SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
2018 SP.com Season-End Rankings
|
Post by Mike Andrews on Oct 12, 2018 12:25:38 GMT -5
|
|
zekew
New Member
Posts: 1
|
Post by zekew on Oct 12, 2018 14:15:58 GMT -5
Suprised to see Shawaryn drop to 12. I'm also wondering why Travis is ahead of someone like Poyner, although that's probably nitpicking. It seems like Travis is only a Plan C short-term option for the Sox at this point going forward. He probably needs to move to another organization.
|
|
|
Post by huskies15 on Oct 12, 2018 15:11:24 GMT -5
Pretty substantial shakeup in the top 10. Mata down from 2 to 7. Not shocking but he definitely had a disappointing year and got hurt. Hope he bounces back as he is still super young!
|
|
|
Post by Addam603 on Oct 12, 2018 15:28:07 GMT -5
Pretty substantial shakeup in the top 10. Mata down from 2 to 7. Not shocking but he definitely had a disappointing year and got hurt. Hope he bounces back as he is still super young! Remember the peaks of Mata too. Yes, there were obvious struggles. 7.25 BB/9 is horrendous. But that’s just about the end of the negatives to me. Batters hit .229 against him and slugged .281. He only let up 10 XBHs in 253 at bats. 57.2% ground ball rate. If you don’t think the walks will be a long term problem (I don’t) then there’s still at minimum a number three starter here. Down year, but bright future.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Oct 12, 2018 15:43:48 GMT -5
Does Feltman not get a 7 ceiling because he's a reliever only? Because I can see him ultimately turning into a regular allstar reliever.
I know that can be deceiving because of the reliever value, but Feltman could be one of the best in the AL in that regard.
|
|
|
Post by James Dunne on Oct 12, 2018 15:47:58 GMT -5
He also tied for the league lead with 12 HBP in only 72 innings. So his walk+HBP rate was 21.4%, which is really, really bad. I know his mechanics were shaky because of the apparent growth spurt, but that's too much for me to look past. And it's not like he was offsetting that by blowing hitters away: 18.4% isn't much of a K rate. Of course he's extremely young for his level, so it's not a surprise that it challenged him, but there are red flags here.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Oct 12, 2018 15:57:31 GMT -5
then there’s still at minimum a number three starter here. Down year, but bright future. I wouldn't say this about any player in the system. Only a couple even have that ceiling, Mata being one. Does Feltman not get a 7 ceiling because he's a reliever only? Because I can see him ultimately turning into a regular allstar reliever. I know that can be deceiving because of the reliever value, but Feltman could be one of the best in the AL in that regard. A role 6 reliever is an elite closer. See soxprospects.com/about.htmConsider that Blake Treinen, who led MLB relievers in fWAR, had 3.6, while 21 starters were ahead of him, including 12 by 1 win or more. deGrom had 8.8. About the same goes for bWAR (Treinen at 4.3, 16 SP ahead of him led by Nola at 10.5). Simply because of the number of innings they pitch, relievers can only provide so much value.
|
|
|
Post by Addam603 on Oct 12, 2018 16:41:15 GMT -5
My point of view on Mata is that this year’s loss of control is an aberration for him. His control and mechanics before this year were fine. I firmly believe that once he gets used to his growth spurt, he’ll be better than ever. Maybe a minimum of number three is too high, but if he did become a number three then I wouldn’t be surprised
|
|
|
Post by Addam603 on Oct 13, 2018 8:42:54 GMT -5
But beyond Mata...I see you Gilberto Jimenez.
You know a guy came out of nowhere when SP doesn’t even have a picture of him.
|
|
|
Post by alex710707 on Oct 13, 2018 9:08:16 GMT -5
I am quite curious that the scouting report is made by what? Are there scouts coming here and give their report to Soxprospects? Or are there scouts coming here and discuss with sox fan here?
|
|
|
Post by jerryu on Oct 13, 2018 14:14:37 GMT -5
Your final prospect rankings with the addition of a number of players from the low minors is exciting! I hoped that Angel Maita(17yo with a good DSL season and projected to start in the GCl) and Cedanne Rafaela (18yo with power and speed and also projected to start in the GCL)were not in the top 30s. Did they exhibit poorly in the Fall Instructional League?
|
|
|
Post by manfred on Oct 13, 2018 21:25:54 GMT -5
This is pretty awesome. It feels like a new wave of exciting guys, and the farm looks at least partly restocked. At least potentially. I really like the approach: more high/reward/high risk guys near the top, dropping guys like Travis.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Oct 14, 2018 11:18:17 GMT -5
This is pretty awesome. It feels like a new wave of exciting guys, and the farm looks at least partly restocked. At least potentially. I really like the approach: more high/reward/high risk guys near the top, dropping guys like Travis. For what it's worth, there really isn't any change in approach here. I would say that any change in the demographics of who is ranked where is more a reflection on the system than how we're ranking or grading the players.
|
|
dd
Veteran
Posts: 979
|
Post by dd on Oct 14, 2018 12:38:18 GMT -5
Sorry for being late to the party. As noted already, lots of changes.
Details
Summary:
- Michael Chavis held onto his top spot.
- Tristan Casas moved up from 5 to 2.
- Jason Groome slipped from 4 to 3.
- Bobby Dalbec is # 4, up from 6.
- Darwinzon Hernandez up 3 spots to # 5.
- Tanner Houck fell from 3 to 6.
- Bryan Mata down from 2 to 7.
- Antoni Flores made the top 10 for the first time at # 8, up from 14.
- CJ Chatham fell 2 to # 9.
- Mike Shawaryn down from 9 to 12.
- Brandon Howlett up 4 to 13.
- Jarren Duran went from 19 to 15.
- Travis Lakins slipped to 16 from 13.
- Josh Ockimey fell by 6 coming in at 17.
- Alex Scherff at 19, down 3.
- Gilberto makes his first top 60 appearance in style at # 20.
- Chase Shugart almost made the top 20 going from 36 to 21.
- Zach Schellenger, # 53 in August and then 29 last month, continued rising up to 24.
- Pedro Castellanos up from 30 to 25.
- Bobby Poyner, 23 to 27,
- Esteban Quiros jumped up 13 spots, 41 to 28.
- Brayan Bello is another big riser, from 55 to 36.
- Kutter Crawford down 11 from 33 to 22.
- Roniel Roudes, 27 to 34
- Jake Thompson, 26 to 35.
- Yoan Abar soared from 60 to 36
- Tyler Dearden, 32 to 37.
- Devlin Granberg, 33 to 39 (listed as tied for 38 on the site rankings but I'm assuming a typo there)
- Juan Martinez fell to 40 from 34.
- Tyler Esplin went down 7 to # 44.
- Kervin Suarez at 45, down 6.
- Josh Taylor is ranked for the first time at 46.
- Aldo Ramirez, 49, is another newcomer to the list.
- Angel Maita moved up a bit fron 56 to 50.
- Andrew Politi ranked for the first time at 53
- Jonathan Diaz (the catcher, not Jhonathan or the other Jonathan) is at 55.
- Chandler Shepard is #56, down from 45.
- Justin Haley is 57, down from 44.Marino Campana, from 50 to 59.
- Cole Brannen went from 54 to 60.
- Missing from last month:
- Everlois Lozada, from 35 last month.
- Chad De La Guerra, 48
- Tony Renda, 58
- Jeremy Rivera, 59
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Oct 29, 2018 16:21:11 GMT -5
This is pretty awesome. It feels like a new wave of exciting guys, and the farm looks at least partly restocked. At least potentially. I really like the approach: more high/reward/high risk guys near the top, dropping guys like Travis. For what it's worth, there really isn't any change in approach here. I would say that any change in the demographics of who is ranked where is more a reflection on the system than how we're ranking or grading the players. It does seem there has been a shift from counting floor more than ceiling, to now the other way around. I remember the debate in 2015 about Marrero at #10 and it was all about his floor. Now guys like Shawaryn seem to be getting pushed down due to ceiling, when his floor seems rather high. Not saying I really disagree outside of Shawaryn, but there does seem to be a change overall the last few years.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Oct 30, 2018 21:28:16 GMT -5
For what it's worth, there really isn't any change in approach here. I would say that any change in the demographics of who is ranked where is more a reflection on the system than how we're ranking or grading the players. It does seem there has been a shift from counting floor more than ceiling, to now the other way around. I remember the debate in 2015 about Marrero at #10 and it was all about his floor. Now guys like Shawaryn seem to be getting pushed down due to ceiling, when his floor seems rather high. Not saying I really disagree outside of Shawaryn, but there does seem to be a change overall the last few years. I mean, isn't the comp to Marrero CJ Chatham, who is ranked above Shawaryn? I also disagree with the premise that Shawaryn has a high floor, by the way. It's very possible he's an up-and-down reliever (as reflected in his 4 floor on our site). I'd consider a high-floor pitcher someone who is either almost certainly a MLB middle-reliever or back-end starter. (Really, there's a difference between pitchers and "hitters" in that the latter can have higher floors compared to lower ceilings because they can have a carrying tool or two in a way that it's harder for pitchers to have. A slick-fielding shortstop will probably play in the majors as long as he's not a disaster everywhere else. But a fastball alone, for example, isn't necessarily enough unless it's like triple-digits, right?) Ranking is always finding some kind of alchemy allowing you to evaluate a combination of projection, floor, and ceiling. I can assure you that there hasn't been a conscious change in how we evaluate those things. For example, one debate we had was Flores vs. Chatham, which is pretty much as close to a representative floor/ceiling ranking debate as you can get. There is a difference between what we had, which was a discussion of the merits of each player which, of course, focused on their respective floors and ceilings, and a theoretical discussion in which the question would be "should we rank the guy with the higher floor or the higher ceiling first?"
|
|
nomar
Veteran
Posts: 10,685
|
Post by nomar on Nov 2, 2018 14:28:35 GMT -5
Wasn't sure where to put this, but I just realized that Daniel Flores' was added to the SP banner at the top of the homepage. It's probably been there for a while, but kudos.
I'm glad the Sox got baseball's biggest win this year after suffering one of their biggest losses. RIP Daniel
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Nov 4, 2018 16:25:38 GMT -5
It does seem there has been a shift from counting floor more than ceiling, to now the other way around. I remember the debate in 2015 about Marrero at #10 and it was all about his floor. Now guys like Shawaryn seem to be getting pushed down due to ceiling, when his floor seems rather high. Not saying I really disagree outside of Shawaryn, but there does seem to be a change overall the last few years. I mean, isn't the comp to Marrero CJ Chatham, who is ranked above Shawaryn? I also disagree with the premise that Shawaryn has a high floor, by the way. It's very possible he's an up-and-down reliever (as reflected in his 4 floor on our site). I'd consider a high-floor pitcher someone who is either almost certainly a MLB middle-reliever or back-end starter. (Really, there's a difference between pitchers and "hitters" in that the latter can have higher floors compared to lower ceilings because they can have a carrying tool or two in a way that it's harder for pitchers to have. A slick-fielding shortstop will probably play in the majors as long as he's not a disaster everywhere else. But a fastball alone, for example, isn't necessarily enough unless it's like triple-digits, right?) Ranking is always finding some kind of alchemy allowing you to evaluate a combination of projection, floor, and ceiling. I can assure you that there hasn't been a conscious change in how we evaluate those things. For example, one debate we had was Flores vs. Chatham, which is pretty much as close to a representative floor/ceiling ranking debate as you can get. There is a difference between what we had, which was a discussion of the merits of each player which, of course, focused on their respective floors and ceilings, and a theoretical discussion in which the question would be "should we rank the guy with the higher floor or the higher ceiling first?" How is Chatham comp Marrero? The whole point you made with Marrero was you knew what his great D was at the major league level. Chatham isn't close to that level, he's more his bat will determine his future. When did Chatham become a slick fielding SS? Just my two sense but you seem to be getting hung up on trying to predict a role for Shawaryn and docking him because of the role you picked. I'm a numbers guy and he's done great as a starter. Reports his stuff craps out half way through his starts yet the results are still very good. You have to be impressed by his strikeouts and whip if his stuff craps the bed no? He in our AAA in swing percentage over guys like Brasier. 10 strikeouts in 7 and 1/3 innings in the Arizona fall league, only one walk, good whip. He's one of the most proven players of our top players. He's basically major league ready. Chatham hasn't even played in AA or AAA. Good season at high A ball, but he's basically the same age as Shawaryn who's in AAA. At a younger age Shawaryn was top 10 in the minors in strikeouts in A ball. A huge fastball is nice and all, but strikeouts, whip, swing percentage are just as important. I'll take movement and less mph over a straight high 90's fastball. Is it possible he's an up and down guy? Sure, heck Workman is and up and down guy that was worth 1.5 bwar the last two years. That's really not saying much for a deep Red Sox bullpen. There's also a very good chance he's a lot better than that. Remember his strikeout numbers were right up there with Barnes. His delivery hides the ball and gives hitters a totally different look. He's one of the safer bets to play in the majors and give you value. I like his chances of being a good reliever over Chatham being a starting level type player for example. I think Cora has shown he likes a bullpen with guys that can go multiple innings and uses them very well. He's rated higher by most other ranking sites. So while maybe it wasn't an overnight type thing and happened more gradually. It does seem you've gone from more of a floor to upside in the rankings. Not saying that is totally wrong, but it does show. A guy like Nick Decker can certainly have a higher ceiling, but how in the world is his floor the same? He's in the GCL. The guy could flameout and never come close to the majors. I've always been higher on Shawaryn than most, I'm just shocked with what he's doing he keeps moving down in the rankings. Guys doing very well in AAA, with swing and miss stuff have to have rather high floors because a bunch of these guys will flame out. Also if you predict he's a reliever don't we have to expect he'll be better in shorter stints? His already very good numbers as a starter should greatly improve. We are seeing that in the AFL where his strikeouts are way up.
|
|
|
Post by James Dunne on Nov 4, 2018 23:15:53 GMT -5
Decker's floor currently shows as a 3, Shawaryn's as a 4.
|
|
|
Post by patford on Nov 5, 2018 13:56:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Nov 5, 2018 14:09:52 GMT -5
Why isn't Acosta ranked higher?
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Nov 5, 2018 14:29:44 GMT -5
I don't know what I was looking at, but Chatham 3-5 and Shawaryn is 4-5, yet both are rated 4.5 and Chatham is rated higher. So you agree with my take that Shawaryn should have one of the higher floors, shouldn't higher floor guys be ranked above lower floor guys if their ceiling is the same?
|
|
|
Post by James Dunne on Nov 5, 2018 14:55:03 GMT -5
Not necessarily. In Chatham's case, he has such a broad set of skills that there a lot of ways for him to get to being a 5, though as always there could be something in his swing that gets exposed in Double-A which is the reason for the lower floor. Suppose, hypothetically, there's a 20% chance Chatham is a 3, a 20% chance he's a 4, a 30% chance he's a 4.5, and a 30% chance he's a 5; whereas there's an 40% chance Shawaryn is a 4, a 40% chance he's 4.5 and a 20% chance he's a 5. In that case, I'd take the former. And the risk and reward is always different with pitchers anyway. Greater chance they'll get hurt, much better chance of just a skill change in general, that sort of thing.
I think you just like Shawaryn better than the conventional wisdom. That's good! We shouldn't all agree on stuff! I liked Brian Johnson and Carson Blair and Roniel Raudes better than the conventional wisdom. That doesn't mean I valued something different or went about my personal ranking in a different mindset than other people, it just meant that I disagreed at the margins.
|
|
|
Post by rivenp on Nov 5, 2018 14:59:13 GMT -5
I don't know what I was looking at, but Chatham 3-5 and Shawaryn is 4-5, yet both are rated 4.5 and Chatham is rated higher. So you agree with my take that Shawaryn should have one of the higher floors, shouldn't higher floor guys be ranked above lower floor guys if their ceiling is the same? the #2 - #12 guys are all currently rated at 4.5 right now...the difference between chatham and shawaryn is only 3 spots (9 & 12), which to me means it's pretty close to a toss-up, which also probably means you're picking at nits at this point. maybe they feel like the ceiling for chatham as a potential mlb average ss is just a tad higher, say 5.2 vs 5.1 of shawaryn as a projected middle reliever or back-end rotation guy. chatham was a 2nd round pick while shawaryn was 5th, so it would make sense that he has a slightly higher ceiling.
|
|
|