SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
The Big-Time Trade Target List
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 12, 2016 22:38:03 GMT -5
If the Sox wanted Shields and Padres would take Sandoval, no need to involve so many other players and a third team. Also you don't trade Swihart unless it's for a stud pitcher. Trading him for basically Mazara doesn't make sense for me. I don't see a logjam at catcher either, well not yet, maybe by end of year.
|
|
|
Post by sox fan in nc on Apr 14, 2016 12:49:46 GMT -5
Just read the article on OTM about Sandoval maybe wanting to part ways with Boston. It kills me to hear someone say "pay 60% of his salary & give him to SD". At this point we would have to pay like 95%, similar to the Angels paying Hamilton. He is virtually worthless. SD may want him if they only had to pay him 3 or 4 mil per year, maybe. Can't we just keep him on a DL & rehabbing in Pawtucket indefinitely? Just in case Shaw tears an ACL or something.
|
|
nomar
Veteran
Posts: 10,888
|
Post by nomar on Apr 14, 2016 13:30:53 GMT -5
Yeah I'm not giving Pablo up unless it's at least a 75% salary dump. Someone is bound to get hurt and well need a backup 3B.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Apr 14, 2016 16:56:43 GMT -5
Yeah I'm not giving Pablo up unless it's at least a 75% salary dump. Someone is bound to get hurt and well need a backup 3B. We need the roster spot more.
|
|
|
Post by larrycook on Apr 14, 2016 19:39:10 GMT -5
Fenway nation has a blurb about the sox trading for gray.
|
|
|
Post by dnfl333 on Apr 14, 2016 20:06:13 GMT -5
Yeah I'm not giving Pablo up unless it's at least a 75% salary dump. Someone is bound to get hurt and well need a backup 3B. We need the roster spot more. Sandoval is done. Get what you can get and move on.. Bust!
|
|
nomar
Veteran
Posts: 10,888
|
Post by nomar on Apr 15, 2016 10:32:42 GMT -5
Fenway nation has a blurb about the sox trading for gray. We can add that to the seemingly endless list of poor major roster decisions made since 2011 (if it happens). Gray is the next Shelby Miller sized trade loss.
|
|
|
Post by larrycook on Apr 16, 2016 20:22:42 GMT -5
Fenway nation has a blurb about the sox trading for gray. We can add that to the seemingly endless list of poor major roster decisions made since 2011 (if it happens). Gray is the next Shelby Miller sized trade loss. Could not agree more. I do think dombrowski is looking hard for a #2.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 17, 2016 0:21:34 GMT -5
We can add that to the seemingly endless list of poor major roster decisions made since 2011 (if it happens). Gray is the next Shelby Miller sized trade loss. Could not agree more. I do think dombrowski is looking hard for a #2. Swihart, Owens, Castillo, Johnson and Light for Gray like the article says would be a poor major roster decision? Sure that's some talent, but it seems light in my opinion. Also Gray at least in my opinion is a lot better pitcher then Miller, it's not even close. Career era+ is 135 for Gray and 113 for Miller, Gray's is coming off a 5.8 bwar season, while Miller is coming off a 3.6 bwar which was career bests for both players. Gray is a #1 Ace type pitcher and Miller is a #2, maybe a 2/3 in AL.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Apr 17, 2016 8:47:04 GMT -5
Could not agree more. I do think dombrowski is looking hard for a #2. Swihart, Owens, Castillo, Johnson and Light for Gray like the article says would be a poor major roster decision? Sure that's some talent, but it seems light in my opinion. Also Gray at least in my opinion is a lot better pitcher then Miller, it's not even close. Career era+ is 135 for Gray and 113 for Miller, Gray's is coming off a 5.8 bwar season, while Miller is coming off a 3.6 bwar which was career bests for both players. Gray is a #1 Ace type pitcher and Miller is a #2, maybe a 2/3 in AL. And Gray has a career 3.60 SIERA to go with his 2.86 ERA. He's good, but nowhere near as good as he looks in Oakland. Fenway and the AL East wouldn't be kind to him since his walk/k rates are nothing special and nowhere near ace level. He might be a slightly better pitcher than Rick Porcello who had a 3.73 SIERA last season. That's not someone I'm giving up all those prospects for.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 17, 2016 14:36:48 GMT -5
Swihart, Owens, Castillo, Johnson and Light for Gray like the article says would be a poor major roster decision? Sure that's some talent, but it seems light in my opinion. Also Gray at least in my opinion is a lot better pitcher then Miller, it's not even close. Career era+ is 135 for Gray and 113 for Miller, Gray's is coming off a 5.8 bwar season, while Miller is coming off a 3.6 bwar which was career bests for both players. Gray is a #1 Ace type pitcher and Miller is a #2, maybe a 2/3 in AL. And Gray has a career 3.60 SIERA to go with his 2.86 ERA. He's good, but nowhere near as good as he looks in Oakland. Fenway and the AL East wouldn't be kind to him since his walk/k rates are nothing special and nowhere near ace level. He might be a slightly better pitcher than Rick Porcello who had a 3.73 SIERA last season. That's not someone I'm giving up all those prospects for. So an ace has to be an elite strikeout guy? Come on that's crazy talk. Gray is a ground ball pitcher that just doesn't give up many hits. Sounds like a good match for Fenway in my book. Slightly better then Porcello all based off SIERA? Did you write this before you had your coffee? Gray gives up 25% less hits per 9 when compared to Porcello, thats a massive difference. The only thing that is close between these two pitchers is SIERA. SIERA is never going to like Gray do to lower strikeout numbers, doesn't mean his ERA is a fluke. Gotta say glad your not in Red Sox front office.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Apr 17, 2016 14:57:55 GMT -5
And Gray has a career 3.60 SIERA to go with his 2.86 ERA. He's good, but nowhere near as good as he looks in Oakland. Fenway and the AL East wouldn't be kind to him since his walk/k rates are nothing special and nowhere near ace level. He might be a slightly better pitcher than Rick Porcello who had a 3.73 SIERA last season. That's not someone I'm giving up all those prospects for. So an ace has to be an elite strikeout guy? Come on that's crazy talk. Gray is a ground ball pitcher that just doesn't give up many hits. Sounds like a good match for Fenway in my book. Slightly better then Porcello all based off SIERA? Did you write this before you had your coffee? Gray gives up 25% less hits per 9 when compared to Porcello, thats a massive difference. The only thing that is close between these two pitchers is SIERA. SIERA is never going to like Gray do to lower strikeout numbers, doesn't mean his ERA is a fluke. Gotta say glad your not in Red Sox front office. All the numbers you look at are not park adjusted. When you're talking about a pitcher moving from Oakland to Boston, you better. And none of the numbers period are league adjusted when moving from the AL West to the AL East. Porcello was a ground ball pitcher too before he came to Boston but probably goes for more strikeouts now. And I don't care what kind of pitcher someone is. A 2.71 K/BB career ratio is not going to be an ace. Gray's HR/FB% would be a lot higher in Fenway and in the AL East like Porcello's is now.
|
|
|
Post by pokeyreesespieces on Apr 17, 2016 16:42:42 GMT -5
Wonder if we can trade Farrell and get Mike Aviles back
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 17, 2016 17:47:15 GMT -5
So an ace has to be an elite strikeout guy? Come on that's crazy talk. Gray is a ground ball pitcher that just doesn't give up many hits. Sounds like a good match for Fenway in my book. Slightly better then Porcello all based off SIERA? Did you write this before you had your coffee? Gray gives up 25% less hits per 9 when compared to Porcello, thats a massive difference. The only thing that is close between these two pitchers is SIERA. SIERA is never going to like Gray do to lower strikeout numbers, doesn't mean his ERA is a fluke. Gotta say glad your not in Red Sox front office. All the numbers you look at are not park adjusted. When you're talking about a pitcher moving from Oakland to Boston, you better. And none of the numbers period are league adjusted when moving from the AL West to the AL East. Porcello was a ground ball pitcher too before he came to Boston but probably goes for more strikeouts now. And I don't care what kind of pitcher someone is. A 2.71 K/BB career ratio is not going to be an ace. Gray's HR/FB% would be a lot higher in Fenway and in the AL East like Porcello's is now. ERA+ is park adjusted, Gray is at 135 for career, while Porcello is 95 for his career. Also Porcello GB% had a massive drop his last year in Detroit and has now gone down for 3 straight years. His pitching change happend before he got to Boston, not because he went to Boston and plays in Fenway and AL East. There is no reason to believe his GB% decreases playing in AL East and Fenway. Sure I would expect a slight increase in HRs due to home park and AL East. News flash Gray has been an ACE level pitcher for last two years with that K/BB ratio. How does that stop him from being an ACE? You say you don't care about what type of pitcher he is, but you clearly do. You think an ACE has to be a huge strikeout guy. Please go look up Greg Maddux stats, took him till his 6th year to get a K/BB ratio better then Gray's.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Apr 17, 2016 17:52:58 GMT -5
All the numbers you look at are not park adjusted. When you're talking about a pitcher moving from Oakland to Boston, you better. And none of the numbers period are league adjusted when moving from the AL West to the AL East. Porcello was a ground ball pitcher too before he came to Boston but probably goes for more strikeouts now. And I don't care what kind of pitcher someone is. A 2.71 K/BB career ratio is not going to be an ace. Gray's HR/FB% would be a lot higher in Fenway and in the AL East like Porcello's is now. ERA+ is park adjusted, Gray is at 135 for career, while Porcello is 95 for his career. Also Porcello GB% had a massive drop his last year in Detroit and has now gone down for 3 straight years. His pitching change happend before he got to Boston, not because he went to Boston and plays in Fenway and AL East. There is no reason to believe his GB% decreases playing in AL East and Fenway. Sure I would expect a slight increase in HRs due to home park and AL East. News flash Gray has been an ACE level pitcher for last two years with that K/BB ratio. How does that stop him from being an ACE? You say you don't care about what type of pitcher he is, but you clearly do. You think an ACE has to be a huge strikeout guy. Please go look up Greg Maddux stats, took him till his 6th year to get a K/BB ratio better then Gray's. ERA+ is still ERA based, not FIP, so I don't even pay attention to it. Sorted by fWAR, check out the K/BB ratios on that list.When you don't have great K/BB numbers, you are relying on luck to get great results. You're also relying on a large park and your defense. You're relying on not giving up more HR per fly ball than other pitchers. Those aren't skills that are easy to say won't regress to the mean.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 17, 2016 18:22:26 GMT -5
ERA+ is park adjusted, Gray is at 135 for career, while Porcello is 95 for his career. Also Porcello GB% had a massive drop his last year in Detroit and has now gone down for 3 straight years. His pitching change happend before he got to Boston, not because he went to Boston and plays in Fenway and AL East. There is no reason to believe his GB% decreases playing in AL East and Fenway. Sure I would expect a slight increase in HRs due to home park and AL East. News flash Gray has been an ACE level pitcher for last two years with that K/BB ratio. How does that stop him from being an ACE? You say you don't care about what type of pitcher he is, but you clearly do. You think an ACE has to be a huge strikeout guy. Please go look up Greg Maddux stats, took him till his 6th year to get a K/BB ratio better then Gray's. ERA+ is still ERA based, not FIP, so I don't even pay attention to it. Sorted by fWAR, check out the K/BB ratios on that list.When you don't have great K/BB numbers, you are relying on luck to get great results. You're also relying on a large park and your defense. You're relying on not giving up more HR per fly ball than other pitchers. Those aren't skills that are easy to say won't regress to the mean. I don't like fangraph war, they overvalue strikeouts, so yea it's going to help your case. Look at Baseball-Reference war stats, Gray goes from 21 on fangraph to #7 on Baseball-Reference. So your saying Gray has been luckiest pitcher in majors over last 2 and 1/2 years? How long do you need before you understand that batters don't make good contact against him. It's a skill that we have seen a lot of pitchers have. It's a rare skill sure, but it is definitely something that a pitcher can maintain and not regress to the mean. It's the reason I love Gray as a pitcher, I think he'll age really well and can have a very long career.
|
|
|
Post by telson13 on Apr 17, 2016 21:27:02 GMT -5
ERA+ is park adjusted, Gray is at 135 for career, while Porcello is 95 for his career. Also Porcello GB% had a massive drop his last year in Detroit and has now gone down for 3 straight years. His pitching change happend before he got to Boston, not because he went to Boston and plays in Fenway and AL East. There is no reason to believe his GB% decreases playing in AL East and Fenway. Sure I would expect a slight increase in HRs due to home park and AL East. News flash Gray has been an ACE level pitcher for last two years with that K/BB ratio. How does that stop him from being an ACE? You say you don't care about what type of pitcher he is, but you clearly do. You think an ACE has to be a huge strikeout guy. Please go look up Greg Maddux stats, took him till his 6th year to get a K/BB ratio better then Gray's. ERA+ is still ERA based, not FIP, so I don't even pay attention to it. Sorted by fWAR, check out the K/BB ratios on that list.When you don't have great K/BB numbers, you are relying on luck to get great results. You're also relying on a large park and your defense. You're relying on not giving up more HR per fly ball than other pitchers. Those aren't skills that are easy to say won't regress to the mean. Yeah, a guy like that who relies on weak contact over swing-and-miss seems to be the kind of pitcher who would really suffer from moving to a park with minimal foul territory. I don't see him pitching nearly as well in Fenway as he does in Oakland. Kind of Johnny Damon in reverse. I'm not particularly impressed with Gray, although he's been quite good in the Coliseum. The huge ERA-FIP differential scares me in a small park.
|
|
|
Post by telson13 on Apr 17, 2016 21:30:50 GMT -5
All the numbers you look at are not park adjusted. When you're talking about a pitcher moving from Oakland to Boston, you better. And none of the numbers period are league adjusted when moving from the AL West to the AL East. Porcello was a ground ball pitcher too before he came to Boston but probably goes for more strikeouts now. And I don't care what kind of pitcher someone is. A 2.71 K/BB career ratio is not going to be an ace. Gray's HR/FB% would be a lot higher in Fenway and in the AL East like Porcello's is now. ERA+ is park adjusted, Gray is at 135 for career, while Porcello is 95 for his career. Also Porcello GB% had a massive drop his last year in Detroit and has now gone down for 3 straight years. His pitching change happend before he got to Boston, not because he went to Boston and plays in Fenway and AL East. There is no reason to believe his GB% decreases playing in AL East and Fenway. Sure I would expect a slight increase in HRs due to home park and AL East. News flash Gray has been an ACE level pitcher for last two years with that K/BB ratio. How does that stop him from being an ACE? You say you don't care about what type of pitcher he is, but you clearly do. You think an ACE has to be a huge strikeout guy. Please go look up Greg Maddux stats, took him till his 6th year to get a K/BB ratio better then Gray's. K rates in baseball overall have skyrocketed since the mid-90s. Today's strike zone is arguably bigger, too, particularly compared to the mid-late-90s. That's not really a valid comparison.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 17, 2016 22:50:29 GMT -5
ERA+ is park adjusted, Gray is at 135 for career, while Porcello is 95 for his career. Also Porcello GB% had a massive drop his last year in Detroit and has now gone down for 3 straight years. His pitching change happend before he got to Boston, not because he went to Boston and plays in Fenway and AL East. There is no reason to believe his GB% decreases playing in AL East and Fenway. Sure I would expect a slight increase in HRs due to home park and AL East. News flash Gray has been an ACE level pitcher for last two years with that K/BB ratio. How does that stop him from being an ACE? You say you don't care about what type of pitcher he is, but you clearly do. You think an ACE has to be a huge strikeout guy. Please go look up Greg Maddux stats, took him till his 6th year to get a K/BB ratio better then Gray's. K rates in baseball overall have skyrocketed since the mid-90s. Today's strike zone is arguably bigger, too, particularly compared to the mid-late-90s. That's not really a valid comparison. Have they gone up like 300%? Otherwise that's a very valid comparison. Maddux had a K/BB ratio below 2 his first 4 years. Guys that don't strikeout hitters can still be great pitchers and luck has nothing to do with it. It's a fairly rare trait now a days, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't value those pitchers.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Apr 18, 2016 6:13:07 GMT -5
ERA+ is still ERA based, not FIP, so I don't even pay attention to it. Sorted by fWAR, check out the K/BB ratios on that list.When you don't have great K/BB numbers, you are relying on luck to get great results. You're also relying on a large park and your defense. You're relying on not giving up more HR per fly ball than other pitchers. Those aren't skills that are easy to say won't regress to the mean. I don't like fangraph war, they overvalue strikeouts, so yea it's going to help your case. Look at Baseball-Reference war stats, Gray goes from 21 on fangraph to #7 on Baseball-Reference. So your saying Gray has been luckiest pitcher in majors over last 2 and 1/2 years? How long do you need before you understand that batters don't make good contact against him. It's a skill that we have seen a lot of pitchers have. It's a rare skill sure, but it is definitely something that a pitcher can maintain and not regress to the mean. It's the reason I love Gray as a pitcher, I think he'll age really well and can have a very long career. No, I'm not saying that. I said he relies on luck and a large park and weaker competition to get great results. Don't you think he'd get worse results pitching in Fenway, Toronto, NY and Baltimore for about 2/3 of the season?
|
|
|
Post by jdb on Apr 18, 2016 9:41:20 GMT -5
Grays interesting bc he outperforms his periphials. I can see both sides of the argument but at the end of the day think he's more of a very good 2-3 than ace.
|
|
|
Post by telson13 on Apr 18, 2016 10:15:36 GMT -5
K rates in baseball overall have skyrocketed since the mid-90s. Today's strike zone is arguably bigger, too, particularly compared to the mid-late-90s. That's not really a valid comparison. Have they gone up like 300%? Otherwise that's a very valid comparison. Maddux had a K/BB ratio below 2 his first 4 years. Guys that don't strikeout hitters can still be great pitchers and luck has nothing to do with it. It's a fairly rare trait now a days, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't value those pitchers. But what, then, is the value of the comparison to Maddux? Maddux was pitching in the majors for those two years while Gray was in college/minors. Maddux pitched in a couple of bandboxes, in an age of increasing offense and smaller strike zones. There's a bigger picture than just looking at K/BB rates. Are you saying that you think Gray is going to further refine his command like Maddux did? I'm not disputing that Gray is a good pitcher. I don't think he's great, but he might be eventually. There's maybe a 0.1% chance he becomes Greg Maddux, but he could certainly approach that territory. But I think that presuming he will, and trading a bunch of young talent hoping he will, isn't a wise move. I'm the pitchman for the "velocity and strikeouts aren't everything" crowd, so I think I get where you're coming from. I just don't have the faith you do that Gray would translate well to Fenway. Like I said, I think he's Damon in reverse. Johnny was pretty bad his one year in Oakland (low BA, low OBP, not much XB power--including only 4 triples despite all of the space, low assists because his arm was overchallenged in a big OF, etc etc). Damon just wasn't a good fit for that park. Same with Mo Vaughn when he left Fenway...he went from a great hitter to just a very good one. Look at Peavy and Lackey, and what happened to them leaving Fenway. I get the sense that Gray, out of a park (and division) that suit him, and into a small ballpark with unforgivingly small foul territory and the wall in LF...well, he'd turn into a pumpkin.
|
|
|
Post by telson13 on Apr 18, 2016 10:24:47 GMT -5
Grays interesting bc he outperforms his periphials. I can see both sides of the argument but at the end of the day think he's more of a very good 2-3 than ace. I think calling him a 3 is a bit extreme. But a 1a-2, probably. The FIP-ERA gap is probably real--here's an article citing changing speeds as a likely contributor to that "skill"--but note that Gray's not on the list, so he's doing something else, if it isn't luck. www.fangraphs.com/blogs/wei-yin-chen-and-the-art-of-changing-speeds/
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Apr 18, 2016 14:14:57 GMT -5
Grays interesting bc he outperforms his periphials. I can see both sides of the argument but at the end of the day think he's more of a very good 2-3 than ace. That's basically what I'm saying. He'd probably be valued as a top 10 pitcher, but he isn't one. He's actually pretty similar to what Shelby Miller might become IMO. Though now that he's in Arizona, he'll have a hard time outperforming his peripherals. That's a bidding war that I don't want the Red Sox to win.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 18, 2016 14:17:43 GMT -5
I don't like fangraph war, they overvalue strikeouts, so yea it's going to help your case. Look at Baseball-Reference war stats, Gray goes from 21 on fangraph to #7 on Baseball-Reference. So your saying Gray has been luckiest pitcher in majors over last 2 and 1/2 years? How long do you need before you understand that batters don't make good contact against him. It's a skill that we have seen a lot of pitchers have. It's a rare skill sure, but it is definitely something that a pitcher can maintain and not regress to the mean. It's the reason I love Gray as a pitcher, I think he'll age really well and can have a very long career. No, I'm not saying that. I said he relies on luck and a large park and weaker competition to get great results. Don't you think he'd get worse results pitching in Fenway, Toronto, NY and Baltimore for about 2/3 of the season? There it is again the word luck. Please explain what you mean, because with 2 1/2 years of stats I don't see how you think his results are because of luck. Sure a large park and weaker competition would help any pitcher, but they help certain pitchers more then others. Only 28% of his outs come on FBs, he has a 2 to 1 GB to FB ratio for his career. So while I'm sure his park helps him, it's not what makes him good. He's not getting a ton of deep FB outs in that big park, he's a ground ball pitcher. Show me a pitcher that won't have worse stats pitching in AL East compared to other divisions, your just stating the obvious. The difference is I see him going from 2.75 era to like 3.25 era and you act like he would have a 4.25 era because he's all luck, large park and different division.
|
|
|