|
|
Post by okin15 on Aug 29, 2013 12:51:37 GMT -5
40-man page shows Doubront at minimum next year, but he's pretty likely to be Super Two with 2.120 days, right?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike Andrews on Aug 29, 2013 13:25:36 GMT -5
I think it usually takes 2.140 to be a Super Two.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike Andrews on Aug 29, 2013 15:58:11 GMT -5
Heard that the cutoff might be 2.119 this year. Significantly lower than in past years. So you might be right.
|
|
|
|
Post by soxin8 on Aug 30, 2013 9:00:04 GMT -5
When Mickey Pena dropped to 50 on the prospect list last week, he was inadvertantly changed to a first basemen.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Aug 30, 2013 19:21:33 GMT -5
You didn't hear about his position change?
(JK. Thanks)
|
|
dd
Veteran
Posts: 979 
|
Post by dd on Aug 30, 2013 22:33:34 GMT -5
You didn't hear about his position change? (JK. Thanks) Why isn't he # 1 if he could play 1B for 4 days and pitch the 5th? What a threat in the WS!!! |
|
|
|
Post by okin15 on Sept 5, 2013 10:35:59 GMT -5
Heard that the cutoff might be 2.119 this year. Significantly lower than in past years. So you might be right. The new CBA changed the cutoff from top 17% to top 22% of players, so that has made a big difference. I believe there is also some sort of rule about 86 (or something around there) days being another cutoff, so it could be less than 22% if super-2 status encompasses all players with 2.086 days experience. www.fangraphs.com/library/business/super-two/ |
|
|
|
Post by mainesox on Sept 5, 2013 10:50:24 GMT -5
On Daniel McGrath's player page it says his fastball ranges from 86-98 (I'm assuming that's an error, and should either say 88, or 89), and inconsistent is spelled wrong ("Inconstaent command").
|
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Sept 5, 2013 15:11:25 GMT -5
Heard that the cutoff might be 2.119 this year. Significantly lower than in past years. So you might be right. The new CBA changed the cutoff from top 17% to top 22% of players, so that has made a big difference. I believe there is also some sort of rule about 86 (or something around there) days being another cutoff, so it could be less than 22% if super-2 status encompasses all players with 2.086 days experience. www.fangraphs.com/library/business/super-two/, Doubront should be right on the border of Super 2 status, but currently look to miss it by one day. So it will be up in the air right up until the end of the season. |
|
dd
Veteran
Posts: 979
|
Post by dd on Sept 10, 2013 13:35:43 GMT -5
Myles Smith is listed on both the Lowell and GCL rosters.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike Andrews on Sept 10, 2013 14:18:00 GMT -5
The rosters page is now Season End rosters. Smith was on both the GCL and Lowell season end rosters.
|
|
|
|
Post by okin15 on Oct 3, 2013 10:11:15 GMT -5
Not really a correction, but curious who is asking the questions in the top 40 staff series?
|
|
|
|
Post by tjb21 on Oct 14, 2013 9:18:54 GMT -5
Not sure if this was intentional, but on the 2014 Projected Roster, under the Pawtucket Starting Pitchers sub-column, it says "RS" next to Acquisition.
|
|
|
|
Post by soxfanatic on Oct 23, 2013 11:22:22 GMT -5
Totally random question: What is Manny Delcarmen doing in the header of this site? It's not like he amounted to much.
|
|
jimoh
Veteran
Posts: 4,200
|
Post by jimoh on Oct 24, 2013 14:16:56 GMT -5
Ian Cundall typo:
"Margot is a quick twitch athlete, who should be able to physically mature without losing athleticism. He has moderate projection with his frame, and will need to ________ strength in order to actualize his offensive tools"
add?
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt Huegel on Oct 28, 2013 15:56:23 GMT -5
Not really a correction, but curious who is asking the questions in the top 40 staff series? Not sure if you still care, but it was Hatfield who was behind aggregating those and deciding on the questions, fwiw. |
|
|
|
Post by xxdamgoodxx on Oct 28, 2013 17:54:59 GMT -5
there is a / in front of Marrero's OBP on the home page
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Oct 28, 2013 21:52:45 GMT -5
there is a / in front of Marrero's OBP on the home page Danke |
|
|
|
Post by sittingstill on Nov 10, 2013 16:07:02 GMT -5
On the Winter Leagues page--I've never heard Estrellas Orientales called Orientales ["Eastern"] for short, only Estrellas ["Stars"]. Some of the others are inconsistent in usage and it matters less--I hear Toros, not Este, but Licey as often as Tigres and Escogido much more than Leones.
|
|
|
|
Post by okin15 on Nov 11, 2013 13:48:19 GMT -5
Not really a correction, but curious who is asking the questions in the top 40 staff series? Not sure if you still care, but it was Hatfield who was behind aggregating those and deciding on the questions, fwiw. I do still care and thank you. It was a good series. |
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Nov 11, 2013 19:03:34 GMT -5
On the Winter Leagues page--I've never heard Estrellas Orientales called Orientales ["Eastern"] for short, only Estrellas ["Stars"]. Some of the others are inconsistent in usage and it matters less--I hear Toros, not Este, but Licey as often as Tigres and Escogido much more than Leones. My methodology for that page is to always use the "location" part of the name, with the exception of Cibaenas/Cibao which are basically the same thing, right? Willing to listen on why I should go the other way, but it's admittedly tough to Americanize some of these, particularly with LiDom. |
|
|
|
Post by dmaineah on Nov 13, 2013 12:55:15 GMT -5
are the dates correct in the legend on the 2013-2014 off season depth chart?
example; R5 - Eligible for December 6, 2012 Rule 5 Draft if not added to the 40-man roster on or before November 20, 2012
i ask because i was looking to see what players needed to be added to the 40 man this year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike Andrews on Nov 13, 2013 17:27:14 GMT -5
Just updated the legend, it was a year behind.
The Rule 5 eligible players are listed on the Wiki and the depth chart.
|
|
ericmvan
Veteran
Supposed to be working on something more important
Posts: 9,027
|
Post by ericmvan on Dec 11, 2013 0:30:05 GMT -5
Dalier Hinojosa has to be in the top 60, doesn't he?
I'm thinking he was put off being ranked until more was known about him, and then forgotten ...
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Dec 11, 2013 6:58:13 GMT -5
Dalier Hinojosa has to be in the top 60, doesn't he? I'm thinking he was put off being ranked until more was known about him, and then forgotten ... He's going to be 28 this year. He's really more of a post prospect. |
|
