SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Keith Law says MiLB teams should pay players
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Sept 25, 2018 21:20:04 GMT -5
It's a seasonal job though. If you want to get cut. Sure. If you want use logic too.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Sept 25, 2018 21:21:36 GMT -5
It's a seasonal job though. The ask is not that minor league players be paid during the offseason. It’s that in-season, minor league players be paid at least the minimum wage equivalent. There is no set standard for a job like that though. That's the catch 22. It's not a full time or part time job, even though the hours are as such of a full time job during the months of March from the August.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Sept 25, 2018 23:25:59 GMT -5
Just so you guys know 42% of Americans make less than $15 an hour. Its not just a small group, which given the comments I don't think some of you knew. Nevermind the cost of living is so different all across this Country. I could make three times more working in Boston, yet take my house and put it in Boston and it would cost three times as much. Nevermind it wouldn't even be in Boston, but greater Boston with a 45 minute commute everyday.
I bring that up because I just looked up a living wage in my area, its $11.42. I wouldn't be surprised to see it be $7 and $8 down South. $15 an hour might be the overall average for the Country, but that is being inflated by the big cities and basically everywhere in California. There is a reason they have living wage calculators for your town/city.
In theory I love the everyone should just make $15 dollars an hour talk. It sounds great untill you look at the massive effect it would have. It raises the wages for most US workers. Take a state with a $7.25 minimum wage, now everyone gets $15. Doubling the income overnite. It sounds wonderful. The way you guys look at it, the workers get more and Billionaires less. Yet that massive increase will have a huge effect on the cost of living. In the end you haven't changed much. Its why the places with the lowest minimum wages, also have the lowest cost of living. Its all connected.
You really want to live it up, do what a bunch of my plumber friends do. Travel 3 plus hours to Boston every week and then live in my area. You get the big city paycheck, but small town cost of living. Thing is its only works if you don't really like your wife.
|
|
|
Post by swingingbunt on Sept 26, 2018 0:51:59 GMT -5
FFS we're not talking about everyone else. We're talking about minor league baseball players and that's it. Not jobs that can be outsourced to China and not plumbers that can drive 3 hours to lower their cost of living. We're talking about minor league players that have bosses that can afford, with absolutely no problem whatsoever, to pay them a living wage but are choosing not to.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,049
|
Post by mobaz on Sept 26, 2018 5:58:49 GMT -5
Going back to Law's original argument (which I agree beyond the surface doesn't make sense), minor league baseball is "worth" a certain amount to fans, as shown by tickets plus radio, stadium experience etc. Every collectively bargained league has a model that includes calculating that worth and giving players a certain percentage. Minor leaguers are also part of the major league worth (as evidenced by the passion of this very website, where no one would care except there is a major league team to graduate to) but are ignored in those calculations and treated as ancillary. They are getting screwed out of knowing the worth of the minor leagues and then contributions to major league worth (though I agree bonuses compensate for some of the latter) and getting their cut of that.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Sept 26, 2018 6:48:11 GMT -5
No. You deserve at least minimum wage. Please explain why they do not deserve minimum wage. All minor leaguers besides those at the lowest level make above federal minimum wage, which is $7.25 an hour. $15 an hour is over double federal minimum wage. Heck even the highest state minimum wage is $11.50 an hour. I have zero issues giving that lower group like the $75 more dollars needed per month to reach minimum wage. Except that in the lower minors, they're paid $1100 a month and have mandatory club fees taken out of their checks. They're literally training for about 10 hour days, 7 days a week. That's under $5 an hour. They also are not paid for spring training at all. OTHERWISE, they would not have needed to pass this bill, exempting minor leagues from paying minimum wage or overtime! www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/5580/text?format=txtSEC. 2. MINIMUM WAGE AND OVERTIME HOURS EXEMPTIONS.If a player is training 60 hours a week (which is low), just to be paid $7.25 an hour, he would need to be paid almost $2000 a month. And he should be paid for every minute he's preparing for his job since that is his job, including spring training. 60 * 4.5 weeks * $7.25 = $1957.50 Why do minor league baseball players need to be exempt from being paid minimum wage and overtime if they're already getting paid more than minimum wage? $1100 a month / $7.25 = 152 hours /30 days ~ 5 hours/day Do you think that minor league players only put in an average of 5 hours of work per day? I'm not sure where $15 an hour came from, because if they were paid that, they'd be getting close to $5000 a month because they ARE working about 70 hours a week.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Sept 26, 2018 7:03:22 GMT -5
Second point is that the Marlins may look like they're losing 10s of millions last year, but how much did Loria make on the sale? Why did the Jeter group pay so much for the Marlins if it's just hopeless for them to make money? Is Loria struggling to find food and signing up for $50 speaking gigs on his 6 days off in 6 months? Are these billionaires dumb? Are they losing all their money and going broke owning baseball teams? One more thing since this question is unanswered and it at least has some semblance of a counterargument besides "screw rich people". Loria, according to his accountants, lost $140 million in the sale of the Marlins. @suttacbsmiami pbs.twimg.com/media/DVDJkHAVAAAC7cK.jpgBut don't let numbers get in the way of a good story. ROFL! He paid $300 million in income tax on the sale, but didn't make any money. Hahahahaha! Yeah, that's how income taxes work.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Sept 26, 2018 9:11:23 GMT -5
FFS we're not talking about everyone else. We're talking about minor league baseball players and that's it. Not jobs that can be outsourced to China and not plumbers that can drive 3 hours to lower their cost of living. We're talking about minor league players that have bosses that can afford, with absolutely no problem whatsoever, to pay them a living wage but are choosing not to. So your argument is that Baseball is special? That's what you are saying and it makes zero sense. News flash most bosses can afford to pay their workers more. Nevermind you keep worrying about Baseball, when the players get a much higher percentage of overall revenue than almost any other job. It makes no sense.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Sept 26, 2018 9:15:41 GMT -5
Going back to Law's original argument (which I agree beyond the surface doesn't make sense), minor league baseball is "worth" a certain amount to fans, as shown by tickets plus radio, stadium experience etc. Every collectively bargained league has a model that includes calculating that worth and giving players a certain percentage. Minor leaguers are also part of the major league worth (as evidenced by the passion of this very website, where no one would care except there is a major league team to graduate to) but are ignored in those calculations and treated as ancillary. They are getting screwed out of knowing the worth of the minor leagues and then contributions to major league worth (though I agree bonuses compensate for some of the latter) and getting their cut of that. According to Law minor league Baseball generates 200 million in Revenue. Now add up bonus money in the draft, bonus money for international players, and salary. It has to be around 300 to 400 million a year if not more. That is the part Law leaves out, all the bonus money. He's just looking at salary, which makes zero sense.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Sept 26, 2018 9:24:29 GMT -5
All minor leaguers besides those at the lowest level make above federal minimum wage, which is $7.25 an hour. $15 an hour is over double federal minimum wage. Heck even the highest state minimum wage is $11.50 an hour. I have zero issues giving that lower group like the $75 more dollars needed per month to reach minimum wage. Except that in the lower minors, they're paid $1100 a month and have mandatory club fees taken out of their checks. They're literally training for about 10 hour days, 7 days a week. That's under $5 an hour. They also are not paid for spring training at all. OTHERWISE, they would not have needed to pass this bill, exempting minor leagues from paying minimum wage or overtime! www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/5580/text?format=txtSEC. 2. MINIMUM WAGE AND OVERTIME HOURS EXEMPTIONS.If a player is training 60 hours a week (which is low), just to be paid $7.25 an hour, he would need to be paid almost $2000 a month. And he should be paid for every minute he's preparing for his job since that is his job, including spring training. 60 * 4.5 weeks * $7.25 = $1957.50 Why do minor league baseball players need to be exempt from being paid minimum wage and overtime if they're already getting paid more than minimum wage? $1100 a month / $7.25 = 152 hours /30 days ~ 5 hours/day Do you think that minor league players only put in an average of 5 hours of work per day? I'm not sure where $15 an hour came from, because if they were paid that, they'd be getting close to $5000 a month because they ARE working about 70 hours a week. The lawsuit according to the article I just read, stated 40 hours during the season and the 60 hours was during spring training. Which makes sense. Explain to me how a minor league player is working 10 hour days during the season? You think they workout like 6 hours before a game? Or after one? Where are you getting this information?
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Sept 26, 2018 11:51:44 GMT -5
Except that in the lower minors, they're paid $1100 a month and have mandatory club fees taken out of their checks. They're literally training for about 10 hour days, 7 days a week. That's under $5 an hour. They also are not paid for spring training at all. OTHERWISE, they would not have needed to pass this bill, exempting minor leagues from paying minimum wage or overtime! www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/5580/text?format=txtSEC. 2. MINIMUM WAGE AND OVERTIME HOURS EXEMPTIONS.If a player is training 60 hours a week (which is low), just to be paid $7.25 an hour, he would need to be paid almost $2000 a month. And he should be paid for every minute he's preparing for his job since that is his job, including spring training. 60 * 4.5 weeks * $7.25 = $1957.50 Why do minor league baseball players need to be exempt from being paid minimum wage and overtime if they're already getting paid more than minimum wage? $1100 a month / $7.25 = 152 hours /30 days ~ 5 hours/day Do you think that minor league players only put in an average of 5 hours of work per day? I'm not sure where $15 an hour came from, because if they were paid that, they'd be getting close to $5000 a month because they ARE working about 70 hours a week. The lawsuit according to the article I just read, stated 40 hours during the season and the 60 hours was during spring training. Which makes sense. Explain to me how a minor league player is working 10 hour days during the season? You think they workout like 6 hours before a game? Or after one? Where are you getting this information? Ah, so I guess the lawsuit was a complete waste of time, which is why mlb owners lobbied congress to not pay milb players minimum wage. Why did they waste their money on lobbying congress? Dumb billionaires with their money? Or you're wrong. The information is everywhere. You have clearly taken a side since you will not believe anything that goes against what you want to believe.
|
|
|
Post by swingingbunt on Sept 26, 2018 13:17:23 GMT -5
FFS we're not talking about everyone else. We're talking about minor league baseball players and that's it. Not jobs that can be outsourced to China and not plumbers that can drive 3 hours to lower their cost of living. We're talking about minor league players that have bosses that can afford, with absolutely no problem whatsoever, to pay them a living wage but are choosing not to. So your argument is that Baseball is special? That's what you are saying and it makes zero sense. News flash most bosses can afford to pay their workers more. Nevermind you keep worrying about Baseball, when the players get a much higher percentage of overall revenue than almost any other job. It makes no sense. News flash: Baseball has an anti-trust exemption from the government. Of course it's special. There's a lot of factors that keep players from making more money that don't apply to other environments including the fact that players can't just up and move to a different organization if they offer them more money.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Sept 26, 2018 13:20:32 GMT -5
I've read a bunch on this, the Federal lawsuit was the one using 40 and 60 hours as I broke it down. If they regulary work 70 like you claim, why wasn't that in the lawsuit? Please if there are tons of articles saying 70 hours during the season please post a couple. Should be rather easy, no?
The law passed that says they don't need to be paid for training camp and overtime, apllies if they make $1,1160 a month or more. The Goverment set that as meeting the minimum wage requirements. A few other things they get per diem of $25 per day, a $50,000 life insurance policy paid by the team and full health care 100% paid by the team. So they are getting good perks almost no other part time workers get. I want them to be paid for training camp, that only makes sense, but at there normal rate, not overtime.
Why did they lobby Congress? Simple so they didn't have to pay for spring training, overtime during spring training and have to worry about players going to state court trying to get state minimum wages rather than federal minimum wage. Congress told them $1,100 wasn't enough, you need to do $1,160. I don't agree about not paying for spring training, but this wasn't because they work 70 hour weeks all season long. Something I've yet to see after reading more than I should have on this topic.
Yes I clearly have a side, so do you. I'm willing to change my side if the facts are truly different than I think they are, but it seems like you are just making up extreme points to try and prove your point!
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Sept 26, 2018 13:52:53 GMT -5
So your argument is that Baseball is special? That's what you are saying and it makes zero sense. News flash most bosses can afford to pay their workers more. Nevermind you keep worrying about Baseball, when the players get a much higher percentage of overall revenue than almost any other job. It makes no sense. News flash: Baseball has an anti-trust exemption from the government. Of course it's special. There's a lot of factors that keep players from making more money that don't apply to other environments including the fact that players can't just up and move to a different organization if they offer them more money. You think that helps your point? They have that because Baseball is seen as a game and not interstate commerce. Which is a point a bunch of us have been making. If anything the fact Baseball has an anti-trust agreement helps my point. They are being paid to play a game, a game all of them have played for free there whole entire lifes. They can go get another job anytime they want and now have professional baseball player on their resume. They aren't forced into this, they all jump at the chance.
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Sept 26, 2018 14:06:13 GMT -5
The fact that you see professional baseball as a game and not a “real job” really goes a long way towards explaining your fundamental lack of empathy here. I mean, imagine having so much disdain for professional baseball players that you earnestly believe that MLB is not interstate commerce?
|
|
|
Post by swingingbunt on Sept 26, 2018 15:19:38 GMT -5
News flash: Baseball has an anti-trust exemption from the government. Of course it's special. There's a lot of factors that keep players from making more money that don't apply to other environments including the fact that players can't just up and move to a different organization if they offer them more money. You think that helps your point? They have that because Baseball is seen as a game and not interstate commerce. Which is a point a bunch of us have been making. If anything the fact Baseball has an anti-trust agreement helps my point. They are being paid to play a game, a game all of them have played for free there whole entire lifes. They can go get another job anytime they want and now have professional baseball player on their resume. They aren't forced into this, they all jump at the chance. So your first comment said these jobs are exactly like every other job, and when that gets proven wrong, you just say they're not jobs at all? You're just trolling at this point. Bye Felicia.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Sept 26, 2018 23:25:45 GMT -5
The last thing I'll say is I think this concept of MLB paying it's minor leaguers more is a long shot. The minor leaguers are at the mercy of the owners.
The teams control fully in what minor leaguers make. In order for minor leaguers to make more they probably need to form a union, which will probably never happen. All prospects will never call themselves equal. The top 100 prospects probably do not even care what they get paid outside of their bonus money until they reach the union in MLB.
Most of these minor leaguers can not afford to hold out if they do form a union. If they ever did hold out, I would predict half of the prospects would still play because of their goal to reach the majors. Teams would then probably hire scabs to fill the rest of the teams out and go from there. No one cares about the on field product of MiLB, especially the fans. There's no motivation to pay these guys more. People go to games to see the top prospects of the system, not to see the quality of the product.
All the owners risk by not paying these minor leaguers more is bad publicity by very few who care. Until these minor leaguers reach the majors or reach minor league free agency (where they get some control), I don't think there's anything that can be done.
|
|
cdj
Veteran
Posts: 15,896
|
Post by cdj on Sept 27, 2018 8:48:25 GMT -5
That argument is overly simple to the point of being ridiculous. Frankly, I'm sick of the whole argument of milb players getting paid. You chase a dream you take the risk. This whole argument goes away if you take out one of the A-ball levels so the 28 year-olds that can't face reality have to get real jobs. God forbid they get paid a livable wage
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Sept 27, 2018 10:12:47 GMT -5
The fact that you see professional baseball as a game and not a “real job” really goes a long way towards explaining your fundamental lack of empathy here. I mean, imagine having so much disdain for professional baseball players that you earnestly believe that MLB is not interstate commerce? Yea its as fundamentally sound as saying all player deserve more because the owners can afford it. Its is a game!
|
|
|
Post by James Dunne on Sept 27, 2018 10:15:23 GMT -5
The fact that you see professional baseball as a game and not a “real job” really goes a long way towards explaining your fundamental lack of empathy here. I mean, imagine having so much disdain for professional baseball players that you earnestly believe that MLB is not interstate commerce? Yea its as fundamentally sound as saying all player deserve more because the owners can afford it. Its is a game! It is also their profession. If someone undercuts you by doing a slightly worse job than you for cheaper, does it help your company do better, or does it just save the owner a few bucks? Well, baseball is supposed to be results (rather than profit) driven. It's not like the owners are using that extra cash they save to invest in other better players, cutting ticket prices, or some other innovative investment. They pocket it. And just in general labor always deserves a higher cut. Always.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Sept 27, 2018 11:01:58 GMT -5
Yea its as fundamentally sound as saying all player deserve more because the owners can afford it. Its is a game! It is also their profession. If someone undercuts you by doing a slightly worse job than you for cheaper, does it help your company do better, or does it just save the owner a few bucks? Well, baseball is supposed to be results (rather than profit) driven. It's not like the owners are using that extra cash they save to invest in other better players, cutting ticket prices, or some other innovative investment. They pocket it. And just in general labor always deserves a higher cut. Always. If you look at this as the whole economy you need lower labor. It keeps the cost of living down. Thus allowing the people that make more to live a good life. Yea it sucks, but its reality. Our economy needs cheap labor. Its why $100,000 a year in my area puts you in the top 5%, yet makes you middle class in a big city. Look at John Henry, yea he doesn't use profits to cut ticket prices, but he invests into more businesses. He invests in the stock market, etc. The ecomony needs large profits to grow. I would fully support a minor league system of pay based on results. Maybe a bonus system of some sort that pays you more based on results. Heck change the bonus system to spread the money around more fairly. I just have a hard time saying they deserves more like Keith Law said because minor league baseball generates 200 million a year in net revenue, yet teams spend like 400 million a year in bonus money and salary, not even counting the free health care.
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Sept 27, 2018 13:01:51 GMT -5
The fact that you see professional baseball as a game and not a “real job” really goes a long way towards explaining your fundamental lack of empathy here. I mean, imagine having so much disdain for professional baseball players that you earnestly believe that MLB is not interstate commerce? Yea its as fundamentally sound as saying all player deserve more because the owners can afford it. Its is a game! Denigrating baseball as “a game” fundamentally misunderstands the dynamic here. Major League Baseball is fundamentally a business that generates free cash flow at a rate that few other enterprises can match. In this day and age, being a professional baseball player shouldn’t be treated any differently than any other job, and that includes being subject to minimum wage protection and being paid for spring training and overtime. It’s funny, the posters who are prone to pseudo-economic arguments are loading up the discussion with non-economic value judgments just as often. See, e.g., it’s just a game, they should get a real job and the like. For what it’s worth, I’d be in favor of fewer but more highly-paid minor league positions.
|
|
|
Post by James Dunne on Sept 27, 2018 13:16:30 GMT -5
The ecomony needs large profits to grow. For everything else I disagree with, this is fundamentally bad and incorrect economic theory. The more money an individual (or corporation) has, the share of each additional dollar reinvested into the economy (whether through the purchase of goods, the hiring of additional labor, or direct investment) is actually smaller, slowing growth.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Sept 27, 2018 14:17:34 GMT -5
Yea its as fundamentally sound as saying all player deserve more because the owners can afford it. Its is a game! Denigrating baseball as “a game” fundamentally misunderstands the dynamic here. Major League Baseball is fundamentally a business that generates free cash flow at a rate that few other enterprises can match. In this day and age, being a professional baseball player shouldn’t be treated any differently than any other job, and that includes being subject to minimum wage protection and being paid for spring training and overtime. It’s funny, the posters who are prone to pseudo-economic arguments are loading up the discussion with non-economic value judgments just as often. See, e.g., it’s just a game, they should get a real job and the like. For what it’s worth, I’d be in favor of fewer but more highly-paid minor league positions. Major league Baseball overall makes a lot of money and the players are paid accordingly. The average salary is what 4 million a year? Anyone that gets to the Majors makes a ton. What started this is Keith Law talking about minor league Baseball having 200 million in net revenue. Which after the expenses of running and upkeep costs of those parks is likely not much in way of gross revenue. Which he clearly overlooks, nevermind the total yearly paid to minor leaguers including bonuses. Heck even using net revenue minor leaguers get double that. So the money being paid is more than fair. I fully agree pay for spring training, that should be a non-brainer. They have minimum wage protection, per Congress $1,160 meets that requirement on a federal level. Don't forget to add in benefits like free health care that other people pay a ton for and per diem of $25 a day. You can't just overlook those things like they don't get them. Nevermind this is just the lowest level of players, not everyone makes that amount. I don't agree about overtime during spring training. Its like being paid a salary. If someone can show me they truly work 60-70 hours during the season every week, they should get more. I just don't see how that is possible. I have no problem if you pay fewer people more, which is what will happen is the pay is greatly increased.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Sept 27, 2018 14:35:58 GMT -5
The ecomony needs large profits to grow. For everything else I disagree with, this is fundamentally bad and incorrect economic theory. The more money an individual (or corporation) has, the share of each additional dollar reinvested into the economy (whether through the purchase of goods, the hiring of additional labor, or direct investment) is actually smaller, slowing growth. It's 100% fundamentally correct. Your just saying that at a certain point, the more profits companies make will have less of an overall effect on the economy. It's the fatal flaw in trickle down economics. Its not that you don't need large profits, its when you give more profits to companies that already have huge profits they don't invest as much as they should. The point is you need to know and understand what that point is. No one is going to invest a 100 million to create a new plant if they get small profits. The risk is too great, they need to be large. Most of you guys are Lawyers right? You won't leave your job and open your own Law Firm, with all the risk that is involved to make just a little bit more. Well I should say most won't, some might just to be there own boss. You do it to make a lot more.
|
|
|