SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Let's get crazy: Sox among teams interested in Edwin Diaz
bosox
Veteran
Posts: 2,117
|
Post by bosox on Nov 27, 2018 22:22:22 GMT -5
I don't see the Sox taking on a big contract to obtain Edwin Diaz. Per Joel Sherman, the Sox are expressing strong interest in Diaz. New York Post Link
|
|
|
Post by xanderbogaerts2 on Nov 28, 2018 0:19:35 GMT -5
I don't see the Sox taking on a big contract to obtain Edwin Diaz. Per Joel Sherman, the Sox are expressing strong interest in Diaz. New York Post LinkUnpopular Opinion here but I'd trade Pedroia, Swihart, + a prospect (depended on second player) for Diaz, Mallex Smith (or insert another player/prospect), and Cano (eat 25 mil$). I think Cano's bat will age well and he still great at second could move to first after next year with Mitch and Pearce contracts up or could DH if JD leaves if he declines defensively at Second.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Nov 28, 2018 0:49:37 GMT -5
Does anyone really want to see Cano age if he has to stop the roids? Wouldn't the whole point of Diaz be to free up money?
|
|
|
Post by hammerhead on Nov 28, 2018 1:15:02 GMT -5
I don't really want Cano ,but could this be a chance to move Rusney?
The Mariners would still need to eat contract. Plus a lot would depend on the pedroia situation
|
|
|
Post by philsbosoxfan on Nov 28, 2018 1:23:16 GMT -5
Cano is a fine player but let's be realistic. He's 36 and has FIVE years remaining at $24m per. Do people really want to bite into that ?
|
|
|
Post by telson13 on Nov 28, 2018 2:24:23 GMT -5
Cano is a fine player but let's be realistic. He's 36 and has FIVE years remaining at $24m per. Do people really want to bite into that ? My nightmare is DD including Darwinzon or Mata in a deal like that. OTOH, what if they took on $20M annually for Cano? He’s still an above-avg defender. And he can hit, though not like he used to. He’d probably benefit getting out of Safeco. Idk what they’d do with Pedroia, but Cano could DH and JDM play RF. DD might even do something wacky like send JBJ to CO for Gray. That’d let them move Porcello’s deal and save $ there, covering Cano’s salary. And Gray would be an upside low-cost replacement. Diaz would save them a ton at closer. Idk...there’d have to be a lot of moving parts for me to want Cano’s deal, even with some salary relief.
|
|
|
Post by philsbosoxfan on Nov 28, 2018 3:07:45 GMT -5
Here's an example of the craziness buzz about Cano:
Tim Britton Verified account @timbritton
More Tim Britton Retweeted Andy Martino
If the Mets can get the Mariners to...
A. Take back Bruce's $28M B. Pay down $50M of Cano's salary C. Add in All-Star caliber major-league talent...
...yeah, they should do that. I'm skeptical Seattle would be that desperate.
|
|
|
Post by telson13 on Nov 28, 2018 4:07:58 GMT -5
Here's an example of the craziness buzz about Cano: Tim Britton Verified account @timbritton More Tim Britton Retweeted Andy Martino If the Mets can get the Mariners to... A. Take back Bruce's $28M B. Pay down $50M of Cano's salary C. Add in All-Star caliber major-league talent... ...yeah, they should do that. I'm skeptical Seattle would be that desperate. Craig Edwards did a nice piece on the pitfalls of finding a way to arrange a trade for an underwater contract: www.fangraphs.com/blogs/making-a-robinson-cano-trade-work/I figure Diaz, with four years of control, is worth 4/65 if you go off of the Chapman and Jansen deals. That means he probably provides about $50M in excess value ($0.5M, $1M, $5M, $10M for renewal and rough arb figures). Cano’s deal is $40M underwater. I actually think Cano, provided he can play 2b for a couple of years, plus some 1b and DH later, might actually do a little better than his projections. He’d have the benefit of a more forgiving home park, and a better lineup around him. He also has walked more recently and his K rate remains low, which both suggest to me that his hit tool is good enough that he’ll age pretty well. The PED issue bothers me a good bit, but...he’s been a good hitter for a long time, and Nelso Cruz has aged well. Lol, maybe that’s where he got his stuff. Regardless, I don’t think he’ll be a huge drag until after year 3. At that point, youve gotta hope that Hernandez, Houck, Mata, Groome, maybe Shawaryn...at least two are 3/4 starters and coming cheaply, providing sufficient value to offset some big salaries elsewhere (including hopefully Mookie, Beni, Bogey, and Rodriguez). So is it worth it to include, say, Chavis/Dalbec and probably a guy like Mata? Idk...Diaz would be huge and Cano would actually probably make them better this year and provide Pedroia insurance. But I still think it makes more sense to give Britton 3/$30M or Soria 2/$18M and save the prospects, given that they have Holt and Lin for 2b and will need $ for extensions. The last thing I want to see is another trade for a reliever who breaks down, a la Bailey/Hanrahan/Smith/Thornburg. Especially if it means carrying an albatross deal that affects future extensions.
|
|
|
Post by Smittyw on Nov 28, 2018 8:47:31 GMT -5
Cano is a fine player but let's be realistic. He's 36 and has FIVE years remaining at $24m per. Do people really want to bite into that ?
I don't know who thinks we'd take on a contract like that at a time when we're worrying about being able to sign Mookie, Xander, Sale, and others. And I doubt we have the prospects to land Diaz otherwise.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Nov 28, 2018 8:58:20 GMT -5
Yeap, you get Cano and Diaz, you don't resign Mookie or Xander. Which would be a bigger loss than any one of the Sox top 3 prospects in the system right now.
Cano's contract is one of the biggest albatrosses in baseball. There might be a reason why he's taking PED's, maybe to keep his performance up as he declines.
Diaz is probably one of the best 3 closers in baseball right now. That being said, just sign the best reliever you feel available outside of Kimbrel.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Nov 28, 2018 9:30:32 GMT -5
I don’t know what’s worse. Talking about adding Cano in the bullpen thread or people actually thinking there’s a world in which adding Cano to this team is a good thing.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Nov 28, 2018 12:18:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Nov 28, 2018 12:21:57 GMT -5
Taking on a bad contract is about the last thing they should do with next winter looming. And I don't see the Mariners adding so much money that it's not a bad contract.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Nov 28, 2018 12:27:45 GMT -5
FWIW, who's the last player the Red Sox had reported interest in that they later traded for under Dombrowski? Is there one? This feels like he's getting involved to drive up the price.
|
|
|
Post by James Dunne on Nov 28, 2018 13:01:08 GMT -5
FWIW, who's the last player the Red Sox had reported interest in that they later traded for under Dombrowski? Is there one? This feels like he's getting involved to drive up the price. Well, there's that one skinny sidearmer from the White Sox. But yeah, Dombrowski is going to kick the tires everywhere, and DiPoto is going to trade everyone and then trade everyone he traded for and then get fidgety and do some more trades, so I'm not surprised the Red Sox-Mariners rumor mill is flying.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Nov 28, 2018 13:20:37 GMT -5
FWIW, who's the last player the Red Sox had reported interest in that they later traded for under Dombrowski? Is there one? This feels like he's getting involved to drive up the price. Well, there's that one skinny sidearmer from the White Sox. But yeah, Dombrowski is going to kick the tires everywhere, and DiPoto is going to trade everyone and then trade everyone he traded for and then get fidgety and do some more trades, so I'm not surprised the Red Sox-Mariners rumor mill is flying. I couldn't remember whether there were real reports on Sale (not "Boston could trade for Sale" in a general sense) before it went down for real. That said, assuming you're right, I bet he's the only one. Kimbrel wasn't reported before it happened, none of the in-season trades were reported, Thornburg, Smith, etc. It's always "oh crap they made a trade," which is why I often remember where I was when hearing about them (Wiseguys Pizza for Kimbrel, gym for Thornburg, Winter Meetings for Sale). He moves quickly on trades when he's serious and usually gets the other side to keep it quiet.
|
|
|
Post by bgeer091 on Nov 28, 2018 13:35:17 GMT -5
Can we make this deal and just take on Seager? He is definitely trending down offensively, and i'm not sure how he is looking defensively. It'd push us to probably move Devers to 1st. Move Moreland?
|
|
|
Post by Legion of Bloom on Nov 28, 2018 13:48:58 GMT -5
How would people feel about Rusney and Pedroia for Cano, Diaz and cash?
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Nov 28, 2018 13:59:49 GMT -5
How would people feel about Rusney and Pedroia for Cano, Diaz and cash? Castillo shouldn't be added to any trade IMO. Just eat the money unless someone wants to trade for him and his full salary. Pedroia has 10/5 rights and will veto any trade and the Red Sox would be crazy to even ask him after he took about half of what Cano did when they were almost similar players.
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 15,642
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Nov 28, 2018 14:22:43 GMT -5
Honestly, I have trouble taking this report seriously.
The last thing the Sox need to do is take whatever money they have left to spend on Cano so they can get a good closer. That doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
So the Sox would have to trade prospects to get him. So perhaps say Chavis, Hernandez, Feltman, and Duran as a possible package?
And is it good for the Sox to clear out their top prospects given their situation? I would think the more you hang onto the better you have a chance of hitting on one that does about as much as the guy who you're trading for. Sooner or later these 4-1 type deals kill you.
I really think it's Dombrowski doing due diligence.
|
|
|
Post by dmaineah on Nov 28, 2018 17:50:35 GMT -5
I'm sure DD has interest in Diaz & zero interest in Cano.
I'm also sure that if DD called and asked about Diaz that the response was it would have to be for Benintendi.
Benintendi for Diaz seems fair but I wouldn't do it.
|
|
bosox
Veteran
Posts: 2,117
|
Post by bosox on Nov 28, 2018 18:58:44 GMT -5
Honestly, I have trouble taking this report seriously. The last thing the Sox need to do is take whatever money they have left to spend on Cano so they can get a good closer. That doesn't make any sense whatsoever. So the Sox would have to trade prospects to get him. So perhaps say Chavis, Hernandez, Durbin, and Duran as a possible package? And is it good for the Sox to clear out their top prospects given their situation? I would think the more you hang onto the better you have a chance of hitting on one that does about as much as the guy who you're trading for. Sooner or later these 4-1 type deals kill you. I really think it's Dombrowski doing due diligence. I agree DD is doing due diligence. If the Sox and Cano are involved in a Diaz trade, I would think it would be a multi-team deal where another team ends up with Cano.
|
|
|
Post by fenwaythehardway on Nov 29, 2018 9:09:32 GMT -5
Does anyone really want to see Cano age if he has to stop the roids? Wouldn't the whole point of Diaz be to free up money? Nelson Cruz says hi.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Nov 29, 2018 12:11:49 GMT -5
Appears that the Mets and Mariners are moving toward a deal.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Nov 29, 2018 12:16:44 GMT -5
Does anyone really want to see Cano age if he has to stop the roids? Wouldn't the whole point of Diaz be to free up money? Nelson Cruz says hi. Yea he does, roid brothers for life!
|
|
|