SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Netflix: The Comeback 2004 Red Sox
|
Post by incandenza on Oct 28, 2024 10:03:09 GMT -5
Only one thing is certain: If that trade had gone through and the Sox had won with A-Rod, most of us would insist that he was just misunderstood. I insist that anyways! I usually have a soft spot for players that "everyone hates," because none of us actually know these people and to the extent we do it's only through the media; so if they come across poorly, all we can infer is that they're bad at performing for the media. Which, if anything, might reflect well on their basic integrity and virtue. Conversely, I tend to be suspicious of the players that "everyone loves," where all we can infer is that they're good at performing for the media, which probably means they're creepy phonies. Like Derek Jeter. The Jeter/AlexRod dichotomy perfectly illustrates this whole dynamic.
(But I did enjoy the part of the documentary where Theo describes meeting Alex in his hotel room at 2am and Alex was dressed in a business suit and was, to quote Theo, "a little bit full of shit." Theo in general gave a delightfully candid interview for this thing.)
(Schilling, by the way, looks about 80 now. Bronson Arroyo looks 35. How were they teammates?)
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on Oct 28, 2024 11:42:13 GMT -5
- I thought the Grady hate was a little gratuitous. He was a typical baseball man of his generation, and the players liked him at the time as I recall. Leaving Pedro in was outrageous as it was happening, but probably wouldn't have been perceived as such five years earlier. It's on the Red Sox management for having him in that position and giving him the autonomy he had. The owners and Theo having him be the one person in the world they're openly contemptuous of in public is kinda weird. I don't like that the filmmakers came into his home and didn't do much beyond humiliate him further.
- Theo claimed that at the time he was furious with Grady for letting Pedro go through the Yankees third time through the order, which I thought was funny. Pedro's splits later in the game, or after so many pitches, were well known and probably talked about in the papers, but "third time through the order" effects were not on anybody's radar until years later
- I had almost completely forgotten about the negative vibes around Manny. Everyone loves him now.
- The ARod counterfactual is interesting. Ordonez was in his walk year. Who goes to LF in 2005? JD Drew was a free agent coming off his best season. They don't sign Edgar Renteria to replace Nomar/Cabarera, which means they don't end up with Coco Crisp after that. Lester being such a huge success is another wild domino. If you want to go full butterfly effect, maybe they're not quite so keen on drafting a low ceiling, quick to the majors middle infielder early in the 2004 draft.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Oct 28, 2024 14:01:46 GMT -5
Haven't watched yet but listened to the Section 10 episode with Colin Barnicle (the director), which was a great listen. As far as missing people, apparently Bellhorn legit just doesn't talk and doesn't come back to any of the reunions they've had, etc. Millar has apparently joked that Bellhorn says 1 word a month or something.
He actually had an anecdote on there I hadn't heard that Fox tried to set up one of those NFL cameras that's tethered to the top of the stadium between the two foul poles the day of game 1 if the WS, and they almost tore the Pesky Pole down 2 hours before the game. It was apparently bent at a 45 degree angle.
Very funny, entertaining interview.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Oct 28, 2024 14:04:42 GMT -5
- The ARod counterfactual is interesting. Ordonez was in his walk year. Who goes to LF in 2005? JD Drew was a free agent coming off his best season. They don't sign Edgar Renteria to replace Nomar/Cabarera, which means they don't end up with Coco Crisp after that. Lester being such a huge success is another wild domino. If you want to go full butterfly effect, maybe they're not quite so keen on drafting a low ceiling, quick to the majors middle infielder early in the 2004 draft. Don't forget though that FA comp used to be ludicrous. They'd have gotten a first rounder if Mags walked. The penalty for signing a FA wasn't as bad as the comp you got back for signing one, so it created an incentive to cycle free agents.
|
|
|
Post by soxin8 on Oct 28, 2024 17:38:18 GMT -5
The compensation used to be lose one pick if you sign a free agent but get two picks if you lose one. Theo gamed the system after 2004 if you look at that 2005 draft.
I remember Lowe complaining that Boston never contacted him after offering him arb because Theo wanted the two draft picks.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Oct 29, 2024 10:52:11 GMT -5
The compensation used to be lose one pick if you sign a free agent but get two picks if you lose one. Theo gamed the system after 2004 if you look at that 2005 draft. I remember Lowe complaining that Boston never contacted him after offering him arb because Theo wanted the two draft picks. That's right, thank you. I think you got 2 for a Type A and 1 for a Type B? I remember one year they either signed or traded for Ricky Gutierrez in August or something with no intent to play him just because he somehow was a Type B free agent who had compensation attached.
|
|
|
Post by greatscottcooper on Oct 29, 2024 12:23:42 GMT -5
I find it insane you used to be able to trade for a guy at the deadline who was a looming free agent and still get draft pick compensation.
Jacoby Ellsbury and Jed Lowrie were the result of Orlando Cabrera.
I get why they don’t do that anymore, but trade deadlines back then were much more……tradey.
|
|
|
Post by Oregon Norm on Oct 29, 2024 12:32:09 GMT -5
The first person stuff is always the best. All the pain and then the release and joy for the players and how cathartic that was. Here's the "comeback" after the comeback...
|
|
|
Post by scottysmalls on Oct 29, 2024 16:48:15 GMT -5
Just watched this and as someone who was a child in ‘04 just did not really realize a lot of this. The extent of the Nomar drama in particular stood out. Also Theo called an individual a “Red Sock” rather than a “Red Sox” which I’m surprised hasn’t been called out here yet
|
|
shagworthy
Veteran
My neckbeard game is on point.
Posts: 1,857
|
Post by shagworthy on Oct 29, 2024 16:58:10 GMT -5
- I thought the Grady hate was a little gratuitous. He was a typical baseball man of his generation, and the players liked him at the time as I recall. Leaving Pedro in was outrageous as it was happening, but probably wouldn't have been perceived as such five years earlier. It's on the Red Sox management for having him in that position and giving him the autonomy he had. The owners and Theo having him be the one person in the world they're openly contemptuous of in public is kinda weird. I don't like that the filmmakers came into his home and didn't do much beyond humiliate him further. - Theo claimed that at the time he was furious with Grady for letting Pedro go through the Yankees third time through the order, which I thought was funny. Pedro's splits later in the game, or after so many pitches, were well known and probably talked about in the papers, but "third time through the order" effects were not on anybody's radar until years later - I had almost completely forgotten about the negative vibes around Manny. Everyone loves him now. - The ARod counterfactual is interesting. Ordonez was in his walk year. Who goes to LF in 2005? JD Drew was a free agent coming off his best season. They don't sign Edgar Renteria to replace Nomar/Cabarera, which means they don't end up with Coco Crisp after that. Lester being such a huge success is another wild domino. If you want to go full butterfly effect, maybe they're not quite so keen on drafting a low ceiling, quick to the majors middle infielder early in the 2004 draft. Agreed on Grady, they did him dirty, hindsight is one thing, but trotting him out there for the special just to take a steaming dump on him is pretty low brow, even if there is truth to the outrage. Ultimately 04 happened, at that point it should have been put to bed.
|
|
|
Post by scottysmalls on Oct 29, 2024 17:01:08 GMT -5
Re; Grady, yeah maybe they should be over it, but also if I put myself in Theo’s shoes he probably had told Grady not to let Pedro throw that many pitches (whether or not he knew it was 3tto yet), and probably had been asking to replace him for his inability to accept analytics for a while, and probably still feels like they would have won in ‘03 had he been allowed a different manager or had Little listened, and for a super competitive guy at a time that was super emotionally charged it probably would still be frustrating to think about.
Kudos to Grady though for taking part
|
|
|
Post by chaimtime on Oct 29, 2024 17:18:38 GMT -5
Just watched this and as someone who was a child in ‘04 just did not really realize a lot of this. The extent of the Nomar drama in particular stood out. Also Theo called an individual a “Red Sock” rather than a “Red Sox” which I’m surprised hasn’t been called out here yet My understand has always been that the singular version of Red Sox is still written Red Sox but pronounced Red Sock
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 16,642
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Oct 29, 2024 18:35:14 GMT -5
Re; Grady, yeah maybe they should be over it, but also if I put myself in Theo’s shoes he probably had told Grady not to let Pedro throw that many pitches (whether or not he knew it was 3tto yet), and probably had been asking to replace him for his inability to accept analytics for a while, and probably still feels like they would have won in ‘03 had he been allowed a different manager or had Little listened, and for a super competitive guy at a time that was super emotionally charged it probably would still be frustrating to think about. Kudos to Grady though for taking part From what I remember of the topic Theo was kind of caught in the middle. Ownership installed Grady Little as manager to kind of appease the players who were very unhappy with Dan Duquette firing Jimy Williams in August 2001 and then replacing him with pitching coach Joe Kerrigan, whom the players despised. There was a very unhappy dour clubhouse Henry and Company inherited when they bought the team in Dec 2001. Grady Little had been a coach under Jimy Williams and the players loved him, so new ownership scored instant points with the players. Problem is they discovered he ran counter to the new age way they wanted to run the organization. Theo became GM in the 2002-03 offseason and inherited Grady Little. He liked Little personally but sided with his bosses. I think he tried to influence Grady to look at the stats to help him keep his job but Grady rejected the stat work. Ownership was very disenchanted with Little by June 2003 and Henry wanted to fire him then. And that feeling grew as the season progressed. Eventually they got the smoking gun they needed to fire Grady Little, although I truly believe Henry wanted to fire him in the 8th inning Game 7 ALCS. As an aside, it was fantastic when Henry was truly engaged with running the Sox. Theo found the perfect combo of a players manager, like Grady, that had some modern tech savvy, although in retrospect I think Francona was probably more old school than they let on, as Francona left Pedro in too long in a game against the Yankees in Sept 2004 where Pedro lost the lead in the 8th inning, and was calling the Yankees his daddy after the game. Worse, he left Pedro in too long in Game 5, where he was losing it, gave up a 3 run double to Jeter to fall behind and needed a great Trot Nixon catch to keep the deficit at 4-2, rather than 7-2. Francona got away with the non-move. That said, Francona made a lot of right decisions that post season and he became the ultimate players managers as he did a fantastic job managing those big personalities. Francona truly was and still is a fantastic manager.
|
|
|
Post by lesnessman on Oct 29, 2024 23:01:06 GMT -5
Loved the show. Wish Bellhorn and Cabrera would have gotten more attention. Both were important pieces. Same with Timlin and Embree. I remember at the time the Garciaparra trade and I hated it. I was one who did not think Theo got nearly enough. Probably best I keep my opinions to myself... Derek Lowe was so money. On a related note, would anyone know which edition the Boston Globe printed the following: www.bostonglobe.com/2024/10/24/sports/red-sox-2004-world-series-memories/My story got published and I would love to get a copy. I am an online subscriber but don't have access to the paper edition. Thanks in advance,
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Oct 30, 2024 10:34:30 GMT -5
As I recall (memory of course being very fallible), Little did that kind of thing all year long. Old-timey baseball stuff that had since been pushed against if not debunked. I remember that being one of my first experiences with pushing against an oversimplified narrative - that he was fired because he didn't take Pedro out of that specific game like it was the only time something like that had happened.
Fwiw nobody made Little do the interview. Colin Barnicle, IIRC, said he thought Little might say no when they asked him. But at any rate, the team didn't make this - it's Barnicle and Netflix. You can't truly tell the story of the 04 team well without 2003, which means you have to talk about Grady Little.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,036
|
Post by mobaz on Oct 30, 2024 11:14:23 GMT -5
Watched an episode a night, and finished last night. I loved the doc, but as others said I also thought so much got missed. Great timing with Boone and Roberts at the WS managers. It was fun reminiscing but also crazy that we then went on to win 3 more! My wife had a ton of questions but also loved it, and now she wants the same treatment for "the year with the beards" since we were together and watching that one live. I might pull out the 2013 DVD tonight, if I can find a player.
|
|
|
Post by Oregon Norm on Oct 30, 2024 11:53:14 GMT -5
As I said above, the first person stuff is the best. That includes honest assessments of what people were feeling and saying at that time. That includes Theo Epstein and John Henry. The latter's talk about asking if he could fire Little on the spot was an inside joke at the time for his partner, while Epstein's take on what happened was just about as frustrated. I remember my own reaction, I walked away from viewing what came next since the mistake was obvious to me. There was no way Martinez should have still been on the mound. I wasn't surprised at the result and it had me shaking my head. Little's had a while to think about it and to his credit he was willing to sit and talk to the camera. I'll bet he understood what the frame would look like.
|
|
|
Post by jodyreidnichols on Oct 30, 2024 18:11:44 GMT -5
It brought back all the loathing and disgust I had for the TV broadcasters verbally humping the Yankees and putting the Sox down. There was plenty of bad behaivor and villians in the series on both sides but the National Broadcaster were sycophants to NY. Watching episode 1 rekindled a hatred for a fan base I hadn't felt in decades. Well produced.
Edit: When the asked Varitek what Wakefield meant to him and he simply said, "Friend" and you could see him look up and choke back some, it was a gut punch, nah it's just allergies.
|
|
jimoh
Veteran
Posts: 4,171
|
Post by jimoh on Oct 31, 2024 6:09:54 GMT -5
One thing they left out, maybe because it had been covered before: no interview with Timlim on Pedro being left in. If I remember correctly there was a great shot of Timlin in the bullpen with his arms on the wall looking on in amazement as Pedro continued to pitch. Unless I dreamed that!
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 16,642
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Oct 31, 2024 11:37:25 GMT -5
One thing they left out, maybe because it had been covered before: no interview with Timlim on Pedro being left in. If I remember correctly there was a great shot of Timlin in the bullpen with his arms on the wall looking on in amazement as Pedro continued to pitch. Unless I dreamed that! I think they showed a clip of Timlin during that 8th inning asking Embree if he was ready and they both said they were. My guess is Embree would have had first crack as they had mostly lefties coming up, if the Sox had been managed competently
|
|
briam
Veteran
Posts: 1,189
|
Post by briam on Oct 31, 2024 12:17:03 GMT -5
It brought back all the loathing and disgust I had for the TV broadcasters verbally humping the Yankees and putting the Sox down. There was plenty of bad behaivor and villians in the series on both sides but the National Broadcaster were sycophants to NY. Watching episode 1 rekindled a hatred for a fan base I hadn't felt in decades. Well produced. The absolute worst was the “He’s just looking for a reason!” Call about Manny when just seconds earlier Clemens said he was looking to get the Sox back. I’m not usually one to cry the announcers hate my team, but between that and the Zimmerman overreaction it was pretty shameful.
|
|
|