mastering the technique to slide, dive and read how close things like the walls are safely. We got a first hand lesson last year with Ramirez that learning how to play the OF isn't easy. It takes a lot of time and skill.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Oct 26, 2016 16:11:55 GMT -5
How can you disagree? Sure maybe he gets injured, but he doesn't get that injury playing catcher. Catchers in general get hurt a lot more often than left fielders. This is like blaming someone for calling you and you hurt yourself when grabbing your phone. Ridiculous. It's nothing like that. The Red Sox put Swihart in a position he has hardly played and he didn't have nearly the development time needed to properly know how to play the position. Sure catchers get injured, but most are just from the beating they take from behind the plate. Here's the thing Swihart has spent what 5 years getting his body ready to handle the catcher position. He had what a few weeks to get ready for the OF. If you gave Swihart a full offseason to get ready to play OF I wouldn't have a problem if he got injured. It's the fact they rushed him, because they had a short term need due to injury. It was short sighted in my opinion. There's a reason why pitchers that pinch run get hurt at a lot higher rate than positional players. Your asking them to do something they usually don't do. And don't give me they practice it, without in game action it means nothing. It's just totally different when a game is on the line. There's a reason why managers rarely pinch run pitchers, they don't want them to get injured doing something out of their comfort zone.
|
|
|