SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Looking Ahead to a Potential Rebuild
|
Post by FenwayFanatic on Jun 19, 2018 9:06:46 GMT -5
I am not sure it makes a lot of sense to go big into free agency this next offseason, the way its looking, if they can't re-sign Mookie we're looking at a rebuild here. Bogaerts, Porcello, Sale, and possibly JD all hitting free agency, and then Mookie the year after. No real help on the way from the farm system, which most everyone on this site knows.
I am wondering how much sense it makes to retain Mookie after next year if we can't resign all these guys, it might make more sense to try and trade him as well as possibly ERod to kick start a rebuild around Benintendi and Devers. We will still be stuck with Price but that will really be about it as far as obligations.
Am I getting way too ahead of myself here? I would much rather see them kick start a rebuild than become the Detroit Tigers.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Jun 19, 2018 10:01:30 GMT -5
Am I getting way too ahead of myself here? Yes
|
|
|
Post by redsoxfan2 on Jun 19, 2018 10:43:35 GMT -5
I am not sure it makes a lot of sense to go big into free agency this next offseason, the way its looking, if they can't re-sign Mookie we're looking at a rebuild here. Bogaerts, Porcello, Sale, and possibly JD all hitting free agency, and then Mookie the year after. No real help on the way from the farm system, which most everyone on this site knows. I am wondering how much sense it makes to retain Mookie after next year if we can't resign all these guys, it might make more sense to try and trade him as well as possibly ERod to kick start a rebuild around Benintendi and Devers. We will still be stuck with Price but that will really be about it as far as obligations. Am I getting way too ahead of myself here? I would much rather see them kick start a rebuild than become the Detroit Tigers. Just to play along, the Red Sox have already freed themselves of 22 million next year with Hanley. Assuming the price of Harper/Machado is 35 million next season they're paying a difference of 13 million for his services. The year after that, the Red Sox are mostly off the books for Pablo Sandoval (5 million for 2020 as oppose to 18,455,000 for 2019) $~13.5 million + JD Martinez potentially opting out $23,750,000 is enough to retain Mookie. There's always the slim possibility that Price opts out of his 32 million a year contract as well and I doubt Pomeranz and his 8.5 million are back next year. Point is, there's a lot that can happen between then and now. Heck, Chavis could tear it up after he comes back and prove he's not just a product of chemicals and Groome can finally get healthy and show why he was so highly coveted.
|
|
|
Post by FenwayFanatic on Jun 19, 2018 10:51:25 GMT -5
Just seems like we have too many of our core guys all hitting free agency at roughly the same time. The good news is that we're not hamstrung with a lot of long-term awful contracts.
|
|
|
Post by fenwaythehardway on Jun 19, 2018 11:52:47 GMT -5
I don't think the Red Sox should go into a full rebuild basically ever, and certainly not when they have legit star talent to build around. You might see a bit more of a stars-and-scubs look to the team in a couple years, but with their budget and the talent they have under control, they should have the stars end of that covered. Then you just do the thing where you buy as much cheap talent as you can, hope it's enough to get you into contention, and if not, sell whatever you can at the deadline to build prospect depth.
The issue here is, if you look at big budget teams that have successfully rebuilt without ever doing a full tear down (the Dodgers and Yankees, basically), they've done it by hoarding prospects. For obvious reasons, I don't see that strategy working with Dombrowski at the helm. So maybe the real rebuilding move after 2019 is Dombrowski moves on, or into more of the Special Assistant/Senior Advisor type role, and you promote someone from within with more of a player development background to hopefully be the Next Great Red Sox GM.
|
|
|
Post by redsoxfan2 on Jun 19, 2018 12:23:30 GMT -5
I don't think the Red Sox should go into a full rebuild basically ever, and certainly not when they have legit star talent to build around. You might see a bit more of a stars-and-scubs look to the team in a couple years, but with their budget and the talent they have under control, they should have the stars end of that covered. Then you just do the thing where you buy as much cheap talent as you can, hope it's enough to get you into contention, and if not, sell whatever you can at the deadline to build prospect depth. The issue here is, if you look at big budget teams that have successfully rebuilt without ever doing a full tear down (the Dodgers and Yankees, basically), they've done it by hoarding prospects. For obvious reasons, I don't see that strategy working with Dombrowski at the helm. So maybe the real rebuilding move after 2019 is Dombrowski moves on, or into more of the Special Assistant/Senior Advisor type role, and you promote someone from within with more of a player development background to hopefully be the Next Great Red Sox GM. The Yankees have torn it down mid-season. I agree that they shouldn't go into a season with the idea of a full tear-down in mind, but there will be a season where nothing is working and at that point they should tear it down and reload the system. The Yankees traded Chapman for Torres and then signed Chapman in the off-season. They also got Clint Frazier for Andrew Miller.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Jun 19, 2018 13:00:11 GMT -5
I don't think the Red Sox should go into a full rebuild basically ever, and certainly not when they have legit star talent to build around. You might see a bit more of a stars-and-scubs look to the team in a couple years, but with their budget and the talent they have under control, they should have the stars end of that covered. Then you just do the thing where you buy as much cheap talent as you can, hope it's enough to get you into contention, and if not, sell whatever you can at the deadline to build prospect depth. The issue here is, if you look at big budget teams that have successfully rebuilt without ever doing a full tear down (the Dodgers and Yankees, basically), they've done it by hoarding prospects. For obvious reasons, I don't see that strategy working with Dombrowski at the helm. So maybe the real rebuilding move after 2019 is Dombrowski moves on, or into more of the Special Assistant/Senior Advisor type role, and you promote someone from within with more of a player development background to hopefully be the Next Great Red Sox GM. I think the future Red Sox look like the Angels to some extent, maybe not even as good because Mookie isn't Trout. I fully expect them to re-sign the guys they want (Mookie, Xander and Sale), but it's going to be painful.
|
|
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jun 19, 2018 13:05:02 GMT -5
I get concerned about the teams' window of contention lessening in the next few years and worry that there's not a crop of players that looks like the next Mookie or the next Xander or the next Sale, etc.
I wouldn't say the Sox should NEVER do a full rebuild - I mean if they don't have anything resembling a young core in place, then maybe...
But Benintendi and Devers are still under Red Sox control well into 2022 or 2023. E-Rod is around until 2021.
The Sox have money coming off the books between Hanley after this season, Pomeranz, and I suspect that only one or neither of Kelly/Kimbrel will be back.
Then after 2019 Xander, Sale, Porcello, JDM, and most of Sandoval's $ come off the books.
I would think there's money there to sign one or two of those guys. Perhaps kick in some extra $ for JDM - it's not like he'd be going from $10 million/year to $30 million/year. Probably more like 22 million/year to 27 million/year or whatever.
Then after 2020 there's Mookie and JBJ. And you take your best shot with Mookie.
The two keys will be DD's ability or maybe his successor's ability to make astute low level free agent signings or deals that turn into something great - not necessarily signing David Ortiz off the scrapheap great, but moves that can help, and the other key is hoping that the Sox start getting prospects developed through this system - this draft might be a great start for that.
Those two keys are something we don't know about yet, so it's too hard to say - yeah, tear it down.
Also keep in mind the upper luxury tax limit will be moving up to about $249 million next year, and by 2022 there's a pretty good chance a work stoppage occurs which will further change the rules, and what impact it has who knows?
They're already limiting the draft pick you lose when signing a premier free agent. You're no longer punting a first round pick. Trending in that direction, a team like the Sox might not lose anything to sign a player like that.
And until then, it's possible free agent winters will be similar to this past offseason where humungous contracts aren't routinely given out. Yeah, Machado and Harper will get massive contracts, but the others perhaps, not as much as anticipated, which will help the Sox like it helped keep them under the limit when JDM had to "settle" for 22 million/year.
|
|
|
Post by greatscottcooper on Jun 19, 2018 13:25:37 GMT -5
Trade away the guy for prospects you'd get nothing for if you sign that guy in house.
This will be unpopular but hear me out.
You trade Xander this off-season for a prospect package, and you just resign him a year early by going out and getting Manny Machado.
You trade Chris Sale this off-season for a package of prospects, and you just resign him a year early by going out and signing Clayton Kershaw.
You trade Mookie Betts this off-season for a package of prospects, and you resign him early by going out and getting Bryce Harper.
Your team is effectively just as good next year and your farm system will be absolutely stacked again.
I'm not advocating all these moves in conjunction, or even opposed to MLB players in return but these are the types of moves you're to have to make if you want to extend this window by more than the next 2-3 years with the only caveat being we get extremely lucky in this years and next years draft and prospects skyrocket.
There you go, a perfectly flawed plan from the arm chair.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Jun 19, 2018 14:19:31 GMT -5
Trade away the guy for prospects you'd get nothing for if you sign that guy in house. This will be unpopular but hear me out. You trade Xander this off-season for a prospect package, and you just resign him a year early by going out and getting Manny Machado. You trade Chris Sale this off-season for a package of prospects, and you just resign him a year early by going out and signing Clayton Kershaw. You trade Mookie Betts this off-season for a package of prospects, and you resign him early by going out and getting Bryce Harper. Your team is effectively just as good next year and your farm system will be absolutely stacked again. I'm not advocating all these moves in conjunction, or even opposed to MLB players in return but these are the types of moves you're to have to make if you want to extend this window by more than the next 2-3 years with the only caveat being we get extremely lucky in this years and next years draft and prospects skyrocket. There you go, a perfectly flawed plan from the arm chair. That sounds good if you think the Red Sox could go with a $300 million payroll and all the penalties associated with that.
|
|
|
Post by fenwaythehardway on Jun 19, 2018 14:30:29 GMT -5
Yes let's definitely give Clayton Kershaw and his lower back $300m, this is the path to sustainable contention.
|
|
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jun 19, 2018 14:44:41 GMT -5
Trade away the guy for prospects you'd get nothing for if you sign that guy in house. This will be unpopular but hear me out. You trade Xander this off-season for a prospect package, and you just resign him a year early by going out and getting Manny Machado. You trade Chris Sale this off-season for a package of prospects, and you just resign him a year early by going out and signing Clayton Kershaw. You trade Mookie Betts this off-season for a package of prospects, and you resign him early by going out and getting Bryce Harper. Your team is effectively just as good next year and your farm system will be absolutely stacked again. I'm not advocating all these moves in conjunction, or even opposed to MLB players in return but these are the types of moves you're to have to make if you want to extend this window by more than the next 2-3 years with the only caveat being we get extremely lucky in this years and next years draft and prospects skyrocket. There you go, a perfectly flawed plan from the arm chair. You mean like trade Jon Lester and re-sign him? Like trading Andrew Miller and re-signing him? Both players really loved Boston, particularly Lester. But if you do that, prepare that those guys dealt aren't coming back. You cannot guarantee that you sign a particular free agent. Other than, basically what the others have said.
|
|
|
Post by fenwaythehardway on Jun 19, 2018 14:49:37 GMT -5
You mean like trade Jon Lester and re-sign him? Like trading Andrew Miller and re-signing him? Both players really loved Boston, particularly Lester. But if you do that, prepare that those guys dealt aren't coming back. You cannot guarantee that you sign a particular free agent. Other than, basically what the others have said. That's the thing. Assuming the free agents you want to sign are worth signing, everyone else is going to want them as well. So you're unlikely to get them all, and even if you do, it's because you outbid everyone else and then you have to deal with the winner's curse.
|
|
|
Post by FenwayFanatic on Jun 19, 2018 15:35:41 GMT -5
I don't see how you can trade Xander, the team is loaded this year and next and should go for it. What I'm not sure about is whether they should go for it in 2020. If they can't re-sign Mookie I'd prefer they trade him rather than keep him another year on a middling team and then lose him in free agency.
|
|
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jun 19, 2018 16:34:37 GMT -5
I don't see how you can trade Xander, the team is loaded this year and next and should go for it. What I'm not sure about is whether they should go for it in 2020. If they can't re-sign Mookie I'd prefer they trade him rather than keep him another year on a middling team and then lose him in free agency. Without seeing what they do between now and then, how would you know? They could re-sign Sale and Bogaerts and perhaps replace Porcello with a Jalen Beeks and be no worse off going into 2020. And they could also retain JDM as well. Or maybe some other scenario happens and they spend their money differently. They will have some money with Hanley and Sandoval's money coming off the books. The point I, while I too have concern they won't be as good, 2020 could well be a season where the Sox are still in the thick of things. It's not a foregone conclusion that they can't keep some of their talent and reasonably replace some departing talent. I don't know that there's going to be an infusion of young talent in the next couple of years beyond Beeks, Poyner, Ockimey, Shawaryn, and Chavis (and who knows who stays and goes during trade season?). The point is it's too soon to think about jumping ship. If the Sox are middling in 2020 and there's no chance they can re-sign Betts, sure then trade him if you're giving up on the season because you have very little shot. But planning on the team being bad or awful in 2020 doesn't make sense. While I think they might be on the downside of the curve, they're not going to be that far over the hill if they play their cards right. Like I said, this is where DD will truly earn his money, rather than using Ben Cherington's farm system as his personal asset stash. He'll have to build the team - his own team all the way.
|
|
|
Post by GyIantosca on Jun 19, 2018 17:17:43 GMT -5
I mentioned this a couple of times before. I blame Tony Mazz and Sean Mcadam for this topic. For some reason Felger and Mazz have adopted the question every home team. Look under every rock for a problem. I guess because they have some success with there ratings. But this is played out when you start questioning every single home team just looking to create ratings. I think you move one you target your top people try to sign them. Don't forget the Sox are top of the food chain with resources and they are clearing out some money after 2019 season. I believe they can resign who they want. The ones who leave offer a Qualifying offer to get the pick and move on. This season they addressed Hanley so only Kimbrel and Pomerez are left. Next season more interesting Sale,Porcello and Xman. We will see.
|
|
|
Post by Smittyw on Jun 19, 2018 17:34:43 GMT -5
This might put me in an extreme minority, but it's hard for me to see us re-signing Sale, as great as he is. He's going to command a Price-type contract at a minimum, and maybe much more. Paying a combined $60-70 million per season to two 30-something pitchers in several years just doesn't give me the warm and fuzzies.
For most other franchises, that'd mean you look to deal him this winter for a massive haul, but that's almost certainly not an option for us, obviously.
|
|
|
Post by Smittyw on Jun 19, 2018 17:40:43 GMT -5
Trade away the guy for prospects you'd get nothing for if you sign that guy in house. This will be unpopular but hear me out. You trade Xander this off-season for a prospect package, and you just resign him a year early by going out and getting Manny Machado. You trade Chris Sale this off-season for a package of prospects, and you just resign him a year early by going out and signing Clayton Kershaw. You trade Mookie Betts this off-season for a package of prospects, and you resign him early by going out and getting Bryce Harper. Your team is effectively just as good next year and your farm system will be absolutely stacked again. I'm not advocating all these moves in conjunction, or even opposed to MLB players in return but these are the types of moves you're to have to make if you want to extend this window by more than the next 2-3 years with the only caveat being we get extremely lucky in this years and next years draft and prospects skyrocket. There you go, a perfectly flawed plan from the arm chair. You have given me some great ideas, my friend. Many thanks! *fires up Playstation*
|
|
|
Post by FenwayFanatic on Jun 19, 2018 18:37:52 GMT -5
I mentioned this a couple of times before. I blame Tony Mazz and Sean Mcadam for this topic. For some reason Felger and Mazz have adopted the question every home team. Look under every rock for a problem. I guess because they have some success with there ratings. But this is played out when you start questioning every single home team just looking to create ratings. I think you move one you target your top people try to sign them. Don't forget the Sox are top of the food chain with resources and they are clearing out some money after 2019 season. I believe they can resign who they want. The ones who leave offer a Qualifying offer to get the pick and move on. This season they addressed Hanley so only Kimbrel and Pomerez are left. Next season more interesting Sale,Porcello and Xman. We will see. No, I am very optimistic about the team in the short and long term just not the medium term. I live in Boston and go to lots of games and if a year or two of rebuilding is whats best than thats what I want.
|
|
|
Post by larrycook on Jun 19, 2018 18:43:13 GMT -5
This might put me in an extreme minority, but it's hard for me to see us re-signing Sale, as great as he is. He's going to command a Price-type contract at a minimum, and maybe much more. Paying a combined $60-70 million per season to two 30-something pitchers in several years just doesn't give me the warm and fuzzies. For most other franchises, that'd mean you look to deal him this winter for a massive haul, but that's almost certainly not an option for us, obviously. I am ok with letting sale walk as well. In order for the math to work, we need to actually develop a starter in the near future though.
|
|
|
Post by greatscottcooper on Jun 19, 2018 18:56:20 GMT -5
Trade away the guy for prospects you'd get nothing for if you sign that guy in house. This will be unpopular but hear me out. You trade Xander this off-season for a prospect package, and you just resign him a year early by going out and getting Manny Machado. You trade Chris Sale this off-season for a package of prospects, and you just resign him a year early by going out and signing Clayton Kershaw. You trade Mookie Betts this off-season for a package of prospects, and you resign him early by going out and getting Bryce Harper. Your team is effectively just as good next year and your farm system will be absolutely stacked again. I'm not advocating all these moves in conjunction, or even opposed to MLB players in return but these are the types of moves you're to have to make if you want to extend this window by more than the next 2-3 years with the only caveat being we get extremely lucky in this years and next years draft and prospects skyrocket. There you go, a perfectly flawed plan from the arm chair. You mean like trade Jon Lester and re-sign him? Like trading Andrew Miller and re-signing him? Both players really loved Boston, particularly Lester. But if you do that, prepare that those guys dealt aren't coming back. You cannot guarantee that you sign a particular free agent. Other than, basically what the others have said. I never said we should resign Betts, Bogaerts, or Sale, I implied we trade them for value a year before their free agency and sign comparable players.
|
|
|
Post by greatscottcooper on Jun 19, 2018 19:01:08 GMT -5
Trade away the guy for prospects you'd get nothing for if you sign that guy in house. This will be unpopular but hear me out. You trade Xander this off-season for a prospect package, and you just resign him a year early by going out and getting Manny Machado. You trade Chris Sale this off-season for a package of prospects, and you just resign him a year early by going out and signing Clayton Kershaw. You trade Mookie Betts this off-season for a package of prospects, and you resign him early by going out and getting Bryce Harper. Your team is effectively just as good next year and your farm system will be absolutely stacked again. I'm not advocating all these moves in conjunction, or even opposed to MLB players in return but these are the types of moves you're to have to make if you want to extend this window by more than the next 2-3 years with the only caveat being we get extremely lucky in this years and next years draft and prospects skyrocket. There you go, a perfectly flawed plan from the arm chair. That sounds good if you think the Red Sox could go with a $300 million payroll and all the penalties associated with that. Yes very true. I was merely giving examples of moves that could allow us to effectively retain the value at the MLB level while also picking up assets. I didn’t necessarily mean we make all these moves or even more than one. In regards to another rebuttal, yes the Sox will have to pay a boatload for the Machado types but they are also going to pay a boatload to resign the Sale types too. The downsize to my plan is you’re adding 18 million +\- to your payroll a year early.
|
|
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jun 19, 2018 19:06:37 GMT -5
You mean like trade Jon Lester and re-sign him? Like trading Andrew Miller and re-signing him? Both players really loved Boston, particularly Lester. But if you do that, prepare that those guys dealt aren't coming back. You cannot guarantee that you sign a particular free agent. Other than, basically what the others have said. I never said we should resign Betts, Bogaerts, or Sale, I implied we trade them for value a year before their free agency and sign comparable players. Won't be easy. There's not too many comparable players to Betts, Bogaerts, and Sale.
|
|
|
Post by greatscottcooper on Jun 19, 2018 19:19:33 GMT -5
I never said we should resign Betts, Bogaerts, or Sale, I implied we trade them for value a year before their free agency and sign comparable players. Won't be easy. There's not too many comparable players to Betts, Bogaerts, and Sale. No they’re are not, but it was the philosophy I was stressing more than anything. Perhaps it would be easier if we focused on one hypothetical. Perhaps the Sox are higher on Machado than Bogaerts, and you know Bogaerts is either going to walk or get paid a hefty amount himself one year later. Get some assets for Bogey in a trade and sign Machado. Maybe Machado isn’t that guy, maybe there’s another player who fits that model like Harper. Yes, these guys are going to get hefty pay days but does anyone think Betts, Bogaerts, and Sale are not? and/or are going to sign deep discounts?
|
|
|
Post by dawnbringr on Jun 19, 2018 19:47:28 GMT -5
Won't be easy. There's not too many comparable players to Betts, Bogaerts, and Sale. Maybe Machado isn’t that guy, maybe there’s another player who fits that model like Harper. Yes, these guys are going to get hefty pay days but does anyone think Betts, Bogaerts, and Sale are not? and/or are going to sign deep discounts? I doubt any of them will take a discount... if Sale is really happy in Boston, maybe he wouldn't be looking to break the bank. As mentioned elsewhere, Bogaerts being a Boras client will probably chase the highest $$ possible. And while I'd like to see Betts play his whole career in Boston, I'm starting to get the impression he's really not of that mind. Kind of like Ellsbury was - lukewarm to the fan base here, and while it might be a nice gig,, he'd rather be elsewhere....
|
|
|