|
DIPS
Jan 4, 2015 15:12:08 GMT -5
Post by jimed14 on Jan 4, 2015 15:12:08 GMT -5
But if he didn't pitch better, he wouldn't have been in the majors long. And still, you cannot say what part of bad BABIP is due to bad luck and what part of it is due to pitching badly. Yes that matters, because when pitchers decline (early) or they are hurt, they don't pitch as well and their BABIP doesn't have to regress to the mean. Luck will always regress to the mean, but performance doesn't have to and often doesn't. Let's use Daniel Bard as an example instead of Buchholz.
|
|
|
DIPS
Jan 4, 2015 16:15:34 GMT -5
Post by jmei on Jan 4, 2015 16:15:34 GMT -5
Daniel Bard didn't wash out of the league because of a high BABIP. He put up a .285 BABIP in his 2012 season, the one that saw him put up a 6.22 ERA that was actually lower than his 6.36 FIP.
Again: this is a total red herring. The vast, vast majority of time when FIP is used to evaluate pitchers, these objections about non-MLB-quality pitchers aren't applicable. Plus, when guys have declined and are no longer MLB-quality pitchers (or are not MLB-quality pitchers to begin with), their walk/strikeout/home run rates tend to take a nosedive as well. FIP is far from perfect, and there are pitchers who consistently under- or over-perform their peripherals, but in general, it's a very useful tool.
|
|
|
DIPS
Jan 26, 2015 15:21:51 GMT -5
Post by jimed14 on Jan 26, 2015 15:21:51 GMT -5
Not sure where else to ask this, but hopefully someone can answer.
Are there any pitcher stats that adjust BABIP based on batted ball type? I would guess that expected BABIP would change based on percentage of ground balls and line drives and fly balls a pitcher tends to give up since it seems to be a repeatable skill. What I find incredibly interesting is Henry Owens only giving up 12.6% line drives in almost 400 minor league innings and wonder if that's partly why he gives up a very low H/9. These questions came about because I am continually trying to figure out why Henry Owens' results seem to outperform his scouting report.
For one, I think at the very least, pitcher BABIP should be shown as BABIP not including infield flies. This is kind of why someone like Tim Wakefield's FIP was almost always higher compared to his ERA because he got no credit for his career 14.7% IFFB% (which is 15th all time among starting pitchers). And that would probably be significantly more pronounced if he pitched in a place like Oakland, given all the popups that landed in the first few rows at Fenway. Those foul balls are not counted at all for anything. This is also the case for guys like Uehara or Rivera.
In fact if you look at all of the best career BABIPs for pitchers, most have well above average IFFB%s.
This will likely be solved in the next 10 years if they get hitFX in all parks including the minors and can adjust for hardness of contact (where a Papi line drive is not treated as equal to one by Iglesias or one given up by Kershaw is not equal to one given up by Buchholz when he was awful last season). I really hope that data is released to the public in a timely manner. Maybe at that point, xBABIP based on hardness of contact and quality of opponent will be a common stat. They could even include speed and defensive effectiveness and shifts into it.
I wish fangraphs or b-ref would at least publish xBABIP, even though it's a prety inexact stat today.
|
|
|
DIPS
Jan 26, 2015 16:22:39 GMT -5
via mobile
jimed14 likes this
Post by jmei on Jan 26, 2015 16:22:39 GMT -5
SIERA does: www.fangraphs.com/library/pitching/siera/I agree with the IFFB analysis (which SIERA accounts for), but because line drive rate fluctuates so much (and because minor league stringers are not the best), I'm not sure two years' worth of few line drives is very predictive with regards to Owens specifically.
|
|
|
DIPS
Jan 26, 2015 17:49:01 GMT -5
Post by jimed14 on Jan 26, 2015 17:49:01 GMT -5
Thanks for that. One of the few stats I never looked into, maybe it's the one I've been searching for. I can't find evidence that it credits IFFB, only ground balls. IMO, IFFB are closer to strike outs than they are to fly balls.
Another issue I have is with HR/FB%. I think that should be HR/OFFB% instead. And that would change xFIP quite a bit I bet. There is nothing at all wrong with being a flyball pitcher in a big park. It might be better. But the increased IFFB that flyball pitchers tend to get, harm their xFIPs because it brings their HR/FB% to typically lower than average.
It stands to reason that when a groundball sinkerball pitcher gives up a flyball, a lot of times it's because the pitch didn't sink or it's up in the zone (IOW a mistake) so they would have a higher HR/FB% than average. Along with not getting nearly as many popups.
And of note, I really like that minorleaguecentral.com lists (BABIP excluding IFFB) and (HR/OFFB%) as stats.
|
|
|
DIPS
Mar 23, 2015 9:38:06 GMT -5
Post by jimed14 on Mar 23, 2015 9:38:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
DIPS
Dec 11, 2015 16:06:25 GMT -5
Post by jmei on Dec 11, 2015 16:06:25 GMT -5
This is one hell of a straw man. I cannot remember anyone (and certainly not me) arguing that BABIP is not a skill that some pitchers have (at least not in the last couple years, anyways). If I remember correctly, the argument I made was that even if Owens did have a BABIP skill, it was likely to regress up from the unsustainably low mark he put up in AAA last year. You can revisit the DIPS thread here. Quickly reading through it, I don't think I disagree now with anything I wrote then. This is one of your quotes from that thread. So do some pitchers have control over their BABIP or don't they? I thought that's what everyone means by saying the phrase BABIP-skill. "Pitchers have very little control over their BABIP" is a different statement than "pitchers have no control over their BABIP." Some pitchers have a true-talent BABIP skill, relatively few pitchers have such a skill, it is of limited magnitude, and we know most of the factors that allow them to have this skill. These are the things that I have argued over and over in this thread.
|
|