SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Pedro named Special Assistant to the GM
|
Post by hammerhead on Jan 24, 2013 12:57:01 GMT -5
If they named Pedro, GM, Manager, Head of Scouting and Team President all at the same time I'd be all for it...
So I love this especially if he can help bring along some of the young pitchers.
|
|
|
Post by bluechip on Jan 24, 2013 13:15:09 GMT -5
I guess his first duty could be helping Ruby De La Rosa refine the change up.
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 15,644
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jan 24, 2013 13:25:17 GMT -5
I guess his first duty could be helping Ruby De La Rosa refine the change up. He already did that years ago. He taught Rubby his excellent change-up. It's great to have Pedro back in the organization. He could definitely teach some of those young kids coming up. Between he and Varitek coming back, the collective baseball IQ of the organization has improved. My guess is he'll start off as a spring training mentor and in time he'll get more involved. Great to have Pedro Martinez back home again. And I look forward to his HOF speech and his number being retired in 2015 (if the writers don't mess up the vote).
|
|
steveofbradenton
Veteran
Watching Spring Training, the FCL, and the Florida State League
Posts: 1,823
|
Post by steveofbradenton on Jan 24, 2013 13:35:20 GMT -5
Great move!!!
The ramifications of Pedro's signing will far exceed his imput in Spring Training.....although considerable.
If Pedro Martinez walks into some young Dominican's home and says "we would like you to sign with the Boston Red Sox", what do you think that kid may do?
His influence with Latin ballplayers, and especially young pitchers, could be powerful for years.
I'm sure Rubby will learn a lot from him, but so will a Webster, a Barnes, an Owens, etc. One of the things that set him apart from other pitchers, other than his change-up and fastball command, was his mind. He was a real artist on the mound, and our organization is much improved as of today.
|
|
badfishnbc
Veteran
Doing you all a favor and leaving through the gate in right field since 2012.
Posts: 410
|
Post by badfishnbc on Jan 24, 2013 14:27:25 GMT -5
If Pedro Martinez walks into some young Dominican's home and says "we would like you to sign with the Boston Red Sox", what do you think that kid may do? And if said prospect hedges even slightly, he says, "Oh, and have you met my friend David? You may know him as 'Big Papi.'"
|
|
|
Post by brianthetaoist on Jan 24, 2013 21:03:03 GMT -5
Pedro Martinez is the most beloved living Red Sox player, right? Who else could it be? Yaz? Maybe a while ago, but so many Sox fans have no real connection with him at this point, and he's just not as engaging a personality, anyway. Fisk? Not even the same league. Schilling? Ha, that clown. Big Papi comes close, probably wil be right there or even more when he retires, but it's not quite the same when you're still playing.
|
|
|
Post by curll on Jan 24, 2013 22:36:16 GMT -5
His role will likely be an eclectic one. Basically, a liaison. If a pitcher needs advice, and perhaps the pitching coach just isn't getting through, the pitcher might seek out Pedro for a different vantage point. A position player may be struggling with the media or some aspect of the game and Pedro, Tek, and Wake can all give a unique perspective that may connect with the player and get him playing well.
It is like having a Jedi Council, basically.
|
|
|
Post by James Dunne on Jan 25, 2013 10:23:54 GMT -5
A couple thoughts. Pedro Martinez is the most beloved living Red Sox player, right? Who else could it be? Yaz? Maybe a while ago, but so many Sox fans have no real connection with him at this point, and he's just not as engaging a personality, anyway. Fisk? Not even the same league. Schilling? Ha, that clown. Big Papi comes close, probably wil be right there or even more when he retires, but it's not quite the same when you're still playing. This is a good question. I spent more time than I should have thinking about this. It's still probably Yaz. Everyone between the ages of 40 and 70 basically grew up with him. It's definitely a different connection with the crowd than that Pedro has, but the feelings about Yaz are more reverent, you know? Throw in the fact that he spent his whole career with the Red Sox, the fact that he's the franchise leader in just about every counting stat... It's impossible to quantify, but I'd say it's Yaz. It's funny that you mention Schilling. He's probably the least liked good player in Red Sox history, isn't he? I mean, is there ANY other player with his accomplishments who, if you ask half the fans in the park what they think of him, would say something along the lines of "I respect what he did for us, but I wish he'd shut up and go away forever." I think you'll find better opinions of Manny, and possibly even Clemens. Politics is a funny thing like that. EDIT: It probably should be noted there are a lot of Red Sox fans in Rhode Island. Politics may be a funny thing, but fraud sort of isn't. I guess his first duty could be helping Ruby De La Rosa refine the change up. I've seen this quite a bit since the stories about De La Rosa working out with the Martinezes earlier in the month. It's obviously good for any young pitcher to be able to get instruction from Pedro, but I don't think the change-up Pedro threw is teachable. One of the things that made his change possibly the best ever is the fact that Pedro had abnormally long fingers, allowing him to get a deeper grip on the baseball. In a way, asking a pitcher to mimic Pedro's changeup would be like asking a hitter to mimic Ted Williams' hand-eye coordination.
|
|
|
Post by fenwaythehardway on Jan 25, 2013 15:24:59 GMT -5
If Pedro Martinez walks into some young Dominican's home and says "we would like you to sign with the Boston Red Sox", what do you think that kid may do? Right, because that's totally how business gets done in the DR. Not with shady underhanded dealings or anything like that...
|
|
|
Post by fenwaythehardway on Jan 25, 2013 15:29:23 GMT -5
I've seen this quite a bit since the stories about De La Rosa working out with the Martinezes earlier in the month. It's obviously good for any young pitcher to be able to get instruction from Pedro, but I don't think the change-up Pedro threw is teachable. One of the things that made his change possibly the best ever is the fact that Pedro had abnormally long fingers, allowing him to get a deeper grip on the baseball. In a way, asking a pitcher to mimic Pedro's changeup would be like asking a hitter to mimic Ted Williams' hand-eye coordination. Think of every great pitching coach you can. Now, can you name one of them that didn't suck out loud as a player? I can't. Great players are almost universally bad coaches; good coaches were almost universally terrible players. Every please continue to ignore this fact.
|
|
|
Post by James Dunne on Jan 25, 2013 15:39:18 GMT -5
Dave Righetti, Johnny Podres and Roger Craig were good pitchers. But they are the exception and not the norm.
The best players - and this is true in every sport - are the ones with the best natural talent. The theory is that they struggle as coaches because they can't understand why others don't get the same results doing the same thing. I mentioned Ted Williams, because he's sort of the perfect case of that. As manager of the Senators, he couldn't communicate to his players because he couldn't identify with their struggles. Pitch recognition came remarkably easy to Williams, and the hand-eye coordination is legendary. A player like that really can't impart his lessons upon someone else.
|
|
|
Post by bluechip on Jan 25, 2013 16:15:19 GMT -5
Dave Righetti, Johnny Podres and Roger Craig were good pitchers. But they are the exception and not the norm. The best players - and this is true in every sport - are the ones with the best natural talent. The theory is that they struggle as coaches because they can't understand why others don't get the same results doing the same thing. I mentioned Ted Williams, because he's sort of the perfect case of that. As manager of the Senators, he couldn't communicate to his players because he couldn't identify with their struggles. Pitch recognition came remarkably easy to Williams, and the hand-eye coordination is legendary. A player like that really can't impart his lessons upon someone else. I do not see Pedro as being a coach, but I would love to see him teach that circle changeup to as many players as possible.
|
|
|
Post by James Dunne on Jan 25, 2013 16:55:17 GMT -5
Right, that's kind of my and FTHW's point. It's like asking Usain Bolt to teach people to run fast. Because the people he'd be teaching don't have the freakish physical skills (in Pedro's case, abnormally long fingers AND an arm that allowed him to throw a baseball 100 miles an hour), I'm skeptical that His method of throwing the change will be effective for other players.
Can't hurt to try, of course.
|
|
|
Post by fenwaythehardway on Jan 25, 2013 17:05:25 GMT -5
I do not see Pedro as being a coach, but I would love to see him teach that circle changeup to as many players as possible. This is just silly. You cannot teach that pitch. I've already seen Pedro show the grip he uses for it any number of times; it's not like it's some highly guarded secret. I'm sure any number of pitchers or coaches on the Red Sox could show you how to throw Pedro's circle-change, but unless you've got his arm and his hands and his mechanics, it doesn't mean much. If you could just "teach" a pitch like that, every pitcher on the Yankees would throw a completely unhittable cutter. Or Randy Johnson would be teaching pitchers to throw a slider with eight and a half feet of break. It doesn't work that way.
|
|
|
Post by Guidas on Jan 25, 2013 17:11:03 GMT -5
There must be some confidence in Pedro as a talent evaluator more so, I'm guessing, than an instructor. I've seen it both ways with players - some can recognize budding greatness or a diamond in the rough before anyone else, others are just basing their evaluations on a very narrow personal prism. If Pedro can in anyway help this team spot and sign better pitching prospects than they have in the past he's worth ever penny.
|
|
|
Post by bluechip on Jan 25, 2013 17:12:54 GMT -5
Right, that's kind of my and FTHW's point. It's like asking Usain Bolt to teach people to run fast. Because the people he'd be teaching don't have the freakish physical skills (in Pedro's case, abnormally long fingers AND an arm that allowed him to throw a baseball 100 miles an hour), I'm skeptical that His method of throwing the change will be effective for other players. Can't hurt to try, of course. Obviously it is not the pitch for everyone, and I doubt anyone will be as effective with the pitch as Pedro was. Nevertheless, it does not hurt for him to show a young pitcher how to throw the pitch. While, I am not sure Pedro could help a struggling AA pitcher consistently repeat his delivery, but he could show that pitcher how to properly throw the circle change up. There have been plenty of examples of guys brought in simply to teach a pitch rather than act as a full-time pitching coach. I think the most famous example is when Rube Foster taught Christy Mathewson his iconic screwball. Phil and Joe Niekro helped Wakefield with his knuckleball. If nothing else, working with a master of the pitch will help the confidence of kid trying out something new.
|
|
|
Post by pedroelgrande on Jan 25, 2013 18:28:26 GMT -5
I'm more interested in Pedro's pitching philosophy than teaching a pitch or pitchers in the system starting to mimic him in any way.
I've seen interviews with Pedro in Spanish and in English where he talks about how he attacked hitters and used his head in games. I talked earlier in the off-season that The Red Sox needed to have a pitching philosophy and if Pedro can help implement some of the things he did the better.
About his change-up. Pedro actually got the change-up from his brother, Ramon, and he works in the Dodgers organization so you better believe he has worked with Ruby and presumably Ramon has given Ruby instructions on the change up but as others have said its one thing being taught the pitch another is the pitch actually clicking the way it did with Pedro.
|
|
|
Post by Oregon Norm on Jan 26, 2013 0:37:59 GMT -5
Just a quick note. I watched De La Rosa pitch and he already had a very good changeup. He used it to punch out players who got to looking for the heat. And while I have no idea how long his fingers are, his fastball - the one that clocks in at 98+ - was moving sharply also. It's not as if this guy is a novice, believe me. The pitches I watched, those two, both were darting around.
|
|
|
Post by brianthetaoist on Jan 26, 2013 9:19:24 GMT -5
I agree that teaching Pedro's "change" is impossible; it was one of history's great pitches, like Carlton's slider or Blyleven's curve. Unteachable, a combination of a lot of physical factors. But one thing that made Pedro great was his ability to read and set up hitters. I remember one story when he was pitching against, I think, Chili Davis, and he saw something in Chili's eyes when Chili took a pitch that showed Pedro that Davis was having trouble picking up the curve. So he threw him a couple curves in the strike zone and punched him out. That can be taught. Also, Pedro as a young pitcher did not have pinpoint control; he actually had somewhat similar BB/9 numbers as Rubby in the minors. If there were specific things he actually did to tighten up his control, that would be incredibly valuable. Rubby has the stuff already ... it's stuff like this that would make the difference. It's still probably Yaz. Everyone between the ages of 40 and 70 basically grew up with him. It's definitely a different connection with the crowd than that Pedro has, but the feelings about Yaz are more reverent, you know? Throw in the fact that he spent his whole career with the Red Sox, the fact that he's the franchise leader in just about every counting stat... It's impossible to quantify, but I'd say it's Yaz. It's funny that you mention Schilling. He's probably the least liked good player in Red Sox history, isn't he? [...] EDIT: It probably should be noted there are a lot of Red Sox fans in Rhode Island. Politics may be a funny thing, but fraud sort of isn't. It's an oddly addicting question, no? At least to me ... Yaz would be the only competition, but he's been so out of the public eye, and he really wasn't the kind of seminal athlete that a Bobby Orr, or Larry Bird, or Ted Williams was, the kind of athlete that's in every sports discussion on best players ever, keeping his legacy fresh. I dunno, unquantifiable, of course, but a fun thing to think about while we wait for spring training. And, yeah, Schilling's an object lesson in how you can tarnish your legacy with your words and deeds off the field, was why I mentioned him.
|
|
|
Post by fenwaythehardway on Jan 26, 2013 10:59:59 GMT -5
If you were to poll Red Sox fans on their FAVORITE players, I don't think Yaz would rank very highly. The list would be dominated by '04-'07 guys, just because those teams were so damn popular. On the other hand, if you did a like/dislike poll for each player, he might actually have a chance to win that. High name recognition and there's no minority faction of people who hate him as far as I know, which is true for most everyone else.
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 15,644
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jan 26, 2013 11:59:28 GMT -5
If you were to poll Red Sox fans on their FAVORITE players, I don't think Yaz would rank very highly. The list would be dominated by '04-'07 guys, just because those teams were so damn popular. On the other hand, if you did a like/dislike poll for each player, he might actually have a chance to win that. High name recognition and there's no minority faction of people who hate him as far as I know, which is true for most everyone else. It depends upon who you're polling. Most of the 20 and 30 somethings would vote Pedro, but older fans, particularly those heavily influenced by 1967, would vote for Yaz. Yaz was around from 1961 - 1983. I'm old enough to remember him in his last few years and he was absolutely my favorite player. I remember Yaz day and how special it was. That said, I'm so beyond thrilled that Pedro is back in the organization. He became a favorite of mine, too. Pedro was event viewing - like Gammons said, the one pitcher that would make fans at Fenway wait until the Sox were actually at-bat before going to the restroom or getting food. Yaz, except down the stretch in 1967, was not event viewing. He was the constant for so many years. Players would come and go, but Yaz was always there, the heart of the club. Alot of people grew up with him. My all-time favorites are Ted Williams (who I never saw play), Yaz, and Pedro, and I think Ortiz falls into that special category as well. I might be in the minority, but I loved it when Schilling was here. Again, I'm not from RI, so I don't have the anger about his business. But I don't think it's much a conicidence that they won twice in his four seasons here. He was a very key pitcher. He talked the talk and he walked the walk. I'll always think of Schill fondly - made going on SOSH fun - and I hope he's inducted into the HOF soon.
|
|
|
Post by onbase on Jan 28, 2013 19:25:20 GMT -5
I've seen this quite a bit since the stories about De La Rosa working out with the Martinezes earlier in the month. It's obviously good for any young pitcher to be able to get instruction from Pedro, but I don't think the change-up Pedro threw is teachable. One of the things that made his change possibly the best ever is the fact that Pedro had abnormally long fingers, allowing him to get a deeper grip on the baseball. In a way, asking a pitcher to mimic Pedro's changeup would be like asking a hitter to mimic Ted Williams' hand-eye coordination. Think of every great pitching coach you can. Now, can you name one of them that didn't suck out loud as a player? I can't. Great players are almost universally bad coaches; good coaches were almost universally terrible players. Every please continue to ignore this fact. The saying goes "them that can do. Them that can't teach". But I put nothing past Pedro. I do agree, though, that his instruction value might be more in the area of how to get a batter out the first second, third, even fourth time through the lineup. And not just out, but his confidence shot.
|
|
|