SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
|
Post by texs31 on Apr 7, 2020 13:50:26 GMT -5
Speaking of Kyed, he's done a couple of mock drafts using FanSpeak's On the Clock (Premium). I paid the 9 dollars and it's pretty good. You can customize your own board or pick from a list of available ones. You can make a receive trade offers.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 8, 2020 16:06:13 GMT -5
If I'm dropping down from 23 I want an extra pick in the top four rounds, not just moving other picks up. Mainly because we know the chances are Bill will ship a pick for a future one.
The Patterson trade comes to mind, even though we got less value, we got a 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 7th round pick.
Early 20s picks always seem to have players drop to them, it's just do we value the player or can we get a big return from another team for that player.
I've had a feeling the experts like they always do have been too high on the QBs and we are finally starting to see that in a few mocks. I don't buy three go in the top 6, two have some big question marks and a lot of teams have drafted QBs recently.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 8, 2020 17:13:41 GMT -5
I take back what I said about Sanu. I did not realize he was at 6.5m.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Apr 9, 2020 8:48:59 GMT -5
This draft is going to be fascinating, and I expect complete chaos and multiple clock stoppages as teams have trouble getting the information in on time. The lack of war rooms will be much more of a problem for teams with shared decision makers than the Patriots. I wonder if all else is equal, would Bill rather load up in this draft or push picks into 2021? There are arguments for both sides. I think that the number of question marks coming into this season are so long and diverse that it is likely a bit of a bridge year. The virus effect on season? Will their even be a season. When does it start. When will they start training. QB performance? TE ? WR ? LB ? OL with no Dante? Kicker ? So many questions to be answered and so little cap space to be helpful makes this a year to try and answer many with draft picks and focus more on 2021. When it comes to the virus the risk on the season is twofold. If they lift restrictions too early with the hope that it is mostly behind us the significant risk is it comes back and kills most of the season with further social distancing. If they play it safe and delay lifting restrictions the training starts when? With all the turnover the Pats are going to need all the training they can get. Seems to me it is an opportune time to reload thru the draft if possible. It will be interesting.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Apr 9, 2020 10:30:49 GMT -5
I think Doug (and I) have been using the old Trade Value Chart (where the proposed trade above fails miserably).
May need some updating.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,044
|
Post by mobaz on Apr 9, 2020 12:24:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 9, 2020 14:28:40 GMT -5
www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.aspI use this one, they talk about Bill and even give you a link to Rich Hills new one. I like that you can highlight your teams picks. Like the trade Texas was talking about was 865.5 to 866.2 using this model. The Patterson trade was 640 to 610 using this model. Which is funny because I love that trade but our value was a little low. Yet you turned a late first into a 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 7th round pick. We got Collins, Mitchell and Ryan.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,044
|
Post by mobaz on Apr 10, 2020 7:29:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 11, 2020 6:28:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 11, 2020 6:39:13 GMT -5
What you see a lot more of now than before is like the Cooks trade Houston sends a second, gets back a fourth. That equals basically a third, yet teams would rather trade the second and get the fourth than just send the third. They don't lose picks that way.
If I'm Houston I love that type of trade, not so much if I'm the Rams. I'd rather have the third and fourth round picks. Yet that's just me, the drafts a crapshoot. I want as many picks as I can get, espically in the top five rounds.
It's why if we trade our first I want extra higher round picks, not just upgrading our picks. I want more chances, not just ungraded chances.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Apr 11, 2020 12:14:09 GMT -5
What you see a lot more of now than before is like the Cooks trade Houston sends a second, gets back a fourth. That equals basically a third, yet teams would rather trade the second and get the fourth than just send the third. They don't lose picks that way. If I'm Houston I love that type of trade, not so much if I'm the Rams. I'd rather have the third and fourth round picks. Yet that's just me, the drafts a crapshoot. I want as many picks as I can get, espically in the top five rounds. It's why if we trade our first I want extra higher round picks, not just upgrading our picks. I want more chances, not just ungraded chances. umass you're totally not defending the Hopkins trade AND the Cooks trade for Houston. They grossly downgraded their receiving corps and got like basically no draft return for their trouble.
|
|
|
Post by beasleyrockah on Apr 11, 2020 13:19:25 GMT -5
What you see a lot more of now than before is like the Cooks trade Houston sends a second, gets back a fourth. That equals basically a third, yet teams would rather trade the second and get the fourth than just send the third. They don't lose picks that way. If I'm Houston I love that type of trade, not so much if I'm the Rams. I'd rather have the third and fourth round picks. Yet that's just me, the drafts a crapshoot. I want as many picks as I can get, espically in the top five rounds. It's why if we trade our first I want extra higher round picks, not just upgrading our picks. I want more chances, not just ungraded chances. The fourth round pick Houston is receiving is for the 2022 draft. Picks are roughly downgraded one round for every year you have to wait, so the 2022 4th is closer in value to a 2020 late 5th or 6th round pick. As far as the 2nd rounder vs a 3rd and 4th, the Rams could always use that pick to trade down and add more picks. According to the Rich Hill draft value chart, the 2nd rounder is worth 95.73 pts, while the Texans 3rd and 4th (originally from Miami) would've net a combined 73.16 pts. I do agree that the 3rd round is the real sweet spot value wise in this draft, especially the beginning/middle of the 3rd (the quality may drop off a bit by the end of the 3rd where the Pats comp picks sit). The other value will come in the form of UDFA's, there will be a ton of draftable guys available after this draft.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 11, 2020 16:21:00 GMT -5
I don’t think he defended the Hopkins trade just said there had to be more to it like a contract which there was. Still a bad trade.
The cooks deal was good when analyzed by itself.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 11, 2020 17:18:25 GMT -5
I mean trading Hopkins for a second isn't great value. Yet he wasn't going to report without a new deal, even with three years left on his old deal that had him as the #7 paid WR.
So I get not liking the value, but I also get trading him. I'm not paying a possession receiver, even one as good as Hopkins 20 or more million when he has three years left on his deal. I get a coach not wanting to deal with a Bell like situation when the whole off-season and maybe even into the games is about when Hopkins will report.
I don't mind the Cooks trade with his Salary at $12 million, yet it isn't the best fit either. He's another smaller speed receiver when they already have two of them. We'll have to see what they do. At the same time they now have three darn good deep threats to open up the field.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 11, 2020 17:25:55 GMT -5
What you see a lot more of now than before is like the Cooks trade Houston sends a second, gets back a fourth. That equals basically a third, yet teams would rather trade the second and get the fourth than just send the third. They don't lose picks that way. If I'm Houston I love that type of trade, not so much if I'm the Rams. I'd rather have the third and fourth round picks. Yet that's just me, the drafts a crapshoot. I want as many picks as I can get, espically in the top five rounds. It's why if we trade our first I want extra higher round picks, not just upgrading our picks. I want more chances, not just ungraded chances. The fourth round pick Houston is receiving is for the 2022 draft. Picks are roughly downgraded one round for every year you have to wait, so the 2022 4th is closer in value to a 2020 late 5th or 6th round pick. As far as the 2nd rounder vs a 3rd and 4th, the Rams could always use that pick to trade down and add more picks. According to the Rich Hill draft value chart, the 2nd rounder is worth 95.73 pts, while the Texans 3rd and 4th (originally from Miami) would've net a combined 73.16 pts. I do agree that the 3rd round is the real sweet spot value wise in this draft, especially the beginning/middle of the 3rd (the quality may drop off a bit by the end of the 3rd where the Pats comp picks sit). The other value will come in the form of UDFA's, there will be a ton of draftable guys available after this draft. Very interesting draft in that players are all over the place more than normal because it's so deep. You have legit 12-13 WRs that are ranked top 100 guys. So either they fall or it will cause other players to fall. Rankings are never the same for everyone, but I don't know if I remember so many guys being so different depending who you go by either.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Apr 11, 2020 18:26:01 GMT -5
So I get not liking the value, but I also get trading him. I'm not paying a possession receiver, even one as good as Hopkins 20 or more million when he has three years left on his deal. I get a coach not wanting to deal with a Bell like situation when the whole off-season and maybe even into the games is about when Hopkins will report. I understand that and like RJP explained, it's fair to ponder that deal as an inevitability. They probably had to deal him. Still, it's hard to deny they inexplicably sold low on Hopkins since it wasn't a Mookie situation yet and overpaid for a guy that looked positively toast last season. BoB is a chaos agent.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,044
|
Post by mobaz on Apr 12, 2020 8:05:14 GMT -5
I think Houston compounded a bad movie with a bad move. I think the 2nd would have yielded a more impactful receiver than Cooks. And I don't think a top tier team should ever trade Hopkins.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 12, 2020 11:20:26 GMT -5
I think Houston compounded a bad movie with a bad move. I think the 2nd would have yielded a more impactful receiver than Cooks. And I don't think a top tier team should ever trade Hopkins. Rookie receivers almost always take time to make big impacts. Sure you can find examples but it’s a low likelihood.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 12, 2020 13:51:01 GMT -5
So I get not liking the value, but I also get trading him. I'm not paying a possession receiver, even one as good as Hopkins 20 or more million when he has three years left on his deal. I get a coach not wanting to deal with a Bell like situation when the whole off-season and maybe even into the games is about when Hopkins will report. I understand that and like RJP explained, it's fair to ponder that deal as an inevitability. They probably had to deal him. Still, it's hard to deny they inexplicably sold low on Hopkins since it wasn't a Mookie situation yet and overpaid for a guy that looked positively toast last season. BoB is a chaos agent. How so? They shopped him around to multiple teams. They took the best offer. They didn't create this mess, Hopkins did by saying he wouldn't report without a new deal. Hopkins on his deal is worth a lot more than they got. Hopkins needing a new five year deal at 20 plus million isn't worth more than they got frankly. You can't leave out the context here. So how did they inexplicably sell low? You either pay him, trade him, or call his bluff. I would never redo a contract with three years on it unless he was grossly underpaid and he wasn't. I wouldn't try and call his bluff because that can get ugly in a hurry and destroy a season. What would you have done?
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 12, 2020 13:53:11 GMT -5
I think Houston compounded a bad movie with a bad move. I think the 2nd would have yielded a more impactful receiver than Cooks. And I don't think a top tier team should ever trade Hopkins. Rookie receivers almost always take time to make big impacts. Sure you can find examples but it’s a low likelihood. I bet they still take one, this was just a hedge type move to make sure they can compete next year and keep Watson happy.
|
|
|
Post by ghostofrussgibson on Apr 12, 2020 16:41:41 GMT -5
So, does Belichick look at Love or other QBs... trade down... or maybe go defense in the first round?
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Apr 12, 2020 16:47:56 GMT -5
How so? They shopped him around to multiple teams. They took the best offer. They didn't create this mess, Hopkins did by saying he wouldn't report without a new deal. Didn't that come out after the trade was done?
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 13, 2020 1:50:01 GMT -5
How so? They shopped him around to multiple teams. They took the best offer. They didn't create this mess, Hopkins did by saying he wouldn't report without a new deal. Didn't that come out after the trade was done? Yeah to the public, not the teams involved.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 13, 2020 2:27:10 GMT -5
So, does Belichick look at Love or other QBs... trade down... or maybe go defense in the first round? That's the thing about Bill you just never know, he could do anything. Recent picks at RB and WR in the first fully cemented that. I don't know everything about Love, yet he certainly fits the profile of guys the draft experts over hype. They do it with all QBs. Mahomes just won a Superbowl and now a QB like him seems to be getting a lot of attention. The funny thing is Love is kinda like Stidham. Had a much better year before the last one when they both lost a lot of talent. Love likely has a little more upside, yet also threw a lot more interceptions and comes from a small school. While Stidham played at Baylor and Auburn. Both are athletic QBs that can throw on the run and make plays with their feet. Love is more upside and potential, where Stidham was a high IQ type guy. Draft Magazines had Stidham as a 2-3 guy that once had the look of franchise type QB, Love is 1-2 with a slightly higher ceiling but a lot more bust potential. Just my two cents because you never know with Bill, I don't see Love at 23 though.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 13, 2020 6:13:09 GMT -5
Rookie receivers almost always take time to make big impacts. Sure you can find examples but it’s a low likelihood. I bet they still take one, this was just a hedge type move to make sure they can compete next year and keep Watson happy. Sure they’ll likely take a receiver but they probably did that with or without any of these deals.
|
|
|