|
|
Post by texs31 on Dec 17, 2019 9:47:37 GMT -5
There are people who are starting to believe that Bjork is starting to "get it" and that, if placed on a top 2 line, there wouldn't be significant difference in production.
Personally, I'm with you. Not only do I think he's productive but I believe he's future captain material and would hate to seem him go. Only really listed him bc he's LH shot, a RFA next year (and will likely get more than a bridge deal so he'll need to clean up his inconsistency) and 1 of 3 "middle six" wingers that they have.
I admit, I'm probably trying to solve too many "problems" at once and that is dangerous.
|
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Dec 17, 2019 17:41:09 GMT -5
Tough to lose guys that you grow to like but that's the business side of it and it does make sense to try and manage that expansion draft. Might hurt depth but finally give them a really good second line.
|
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Dec 17, 2019 17:58:54 GMT -5
They have the 2nd best record in hockey even after a 5 game losing streak and an inordinate number of injuries. They have shown great depth so they are good problems to have.
Bjork just needs to stay healthy.
|
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Dec 17, 2019 19:10:17 GMT -5
Bruins might be interested in Kovalchuk report?
|
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Dec 17, 2019 19:20:13 GMT -5
Kuraly just missed the biggest open net I have ever seen, literally the whole net.
|
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Jan 19, 2020 9:50:16 GMT -5
I cannot stand that 25 of 31 teams in the NHL have "won" more games than they've "lost". Really wish they'd go back to ties and get rid of overtime losses and the shootout. A .500 record means something in all sports but the NHL. I have no idea what winning percentage a team needs in order to be average.
|
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jan 20, 2020 7:21:56 GMT -5
Backes and Ritchie have both been waived (and cleared). Ritchie already in Providence but Boston is giving DB until after the All-Star break to follow.
|
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Jan 20, 2020 10:31:34 GMT -5
I'm hoping the same thing for the B's as I am for the C's and that is they need the all star break to get right and back to winning in the second half of their seasons. Both teams are dealing with injuries and a tough schedule of late.
|
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Jan 22, 2020 19:17:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Feb 18, 2020 11:53:56 GMT -5
Been quiet on here for a while. So, heading into the deadline, who do you want?
- My ideal is Palmieri but I doubt he is moved.
- Liked the idea of Toffoli (RH Shot and seemingly less costly) more than Kreider but he's no longer an option (and the trade return was pretty high for a rental)
- Keeping hearing a lot of folks suggesting Kase from Anaheim. Scored 20+ 2 years ago. Was on a similar pace in a 30 game, injury-shortened season last year. Dropped this year. Is 24. RH shot and has 1 more year on his deal at reasonable money.
- Also keep hearing a lot of Josh Anderson. But his injuries and performance this year have me less than excited.
- I feel like Lauzon (despite being LH) has decreased the need for a bottom pair guy to guy with Grzelcyk.
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Feb 19, 2020 23:55:56 GMT -5
- Keeping hearing a lot of folks suggesting Kase from Anaheim. Scored 20+ 2 years ago. Was on a similar pace in a 30 game, injury-shortened season last year. Dropped this year. Is 24. RH shot and has 1 more year on his deal at reasonable money. Huge fan! Not sure how doable it is, but Kase is a really good skater. Not sure he's THE missing piece, but he's a piece! Anyway, I haven't watched the Bruins as much as I should have this season (it's like I can't dedicate enough attention to both them and the Celtics), but I watched the game tonight and what a great ending! Very intense stuff late in the 3rd, it felt like a playoff game. Big winner by Pasta which is always nice. |
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Feb 21, 2020 13:48:08 GMT -5
Bruins get Kase for Backes (agree to pay 25% of deal), Axel Andersson and 2020 1st.
Like the idea of Kase but would've been happier if he was the smaller of 2 pieces coming back (ie a 2nd trade for Palmieiri or someone of that ilk).
However, giving up that 1st to rid themselves of more of the Backes deal, likely prevents that.
|
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Feb 21, 2020 13:59:55 GMT -5
Meanwhile, Jimmy Murphy tweeted that another winger could be coming and Heinen and Moore are possibilities to be headed elsewhere.
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Feb 21, 2020 19:12:05 GMT -5
Bruins get Kase for Backes (agree to pay 25% of deal), Axel Andersson and 2020 1st. Like the idea of Kase but would've been happier if he was the smaller of 2 pieces coming back (ie a 2nd trade for Palmieiri or someone of that ilk). However, giving up that 1st to rid themselves of more of the Backes deal, likely prevents that. Getting rid of a heavy contract freeing up space to retain Krug and getting a legit good young player is absolutely worth the cost of a late 1st round pick. This is a home run and I'm very excited. |
|
|
|
Post by tizzle on Feb 21, 2020 21:57:22 GMT -5
Bruins get Kase for Backes (agree to pay 25% of deal), Axel Andersson and 2020 1st. Like the idea of Kase but would've been happier if he was the smaller of 2 pieces coming back (ie a 2nd trade for Palmieiri or someone of that ilk). However, giving up that 1st to rid themselves of more of the Backes deal, likely prevents that. Getting rid of a heavy contract freeing up space to retain Krug and getting a legit good young player is absolutely worth the cost of a late 1st round pick. This is a home run and I'm very excited. It wasn't the sexy move for the best possible piece, but a move for a solid player, and potentially more, while saving cap which could really pay off next year. So, everyone thought the 1st was gonna be dealt for a "go for the Cup now" move and instead it was a "go for the Cup the next two years" move. Don't think you can really argue with it. Was so impressed with Coyle and Johannson last year, hope this kid is a similar diamond. |
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Feb 22, 2020 9:51:38 GMT -5
Feel like Sweeney will make another move but likely not a big one:
1. Could move some 20-21 salary (Moore) to give them even more wiggle room next yr.
2. If Moore is traded, then I could see another depth trade on the blue line (someone who is UFA next yr). I like what Lauzon gives but you'd still like some veteran depth. So, in essence, a couple of moves that gives you what Moore gives you but without the salary next yr.
3. As said above, I dont see them being in on a Palmieri as it would likely require a 1st that they no longer have (unless you trade Studnicka which I think is a non-starter). Maybe there is a rental out there for another RW. But would they really be better than Heinen or Kuhlman (whomever ends up as 3RW)?
4. Could see a depth move on the wing.
|
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Feb 22, 2020 10:07:29 GMT -5
Feel like Sweeney will make another move but likely not a big one: 1. Could move some 20-21 salary (Moore) to give them even more wiggle room next yr. 2. If Moore is traded, then I could see another depth trade on the blue line (someone who is UFA next yr). I like what Lauzon gives but you'd still like some veteran depth. So, in essence, a couple of moves that gives you what Moore gives you but without the salary next yr. 3. As said above, I dont see them being in on a Palmieri as it would likely require a 1st that they no longer have (unless you trade Studnicka which I think is a non-starter). Maybe there is a rental out there for another RW. But would they really be better than Heinen or Kuhlman (whomever ends up as 3RW)? 4. Could see a depth move on the wing. I think Moore is an easy offseason move so I don’t think they’d be smart to move him now just to open salary for next year but he certainly could be part of a trade to help this years squad with losing next years salary being a bonus. |
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Feb 22, 2020 10:12:00 GMT -5
Yes. Wouldn't force that 1. Only mentioned it bc there seems to be interest from teams that could use a good bottom 4 guy for THEIR playoff push. The exchange in assets (what you get for Moore offsetting what you give up for Rental D Player X) would have to make sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Feb 24, 2020 12:59:08 GMT -5
Danton Heinen for Nick Ritchie.
Heinen was in that awkward spot of being better than his detractors say but worse than his supporters do. Don't mind that they traded him for someone who is:
1. Similar in age.
2. Has same length on his contract
3. But is cheaper by 1M
4. And plays a bigger/tougher game
|
|
|
|
Post by tizzle on Feb 24, 2020 15:49:49 GMT -5
Danton Heinen for Nick Ritchie. Heinen was in that awkward spot of being better than his detractors say but worse than his supporters do. Don't mind that they traded him for someone who is: 1. Similar in age. 2. Has same length on his contract 3. But is cheaper by 1M 4. And plays a bigger/tougher game Yeah, if all that move does is save $1m+ to put towards Krug next season, then thumbs up on it. But I'm guessing we mildly improved, as well. |
|
|
|
Post by jodyreidnichols on Mar 4, 2020 17:00:13 GMT -5
I cannot stand that 25 of 31 teams in the NHL have "won" more games than they've "lost". Really wish they'd go back to ties and get rid of overtime losses and the shootout. A .500 record means something in all sports but the NHL. I have no idea what winning percentage a team needs in order to be average. I'm going to take you literally. Add all the total games played by the total points. Divide points by games, that's your average and yes it is a pain in the ass to have to do that exercise to figure it out. |
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Mar 6, 2020 6:29:52 GMT -5
Drop the puck! prediction 112 points Combination of veterans not regressing from age yet, Rask Marchand Bergy and Kreiji Prime aged guys being solid and improved with Coyle The continued growth of the young guys, which is why my prediction is bold, Pastrnak DeBrusk Kuhlman McAvoy Carlo Heinen are all young which means they have room for growth. I think it is safe to say that my prediction of 112 points is pretty much a lock at this point as they are on pace for 118 with 14 games left. They should be motivated enough to win the Presidents Cup and home ice even with some reduced minutes for the older core. This could be their best shot at a Cup for a long time. Bergey, Kreiji and Marchand aren't getting any younger and their trajectory is downward at this point or coming soon, like Chara. Can't expect them to be dominant in their mid 30's, very good but not dominant, which is what they have been for awhile now. A Stanley Cup would be really nice right now given the situations the Sox and Patriots find themselves, we could use another parade to soothe the nerves. LOL That would make 13 and it has been a year so we are due. |
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Aug 15, 2020 11:26:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Aug 15, 2020 12:16:47 GMT -5
Ok, so who I'm supposed to blame if we don't win it? Is there enough time to get the "Pasta is never healthy in the playoffs" narrative going strong?
|
|
|
|
Post by dmaineah on Aug 17, 2020 22:01:33 GMT -5
What a game!
|
|
