BA was sure Verdugo was a better pitching than hitting prospect. Lefty with good command, touched 94 (in HS), hammer curve. Most draft boards did have him better as a hitter, but not by very much. This is not some slightly delusional pipe dream.
He would need 20 innings of work, which can only come in blowouts (6+ run differential when he enters) or extra inning games, to qualify as a 2-way player. Once he qualifies, he's in for the next season and will keep that status until he fails to throw 20 in a year, it seems (I bet they fix the rule for guys who get hurt).
It's totally doable. Last year, if you take all blowout losses, and all blowout wins of 8+ runs, and avoid back-to-back games, that's 19 outings. Assume that a guy alternates between 1 and 2 innings in those games, and he would have qualified as a two-way player on July 25.
I actually think the 20 inning rule was thought through, and the idea is that a guy qualifies in his first year at around the trade deadline, if the team really wants to get him qualified.
I love the whole idea, and the Athletic article talks about it being the wave of the future. No more Ken Brett what-ifs!
The big downside now for 2-way players is that if they're a regular who doubles as a reliever (which would seem to be a common combo), you lose the DH if takes the mound. But with my best-of-both-worlds DH rule (essentially, it's good for the first 6 innings only), guys who were regular position players and good relievers would have a ton of extra value.
A game where you essentially switched to NL rules starting in the 7th (the existing DH gets to be the first pinch-hitter when the DH/P spot comes up first), and where half the teams have a two-way player ... that would rock.
Next up: left-handed catchers!