SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
|
Post by manfred on Jul 12, 2021 10:00:31 GMT -5
It seems like it all comes down to money. They’ll have 1st round talent on the board, but they may not have the dough. I’m cool with an idiosyncratic pick to save money. They won the lottery in the first round, but it might be a pricey ticket.
|
|
|
Post by wOBA Fett on Jul 12, 2021 10:10:07 GMT -5
Honestly, I'd draft 19 straight pitchers and figure 0-1 will be elite 0-3 will be good 2-5 will be average and the rest will never see the Show. I like my odds. Lets say there are 8 elite caliber pitchers in the MLB, including pitchers who were once elite and now just all-star. Lets also say the elite pitcher has a career of 16 years (much higher than average player career length). Then an elite pitcher comes every 2 years. Lets say that 2 out 3 elite pitchers are drafted very high in the first round (this should not be difficult to check). this means the probability of finding an elite pitcher outside of the top few picks is 1 out of 6 per year over 30 teams (3 new elite pitchers over 6 years, 2 are high picks, 1 outside of top few) - so the probability of a single team finding an elite pitcher outside of the top few pick is 1 /180 (not that I a trying to discourage people from dreaming) We could say there 60 good pitchers in the MLB (average of 2 per team) but I would prefer to say 90 (3 per team on average) and that the average career length of a good starting pitcher is 10 years. There should be 9 new good pitchers per year (through both draft and international). Lets say half of these are in the first round. If so, that leaves 4.5 per year in round 2 or later. So the probability of one team finding a good pitcher in rounds 2 and higher is 0.15? If there are 60 or so backend starting pitchers, and average career is 5 years, then there needs to be 12 new blood per year In my opinion the breakdown is as follows: Elite: 1-2 Starter for 3-7+ years OR Everyday high level closer for 3-7+ years Good: 1-2 Starter for 1-3 years, 2-4 Starter for 3-7+ years OR Everyday closer for 1-3 years, elite Set-up man for 4-7+ years Average: 2-4 Starter for 1-3 years, 4-5 Starter for 3-7 years OR Set up man for 1-4 years I'd still spin the wheel
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Jul 12, 2021 10:21:48 GMT -5
Lets say there are 8 elite caliber pitchers in the MLB, including pitchers who were once elite and now just all-star. Lets also say the elite pitcher has a career of 16 years (much higher than average player career length). Then an elite pitcher comes every 2 years. Lets say that 2 out 3 elite pitchers are drafted very high in the first round (this should not be difficult to check). this means the probability of finding an elite pitcher outside of the top few picks is 1 out of 6 per year over 30 teams (3 new elite pitchers over 6 years, 2 are high picks, 1 outside of top few) - so the probability of a single team finding an elite pitcher outside of the top few pick is 1 /180 (not that I a trying to discourage people from dreaming) We could say there 60 good pitchers in the MLB (average of 2 per team) but I would prefer to say 90 (3 per team on average) and that the average career length of a good starting pitcher is 10 years. There should be 9 new good pitchers per year (through both draft and international). Lets say half of these are in the first round. If so, that leaves 4.5 per year in round 2 or later. So the probability of one team finding a good pitcher in rounds 2 and higher is 0.15? If there are 60 or so backend starting pitchers, and average career is 5 years, then there needs to be 12 new blood per year In my opinion the breakdown is as follows: Elite: 1-2 Starter for 3-7+ years OR Everyday high level closer for 3-7+ years Good: 1-2 Starter for 1-3 years, 2-4 Starter for 3-7+ years OR Everyday closer for 1-3 years, elite Set-up man for 4-7+ years Average: 2-4 Starter for 1-3 years, 4-5 Starter for 3-7 years OR Set up man for 1-4 years I'd still spin the wheel Look at the draft history tab up top. The very best draft the team has had was 2011, where the significant guys they got were:
- Mookie Betts - Jackie Bradley - Travis Shaw - Matt Barnes
That's as good as it gets. If Mayer pans out as a star and they get one other good player that would make this one of their best drafts this century.
|
|
|
Post by alan on Jul 12, 2021 10:32:21 GMT -5
In my opinion the breakdown is as follows: Elite: 1-2 Starter for 3-7+ years OR Everyday high level closer for 3-7+ years Good: 1-2 Starter for 1-3 years, 2-4 Starter for 3-7+ years OR Everyday closer for 1-3 years, elite Set-up man for 4-7+ years Average: 2-4 Starter for 1-3 years, 4-5 Starter for 3-7 years OR Set up man for 1-4 years I'd still spin the wheel Look at the draft history tab up top. The very best draft the team has had was 2011, where the significant guys they got were:
- Mookie Betts - Jackie Bradley - Travis Shaw - Matt Barnes
That's as good as it gets. If Mayer pans out as a star and they get one other good player that would make this one of their best drafts this century.
I think the best I've seen is the Dodgers 2016 draft class: Gavin Lux (have yet to breakout) Will Smith the catcher Dustin May DJ Peters Luke Raley Tony Gonsolin If Gavin Lux lives up to the potential then it'll be insane, obviously hoping one day to see this type of class from us (or 2011 type as well)
|
|
|
Post by jaffinator on Jul 12, 2021 10:42:12 GMT -5
The depth of this class has been applauded, and I particularly like the depth of the college pitching. I'm a sucker for college pitching as is, but Here are some of my favorites after the top 80ish or so on most boards I'd like to see one of these guys today in the middle rounds. Zeferjahn was among my list in 2019, so there is precedent! Joe Rock - Ohio (A Mikulski and Rock combo of lefties today would be my favorite thing ever) Mason Miller - Gardner Webb (Really impressed at combine, fastball explodes, surprised he's not higher on the media boards) Mason Black - Lehigh (Reliver risk, but someone I think that can benefit from pro coaching, fastball 97-100, slider flashes above average) Jordan Marks - SC Update (Contro/command specialist, with fastball creeping up to 98. Very Shane Bieber-esque profile when Bieber was drafted) Tanner Bibee- Cal State Fullerton (Another control specialist with 4 pitch mix) Kevin Abel - Oregon St (TJ after winning the CWS as a Frosh, FB has played down, but I like his secondary's, think there is more velo to come, and I think he's an underslot guy. Once referred to him incorrectly as Mick's older brother) Gordon Graceffo - Villanova (I recently saw him during a Cape League start and he impressed me, changeup has potential to be one of the best in the draft) There is also a pitcher form Navy, Charlie Connolly that is pretty highly regarded, and popped up to scouts when he faced off versus Black this spring. He's not quite as heralded as Song, but I'm all here for the Naval Academy pipeline. Some England pitchers to keep an eye on: Mike Vasil- Virginia Emmett Sheehan - BC Steve Hajjar- Michigan Sean Burke - Maryland Ben Casparius- UCONN Nick Mondack- St John's Nick Sincola- Maine Tyler Mattison- Bryant Nick Dombrowski - Hartford Totally on board with Mikulski to start things off. On the lower ranked college pitcher end, some agreements and some disagreements. Not a huge Mason Miller guy - the fastball has nice velo and apparently great analytics but he failed to consistently miss bats with it the way he should. If the scouts think it's just a matter of approach, then whatever sign me up I guess. Totally in on Jordan Marks. A fastball that you'd hope he can get up to sitting 94 + 2 secondaries that ought to be above average when it's all said and done + excellent command/control - sign me up. Other lower ranked guys I liked (bit of a big school/CWS bias here, sorry): Jonathan Cannon (Georgia): growing into a 6'6 frame still, already has an above average change. Velocity has been ticking up, but a bought of mono brought it down a bit. Good athlete. If he's healthy and you can add some muscle we ought to be talking about 95 fb + nice change. If you can figure out a third pitch, that's a mid rotation starter. Mack Anglin (Clemson): Strong feel for above average to plus curveball and slider. Fb hits 95 and above consistently with spin. Delivery a bit violent and long, but the stuff is there, worth a risk later. Russell Smith (TCU): 6'9 with excellent command/control, especially of the fb which tends to sit low 90s. Plus change in my opinion and a good candidate to add velocity. Dominic Hamel (Dallas Baptist): elite analytics on the pitches. Sits low 90s on the fb, plus breaking stuff (though they blend), star of a very good DBU team. Dylan Heid (Pitt - Johnstown): Great extension, great analytics, shit competition. Two guy worth taking later round risks on for their elite stuff but not super command/control: Eric Cerantola (Mississippi State), Griff McGarry (UVA) and Nick Nastrini (UCLA). Cerantola throws a hard fb and a hard curve both of which would be true plus pitches if he could locate them worth a damn. Nastrini tunnels a mid 90s fb and a change with plenty of movement and has other breaking stuff too. McGarry can pump a mid 90s heater with life, throws an above average change, and has more breaking stuff. Great CWS, mediocre rest of the season. Cerantola's command was bad enough that he was left off of the MS CWS roster.
|
|
radiohix
Veteran
'At the end of the day, we bang. We bang. We're going to swing.' Alex Verdugo
Posts: 6,306
|
Post by radiohix on Jul 12, 2021 10:42:42 GMT -5
Some here mentioned the need to pull a "Nick Yorke type of pick" in the 2nd round, Peyton Stovall is EXACTLY that. I saw some writings grading his hit tool as high as 70! I'm a sucker for that
|
|
nomar
Veteran
Posts: 10,803
|
Post by nomar on Jul 12, 2021 10:50:49 GMT -5
Some here mentioned the need to pull a "Nick Yorke type of pick" in the 2nd round, Peyton Stovall is EXACTLY that. I saw some writings grading his hit tool as high as 70! I'm a sucker for thatPretty sure he's 2B only too though. Batting profile looks great to me otherwise. Norby is another 2B hit tool guy out of college
|
|
jimoh
Veteran
Posts: 3,980
|
Post by jimoh on Jul 12, 2021 10:58:17 GMT -5
Interesting thread:
Mark Armour @markarmour04 · 19m 1. WAR baseline 47 wins, so average team will have 34 WAR per 162. 2. The draft brings in 75-80% of MLB talent, so average teams drafts 25-27 future WAR per season. 3. If you draft 40 WAR every year, you will be in the playoffs regularly unless you mess up elsewhere. (1/3)
Mark Armour @markarmour04 · 18m 4. 1968 Dodgers drafted 234 WAR, the best ever, about 9 drafts worth of talent. 5. Studying in 2013, using 1965-2000 drafts, Red Sox had averaged ~40 WAR/year. Second highest was Oakland at 36. 6. BOS has drafted several stars post-2000, so I assume lead has grown. (2/3)
Mark Armour @markarmour04 · 19m 7. I did not adjust for draft position. BOS usually is in back of draft. 8. Takeway: fan expectation (unless you are near the top) should be 25 WAR (essentially AJ Pierzynski). 9. Barry Bonds (162 WAR) was 6.5 years worth of an average draft. (3/3)
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Jul 12, 2021 10:59:40 GMT -5
Some here mentioned the need to pull a "Nick Yorke type of pick" in the 2nd round, Peyton Stovall is EXACTLY that. I saw some writings grading his hit tool as high as 70! I'm a sucker for thatLooks great, but while he may be a Yorke in the hit tool department he won't be in the underslot department - the median ranking seems to be about 40 so the Red Sox would probably have to pay full sticker price.
|
|
|
Post by taftreign on Jul 12, 2021 11:10:01 GMT -5
Some here mentioned the need to pull a "Nick Yorke type of pick" in the 2nd round, Peyton Stovall is EXACTLY that. I saw some writings grading his hit tool as high as 70! I'm a sucker for thatExcept he’s rated the 29th best prospect by MLB and Yorke was rated 139th so not sure that comes with any savings versus slot. For me I’ll take Cody Morrisette. Contact skills, gets on base, versatile defensively. Seems like a kid who has a chance to contribute in some way at the major league level. Still a bit of upside as well.
|
|
|
Post by Underwater Johnson on Jul 12, 2021 11:10:40 GMT -5
I don’t really believe Fabian would go back to school, because if he doesn’t cut his Ks down dramatically, he’d fall even lower next year as a graduating senior with no leverage. That being said, who knows if they’re even interested at all. He has to be polarizing after posting a 28%+ K rate this year. Hard no for me. Dunno about Chaim...
|
|
|
Post by Underwater Johnson on Jul 12, 2021 11:13:08 GMT -5
I don't think they care @ 40, but once they're picking guys ranked in the 100's, it's gonna be tough to find at bats for them in the low minors if they're an OF or SS. Honestly, I'd draft 19 straight pitchers and figure 0-1 will be elite 0-3 will be good 2-5 will be average and the rest will never see the Show. I like my odds. Braves did that a few years ago. Worked okay -- were on their way to '19 WS before spitting the bit in the NLCS.
|
|
|
Post by Underwater Johnson on Jul 12, 2021 11:14:01 GMT -5
I’m feeling lucky today. We’ll get Joshua Baez. More likely though the Red Sox will deep dive into the pitching ranks now. Bobby Dalbec 2.0
|
|
|
Post by freddysthefuture2003 on Jul 12, 2021 11:16:05 GMT -5
I’m feeling lucky today. We’ll get Joshua Baez. More likely though the Red Sox will deep dive into the pitching ranks now. Bobby Dalbec 2.0 A top 100 league wide prospect? Sign me up
|
|
|
Post by rismith on Jul 12, 2021 11:28:06 GMT -5
Would think Mayer is only a little over slot if at all. If I am the Sox I would say this is a good deal. You can go to college and hope in 3 years you get drafted higher and the tax rates are the same or lower (very unlikely) plus the lost opportunity value of the money paid in the present or looking at it a different way discounting the money he "might" receive in the future back to present value.
Maybe you pay him 7M as a token of goodwill but I don't see the risk/reward proposition for Mayer going to college hoping to get picked higher in 3 years over maybe a 500K difference when all factors taken into account. He didn't get drafted 2nd and so doesn't get 2nd pick money.....unless he has real leverage. It would be one thing if he slid down to 20 or so and the difference was material.
|
|
|
Post by ramireja on Jul 12, 2021 11:32:41 GMT -5
Would think Mayer is only a little over slot if at all. If I am the Sox I would say this is a good deal. You can go to college and hope in 3 years you get drafted higher and the tax rates are the same or lower (very unlikely) plus the lost opportunity value of the money paid in the present or looking at it a different way discounting the money he "might" receive in the future back to present value. Maybe you pay him 7M as a token of goodwill but I don't see the risk/reward proposition for Mayer going to college hoping to get picked higher in 3 years over maybe a 500K difference when all factors taken into account. He didn't get drafted 2nd and so doesn't get 2nd pick money.....unless he has real leverage. It would be one thing if he slid down to 20 or so and the difference was material. This completely ignores why he might have been available at #4 in the first place. I think a reasonable theory is that Mayer wanted slot at each position because the Red Sox may have led off with an offer in the $7.5M-$8M range and other teams needed to top that.
|
|
ericmvan
Veteran
Supposed to be working on something more important
Posts: 8,928
|
Post by ericmvan on Jul 12, 2021 11:36:08 GMT -5
Reposting from the Day 1 thread ... Hope this still stays formatted correctly if printed out.
A (hopefully) definitive list of consensus rankings of the next 40 guys (starting with anyone who was ranked in the top 60 by anyone). As you can see, a lot of guys are valued very differently across the four sources (BP only did a top 50), so you don't want to use just one. Sources were weighted by how well they did with round 1, but there weren't dramatic differences. FanGraphs was best, then MLB, BA, and Kiley McDaniel at ESPN (he scored a bunch of hits on the unexpected picks but had even more misses on guys he had rated low).
Positions given are projected MLB roles according to BA. BA had no entry in their top 500 for either Josh Hartle or Cody Schrier, which would seem to be a data deletion mishap, while FG only ranked 78 guys. I dealt with these gaps in the logical way.
Name Lvl Pos BA MLB KMc FG Ave Bubba Chandler HS RHP/SS 20 21 23 16 20 Will Taylor HS CF 21 20 9 30 20 Jud Fabian 4Yr CF 27 23 28 24 25 Antho. Solometo HS LHP 29 17 35 34 29 Ethan Wilson 4Yr LF 26 35 44 21 31 Joshua Baez HS RF 31 24 63 23 35 Jaden Hill 4Yr RHP 24 36 47 39 36 A. del Castillo 4Yr C 25 42 40 50 39 Wes Kath HS 3B 54 34 43 27 39 Connor Norby 4Yr 2B 44 58 32 25 40 Peyton Stovall HS 2B 33 29 48 66 44 Isaac Pacheco HS 3B 36 30 52 65 46 Josh Hartle HS LHP 48 34 60 47 Lonnie White HS RF 32 72 39 54 49 Ben Kurdna HS RHP 48 46 49 56 50 James Wood HS RF 35 44 51 70 50 Tyler Whitaker HS CF 60 37 30 52 Gage Jump HS LHP 58 43 53 57 53 Thatcher Hurd HS RHP 45 60 68 45 54 Ky Bush 4Yr LHP 47 67 55 52 55 Tommy Mace 4Yr RHP 65 45 64 51 56 Matt Mikulski 4Yr LHP 40 50 99 38 56 S Schwellenbach 4Yr RHP/3B 52 54 46 58 James Triantos HS 2B 59 78 61 46 61 Cody Morrisette HS 2B 46 59 58 61 Peyton Wilson 4Yr all 78 68 41 64 63 Chase Burns HS RHP 50 47 97 59 63 Dylan Smith 4Yr RHP 56 74 56 69 64 Alex Mooney HS SS 66 64 75 58 66 Jac. Baumeister HS RHP 84 53 45 66 Bra. Montgomery HS RHP/RF 87 66 86 28 66 Cody Schrier HS SS 63 57 67 Andrew Abbott 4Yr LHP 67 51 70 68 Alex Binelas 4Yr 1B 77 65 93 43 69 Daylen Lile HS LF 62 80 50 69 Chris. Franklin 4Yr CF 57 52 124 49 70 Aaron Zavala 4Yr LF 124 76 69 33 75 Sean Burke 4Yr RHP 53 75 87 75 Davis Diaz HS C/SS 69 71 103 62 76 Ewwin Arroyo HS SS 72 83 66 77
|
|
|
Post by ramireja on Jul 12, 2021 11:39:03 GMT -5
Sign me up for Mikulski if savings are needed, but I'm also wondering if the Red Sox could go the route of HS player they like more than industry consensus who is willing to sign in the $1.3M-$1.5M range (think Ben Hernandez to Royals last year).
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on Jul 12, 2021 11:39:24 GMT -5
Would think Mayer is only a little over slot if at all. If I am the Sox I would say this is a good deal. You can go to college and hope in 3 years you get drafted higher and the tax rates are the same or lower (very unlikely) plus the lost opportunity value of the money paid in the present or looking at it a different way discounting the money he "might" receive in the future back to present value. Maybe you pay him 7M as a token of goodwill but I don't see the risk/reward proposition for Mayer going to college hoping to get picked higher in 3 years over maybe a 500K difference when all factors taken into account. He didn't get drafted 2nd and so doesn't get 2nd pick money.....unless he has real leverage. It would be one thing if he slid down to 20 or so and the difference was material. This completely ignores why he might have been available at #4 in the first place. I think a reasonable theory is that Mayer wanted slot at each position because the Red Sox may have led off with an offer in the $7.5M-$8M range and other teams needed to top that. I think it's likely more accurate to model this as a four-way negotiation between Pittsburgh, Boston, Davis and Mayer that ended before the draft started, instead of a Mayer/Boston negotiation that started after Manfred read the draft card.
|
|
|
Post by outofleftfield on Jul 12, 2021 11:43:04 GMT -5
My quick board is Hill, Mace, Miklulski, Pacheco
Feeling good about today in general, though.
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Jul 12, 2021 11:45:02 GMT -5
Would think Mayer is only a little over slot if at all. If I am the Sox I would say this is a good deal. You can go to college and hope in 3 years you get drafted higher and the tax rates are the same or lower (very unlikely) plus the lost opportunity value of the money paid in the present or looking at it a different way discounting the money he "might" receive in the future back to present value. Maybe you pay him 7M as a token of goodwill but I don't see the risk/reward proposition for Mayer going to college hoping to get picked higher in 3 years over maybe a 500K difference when all factors taken into account. He didn't get drafted 2nd and so doesn't get 2nd pick money.....unless he has real leverage. It would be one thing if he slid down to 20 or so and the difference was material. This completely ignores why he might have been available at #4 in the first place. I think a reasonable theory is that Mayer wanted slot at each position because the Red Sox may have led off with an offer in the $7.5M-$8M range and other teams needed to top that. Yeah, exactly. People are saying "what leverage does he have? he can't turn them down" but he had leverage before he was picked - which is when the deal (whatever it is) was agreed to.
|
|
|
Post by kman22 on Jul 12, 2021 11:50:56 GMT -5
Reposting from the Day 1 thread ... Hope this still stays formatted correctly if printed out.
A (hopefully) definitive list of consensus rankings of the next 40 guys (starting with anyone who was ranked in the top 60 by anyone). As you can see, a lot of guys are valued very differently across the four sources (BP only did a top 50), so you don't want to use just one. Sources were weighted by how well they did with round 1, but there weren't dramatic differences. FanGraphs was best, then MLB, BA, and Kiley McDaniel at ESPN (he scored a bunch of hits on the unexpected picks but had even more misses on guys he had rated low).
Positions given are projected MLB roles according to BA. BA had no entry in their top 500 for either Josh Hartle or Cody Schrier, which would seem to be a data deletion mishap, while FG only ranked 78 guys. I dealt with these gaps in the logical way.
Name Lvl Pos BA MLB KMc FG Ave Bubba Chandler HS RHP/SS 20 21 23 16 20 Will Taylor HS CF 21 20 9 30 20 Jud Fabian 4Yr CF 27 23 28 24 25 Antho. Solometo HS LHP 29 17 35 34 29 Ethan Wilson 4Yr LF 26 35 44 21 31 Joshua Baez HS RF 31 24 63 23 35 Jaden Hill 4Yr RHP 24 36 47 39 36 A. del Castillo 4Yr C 25 42 40 50 39 Wes Kath HS 3B 54 34 43 27 39 Connor Norby 4Yr 2B 44 58 32 25 40 Peyton Stovall HS 2B 33 29 48 66 44 Isaac Pacheco HS 3B 36 30 52 65 46 Josh Hartle HS LHP 48 34 60 47 Lonnie White HS RF 32 72 39 54 49 Ben Kurdna HS RHP 48 46 49 56 50 James Wood HS RF 35 44 51 70 50 Tyler Whitaker HS CF 60 37 30 52 Gage Jump HS LHP 58 43 53 57 53 Thatcher Hurd HS RHP 45 60 68 45 54 Ky Bush 4Yr LHP 47 67 55 52 55 Tommy Mace 4Yr RHP 65 45 64 51 56 Matt Mikulski 4Yr LHP 40 50 99 38 56 S Schwellenbach 4Yr RHP/3B 52 54 46 58 James Triantos HS 2B 59 78 61 46 61 Cody Morrisette HS 2B 46 59 58 61 Peyton Wilson 4Yr all 78 68 41 64 63 Chase Burns HS RHP 50 47 97 59 63 Dylan Smith 4Yr RHP 56 74 56 69 64 Alex Mooney HS SS 66 64 75 58 66 Jac. Baumeister HS RHP 84 53 45 66 Bra. Montgomery HS RHP/RF 87 66 86 28 66 Cody Schrier HS SS 63 57 67 Andrew Abbott 4Yr LHP 67 51 70 68 Alex Binelas 4Yr 1B 77 65 93 43 69 Daylen Lile HS LF 62 80 50 69 Chris. Franklin 4Yr CF 57 52 124 49 70 Aaron Zavala 4Yr LF 124 76 69 33 75 Sean Burke 4Yr RHP 53 75 87 75 Davis Diaz HS C/SS 69 71 103 62 76 Ewwin Arroyo HS SS 72 83 66 77
Totally guessing, but pretty sure Hartle and Schrier both said they were going to school and "removed" themselves from the draft, maybe that took them off the ranking list for BA?
|
|
radiohix
Veteran
'At the end of the day, we bang. We bang. We're going to swing.' Alex Verdugo
Posts: 6,306
|
Post by radiohix on Jul 12, 2021 11:51:09 GMT -5
Instead of Baez, why not Braylon Bishop? Uber athlete (HS QB, Track & Field star), plays plus defense in CF, great plate discipline and swings like Cody Bellinger? He too, like Baez, has contact issues that need to be worked on but the price tag should be a lot lower.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jul 12, 2021 11:52:25 GMT -5
As of their 7/5 ranking, BA had Hartle at 37 and Schrier at 112.
|
|
|
Post by 1toolplayer on Jul 12, 2021 11:57:24 GMT -5
Reposting from the Day 1 thread ... Hope this still stays formatted correctly if printed out.
A (hopefully) definitive list of consensus rankings of the next 40 guys (starting with anyone who was ranked in the top 60 by anyone). As you can see, a lot of guys are valued very differently across the four sources (BP only did a top 50), so you don't want to use just one. Sources were weighted by how well they did with round 1, but there weren't dramatic differences. FanGraphs was best, then MLB, BA, and Kiley McDaniel at ESPN (he scored a bunch of hits on the unexpected picks but had even more misses on guys he had rated low).
Positions given are projected MLB roles according to BA. BA had no entry in their top 500 for either Josh Hartle or Cody Schrier, which would seem to be a data deletion mishap, while FG only ranked 78 guys. I dealt with these gaps in the logical way.
Name Lvl Pos BA MLB KMc FG Ave Bubba Chandler HS RHP/SS 20 21 23 16 20 Will Taylor HS CF 21 20 9 30 20 Jud Fabian 4Yr CF 27 23 28 24 25 Antho. Solometo HS LHP 29 17 35 34 29 Ethan Wilson 4Yr LF 26 35 44 21 31 Joshua Baez HS RF 31 24 63 23 35 Jaden Hill 4Yr RHP 24 36 47 39 36 A. del Castillo 4Yr C 25 42 40 50 39 Wes Kath HS 3B 54 34 43 27 39 Connor Norby 4Yr 2B 44 58 32 25 40 Peyton Stovall HS 2B 33 29 48 66 44 Isaac Pacheco HS 3B 36 30 52 65 46 Josh Hartle HS LHP 48 34 60 47 Lonnie White HS RF 32 72 39 54 49 Ben Kurdna HS RHP 48 46 49 56 50 James Wood HS RF 35 44 51 70 50 Tyler Whitaker HS CF 60 37 30 52 Gage Jump HS LHP 58 43 53 57 53 Thatcher Hurd HS RHP 45 60 68 45 54 Ky Bush 4Yr LHP 47 67 55 52 55 Tommy Mace 4Yr RHP 65 45 64 51 56 Matt Mikulski 4Yr LHP 40 50 99 38 56 S Schwellenbach 4Yr RHP/3B 52 54 46 58 James Triantos HS 2B 59 78 61 46 61 Cody Morrisette HS 2B 46 59 58 61 Peyton Wilson 4Yr all 78 68 41 64 63 Chase Burns HS RHP 50 47 97 59 63 Dylan Smith 4Yr RHP 56 74 56 69 64 Alex Mooney HS SS 66 64 75 58 66 Jac. Baumeister HS RHP 84 53 45 66 Bra. Montgomery HS RHP/RF 87 66 86 28 66 Cody Schrier HS SS 63 57 67 Andrew Abbott 4Yr LHP 67 51 70 68 Alex Binelas 4Yr 1B 77 65 93 43 69 Daylen Lile HS LF 62 80 50 69 Chris. Franklin 4Yr CF 57 52 124 49 70 Aaron Zavala 4Yr LF 124 76 69 33 75 Sean Burke 4Yr RHP 53 75 87 75 Davis Diaz HS C/SS 69 71 103 62 76 Ewwin Arroyo HS SS 72 83 66 77
Totally guessing, but pretty sure Hartle and Schrier both said they were going to school and "removed" themselves from the draft, maybe that took them off the ranking list for BA? Yes, BA removed them when they removed themselves from the draft. Thatcher Hurd recently removed himself as well.
|
|
|