|
|
Post by ramireja on May 12, 2017 23:57:11 GMT -5
I can't recall a preseason thread this year in which posters put up their own prospect rankings. My apologies if I missed this. Well what better time to start a thread than now? Feel free to put up however many prospects you like...I find that after 30 is a bit of a crapshoot. Feel free to add or adjust as the year progresses as well.
My current top 30 (May edition)
1. Rafael Devers
2. Jay Groome
3. Sam Travis
4. Travis Lakins
5. Josh Ockimey
6. C.J. Chatham
7. Mike Shawaryn
8. Michael Chavis
9. Brian Johnson
10. Bobby Dalbec
11. Shaun Anderson
12. Nick Longhi
13. Roniel Raudes
14. Jalen Beeks
15. Aneury Tavarez
16. Ben Taylor
17. Chandler Shepherd
18. Jamie Callahan
19. Ty Buttrey
20. Lorenzo Cedrola
21. Darwinzon Hernandez
22. Austin Rei
23. Bryan Mata
24. Kyle Martin
25. Danny Mars
26. Trey Ball
27. Josh Tobias
28. Steve Nogosek
29. Tate Matheny
30. Jake Cosart
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2017 9:48:47 GMT -5
My evaluation criteria is based more on the level achieved, along with projection.
1. Aneury Tavarez 2. Rafael Devers 3. Sam Travis 4. Robby Scott 5. Marco Hernandez 6. Bobby Dalbec 7. Ben Taylor 8. Brian Johnson 9. Steve Selsky 10.H.Velazquez 11. C. Shepherd 12. Jalen Beeks 13. Ty Buttrey 14. Jamie Callahan 15. Josh Ockimey 16. Hildemro Requena 17. J Tobias 18. Nick Longhi 19. Stephen Nogosek 20. Trevor Kelly 21. Lakins 22. Jay Groome 23. Mike Shawaryn 24. Adam Lau 25. A. Maddox 26. Deven Marrero 27. Jake Romanski 28. Danny Mars 29. Stugreon 30. M Chavis 31. CJ Chatham 32. Shaun Anderson 33. A Glorius 34. J Procyshen 35. T Stankiewicz 36. Trey Ball 37. Kyle Martin 38. Yankry Pimentel 39. Tate Matheny 40.William Jerez / Luis Ysla
|
|
|
|
Post by jondrink on May 13, 2017 10:20:59 GMT -5
Based on projection, level, age and performance
DEVERS
GROOME
TRAVIS
HERNANDEZ M
LAKINS
OCKIMEY
CHAVIS
CHATHAM (hasn't played)
LONGHI
DALBEC
JOHNSON
SHAWARYN
RAUDES
TAYLOR
ANDERSON
TAVAREZ
BEEKS
MATA
CALLAHAN
HERNANDEZ D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2017 11:41:47 GMT -5
1-10: Expect to be above-average Major Leaguers, likely all-stars.
11-30: Expect to be average to above-average Major Leaguers. Not all stars, but solid contributors and regulars.
31-50: Expect to be average to below-average Major Leaguers that stay in the MLB, but may be backup fielders or emergency relievers. Some may become regulars.
51-63: Expect to be Quad-A Players.
Updated 8/30:
1. R. Devers
2. S. Travis
3. D. Flores
4. B. Mata
5. M. Chavis
6. T. Houck
7. J. Groome
8. J. Beeks
9. B. Johnson
10. C. Brannen
11. A. Scherff
12. C. Chatham
13. J. Thompson
14. T. Lin
15. B. Netzer
16. J. Ockimey
17. B. Dalbec
18. A. Maddox
19. K. Martin
20. D. Herandez
21. D. Diaz
22. T. Buttrey
23. R. Raudes
24. C. De La Guerra
25. M. Shawaryn
26. T. Lakins
27. T. Matheny
28. D. Mars
29. B. Taylor
30. M. Kent
31. A. Tavarez
32. Z. Schellenger
33. A. Rei
34. J. Tobias
35. J. Cosart
36. B. Poyner
37. H. Velazquez
38. W. Jerez
39. Y. Aybar
40. A. Perry
41. J. Witte
42. H. Meneses
43. N. Lovullo
44. J. Barfield
45. B. Brentz
46. D. Jimenez
47. M. Miller
48. T. Hill
49. D. Butler
50. H. Requena
51. J. Romanski
52. R. Baldwin
53. E. Olmos
54. T. Ball
55. T. Stankiewicz
56. K. Hart
57. V. Acosta
58. C. Gregor
59. L. Boyd
60. R. Court
61. B. Hudson
62. A. Glorius
63. L. Cedrola
64. D. Lopez
65. J. Betts
|
|
|
|
Post by dmaineah on Aug 8, 2017 12:25:57 GMT -5
My top 10 based on what I believe is their ability to make it to the majors, contribute and stick.
1) Devers
2) Groome
3) Chavis
4) Travis
5) Johnson
6) Maddox
7) Dalbec
8) Houck
9) Chatham
10)Flores
|
|
|
|
Post by ryan24 on Aug 8, 2017 15:31:46 GMT -5
WOW interesting one has mata rated 4th and the other does not have him in the top 10. Flores is rated 3rd on one and 10th on the other. Dalbec 15 on one and 7 on the other. To me that is some big differences.
|
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Aug 8, 2017 15:35:25 GMT -5
WOW interesting one has mata rated 4th and the other does not have him in the top 10. Flores is rated 3rd on one and 10th on the other. Dalbec 15 on one and 7 on the other. To me that is some big differences. This is an old thread. A lot has changed in almost 3 months. |
|
|
|
Post by soxinnj on Aug 8, 2017 15:42:39 GMT -5
Let me know thoughts:
1. Devers
2. Groome
3. Chavis
4. Flores
5. Houck
6. Mata
7. Beeks
8. Shawaryn
9. Scherff
10. Ockimey
I don't get the hype about Travis. Based upon the position he plays, I don't ever see him putting up numbers better than Moreland and all anybody does on here is rip Moreland apart, yet he's a very good fielder and is playing w a broken toe.
|
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Aug 8, 2017 15:46:03 GMT -5
Let me know thoughts: 1. Devers 2. Groome 3. Chavis 4. Flores 5. Houck 6. Mata 7. Beeks 8. Shawaryn 9. Scherff 10. Ockimey I don't get the hype about Travis. Based upon the position he plays, I don't ever see him putting up numbers better than Moreland and all anybody does on here is rip Moreland apart, yet he's a very good fielder and is playing w a broken toe. I'd be way more excited about Travis if he were a CF or 2B. As a 1B, I'm not excited and definitely would not hand him the job next year. I'd have a different Plan A. |
|
|
|
Post by jrffam05 on Aug 8, 2017 15:52:40 GMT -5
Quick math working off the front page, I'd put Johnson and Dalbec in the top 10 and take Shawaryn and Beeks out. I'd leave the top 4 as is but shuffle 5-10 (just don't know exactly how yet) with Houck over Mata. I'd also give Devers a contract extension.
|
|
|
|
Post by jondrink on Aug 8, 2017 20:08:46 GMT -5
Let me know thoughts: 1. Devers 2. Groome 3. Chavis 4. Flores 5. Houck 6. Mata 7. Beeks 8. Shawaryn 9. Scherff 10. Ockimey I don't get the hype about Travis. Based upon the position he plays, I don't ever see him putting up numbers better than Moreland and all anybody does on here is rip Moreland apart, yet he's a very good fielder and is playing w a broken toe. I'd be way more excited about Travis if he were a CF or 2B. As a 1B, I'm not excited and definitely would not hand him the job next year. I'd have a different Plan A. . Well if they said Longhi wasnt putting up enough power numbers to be a 1B ......Travis isn't either then as far as I can see |
|
|
|
Post by ryan24 on Aug 9, 2017 6:38:05 GMT -5
WOW interesting one has mata rated 4th and the other does not have him in the top 10. Flores is rated 3rd on one and 10th on the other. Dalbec 15 on one and 7 on the other. To me that is some big differences. This is an old thread. A lot has changed in almost 3 months. I am comparing both posts from 18 hrs ago. Not from May or the beginning of the year. |
|
|
|
Post by mandelbro on Aug 9, 2017 9:23:53 GMT -5
Let me know thoughts: 1. Devers 2. Groome 3. Chavis 4. Flores 5. Houck 6. Mata 7. Beeks 8. Shawaryn 9. Scherff 10. Ockimey I don't get the hype about Travis. Based upon the position he plays, I don't ever see him putting up numbers better than Moreland and all anybody does on here is rip Moreland apart, yet he's a very good fielder and is playing w a broken toe. I'd be way more excited about Travis if he were a CF or 2B. As a 1B, I'm not excited and definitely would not hand him the job next year. I'd have a different Plan A. Yeah, I believe in his cup of coffee he hit 1 wall ball and got 1 ball to the warning track. I love his batting eye and contact ability, and he deserves to be a highly ranked prospect for his age-advanced MiLB production. But there's so much pressure on his AVG/OBP in the majors to be outstanding, not just good. It'd be one thing if he had notable defensive chops but he doesn't. It's all on the hit tool right now. Now that Dalbec and Ockimey have been dropped, the site rankings are about where I'd have them. I'd probably push Darwinzon Hernandez higher since he seems like he has an interesting floor if fast-tracked in relief. His velocity + delivery combo is tough. |
|
|
|
Post by widewordofsport on Aug 9, 2017 10:27:49 GMT -5
Let me know thoughts: 1. Devers 2. Groome 3. Chavis 4. Flores 5. Houck 6. Mata 7. Beeks 8. Shawaryn 9. Scherff 10. Ockimey I don't get the hype about Travis. Based upon the position he plays, I don't ever see him putting up numbers better than Moreland and all anybody does on here is rip Moreland apart, yet he's a very good fielder and is playing w a broken toe. I'm fine with dropping Travis but I wouldn't be dropping him below Ockimey. Also think Thompson and Scherff ahead of Shawaryn. Beeks, Chavis, Mata are the big movers for me this year. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 9, 2017 11:26:57 GMT -5
Let me know thoughts: 1. Devers 2. Groome 3. Chavis 4. Flores 5. Houck 6. Mata 7. Beeks 8. Shawaryn 9. Scherff 10. Ockimey I don't get the hype about Travis. Based upon the position he plays, I don't ever see him putting up numbers better than Moreland and all anybody does on here is rip Moreland apart, yet he's a very good fielder and is playing w a broken toe. I'd be way more excited about Travis if he were a CF or 2B. As a 1B, I'm not excited and definitely would not hand him the job next year. I'd have a different Plan A. He still has 2 options left, so you don't need him next year. |
|
