SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
How far away are the Red Sox from contending?
|
Post by wOBA Fett on Nov 14, 2022 21:56:51 GMT -5
I know Bloom is in a make it or break it year, but the franchise still seems 2-4 years away from contending in the toughest division in baseball. The Rays and Blue Jays aren't going anywhere over the next few seasons and Baltimore will only get better as their prospect wave hits the majors. Going .500% in the AL East will be extremely difficult as the Yankees seem like the only team in the division that will get worse over the next few years, especially without Aaron Judge.
Given the Red Sox are in no-mans-land territory this offseason, throwing long term money to fix a team without a young core might not be worth it. Part of me looks at where the Red Sox are positioned in the AL East over the next few years and wonder if committing to a total rebuild at this point wouldn't make the most sense for the franchise if we don't like the markets on Xander or Correra.
|
|
cdj
Veteran
Posts: 14,083
|
Post by cdj on Nov 14, 2022 21:58:47 GMT -5
Ask me in a couple months
Too much money available to spend to know anything right now. They can contend immediately with the right moves
|
|
|
Post by wOBA Fett on Nov 14, 2022 22:06:54 GMT -5
Ask me in a couple months Too much money available to spend to know anything right now. They can contend immediately with the right moves Can they fix all their holes for $120MM? The Red Sox lack an ace, closer, at least one outfielder, a DH, a SS, a catcher and a bullpen. Im not convinced this team is all that close to contending for a championship as currently built and locking up free agents to multi-year deals will only come back to bite us in the ass by the time we actually have our young core ready to reach the majors.
|
|
cdj
Veteran
Posts: 14,083
|
Post by cdj on Nov 14, 2022 22:10:14 GMT -5
Ask me in a couple months Too much money available to spend to know anything right now. They can contend immediately with the right moves Can they fix all their holes for $120MM? The Red Sox lack an ace, closer, at least one outfielder, a DH, a SS, a catcher and a bullpen. Im not convinced this team is all that close to contending for a championship as currently built and locking up free agents to multi-year deals will only come back to bite us in the ass by the time we actually have our young core ready to reach the majors. Phillies won 87 games and made it to the World Series, don’t have to necessarily be infallible to be a contender these days. You also don’t know who is going to improve and/or surprise that is already on the roster They’ll for sure need to add impact talent though- the good news is they have the money and some prospect capital to do that
|
|
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Nov 14, 2022 22:17:43 GMT -5
Ask me in a couple months Too much money available to spend to know anything right now. They can contend immediately with the right moves Can they fix all their holes for $120MM? The Red Sox lack an ace, closer, at least one outfielder, a DH, a SS, a catcher and a bullpen. Im not convinced this team is all that close to contending for a championship as currently built and locking up free agents to multi-year deals will only come back to bite us in the ass by the time we actually have our young core ready to reach the majors. With the current wild card rules in place you can win 87 games and go to the World Series, although it was a 106 win team that prevailed. I would agree with you saying that this team right now doesn't have the look of an annual 95 win/year team and as they are currently constituted, they are the worst team in the division. Of course the winter has barely begun. Can they fix all their holes? Probably not, although if Bloom does well they can fill most of them or at least fill enough of them they can hope to win 85 games, squeak into the playoffs and capture lightning in a bottle sort of like the Phillies did. As to whether I trust Bloom to fix the team with all that money that's available that's a different topic of conversation. But I don't see why if they do a reasonably good job why they can't perhaps win 80 something games and make the playoffs. Of course you can easily make that argument with the other 4 teams in the division and they all start from a better position than the Sox do - in other words they're in better shape going into 2023. I think the Yankees are kind of in trouble if they lose Judge, but this team never has losing seasons so they'll win at least 80 something games although there's still a good chance they get Judge back and still improve the team enough to win their usual 90 - 100 games. Tampa always seems to be better than they are on paper. The Orioles are on the way up and the Blue Jays always look like the best team but settle in the low 90s when it seems they should be better, or at least they look like they do after they destroy the Red Sox. Your main point is correct. I don't think this is a consistent 90 win team until they put a young core in place (enough of the let's trade Casas stuff - he's a huge part of the solution going forward!), and even then they'll have to acquire top notch talent in free agnecy by then instead of shopping in the mid tier to bargain section, but the young cheap talent will allow for them to spend big. They're not there yet and it's going to take a few years.
|
|
|
Post by soxfansince67 on Nov 14, 2022 22:19:50 GMT -5
I know it is apples and oranges, but 2012 - worst. 2013 - World Series champs
I won't predict what 2023 will look like in terms of likely contention until I see how Bloom approaches things - so I am just going to sit back and relax, bask in the Celts and Bruins, and watch those who post here, who are much more knowledgeable than I on what the options will likely be.
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Nov 14, 2022 22:30:26 GMT -5
The Red Sox had a lot of good luck and won 92 games in 2021 and made it to the ALCS. Then people predicted them to win ~90 games in 2022. Then they had a lot of bad luck and won 78 games in 2022. Now people are saying they have no hope of competing in 2023 despite a huge amount of money coming off the books and major prospects starting to matriculate. Maybe there are better ways to project the team than simply assuming the previous season will repeat itself because it's the last thing you remember?
|
|
|
Post by wOBA Fett on Nov 14, 2022 22:34:12 GMT -5
Can they fix all their holes for $120MM? The Red Sox lack an ace, closer, at least one outfielder, a DH, a SS, a catcher and a bullpen. Im not convinced this team is all that close to contending for a championship as currently built and locking up free agents to multi-year deals will only come back to bite us in the ass by the time we actually have our young core ready to reach the majors. Phillies won 87 games and made it to the World Series, don’t have to necessarily be infallible to be a contender these days. You also don’t know who is going to improve and/or surprise that is already on the roster They’ll for sure need to add impact talent though- the good news is they have the money and some prospect capital to do that I'd just add the Phillies had Harper, JT, Hoskins going into the season and then added Castellanos and Schwarber to bolster their lineup while giving Bohm another season to develop. The Phillies also had two frontline starters in Nola and Wheeler and were able to piece together the rest of their rotation and bullpen. Are the Red Sox as close as the Phillies were entering this 2021 offseason? We only have Story and Devers right now and I don't see the Red Sox currently having a single front line starter rivaling Nola or Wheeler unless Sale returns to form and stays healthy. It just seems like our best case scenario requires a ton of things going right that shouldn't be expected to happen.
|
|
|
Post by wOBA Fett on Nov 14, 2022 22:50:09 GMT -5
The Red Sox had a lot of good luck and won 92 games in 2021 and made it to the ALCS. Then people predicted them to win ~90 games in 2022. Then they had a lot of bad luck and won 78 games in 2022. Now people are saying they have no hope of competing in 2023 despite a huge amount of money coming off the books and major prospects starting to matriculate. Maybe there are better ways to project the team than simply assuming the previous season will repeat itself because it's the last thing you remember? Let's say the red Sox sign Judge, DeGrom, and Correa and spend all 120MM on those 3 players. Here's the lineup C: Wong/Mcguire D+ 1st: Casas/Hosmer B- 2nd: Story A- SS: Correa A 3rd Devers A+ LF: Verdugo B- CF: Keke C+ RF: Judge A+ SP1: DeGrom A+ SP2: Evoldi B+ SP3: Sale B+ SP4: Whitlock B SP5: Bello/Pavetta B- Bullpen: C Door #1 FA
The Red Sox would be able to build a legit 2022 year contender assuming DeGrom and Sale stay healthy and we can salvage some type of a bullpen. We also lose Devers next year and have Correa and Judge on the back end of long term bad deals by the time our next waive of elite prospects start reaching the majors and will be stuck with their bad contracts by the time our young core is in need of an impact piece to take the roster to the next level. Door #2 Trade
If we trade to address our lineup needs and get more cost efficient options and gut the middle 3-10 of our system and hope our 2021 draft class and international signs can fix the holes. Door #3 RebuildTrade what we can for more elite prospects and bring up an elite young core between 2023-2025 with enough cap space to add pieces as needed and lock up young players to long term deals. We are also able to continue building through the draft with better picks so we can acquire another wave of prospects coming up between 2025-2028. The AL East will also be more beatable as Toronto and the Yankees enter their rebuilds after 2024. Option 3 seems like best long term move as much as I hate sucking for a few more
|
|
|
Post by blizzards39 on Nov 14, 2022 23:54:10 GMT -5
With the balanced schedule and the expanded playoffs divisions are not all that pertinent anymore. You have to look where you fall in the whole of the AL. The top 2 teams get the byes and a huge advantage but no gaurantee. Looking at the AL as it stands now this is what I see. A teams - Astros B teams - mariners, Jays, MFY, Guardians, rays C teams - Sox, Sox, twins, orioles D teams - angels, tigers, rangers E teams - royals, As Basicly Sox are on cusp. Do not need to improve that much to be playoff team. Unlikely to be able to improve enough to be top 2 in AL. So what are your goals and expectations. I think do everything you can do, without mortgaging the future, in order to improve. Once you feel you have that top 2 team then push the chips in.
|
|
|
Post by blizzards39 on Nov 14, 2022 23:56:54 GMT -5
The Red Sox had a lot of good luck and won 92 games in 2021 and made it to the ALCS. Then people predicted them to win ~90 games in 2022. Then they had a lot of bad luck and won 78 games in 2022. Now people are saying they have no hope of competing in 2023 despite a huge amount of money coming off the books and major prospects starting to matriculate. Maybe there are better ways to project the team than simply assuming the previous season will repeat itself because it's the last thing you remember? Let's say the red Sox sign Judge, DeGrom, and Correa and spend all 120MM on those 3 players. Here's the lineup C: Wong/Mcguire D+ 1st: Casas/Hosmer B- 2nd: Story A- SS: Correa A 3rd Devers A+ LF: Verdugo B- CF: Keke C+ RF: Judge A+ SP1: DeGrom A+ SP2: Evoldi B+ SP3: Sale B+ SP4: Whitlock B SP5: Bello/Pavetta B- Bullpen: C Door #1 FA
The Red Sox would be able to build a legit 2022 year contender assuming DeGrom and Sale stay healthy and we can salvage some type of a bullpen. We also lose Devers next year and have Correa and Judge on the back end of long term bad deals by the time our next waive of elite prospects start reaching the majors and will be stuck with their bad contracts by the time our young core is in need of an impact piece to take the roster to the next level. Door #2 Trade
If we trade to address our lineup needs and get more cost efficient options and gut the middle 3-10 of our system and hope our 2021 draft class and international signs can fix the holes. Door #3 RebuildTrade what we can for more elite prospects and bring up an elite young core between 2023-2025 with enough cap space to add pieces as needed and lock up young players to long term deals. We are also able to continue building through the draft with better picks so we can acquire another wave of prospects coming up between 2025-2028. The AL East will also be more beatable as Toronto and the Yankees enter their rebuilds after 2024. Option 3 seems like best long term move as much as I hate sucking for a few more No team with a $220-250M$ budget should ever rebuild. No need and no guarantee. Almost half the teams make the playoffs.
|
|
|
Post by Underwater Johnson on Nov 15, 2022 0:25:46 GMT -5
I'll go with 2023 if ownership is willing to write a few checks (including a tax check). I'd spend $85-90m on deGrom, Bogie, and Jansen. If we're talking $120m total, throw in Nimmo and you still have a little to fill in with some role players. Jansen is a one-year deal, which comes off the books to add to a Devers extension in '24. Some of that could also pay for the parade...
|
|
|
Post by notnickyorke on Nov 15, 2022 4:24:12 GMT -5
I feel like they are not that far off from contending. They didn't feel that far away this past year. Add 2 decent bullpen arms, another outfielder for the whole year, and a backup 1st baseman and I think they would have made the playoffs this past year.
For all the talk about the depth Bloom has built up, he left them unforgivably thin and weak at first base and rightfield most of the past year. If Bloom continues to leave multiple large holes on the roster, then they are not going anywhere fast.
|
|
|
Post by xdmo on Nov 15, 2022 7:06:15 GMT -5
I'm interested to see what kind of trades Bloom can make with the major league roster. He really hasn't done that yet in his time here. We won't know half the answers to the roster until we see what he can do there.
The free agent market is pretty straightforward. It's just a matter of seeing who Bloom values most there.
The answer to the question of this thread is directly related to how well Bloom can trade and who he values in free agency.
|
|
|
Post by alexcorahomevideo on Nov 15, 2022 7:35:58 GMT -5
I feel like they are not that far off from contending. They didn't feel that far away this past year. Add 2 decent bullpen arms, another outfielder for the whole year, and a backup 1st baseman and I think they would have made the playoffs this past year. For all the talk about the depth Bloom has built up, he left them unforgivably thin and weak at first base and rightfield most of the past year. If Bloom continues to leave multiple large holes on the roster, then they are not going anywhere fast. If you swap out James Paxton for a full season of Pham and a 1st baseman then they probably do make the playoffs. Wouldn't have hurt if they traded Renfroe for a good pen arm in lieu of two middling prospects and JBJ. My uncle used to love buying 1 and 2 dollar scratch tickets and maybe won 10 dollars off a couple but more often than not you're going to lose. If Bloom spends and is aggressive then the team will make the playoffs this upcoming season. If they keep being conservative and replaces JD internally and goes for a couple stop gap players then they probably contend for the final wild card spot. Today should be interesting to see how they use their 40 man roster.
|
|
|
Post by greatscottcooper on Nov 15, 2022 8:16:19 GMT -5
If the last several years have taught us anything it should be the difference between first and last isn't just a roster move or two but it could be the difference between a clean bill of health and a mountain of injury.
You may say the Sox overperformed in 2021, and I'd agree, but it's probably also true that they underperformed in 2022. There are plenty of permutations of the future that have the Sox winning over 90 games next year and they are very reasonable and within the budget. However, they could just as easily lay an egg next year.
As someone who considers himself a realistic pragmatic person, I also happen to be an optimist so excuse me while I prepare for a 2023 title run.
|
|
|
Post by bspeed on Nov 15, 2022 8:30:33 GMT -5
Since 1986 the Sox have never gone more than 3 seasons without a playoff appearance 91-93, 00-02 and 10-12 (not including the 1994 strike shortened season) and two of the missed seasons they won 90+ games. They'll be fine, we just have to let it play out.
|
|
|
Post by soxfansince67 on Nov 18, 2022 10:29:44 GMT -5
according to FanGraphs very early power ranking post (from today) blogs.fangraphs.com/fangraphs-power-rankings-the-beginning-of-the-offseason/We are a Tier 4 (out of 6 tiers) team, essentially predicted to be .500 - a High Variance Could - Be team. From the article - "The Red Sox find themselves at a bit of a crossroads. Xander Bogaerts opting out of his contract makes their lineup feel a lot less intimidating. With Trevor Story locked up for five more seasons and Rafael Devers the subject of long-term extension talks, they could try to build around those two. It would be difficult; there are tons of holes on the roster and few major league-ready solutions in the farm system. If they do try to build another contender with what they have, they absolutely need Chris Sale to be healthy next year; his last three seasons have been wiped out by injuries."
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Nov 18, 2022 10:53:11 GMT -5
according to FanGraphs very early power ranking post (from today) blogs.fangraphs.com/fangraphs-power-rankings-the-beginning-of-the-offseason/We are a Tier 4 (out of 6 tiers) team, essentially predicted to be .500 - a High Variance Could - Be team. From the article - "The Red Sox find themselves at a bit of a crossroads. Xander Bogaerts opting out of his contract makes their lineup feel a lot less intimidating. With Trevor Story locked up for five more seasons and Rafael Devers the subject of long-term extension talks, they could try to build around those two. It would be difficult; there are tons of holes on the roster and few major league-ready solutions in the farm system. If they do try to build another contender with what they have, they absolutely need Chris Sale to be healthy next year; his last three seasons have been wiped out by injuries." This is kind of quibbly, but I wouldn't exactly call this a "prediction"... these are just making projections for current rosters, which are of course nothing like what teams will look like by April. It's basically answering the question "what if all current free agents got on a rocket ship tomorrow and never came back?"
So another way to put it is: they're an 82-80 roster before anyone spends their money this offseason, and they have way more money to spend than most teams.
|
|
|
Post by soxfansince67 on Nov 18, 2022 11:13:15 GMT -5
according to FanGraphs very early power ranking post (from today) blogs.fangraphs.com/fangraphs-power-rankings-the-beginning-of-the-offseason/We are a Tier 4 (out of 6 tiers) team, essentially predicted to be .500 - a High Variance Could - Be team. From the article - "The Red Sox find themselves at a bit of a crossroads. Xander Bogaerts opting out of his contract makes their lineup feel a lot less intimidating. With Trevor Story locked up for five more seasons and Rafael Devers the subject of long-term extension talks, they could try to build around those two. It would be difficult; there are tons of holes on the roster and few major league-ready solutions in the farm system. If they do try to build another contender with what they have, they absolutely need Chris Sale to be healthy next year; his last three seasons have been wiped out by injuries." This is kind of quibbly, but I wouldn't exactly call this a "prediction"... these are just making projections for current rosters, which are of course nothing like what teams will look like by April. It's basically answering the question "what if all current free agents got on a rocket ship tomorrow and never came back?"
So another way to put it is: they're an 82-80 roster before anyone spends their money this offseason, and they have way more money to spend than most teams.
Agreed. I do find these articles interesting, hence me posting. Those who read can assess them as they wish.
|
|
|
Post by notstarboard on Nov 18, 2022 12:20:53 GMT -5
The Red Sox had a lot of good luck and won 92 games in 2021 and made it to the ALCS. Then people predicted them to win ~90 games in 2022. Then they had a lot of bad luck and won 78 games in 2022. Now people are saying they have no hope of competing in 2023 despite a huge amount of money coming off the books and major prospects starting to matriculate. Maybe there are better ways to project the team than simply assuming the previous season will repeat itself because it's the last thing you remember? Let's say the red Sox sign Judge, DeGrom, and Correa and spend all 120MM on those 3 players. Here's the lineup C: Wong/Mcguire D+ 1st: Casas/Hosmer B- 2nd: Story A- SS: Correa A 3rd Devers A+ LF: Verdugo B- CF: Keke C+ RF: Judge A+ SP1: DeGrom A+ SP2: Evoldi B+ SP3: Sale B+ SP4: Whitlock B SP5: Bello/Pavetta B- Bullpen: C Door #1 FA
The Red Sox would be able to build a legit 2022 year contender assuming DeGrom and Sale stay healthy and we can salvage some type of a bullpen. We also lose Devers next year and have Correa and Judge on the back end of long term bad deals by the time our next waive of elite prospects start reaching the majors and will be stuck with their bad contracts by the time our young core is in need of an impact piece to take the roster to the next level. Door #2 Trade
If we trade to address our lineup needs and get more cost efficient options and gut the middle 3-10 of our system and hope our 2021 draft class and international signs can fix the holes. Door #3 RebuildTrade what we can for more elite prospects and bring up an elite young core between 2023-2025 with enough cap space to add pieces as needed and lock up young players to long term deals. We are also able to continue building through the draft with better picks so we can acquire another wave of prospects coming up between 2025-2028. The AL East will also be more beatable as Toronto and the Yankees enter their rebuilds after 2024. Option 3 seems like best long term move as much as I hate sucking for a few more Door #4 FA & Trade but be smart about it No Judge, no deGrom. Sensible signings. Ideally X or another top SS, Devers extension if possible, RF (possibly via trade; Alek Thomas? Bryan Reynolds?), 1-2 SP (Senga? Eovaldi?), a late inning arm or two (doesn't need to be a bonafide closer; Green? Chafin?).
McGuire seems like he'll be solid as a most-days catcher and I'm optimistic Wong will make a good adjustment to MLB too. I will not stand for this D+ slander!
|
|
TearsIn04
Veteran
Everybody knows Nelson de la Rosa, but who is Karim Garcia?
Posts: 2,835
|
Post by TearsIn04 on Nov 19, 2022 14:27:46 GMT -5
A misconception that shows up in the threads about the 2023 Red Sox is the idea that they can fill a lot of holes because they have a lot of money to spend. I don't see it.
Three points: 1. FG Roster Resource has them at $151M, including arb estimates, but not including X or Eo. That's against a LTT of $233M. Assuming they stay under the LTT - and they should since 2023 is not a GFIN year and they foolishly went over it to finish last in 2022 - they have $81M to spend.
2. But they shouldn't spend the entire $81M because they'll need room for deadline acquisitions if they contend, or even if they don't contend but CB wants to do a genius buy-and-sell thing at the deadline (snark intended).
3. They can't tie up all their FA spending on long-term contracts because that'll cannibalize payroll for 2024 and beyond. Whatever amount they spend should include some one- and two-year deals.
So, where does that leave us?
1. X should be the priority and FWIW CB says he is. Let's say that costs $26M in AAV. We're down to $55M for 2023.
2. I don't think they want to pay Eo $20M and will work out a longer deal. Let's say it's two years at $15M per. Now we have the same team that just finished last and $40M left to spend before we hit the LTT.
3. The BP is probably the cheapest place to make a significant add. I like Andrew Chafin. MLBTR has him projected at two years/$9M in AAV. $31M left to spend.
At that point, we still need an OF, a DH, another SP and at least one low-cost, let's-take-a-shot RP. Kodai Senga and Jose Abreu are probably out of reach.
It think it points to CB waiting until deep into the off-season to pick through the leftovers and taking flyers on guys to fill some of these holes. I wouldn't be surprised to see a lukewarm JDM market and him back on a modest one- or two-year contract. MLBTR says two years, $15M AAV, which would would leave $16M under the LTT, though I have a feeling he could cost less than MLBTR projects.
I'd look to someone like Michael Brantley, assuming his shoulder is sound) as as LHH platoon with Refsnyder in LF. MLBTR says one year, $15M, but if he's a Dumpster-dive signing in Feb. it should be less.
They could still leave some money for cheapo, one-year deals for a low-budget RP and a utility-type position player who can give them some roster flexibility - a better version of what Marwin Gonzalez turned out to be in 2021.
Against RHP: Dugo, LF X, SS Raffy, 3B JDM, DH Casas, 1B Story 2B Brantley, LF KKH, CF McGuire, C KKH, CF
Rotation in no particular order: Eo, Bello, Whitlock, Pivetta, low-budget signee on a one-year deal - Hill? That would leave Sale and Paxton to make however many starts they can, plus Kutter, as rotation fill-ins.
High-leverage BP guys: Chafin, Schreiber, Houck, whoever else steps into the circle of trust - Barnes? Kutter? Brandon Walter?
|
|
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Nov 19, 2022 15:25:18 GMT -5
Basically any team within a stone's throw of .500 is basically "contending" these days or at least close enough that fangraphs says they have a 30% chance and the fanbase is afraid to sell.
This is because so many (too many) teams make the playoffs you dont necessarily need to build a 90 win team to compete. For the most part if you build a team capable of 85 to 90 wins that puts you right in the thick of postseason contention.
The Sox at the moment are a 78 win team so they're about 7 to 10 games away from being a contender which is doable if Bloom does a good job.
Eventually a 78 win team might actually snag a playoff spot, especially if Rob Manfred gets his way and two more playoff teams are added. Could happen even if that's not the case.
So at 78 wins they could be in contention. What a warped way to compete.
|
|
kwodes
Veteran
Posts: 419
Member is Online
|
Post by kwodes on Nov 19, 2022 16:02:01 GMT -5
I get the 2012 off-season comparisons to this off-season, but I think there's a big difference. The 2012 team struggled, but still had a strong core already under contract (Ortiz, ellsbury, pedroia, middlebrooks, Lester, lackey, buchholz, with xander in AAA). Where is the strong core on this team currently under contract? Devers, bello, casas?, story, Verdugo?, pivetta?, am I missing someone obvious? It just seems like the 2012 team had the core and just needed complementary pieces whereas this team needs some more core pieces.
|
|
|
Post by notstarboard on Nov 20, 2022 11:53:41 GMT -5
I get the 2012 off-season comparisons to this off-season, but I think there's a big difference. The 2012 team struggled, but still had a strong core already under contract (Ortiz, ellsbury, pedroia, middlebrooks, Lester, lackey, buchholz, with xander in AAA). Where is the strong core on this team currently under contract? Devers, bello, casas?, story, Verdugo?, pivetta?, am I missing someone obvious? It just seems like the 2012 team had the core and just needed complementary pieces whereas this team needs some more core pieces. Our lord and savior Garrett Whitlock
|
|
|