Post by patrmac04 on Jan 29, 2014 1:59:36 GMT -5
This is my response to these two articles when they left me wondering how many top 20 prospects = 21-50 prospects = 51-100 prospects? It is further broken down into position prospects vs pitching prospects. I am curious to see the conclusions from others on these two very powerful baseball articles (to me at least).
www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2013/6/3/4386214/how-well-does-the-baseball-america-prospect-top-100-estimate-the-top
www.royalsreview.com/2011/2/14/1992424/success-and-failure-rates-of-top-mlb-prospects
My takeaways
Position players have a roughly 60% (over 1 in 2 closer to 2 in 3) chance of success in the top 20.
Pitchers roughly 40% chance in the top 20 (under 1 in 2 closer to 1in 3)
Position players have about a 37% (barely over 1 in 3) chance of success 21-50
21-50 pitchers 23% ( slightly under 1 in 4)
Position players have about a 25% (1 in 4) chance of success 51-100
51-100 pitchers 17% (about 1 in 6)
conclusion is 1 position player in the top 20 if valued at 100 is equal to 1.5 pitching prospects or a 66. That is about the same value but a tiny bit less for position players at about a 60 in position 21-50. Pitchers would be around a 40. Position players 51-60 about 36 and pitchers about 25... I'm tired so I estimated off the top of my head. Use a calculator for more details and to fact check me please.
1 position prospect is 1.5 pitching prospects 1-20 and position prospects 21-50.
2.5 pitching prospects 21-50 and 3 position prospects 51-100 to equal one top 20 position prospect.
It would take 4 pitching prospects 51-100 to equal the chances of a top 20 position prospect
3.5 pitching prospects 51-100 equal a top 20 pitching prospect.
To go further and working with simplification, success is defined by 2-4 WAR (4+ is star level) per year so that comes out to around $12-24 million per year in value minus salary obligations if WAR is valued at ~$6 million per year.
If my math is off, I blame the gin
Sent from my SGH-T999 using proboards
www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2013/6/3/4386214/how-well-does-the-baseball-america-prospect-top-100-estimate-the-top
www.royalsreview.com/2011/2/14/1992424/success-and-failure-rates-of-top-mlb-prospects
My takeaways
Position players have a roughly 60% (over 1 in 2 closer to 2 in 3) chance of success in the top 20.
Pitchers roughly 40% chance in the top 20 (under 1 in 2 closer to 1in 3)
Position players have about a 37% (barely over 1 in 3) chance of success 21-50
21-50 pitchers 23% ( slightly under 1 in 4)
Position players have about a 25% (1 in 4) chance of success 51-100
51-100 pitchers 17% (about 1 in 6)
conclusion is 1 position player in the top 20 if valued at 100 is equal to 1.5 pitching prospects or a 66. That is about the same value but a tiny bit less for position players at about a 60 in position 21-50. Pitchers would be around a 40. Position players 51-60 about 36 and pitchers about 25... I'm tired so I estimated off the top of my head. Use a calculator for more details and to fact check me please.
1 position prospect is 1.5 pitching prospects 1-20 and position prospects 21-50.
2.5 pitching prospects 21-50 and 3 position prospects 51-100 to equal one top 20 position prospect.
It would take 4 pitching prospects 51-100 to equal the chances of a top 20 position prospect
3.5 pitching prospects 51-100 equal a top 20 pitching prospect.
To go further and working with simplification, success is defined by 2-4 WAR (4+ is star level) per year so that comes out to around $12-24 million per year in value minus salary obligations if WAR is valued at ~$6 million per year.
If my math is off, I blame the gin
Sent from my SGH-T999 using proboards