SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
5/24 ML Gameday Thread: Johnson, Ball & Jimenez pitching
|
Post by Jonathan Singer on May 24, 2015 8:44:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by amfox1 on May 24, 2015 10:34:42 GMT -5
Should be obvious, but Diaz activated from TIA.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on May 24, 2015 10:43:01 GMT -5
Should be obvious, but Diaz activated from TIA. Spot opened up by Miller to Pawtucket yesterday.
|
|
|
Post by gregblossersbelly on May 24, 2015 17:38:20 GMT -5
Trey Ball haters fess up. Good outing. Still don't think the K rate is good. 5 1/3 with 5!hits and 3 bb's with no runs allowed. 2 k's.
|
|
|
Post by mgoetze on May 24, 2015 17:42:47 GMT -5
Trey Ball haters fess up. Good outing. Still don't think the K rate is good. 5 1/3 with 5!hits and 3 bb's with no runs allowed. 2 k's. I'm not a Ball hater - in fact I don't get into judging prospects below AAA at all - but I don't consider 3 BB 2 K a good outing for any pitcher at any level.
|
|
|
Post by chavopepe2 on May 24, 2015 17:46:17 GMT -5
Trey Ball haters fess up. Good outing. Still don't think the K rate is good. 5 1/3 with 5!hits and 3 bb's with no runs allowed. 2 k's. Yeah, that's not a good outing.
|
|
ericmvan
Veteran
Supposed to be working on something more important
Posts: 8,924
|
Post by ericmvan on May 24, 2015 19:13:25 GMT -5
Trey Ball haters fess up. Good outing. Still don't think the K rate is good. 5 1/3 with 5!hits and 3 bb's with no runs allowed. 2 k's. Yeah, that's not a good outing. Hmm ... the three walks (and a wild pitch) came in a stretch of five batters in the middle of the outing, which suggests a temporary loss of mechanics rather than command difficulties. There were no line drives hit at all. He went into the fifth working on a one-hitter, which was an infield single, and then gave up singles to four of his last seven hitters -- another infield single, and three fly balls. Infield and fly ball singles are almost never hit hard, either. I think that if 18 guys hit the ball off you and none makes hard contact, that's a good outing. Most A-ball hitters do not have the patience to lay off pitches that look good but really can't be hit hard, and it's hard to strike guys out when they hit the first or second strike weakly into play. Of course, this hypothesis will be impossible to test, because by the time he faces better hitters, he'll presumably have improved his own stuff. But I would never get discouraged about a prospect well-regard by scouts (check Chaz's re-tweets) who is succeeding in the low minors with a legitimate BABIP skill rather than strikeouts. At worst, I'd stay agnostic with a wait-and-see attitude.
|
|
|
Post by jmei on May 24, 2015 19:27:54 GMT -5
You're assuming the conclusion. We don't know if he has a legitimate BABIP skill or whether he's just been lucky, and the sample sizes have been far too small to assume the former rather than the latter. That's especially true when you're relying exclusively on minor league batted ball classifications to assume that he gave up no hard contact.
|
|
ericmvan
Veteran
Supposed to be working on something more important
Posts: 8,924
|
Post by ericmvan on May 24, 2015 19:46:45 GMT -5
You're assuming the conclusion. We don't know if he has a legitimate BABIP skill or whether he's just been lucky, and the sample sizes have been far too small to assume the former rather than the latter. That's especially true when you're relying exclusively on minor league batted ball classifications to assume that he gave up no hard contact. Well, I certainly should have said "appears to be succeeding so far" via the skill. And it's true that minor league batted ball discriminations between fly balls and line drives are sketchy. But he has a 6.9% LD% since his first start of the season, which is 11.4% for three starts and 4.2% in his last three. To put that in perspective, Alex Cobb led MLB qualifying pitchers last year with 16.4%, and Pat Neshek led those with 60 IP or more with 11.2%. As sketchy as those batted ball judgments are, I think it's seriously unlikely that he allowed 19 line drives in those six starts and had 11 scored as fly balls instead (including 12 line drives with 9 gifts by the scorer in his last three starts)-- which would bring his LD% up just to match Cobb's. IOW, his variance from average has been much larger than the error bars in the metric.
|
|
|
Post by chavopepe2 on May 24, 2015 19:59:55 GMT -5
You're assuming the conclusion. We don't know if he has a legitimate BABIP skill or whether he's just been lucky, and the sample sizes have been far too small to assume the former rather than the latter. That's especially true when you're relying exclusively on minor league batted ball classifications to assume that he gave up no hard contact. Well, I certainly should have said "appears to be succeeding so far" via the skill. And it's true that minor league batted ball discriminations between fly balls and line drives are sketchy. But he has a 6.9% LD% since his first start of the season, which is 11.4% for three starts and 4.2% in his last three. To put that in perspective, Alex Cobb led MLB qualifying pitchers last year with 16.4%, and Pat Neshek led those with 60 IP or more with 11.2%. As sketchy as those batted ball judgments are, I think it's seriously unlikely that he allowed 19 line drives in those six starts and had 11 scored as fly balls instead (including 12 line drives with 9 gifts by the scorer in his last three starts)-- which would bring his LD% up just to match Cobb's. IOW, his variance from average has been much larger than the error bars in the metric. I think you'd be surprised at how random the differentiation is between line drives and fly balls in single A. His GB% was 41.4% coming into this game. I doubt the scoring is accurate.
|
|
|
Post by jmei on May 24, 2015 20:13:58 GMT -5
You're assuming the conclusion. We don't know if he has a legitimate BABIP skill or whether he's just been lucky, and the sample sizes have been far too small to assume the former rather than the latter. That's especially true when you're relying exclusively on minor league batted ball classifications to assume that he gave up no hard contact. Well, I certainly should have said "appears to be succeeding so far" via the skill. And it's true that minor league batted ball discriminations between fly balls and line drives are sketchy. But he has a 6.9% LD% since his first start of the season, which is 11.4% for three starts and 4.2% in his last three. To put that in perspective, Alex Cobb led MLB qualifying pitchers last year with 16.4%, and Pat Neshek led those with 60 IP or more with 11.2%. As sketchy as those batted ball judgments are, I think it's seriously unlikely that he allowed 19 line drives in those six starts and had 11 scored as fly balls instead (including 12 line drives with 9 gifts by the scorer in his last three starts)-- which would bring his LD% up just to match Cobb's. IOW, his variance from average has been much larger than the error bars in the metric. You're grossly overestimating the accuracy of minor league batted ball numbers. Check out the list of Carolina League pitchers with 75+ IP last year-- the median LD% is about 14.5%, which is way, way lower than the MLB average. The Salem Red Sox stringers are particularly bad-- the SalSox dominate the leaderboard I just linked to, with Justin Haley at 7.4% LD, Corey Littrell at 9.9%, Mercedes at 10.5%, Cuevas at 11.2%, Kukuk at 11.8%, Martin at 12.1%, Light at 14.4%. If you think those are their actual rates of hard contact, I have a bridge to sell you.
|
|
|
Post by soxfan06 on May 24, 2015 20:24:48 GMT -5
So is Jamie Callahan officially a full time reliever now?
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on May 24, 2015 20:30:12 GMT -5
So is Jamie Callahan officially a full time reliever now? We'll see. I could see it being a temporary thing to help him get his mind right, or a permanent thing because he's had such an awful time keeping his mechanics for an entire start. This will be his second three-inning relief stint, which could be a piggyback outing cut short by the starter going six or the Drive losing on the road, or a longer relief outing because he was successful but needed to reach his target pitch count.
|
|
|