SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
2018 Patriots/NFL offseason thread
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 28, 2018 17:06:11 GMT -5
There were like 8 guys that were very interesting, he wasn't one of them. Heck he was never mentioned at all. Which is saying something given he played at LSU with a ton of talent. LSU hasn’t been that great lately and they were a running team. I don’t expect anything but I also have never seen the kid throw. 2nd round RB and WR and another WR taken in the 6th in this draft. That is a bunch of talent. Earlier they were slamming LSU QBs, when talking about DJ Clark in 2nd round.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 28, 2018 17:07:30 GMT -5
So many 2019
2019 1st 2nd 2nd (via Bears) 3rd (via Lions) 3rd (projected comp) 3rd (projected comp) 4th 5th 6th (projected comp) 7th 7th (Eagles) 7th (projected comp)
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 28, 2018 20:31:49 GMT -5
All those QBs and they wind up with Danny Etling?! Really hope Brady stays healthy for a long time. Looks like Pats did a lot of homework on this kid... officially intrigued... still don’t expect anything
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 29, 2018 1:18:24 GMT -5
So a look at the class;
Isaiah Wynn OT/G
Sony Michel RB
Duke Dawson CB
Ja'Whaun Bently LB
Christian Sam OLB
Braxton Berrios WR
Danny Etling QB
Keion Crossen CB
Ryan Izzo TE
Then add in a future 2nd, 3rd and 7th round pick, plus Trent Williams.
Love the top three picks. Heck only Keion Crossen was such a reach no one has a scouting report on him and he's late 7th round. So given past years you can't complain. I'd give it a B+ overall. The main questions is will the volume approach work or would adding another top notch player or two have been better? I also have to question the QB pick. Ok you love Etling, I'm ok with that. In this crazy deep class why not double dip? A bunch of these guys are not making the team, hopefully practice squad players. So I would have really like to see them take another QB. Maybe they will bring in another guy.
I want to buy into Etling. I mean overall the Patriots are very good at getting value from QBs. It would just be weird if everyone was soo wrong on Etling. He played at LSU, the most scouted confrence in college football. This isn't Jimmy playing against lesser talent, Cassell not playing at all, Brady splitting time with a guy people said could be the #1 pick or a guy coming from a spread offense. Etling just wasn't talked about by anyone as being a guy that would even be drafted and they talked about 20 plus QBs. I have some hope maybe he turns into a good backup, but that's about it. Which wouldn't be bad, was just hoping for more.
|
|
|
Post by philarhody on Apr 29, 2018 7:38:08 GMT -5
/photo/1
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 29, 2018 8:14:56 GMT -5
Crosson is ridiculously athletic - unfortunately that doesn’t mean much for production but it’s better than not being athletics. Worth a flier.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Apr 29, 2018 11:04:43 GMT -5
So many 2019 2019 1st 2nd 2nd (via Bears) 3rd (via Lions) 3rd (projected comp) 3rd (projected comp) 4th 5th 6th (projected comp) 7th 7th (Eagles) 7th (projected comp) I think it is obvious that the Pats where not too impressed by the talent in this years draft so they parlayed that into better picks next year along with trading for Brown. That is about the only thing that the Pats have done consistently in the past, few coaches have the luxury of doing that knowing they need to win now. If they added 3/4 starters and a role player or 2 that contribute this year that is a lot for a Super Bowl team. Bill just doing what Bill does, sometimes it doesn't work but usually it does. Overall I like it, give it a B+ with the chance of being an A.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Apr 29, 2018 11:05:39 GMT -5
To be honest, Etling was probably brought in to be a 3rd string or practice squad QB, not to replace Brady someday.
|
|
|
Post by beasleyrockah on Apr 29, 2018 11:50:51 GMT -5
The Patriots used picks from this draft to trade for players like Eric Rowe, Jason McCourty, Danny Shelton, Trent Brown, Cassius Marsh, Cordarelle Patterson, and Marquis Flowers in addition to their draft class. Marsh already busted here and it's not a lock all those players contribute, but it's impressive to see Bill use the draft to add so many options. I'm sure he'll use some of these extra 2019 picks to trade during the remainder of the offseason and in-season too, and since he can't trade projected comp picks until they are awarded it was big to acquire some tradeable draft capital. Remember last offseason when the Patriots "loaded up", supposedly for a last run or two with Brady and Belichick? It sure seems like Bill is still invested in the Patriots long term future.
It felt like Sony Michel was a bit of an overdraft at the time of the pick (strictly due to the depth of this RB class) but the quick run on RB's made me reconsider, along with seeing how good Michel is in pass protection. Dion Lewis was extremely productive last season, but Michel should give this offense even more versatility.
|
|
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Apr 29, 2018 13:10:37 GMT -5
To be honest, Etling was probably brought in to be a 3rd string or practice squad QB, not to replace Brady someday. Honestly I don't get it. If Brady gets hurt Hoyer is the QB and any playoff aspirations they have can go out the window. I'm no football expert but from what I've read/heard it sounds like the Pats took guys with big question marks, like grabbing a guard and hoping he can be a left tackle, grabbing a safety and hoping he can be a cornerback, drafting a running back with knee issues - in the first round no less with Lamar Jackson sitting out there. And if this team is trying to secure for the long-term then how do you not get the best talent out there to replace Garrapolo? Etling's resume isn't that impressive and I don't think he's some long-term project that's going to replace Brady, either. The Patriots struck a truckload of gold with the 199th pick in the draft when they got Brady, but trying to get his replacement with the 219th pick? There were about at least 8 more highly regarded QBs ahead of him. I really don't get it. If not Jackson they could have taken a shot with White or Lauletta or somebody else who could have gotten a year of learning the system with Brady and Belichick. Instead Brady's replacement is still nowhere to be found and worse any lasting injury and the Patriots are screwed. I could be all wet and hope I am, but I was disappointed a bit with the draft. I thought they'd fix that front 7 with a pick or two, and get a true left tackle. If the Jets and Bills improved themselves reasonably enough 12-4 from the Pats with the #1 seed could become 10-6 with a #4 seed or something like that.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Apr 29, 2018 13:44:37 GMT -5
To be honest, Etling was probably brought in to be a 3rd string or practice squad QB, not to replace Brady someday. Honestly I don't get it. If Brady gets hurt Hoyer is the QB and any playoff aspirations they have can go out the window. I'm no football expert but from what I've read/heard it sounds like the Pats took guys with big question marks, like grabbing a guard and hoping he can be a left tackle, grabbing a safety and hoping he can be a cornerback, drafting a running back with knee issues - in the first round no less with Lamar Jackson sitting out there. And if this team is trying to secure for the long-term then how do you not get the best talent out there to replace Garrapolo? Etling's resume isn't that impressive and I don't think he's some long-term project that's going to replace Brady, either. The Patriots struck a truckload of gold with the 199th pick in the draft when they got Brady, but trying to get his replacement with the 219th pick? There were about at least 8 more highly regarded QBs ahead of him. I really don't get it. If not Jackson they could have taken a shot with White or Lauletta or somebody else who could have gotten a year of learning the system with Brady and Belichick. Instead Brady's replacement is still nowhere to be found and worse any lasting injury and the Patriots are screwed. I could be all wet and hope I am, but I was disappointed a bit with the draft. I thought they'd fix that front 7 with a pick or two, and get a true left tackle. If the Jets and Bills improved themselves reasonably enough 12-4 from the Pats with the #1 seed could become 10-6 with a #4 seed or something like that. IMO the Pats decided to believe Brady when he says he is going to play for a few more years so it makes it a little early to draft his replacement. They already did that with JG and it didn't pan out so I don't think they feel the need yet. Obviously there is a need but the Pats must not feel it's not dire. They loaded up on picks for next year so maybe they like someone, who knows. IMO they should be thinking 2 more years of TB and then they need to be ready. I initially agreed with your thoughts on Wynn being a guard that they hope can play tackle. Then I find that he was the highest ranked LT in the SEC last year and only gave up 5 QB pressures all season against some really good talent. I trust they know what they are doing with him as their track record with OL is very good. Not sure where drafting a safety they hope can play cb comes from but either way BB likes versatile players. In regards to the RB with bad knees, that is an over statement IMO. Frank Gore tore his ACL twice in college and just became the first player in history to have 12 consecutive seasons of 1200 yards from scrimmage. Maybe you end up being right because the draft can be a crapshoot but I think you are looking for reasons to hate it while I tend to be optimistic. Only time will tell.
|
|
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Apr 29, 2018 13:53:14 GMT -5
Honestly I don't get it. If Brady gets hurt Hoyer is the QB and any playoff aspirations they have can go out the window. I'm no football expert but from what I've read/heard it sounds like the Pats took guys with big question marks, like grabbing a guard and hoping he can be a left tackle, grabbing a safety and hoping he can be a cornerback, drafting a running back with knee issues - in the first round no less with Lamar Jackson sitting out there. And if this team is trying to secure for the long-term then how do you not get the best talent out there to replace Garrapolo? Etling's resume isn't that impressive and I don't think he's some long-term project that's going to replace Brady, either. The Patriots struck a truckload of gold with the 199th pick in the draft when they got Brady, but trying to get his replacement with the 219th pick? There were about at least 8 more highly regarded QBs ahead of him. I really don't get it. If not Jackson they could have taken a shot with White or Lauletta or somebody else who could have gotten a year of learning the system with Brady and Belichick. Instead Brady's replacement is still nowhere to be found and worse any lasting injury and the Patriots are screwed. I could be all wet and hope I am, but I was disappointed a bit with the draft. I thought they'd fix that front 7 with a pick or two, and get a true left tackle. If the Jets and Bills improved themselves reasonably enough 12-4 from the Pats with the #1 seed could become 10-6 with a #4 seed or something like that. IMO the Pats decided to believe Brady when he says he is going to play for a few more years so it makes it a little early to draft his replacement. They already did that with JG and it didn't pan out so I don't think they feel the need yet. Obviously there is a need but the Pats must not feel it's not dire. They loaded up on picks for next year so maybe they like someone, who knows. IMO they should be thinking 2 more years of TB and then they need to be ready. I initially agreed with your thoughts on Wynn being a guard that they hope can play tackle. Then I find that he was the highest ranked LT in the SEC last year and only gave up 5 QB pressures all season against some really good talent. I trust they know what they are doing with him as their track record with OL is very good. Not sure where drafting a safety they hope can play cb comes from but either way BB likes versatile players. In regards to the RB with bad knees, that is an over statement IMO. Frank Gore tore his ACL twice in college and just became the first player in history to have 12 consecutive seasons of 1200 yards from scrimmage. Maybe you end up being right because the draft can be a crapshoot but I think you are looking for reasons to hate it while I tend to be optimistic. Only time will tell. From reading those articles that came out about the Patriots I remember reading something to the effect that the Pats' own internal evaluations of Brady showed a 40 yr old QB with some slippage and they specified the play that got Hogan injured as an example. If the Pats feel that the decline is setting in, you'd think that they'd be more proactive securing his successor? I think that's what worries me most about the draft - passing on a QB-rich draft, which makes me uneasy. We saw the difference between Hoyer's 49ers and Jimmy G's 49ers. It was night and day so if Brady gets hurt, they don't have a great shot at winning. Hoyer isn't going to be Foles, and neither do I think is the kid they drafted. I like what you said about Wynn and Michel.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 29, 2018 15:03:42 GMT -5
To be honest, Etling was probably brought in to be a 3rd string or practice squad QB, not to replace Brady someday. Honestly I don't get it. If Brady gets hurt Hoyer is the QB and any playoff aspirations they have can go out the window. I'm no football expert but from what I've read/heard it sounds like the Pats took guys with big question marks, like grabbing a guard and hoping he can be a left tackle, grabbing a safety and hoping he can be a cornerback, drafting a running back with knee issues - in the first round no less with Lamar Jackson sitting out there. And if this team is trying to secure for the long-term then how do you not get the best talent out there to replace Garrapolo? Etling's resume isn't that impressive and I don't think he's some long-term project that's going to replace Brady, either. The Patriots struck a truckload of gold with the 199th pick in the draft when they got Brady, but trying to get his replacement with the 219th pick? There were about at least 8 more highly regarded QBs ahead of him. I really don't get it. If not Jackson they could have taken a shot with White or Lauletta or somebody else who could have gotten a year of learning the system with Brady and Belichick. Instead Brady's replacement is still nowhere to be found and worse any lasting injury and the Patriots are screwed. I could be all wet and hope I am, but I was disappointed a bit with the draft. I thought they'd fix that front 7 with a pick or two, and get a true left tackle. If the Jets and Bills improved themselves reasonably enough 12-4 from the Pats with the #1 seed could become 10-6 with a #4 seed or something like that. In a way I'm upset about the QB spot, I wanted more, but Nick Caserio after day one made comments you guys can ask us about not taking QBs again after day 2. Then he's like, if we don't take one. Etling was there guy all along it seems. Just glad they picked him in the 7th and not higher. If they didn't like anyone more than him after the top 4, no reason to waste a high pick on Jackson and Randolph. Those guys did have big question marks and it made no sense to trade everything to move up, while you still have Brady. As much as Jacksons physical tools interested me, he wasn't an accurate passer, scored very low on the wonderlic test and frankly just listening to him I really question his intelligence. He was the anti Brady and Jimmy. Chances you got a rookie QB that could save your season if Brady goes down next year is slim. I would have liked a second QB just to increase the Odds, but they must really like Etling, because it seems he was the pick all along. Wynn played more LT than guard in College, even if he can't play LT, he's seen as having all pro upside at guard. Think Mankins, not sure how you hate that pick. Michel was most peoples #2 RB and a new age type RB. I question it from a value standpoint because my boy Josh Adams didn't even get drafted this RB class was soo deep. He's just a different type of RB though, he's more of an old school back, not the new age type RB. That new age RB that can run and pass catch, were all taken very high in this draft. As Brady gets older you need to take pressure off him and the first two picks do just that. Nevermind our next QB will have a good line and running attack, which is huge. Not sure where you heard Dawson is a safety, he's a CB. Everyone loves him, some comparing him to Logan Ryan. Kiper called him the best slot corner in the draft. He can play outside, just not against huge WRs. We have Gilmore for that. He has a compact build, he's very well built for a smaller guy. Thing is that's a huge plus, because he has very good speed and change of direction skills. It will allow him to play physical with WRs and RBs. Given how the league is changing that is huge. Also by all account just like with Wynn and Michel he's a very low risk player. All three are ready to play next year. One thing about studying LSU is they don't seem very good at developing QBs. They get a ton of high recruits that keep not doing well. I'll keep trying to talk myself into liking him more. Etling did have very good yard per attempt numbers and threw very few interceptions. So there's that at least. He did play against very good defenses in the SEC. I'm warming up to him after the shock of the pick wears off.
|
|
|
Post by benogliviesbrother on Apr 29, 2018 15:10:09 GMT -5
A lot of teeth gnashing about QB play beyond TB12 -- anyone remember 2001 SB season? We didn't have TB12 then either, at least, not this version. We had the Matt Cassel or Brian Hoyer version -- game manage & let superior coaching, defense, running game, special teams, i.e., complimentary football, win the game. As a group they were good enough.
Seems to me investing in a top flight OL & RB will pay immediate dividend, while also mitigating the inevitable drop off at QB at some point.
There's a lot of ways to win football games that don't involve Tom Brady throwing for 300+ yards and 3 TDs.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Apr 29, 2018 15:17:59 GMT -5
The one thing I'd say against drafting a QB high in the draft is that it's not maximizing the assets to win now while Brady is still playing. If you draft Jackson, you don't have Sony Michel, who will contribute way more than the clipboard carrying that Jackson would contribute.
|
|
|
Post by FenwayFanatic on Apr 29, 2018 15:22:46 GMT -5
Why are people complaining about trading down so much? Waiting one year is not a big deal at all especially if that pick they’re acquiring is going to be higher than the one they gave up. Clearly they traded down because they didn’t like the pick.
There are some NBA teams that are trading for picks 3-4 years from now for crying out loud.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Apr 29, 2018 15:31:52 GMT -5
Why are people complaining about trading down so much? Waiting one year is not a big deal at all especially if that pick they’re acquiring is going to be higher than the one they gave up. Clearly they traded down because they didn’t like the pick. There are some NBA teams that are trading for picks 3-4 years from now for crying out loud. The Patriots window to win is now though, not next year. Who knows what will happen with Brady and Gronk next year. We barely knew what they were going to do this year. Couldn't get answers out of neither until recently.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 29, 2018 15:37:54 GMT -5
Why are people complaining about trading down so much? Waiting one year is not a big deal at all especially if that pick they’re acquiring is going to be higher than the one they gave up. Clearly they traded down because they didn’t like the pick. There are some NBA teams that are trading for picks 3-4 years from now for crying out loud. That is part of the problem though if they didn't see value in any other player after Dawson in the 2nd round all the way to the 5th round when they took a guy almost everyone had not getting drafted. You can make a very good case that adding a safety like Reid and another impactful DE could have taken this teams D to another level. How don't you see value in basically the 3rd, 4th and 5th rounds? Bill as he gets older has really limited the number of players he'll draft. Reports from past years that the Patriot boards only have 20 to 30 draftable players is crazy. When a bunch of them are all in the first round. At some point value should overtake the risk, but Bill just won't take any gambles on players anymore. I guess its the curse of Aaron Hernandez.
|
|
|
Post by FenwayFanatic on Apr 29, 2018 15:44:22 GMT -5
A lot of teeth gnashing about QB play beyond TB12 -- anyone remember 2001 SB season? We didn't have TB12 then either, at least, not this version. We had the Matt Cassel or Brian Hoyer version -- game manage & let superior coaching, defense, running game, special teams, i.e., complimentary football, win the game. As a group they were good enough. Seems to me investing in a top flight OL & RB will pay immediate dividend, while also mitigating the inevitable drop off at QB at some point. There's a lot of ways to win football games that don't involve Tom Brady throwing for 300+ yards and 3 TDs. I would love the 2001 version of Belichick right now. He lost us the Super Bowl. And yes, I know our window is now but those Lions and Bears picks they grabbed are higher picks and always be traded. 2019 is not 2022.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 29, 2018 15:49:14 GMT -5
To be honest, Etling was probably brought in to be a 3rd string or practice squad QB, not to replace Brady someday. I have to believe he's the guy they liked the most after the top QBs. In such a deep QB class maybe he was overlooked. A guy they really like. If they view him as just filler they messed up big time. When they took Brady they didn't think he was going to be great, they just really liked him. This year there was a huge need, they studied QBs heavy and had a million options. They took Etling and by all accounts he seems to be the guy they wanted all along.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 29, 2018 15:56:50 GMT -5
A lot of teeth gnashing about QB play beyond TB12 -- anyone remember 2001 SB season? We didn't have TB12 then either, at least, not this version. We had the Matt Cassel or Brian Hoyer version -- game manage & let superior coaching, defense, running game, special teams, i.e., complimentary football, win the game. As a group they were good enough. Seems to me investing in a top flight OL & RB will pay immediate dividend, while also mitigating the inevitable drop off at QB at some point. There's a lot of ways to win football games that don't involve Tom Brady throwing for 300+ yards and 3 TDs. I would love the 2001 version of Belichick right now. He lost us the Super Bowl. And yes, I know our window is now but those Lions and Bears picks they grabbed are higher picks and always be traded. 2019 is not 2022. They turned the 43rd pick into a future 2nd and 3rd, plus a pick used to move up to get Dawson. In the NFL there are no guarantees those picks are higher. Detriot has talent, they have a good QB and now a good coach. That 2nd could easily be lower next year, they didn't get a future first for example. We'll see how it plays out, but it wasn't a slam dunk type trade. Frankly it seemed like they just wanted to spread the Jimmy pick around so the return wasn't one player.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Apr 29, 2018 16:02:15 GMT -5
To be honest, Etling was probably brought in to be a 3rd string or practice squad QB, not to replace Brady someday. I have to believe he's the guy they liked the most after the top QBs. In such a deep QB class maybe he was overlooked. A guy they really like. If they view him as just filler they messed up big time. When they took Brady they didn't think he was going to be great, they just really liked him. This year there was a huge need, they studied QBs heavy and had a million options. They took Etling and by all accounts he seems to be the guy they wanted all along. I think it's more likely that they really didn't like any of them and just took him in the 7th as a backup.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Apr 29, 2018 16:03:05 GMT -5
I would love the 2001 version of Belichick right now. He lost us the Super Bowl. And yes, I know our window is now but those Lions and Bears picks they grabbed are higher picks and always be traded. 2019 is not 2022. They turned the 43rd pick into a future 2nd and 3rd, plus a pick used to move up to get Dawson. In the NFL there are no guarantees those picks are higher. Detriot has talent, they have a good QB and now a good coach. That 2nd could easily be lower next year, they didn't get a future first for example. We'll see how it plays out, but it wasn't a slam dunk type trade. Frankly it seemed like they just wanted to spread the Jimmy pick around so the return wasn't one player. The 2019 draft is supposed to have a lot more talent than 2018 from top to bottom.
|
|
|
Post by FenwayFanatic on Apr 29, 2018 16:07:17 GMT -5
The Patriots traded a fourth round pick for a 2019 third. How is there “no guarantee thats going to be higher?”
And about the trade with the Bears - the Bears have been trash for about a decade now. That pick is, at worst going to be about the same, plus they got an extra pick out of it.
Those were arguably the biggest slam dunks of the entire draft and people are complaining about it?
|
|
|
Post by beasleyrockah on Apr 29, 2018 16:21:21 GMT -5
When you go through all the trades the Patriots were able to turn the #43 pick into the 2019 Bears 2nd, 2019 Lions 3rd, the ability to trade up from #63 to #56 (Dawson pick), and the #178th pick (Christian Sam). That's the official Jimmy G return, until Bill inevitably deals the Bears and Lions picks for other assets.
|
|
|