SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
jimed14
Veteran
Posts: 25,831
Member is Online
|
Post by jimed14 on Jan 8, 2014 11:19:50 GMT -5
For the record, I liked the Johnson pick at the time, thought it was underrated. People seemed to think that he was a 88mph soft-tossing lefty, when he clearly isn't. But I also completely get that I have a bias here; I love 91-93 mph lefty pitchers. As a little kid, I loved watching Jimmy Key, always thought (the big drunk lefty from the Yankees whose name for some reason is escaping me now) (update: David Wells!) was terrific, etc, etc. In fact, I highlighted the Gammons thing mainly to start a discussion on him. But, the reality is that Johnson didn't pitch much his first year (not his fault, obviously!) and started slowly this past year, and everyone had an expectation that he should blow through the lower minors because of his pedigree. Even his Greenville placement was seen as a negative ... none of this is entirely wrong (a guy with his experience *should* probably have great results in A and SSA), but it's also based on a very small window of time and there are some obvious extenuating factors. So I'm just wondering if anyone has a solid case for optimism. He pitched better as the season went on last year, Chris's AFL report said he looked healthy and strong in the fall ... should we be looking at him more? I'm still mad the Red Sox let Bruce Hurst go.
|
|
jimoh
Veteran
Posts: 4,203
|
Post by jimoh on Jan 8, 2014 13:21:40 GMT -5
For the record, I liked the Johnson pick at the time, thought it was underrated. People seemed to think that he was a 88mph soft-tossing lefty, when he clearly isn't. But I also completely get that I have a bias here; I love 91-93 mph lefty pitchers. As a little kid, I loved watching Jimmy Key, always thought (the big drunk lefty from the Yankees whose name for some reason is escaping me now) (update: David Wells!) was terrific, etc, etc. In fact, I highlighted the Gammons thing mainly to start a discussion on him. But, the reality is that Johnson didn't pitch much his first year (not his fault, obviously!) and started slowly this past year, and everyone had an expectation that he should blow through the lower minors because of his pedigree. Even his Greenville placement was seen as a negative ... none of this is entirely wrong (a guy with his experience *should* probably have great results in A and SSA), but it's also based on a very small window of time and there are some obvious extenuating factors. So I'm just wondering if anyone has a solid case for optimism. He pitched better as the season went on last year, Chris's AFL report said he looked healthy and strong in the fall ... should we be looking at him more? I'm still mad the Red Sox let Bruce Hurst go. I saw Hurst pitch at Fenway in 1982, when at the age of 24 he threw 117 innings in mlb and gave up 161 hits and 40 bb, with 4.1 k/9. The previous two years in AAA he was walking 4.1 and 4.3/9 (with low k/9), though the h/9 was better. There was no solid case for optimism.
|
|
jimed14
Veteran
Posts: 25,831
Member is Online
|
Post by jimed14 on Jan 8, 2014 13:27:34 GMT -5
I'm still mad the Red Sox let Bruce Hurst go. I saw Hurst pitch at Fenway in 1982, when at the age of 24 he threw 117 innings in mlb and gave up 161 hits and 40 bb, with 4.1 k/9. The previous two years in AAA he was walking 4.1 and 4.3/9 (with low k/9), though the h/9 was better. There was no solid case for optimism. I saw him in 83 or 84. I don't even remember the circumstances of how he left, but it was after 4 straight 4.0+ WAR seasons. I was a big fan of his. We had some really decent pitching in the mid 80s.
|
|
|
Post by p23w on Jan 8, 2014 17:09:27 GMT -5
I saw Hurst pitch at Fenway in 1982, when at the age of 24 he threw 117 innings in mlb and gave up 161 hits and 40 bb, with 4.1 k/9. The previous two years in AAA he was walking 4.1 and 4.3/9 (with low k/9), though the h/9 was better. There was no solid case for optimism. I saw him in 83 or 84. I don't even remember the circumstances of how he left, but it was after 4 straight 4.0+ WAR seasons. I was a big fan of his. We had some really decent pitching in the mid 80s. The reason Hurst left.... Margo Adams.
|
|
jimed14
Veteran
Posts: 25,831
Member is Online
|
Post by jimed14 on Jan 8, 2014 17:35:08 GMT -5
I saw him in 83 or 84. I don't even remember the circumstances of how he left, but it was after 4 straight 4.0+ WAR seasons. I was a big fan of his. We had some really decent pitching in the mid 80s. The reason Hurst left.... Margo Adams. Totally forgot about that. I was a little young to understand it all.
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 16,877
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jan 8, 2014 21:56:25 GMT -5
The reason Hurst left.... Margo Adams. Totally forgot about that. I was a little young to understand it all. I actually saw Bruce Hurst at a banquet in November. He is such a nice guy. Class act. I really enjoyed meeting him. He didn't really get into the specifics of why he left. The Sox weren't really quick with their offer and he had already committed to San Diego if I can accurately recall what he said. The Sox actually offered more money. He did say that he had wished he had stayed with the Sox. He loved pitching for the Red Sox. I remember Darryl Strawberry saying about Roger Clemens (and I'm talking 1986 Clemens) that he was no Bruce Hurst. The Mets were really worried about him in 1986. He had a 3-0 lead in the 6th inning of Game 7 after dominating the Mets twice in the Series and he started to run out of gas. He regretted the pitch he made to Keith Hernandez that scored two runs and brought the tying run to 3b with one out. I asked him if he could have pitched the 7th as he was due to lead off. He told me that he said to John McNamara if you need a hit to lead off the inning I'm not your guy, but I have another inning left in me. The foolish manager pinchhit the injured and washed up Tony Armas who struck out. Schiraldi was brought back into the game. By time he and Bob Stanley torched the game it was 6-3 Mets. The Sox actually scored 2 runs in the 8th and had no outs and a runner on 2b before Jesse Orosco came in to shut the Sox down. Then Nipper gave up the other 2 runs in the bottom of the 8th. In a perfect world, Hurst would have gone 6 or 7, Boyd would have been able to pitch the 7th or 7th and 8th (This was most likely not an option although Boyd disputes this vehemently), and Clemens was supposed to close out the Series in relief in the 9th inning. Never happened. Makes me very thankful that the Sox have had 3 championships since then and I haven't had the empty feeling of losing the Series since. There's a lot of 20 and even 30 something year olds on this board who have no idea what it's like. Their biggest disappointment is 2003 Game 7 and the 2011 season and perhaps Game 7 of the 2008 ALCS. None of those hurt as bad as Game 6 and Game 7 of the 86 Series (although Grady Little comes close) or Game 7 of 1975 or the ending of the 1978 season. I think we're pretty lucky.
|
|
jimed14
Veteran
Posts: 25,831
Member is Online
|
Post by jimed14 on Jan 9, 2014 10:13:17 GMT -5
Totally forgot about that. I was a little young to understand it all. I actually saw Bruce Hurst at a banquet in November. He is such a nice guy. Class act. I really enjoyed meeting him. He didn't really get into the specifics of why he left. The Sox weren't really quick with their offer and he had already committed to San Diego if I can accurately recall what he said. The Sox actually offered more money. He did say that he had wished he had stayed with the Sox. He loved pitching for the Red Sox. I remember Darryl Strawberry saying about Roger Clemens (and I'm talking 1986 Clemens) that he was no Bruce Hurst. The Mets were really worried about him in 1986. He had a 3-0 lead in the 6th inning of Game 7 after dominating the Mets twice in the Series and he started to run out of gas. He regretted the pitch he made to Keith Hernandez that scored two runs and brought the tying run to 3b with one out. I asked him if he could have pitched the 7th as he was due to lead off. He told me that he said to John McNamara if you need a hit to lead off the inning I'm not your guy, but I have another inning left in me. The foolish manager pinchhit the injured and washed up Tony Armas who struck out. Schiraldi was brought back into the game. By time he and Bob Stanley torched the game it was 6-3 Mets. The Sox actually scored 2 runs in the 8th and had no outs and a runner on 2b before Jesse Orosco came in to shut the Sox down. Then Nipper gave up the other 2 runs in the bottom of the 8th. In a perfect world, Hurst would have gone 6 or 7, Boyd would have been able to pitch the 7th or 7th and 8th (This was most likely not an option although Boyd disputes this vehemently), and Clemens was supposed to close out the Series in relief in the 9th inning. Never happened. Makes me very thankful that the Sox have had 3 championships since then and I haven't had the empty feeling of losing the Series since. There's a lot of 20 and even 30 something year olds on this board who have no idea what it's like. Their biggest disappointment is 2003 Game 7 and the 2011 season and perhaps Game 7 of the 2008 ALCS. None of those hurt as bad as Game 6 and Game 7 of the 86 Series (although Grady Little comes close) or Game 7 of 1975 or the ending of the 1978 season. I think we're pretty lucky. Thanks for this. Games 6 and 7 of 86 crushed me. Don't think I've ever cried for sporting events. Especially game 6. I let myself believe that it was finally going to happen with the 0-2 count to Gary Carter. Then the slow-motion train wreck... And then even though they were up 3-0 in game 7, I absolutely knew they were going to lose. I really liked those teams though. I'd take a Clemens and Hurst any day as my top 2 starters. (duh)
|
|
|
Post by p23w on Jan 9, 2014 11:49:46 GMT -5
I actually saw Bruce Hurst at a banquet in November. He is such a nice guy. Class act. I really enjoyed meeting him. He didn't really get into the specifics of why he left. The Sox weren't really quick with their offer and he had already committed to San Diego if I can accurately recall what he said. The Sox actually offered more money. He did say that he had wished he had stayed with the Sox. He loved pitching for the Red Sox.
I remember Darryl Strawberry saying about Roger Clemens (and I'm talking 1986 Clemens) that he was no Bruce Hurst. The Mets were really worried about him in 1986. He had a 3-0 lead in the 6th inning of Game 7 after dominating the Mets twice in the Series and he started to run out of gas. He regretted the pitch he made to Keith Hernandez that scored two runs and brought the tying run to 3b with one out. I asked him if he could have pitched the 7th as he was due to lead off. He told me that he said to John McNamara if you need a hit to lead off the inning I'm not your guy, but I have another inning left in me. The foolish manager pinchhit the injured and washed up Tony Armas who struck out. Schiraldi was brought back into the game. By time he and Bob Stanley torched the game it was 6-3 Mets. The Sox actually scored 2 runs in the 8th and had no outs and a runner on 2b before Jesse Orosco came in to shut the Sox down. Then Nipper gave up the other 2 runs in the bottom of the 8th. In a perfect world, Hurst would have gone 6 or 7, Boyd would have been able to pitch the 7th or 7th and 8th (This was most likely not an option although Boyd disputes this vehemently), and Clemens was supposed to close out the Series in relief in the 9th inning. Never happened. Makes me very thankful that the Sox have had 3 championships since then and I haven't had the empty feeling of losing the Series since. There's a lot of 20 and even 30 something year olds on this board who have no idea what it's like. Their biggest disappointment is 2003 Game 7 and the 2011 season and perhaps Game 7 of the 2008 ALCS. None of those hurt as bad as Game 6 and Game 7 of the 86 Series (although Grady Little comes close) or Game 7 of 1975 or the ending of the 1978 season. I think we're pretty lucky. Thanks for this. Games 6 and 7 of 86 crushed me. Don't think I've ever cried for sporting events. Especially game 6. I let myself believe that it was finally going to happen with the 0-2 count to Gary Carter. Then the slow-motion train wreck... And then even though they were up 3-0 in game 7, I absolutely knew they were going to lose. I really liked those teams though. I'd take a Clemens and Hurst any day as my top 2 starters. (duh) If you knew Bruce Hurst you'd know it wasn't about the money. He was very religious and was both embarrassed and offended by a member of the team who had little discretion when it came to his affairs. Yes Hurst like pitching for the Red Sox, but his decision to leave eventually cost the team Brady Anderson and Curt Schilling, in a trade to obtain a #2 to go along with Clemens.
|
|
|
Post by James Dunne on Jan 9, 2014 11:52:42 GMT -5
The Boddicker trade happened in July 1988, when Hurst was still with the team. It was a good trade too - Boddicker pitched quite well for two and a half years and helped the team to the ALCS twice before leaving as a free agent.
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 16,877
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jan 9, 2014 13:42:54 GMT -5
Thanks for this. Games 6 and 7 of 86 crushed me. Don't think I've ever cried for sporting events. Especially game 6. I let myself believe that it was finally going to happen with the 0-2 count to Gary Carter. Then the slow-motion train wreck... And then even though they were up 3-0 in game 7, I absolutely knew they were going to lose. I really liked those teams though. I'd take a Clemens and Hurst any day as my top 2 starters. (duh) If you knew Bruce Hurst you'd know it wasn't about the money. He was very religious and was both embarrassed and offended by a member of the team who had little discretion when it came to his affairs. Yes Hurst like pitching for the Red Sox, but his decision to leave eventually cost the team Brady Anderson and Curt Schilling, in a trade to obtain a #2 to go along with Clemens. I don't know Hurst. I met him at a banquet. I doubt he'd say he left because Wade Boggs' extramarital affair was bothering him. And I would think it would be more than that. I'm sure Boggs wasn't the only guy on the team doing what many married ballplayers have been doing for years. I'm sure he didn't appreciate the excessive drinking, but again that's prevalent in baseball. I'm sure there were drug issues on the Sox then (Boyd for one obviously), but I'm sure there was more to it then just that being the reason. Guys are going to have issues whether it's in San Diego or Boston. As far as the Boddicker deal goes, Boddicker was in essence acquired to replace Oil Can Boyd, not Hurst. The Sox rolled to the pennant in 86 with a trio of Clemens, Hurst, and Boyd, and in trying to duplicate it, it was obvious by midseason 1988 that Boyd was no longer going to be able to be the 200 IP workhorse that he had been and that they needed a reliable #3 guy who can pitch better than a #3, and Boddicker certainly did. Didn't like giving up Brady Anderson and Curt Schilling (at the time I really hated losing Anderson), but Boddicker was a quality pitcher and without him they don't win the division title in 1988 or 1990. After the 1986 season Boyd had serious injury problems.
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 16,877
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jan 9, 2014 13:51:50 GMT -5
I actually saw Bruce Hurst at a banquet in November. He is such a nice guy. Class act. I really enjoyed meeting him. He didn't really get into the specifics of why he left. The Sox weren't really quick with their offer and he had already committed to San Diego if I can accurately recall what he said. The Sox actually offered more money. He did say that he had wished he had stayed with the Sox. He loved pitching for the Red Sox. I remember Darryl Strawberry saying about Roger Clemens (and I'm talking 1986 Clemens) that he was no Bruce Hurst. The Mets were really worried about him in 1986. He had a 3-0 lead in the 6th inning of Game 7 after dominating the Mets twice in the Series and he started to run out of gas. He regretted the pitch he made to Keith Hernandez that scored two runs and brought the tying run to 3b with one out. I asked him if he could have pitched the 7th as he was due to lead off. He told me that he said to John McNamara if you need a hit to lead off the inning I'm not your guy, but I have another inning left in me. The foolish manager pinchhit the injured and washed up Tony Armas who struck out. Schiraldi was brought back into the game. By time he and Bob Stanley torched the game it was 6-3 Mets. The Sox actually scored 2 runs in the 8th and had no outs and a runner on 2b before Jesse Orosco came in to shut the Sox down. Then Nipper gave up the other 2 runs in the bottom of the 8th. In a perfect world, Hurst would have gone 6 or 7, Boyd would have been able to pitch the 7th or 7th and 8th (This was most likely not an option although Boyd disputes this vehemently), and Clemens was supposed to close out the Series in relief in the 9th inning. Never happened. Makes me very thankful that the Sox have had 3 championships since then and I haven't had the empty feeling of losing the Series since. There's a lot of 20 and even 30 something year olds on this board who have no idea what it's like. Their biggest disappointment is 2003 Game 7 and the 2011 season and perhaps Game 7 of the 2008 ALCS. None of those hurt as bad as Game 6 and Game 7 of the 86 Series (although Grady Little comes close) or Game 7 of 1975 or the ending of the 1978 season. I think we're pretty lucky. Thanks for this. Games 6 and 7 of 86 crushed me. Don't think I've ever cried for sporting events. Especially game 6. I let myself believe that it was finally going to happen with the 0-2 count to Gary Carter. Then the slow-motion train wreck... And then even though they were up 3-0 in game 7, I absolutely knew they were going to lose. I really liked those teams though. I'd take a Clemens and Hurst any day as my top 2 starters. (duh) It's a tough memory, but it makes 2004, 2007, and 2013 all the more special. I was almost 14 years old and watching the game. My dad with two outs and nobody on and the Sox up 5-3 told me they were going to blow it. I told him off. Naturally, Carter, Mitchell, and Knight (0-2 count) hit singles to make it 5-4 and then I saw McNamara point for Bob Stanley and I knew the Sox were screwed. Stanley by then was pretty bad. He gets 2 strikes on Wilson, throws the wild pitch that Gedman (I've met him too and to this day he has a very tough time talking about the Series) didn't shift enough for that went to the backstop to score Mitchell with the tying run. At that point my dad shuts off the TV and says, "See?!" My dad lived thru 1946 WS Gm 7, 1948, 1949, 1972, 1975 WS Gm 7, 1977, and 1978. Now I was part of the club. A few minutes pass and we're staring at a blank TV screen. He says I want you to see this. And sure enough we turn the TV on and see the replay of Buckner's error. By game 7, I knew the Sox had no chance. Yet when they were up 3-0 I was hopeful, and even when they pulled to within 6-5 in the 8th I had my fingers crossed, but Orosco shut the Sox down (Gedman liner to 2b, Henderson K, and PH Baylor grounder to SS). Then when Al Nipper came in, I know they had no shot. He was a torch that year. It's funny - after Game 2 of the 2004 World Series, while I still had my doubts, my dad told me they really are going to do it this year. Right again. Again it just makes you appreciate the here and now. I really didn't think the 2013 Sox could pull this off. It felt like just about everything had to fall into place and break right, but somehow it did. It was amazing, but at the same time you can't go around expecting this either. It was so special what they pulled off this year. It's not a birthright the way Yankees fans act. It's really a gift, but you need the bad to appreciate the good sometimes. And yeah, Clemens circa 1986 and Hurst were great 1-2, but Schilling and Pedro weren't too bad either
|
|
|
Post by p23w on Jan 10, 2014 11:03:10 GMT -5
The Boddicker trade happened in July 1988, when Hurst was still with the team. It was a good trade too - Boddicker pitched quite well for two and a half years and helped the team to the ALCS twice before leaving as a free agent. Hurst was on is way out the door , despite have his best year. And you are wrong, the Boddicker trade was abysmal. Hurst liked Fenway. He liked some of the players. It was one player in particular that he could not stomach. Management, media and fans were enthralled by this player. Hurst was the #1 playoff pitcher, starting over Clemens. Boddicker was, at best #3. And Schilling turned out to be one of the greatest post season pitchers of all time. Crazy bad trade. Clemens, Hurst and Schilling should/would have won one.
|
|
|
Post by ramireja on Jan 10, 2014 11:30:08 GMT -5
Thanks for this. Games 6 and 7 of 86 crushed me. Don't think I've ever cried for sporting events. Especially game 6. I let myself believe that it was finally going to happen with the 0-2 count to Gary Carter. Then the slow-motion train wreck... And then even though they were up 3-0 in game 7, I absolutely knew they were going to lose. I really liked those teams though. I'd take a Clemens and Hurst any day as my top 2 starters. (duh) It's a tough memory, but it makes 2004, 2007, and 2013 all the more special. I was almost 14 years old and watching the game. My dad with two outs and nobody on and the Sox up 5-3 told me they were going to blow it. I told him off. Naturally, Carter, Mitchell, and Knight (0-2 count) hit singles to make it 5-4 and then I saw McNamara point for Bob Stanley and I knew the Sox were screwed. Stanley by then was pretty bad. He gets 2 strikes on Wilson, throws the wild pitch that Gedman (I've met him too and to this day he has a very tough time talking about the Series) didn't shift enough for that went to the backstop to score Mitchell with the tying run. At that point my dad shuts off the TV and says, "See?!" My dad lived thru 1946 WS Gm 7, 1948, 1949, 1972, 1975 WS Gm 7, 1977, and 1978. Now I was part of the club. A few minutes pass and we're staring at a blank TV screen. He says I want you to see this. And sure enough we turn the TV on and see the replay of Buckner's error. By game 7, I knew the Sox had no chance. Yet when they were up 3-0 I was hopeful, and even when they pulled to within 6-5 in the 8th I had my fingers crossed, but Orosco shut the Sox down (Gedman liner to 2b, Henderson K, and PH Baylor grounder to SS). Then when Al Nipper came in, I know they had no shot. He was a torch that year. It's funny - after Game 2 of the 2004 World Series, while I still had my doubts, my dad told me they really are going to do it this year. Right again. Again it just makes you appreciate the here and now. I really didn't think the 2013 Sox could pull this off. It felt like just about everything had to fall into place and break right, but somehow it did. It was amazing, but at the same time you can't go around expecting this either. It was so special what they pulled off this year. It's not a birthright the way Yankees fans act. It's really a gift, but you need the bad to appreciate the good sometimes. And yeah, Clemens circa 1986 and Hurst were great 1-2, but Schilling and Pedro weren't too bad either Ouch. Thanks for sharing. As a Sox fan who was 3 yrs old in '86, I wasn't affected by this meltdown so yes indeed 2003 is my worst Sox memory. That being said, I can hardly read what you wrote without feeling your pain and I'm sure the pain shared by so many others. Even though 2004 feels so damn important to me, its important for us 'younger' (and the even younger) fans to realize what the older generations went through before this period of success. Who would thought we would win 3 championships in 10 years? I have to say too, I think there were times this year when the gameday threads were so intolerable to me because I couldn't help but imagine that those who were complaining about every facet of the Sox organization couldn't possibly have been a fan in the 80's or probably even the 90's for that matter. Anyways, I'm off on a bit of tangent now, but thanks for sharing your stories. I'm glad you can look back on those days and share with the younger generation a mindset thats been conditioned for decades.
|
|
|
Post by polarbear91 on Jan 10, 2014 11:44:17 GMT -5
If I remember right from the Hurst negotiations, I think his mother was ill at the time and he expressed a desire to be nearer her as one of his considerations when leaving. But it certainly was a big blow when he left.
Regarding Boddicker, I wouldn't say it was a complete disaster of a trade. He was a pretty good pitcher for them, but it was an example and the start of the slow downward spiral of downgrading that became the Red Sox of the late 80's and 90's when we had the likes of Danny Darwin, Frank Viola, Dennis Lamp, Mike Smithson, Dana Kieker, Wes Gardner, etc. to get us over the hump. Clemens really never again had someone to help anchor a staff. Look at the record when he started and the record when others started during this time period and it shows you how management failed the Red Sox for this time period until the sale to Henry's group.
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 16,877
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jan 10, 2014 14:13:08 GMT -5
It's a tough memory, but it makes 2004, 2007, and 2013 all the more special. I was almost 14 years old and watching the game. My dad with two outs and nobody on and the Sox up 5-3 told me they were going to blow it. I told him off. Naturally, Carter, Mitchell, and Knight (0-2 count) hit singles to make it 5-4 and then I saw McNamara point for Bob Stanley and I knew the Sox were screwed. Stanley by then was pretty bad. He gets 2 strikes on Wilson, throws the wild pitch that Gedman (I've met him too and to this day he has a very tough time talking about the Series) didn't shift enough for that went to the backstop to score Mitchell with the tying run. At that point my dad shuts off the TV and says, "See?!" My dad lived thru 1946 WS Gm 7, 1948, 1949, 1972, 1975 WS Gm 7, 1977, and 1978. Now I was part of the club. A few minutes pass and we're staring at a blank TV screen. He says I want you to see this. And sure enough we turn the TV on and see the replay of Buckner's error. By game 7, I knew the Sox had no chance. Yet when they were up 3-0 I was hopeful, and even when they pulled to within 6-5 in the 8th I had my fingers crossed, but Orosco shut the Sox down (Gedman liner to 2b, Henderson K, and PH Baylor grounder to SS). Then when Al Nipper came in, I know they had no shot. He was a torch that year. It's funny - after Game 2 of the 2004 World Series, while I still had my doubts, my dad told me they really are going to do it this year. Right again. Again it just makes you appreciate the here and now. I really didn't think the 2013 Sox could pull this off. It felt like just about everything had to fall into place and break right, but somehow it did. It was amazing, but at the same time you can't go around expecting this either. It was so special what they pulled off this year. It's not a birthright the way Yankees fans act. It's really a gift, but you need the bad to appreciate the good sometimes. And yeah, Clemens circa 1986 and Hurst were great 1-2, but Schilling and Pedro weren't too bad either Ouch. Thanks for sharing. As a Sox fan who was 3 yrs old in '86, I wasn't affected by this meltdown so yes indeed 2003 is my worst Sox memory. That being said, I can hardly read what you wrote without feeling your pain and I'm sure the pain shared by so many others. Even though 2004 feels so damn important to me, its important for us 'younger' (and the even younger) fans to realize what the older generations went through before this period of success. Who would thought we would win 3 championships in 10 years? I have to say too, I think there were times this year when the gameday threads were so intolerable to me because I couldn't help but imagine that those who were complaining about every facet of the Sox organization couldn't possibly have been a fan in the 80's or probably even the 90's for that matter. Anyways, I'm off on a bit of tangent now, but thanks for sharing your stories. I'm glad you can look back on those days and share with the younger generation a mindset thats been conditioned for decades. I'm probably one of those idiots in the game thread complaining. I've seen the Sox both ways. I've seen a new generation of Sox fans that can't imagine anything ever going wrong and I've seen the old generation of Sox fans still complaining about everything under the sun. I'm kind of in the middle. I do a lot of kvetching, but it's not hard for me to sit back and truly appreciate the three championships. For me 2004 was the Championship in which I (like most other veteran fans) were thinking please let me see this before I die. The 2007 Championship was about the hope that 2004 wouldn't be the last Championship for another 86 years and that the Sox were capable of doing it again. Of course the Sox had never won the Series at Fenway Park so my next hope was that I could see that happen and see what it's like, and given all of the circumstances of September 2011, the 2012 debacle, and the 4/15/13 tragedy, the 2013 Red Sox gave us a wonderful gift. In Sept 2012 I became a father and I had my son dressed in a Red Sox jersey the night the Sox won the 2013 World Series. I spent about 3 innings with him before I had to put him to bed. Doubt he saw much of the Series, but when he woke up the next morning he was in a Red Sox jersey, the Sox were Champs, and it happened in his lifetime. This leaves me my goal for the next Championship - watch it with my son who will be old enough to appreciate it. Isn't that what sports is all about?
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 16,877
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jan 10, 2014 14:19:06 GMT -5
The Boddicker trade happened in July 1988, when Hurst was still with the team. It was a good trade too - Boddicker pitched quite well for two and a half years and helped the team to the ALCS twice before leaving as a free agent. Hurst was on is way out the door , despite have his best year. And you are wrong, the Boddicker trade was abysmal. Hurst liked Fenway. He liked some of the players. It was one player in particular that he could not stomach. Management, media and fans were enthralled by this player. Hurst was the #1 playoff pitcher, starting over Clemens. Boddicker was, at best #3. And Schilling turned out to be one of the greatest post season pitchers of all time. Crazy bad trade. Clemens, Hurst and Schilling should/would have won one. The rotation never would have been Clemens, Hurst and Schilling the way you make it sound. Schilling didn't find himself until he had been with Baltimore, Houston, and finally Philly where Johnny Podres helped him. Schilling didn't get his act together until 1992 or was it 1993 (too lazy to look it up, but it doesn't detract from the general point). Hurst was hitting his decline by 1993 and Clemens wasn't quite as great as he had been. He was in his lull period. Mike Boddicker was the Sox #2 starter in 1990 when they won the division. He had been the Orioles ace and he was still a quality pitcher when he came to the Sox. I assume you're referring to Boggs? I wouldn't think that everybody was enthralled by Boggs. He had a lot of people that weren't crazy about him, so I'm not sure where you're getting that from. Doubt Hurst left over one person.
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 16,877
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jan 10, 2014 14:26:09 GMT -5
If I remember right from the Hurst negotiations, I think his mother was ill at the time and he expressed a desire to be nearer her as one of his considerations when leaving. But it certainly was a big blow when he left. Regarding Boddicker, I wouldn't say it was a complete disaster of a trade. He was a pretty good pitcher for them, but it was an example and the start of the slow downward spiral of downgrading that became the Red Sox of the late 80's and 90's when we had the likes of Danny Darwin, Frank Viola, Dennis Lamp, Mike Smithson, Dana Kieker, Wes Gardner, etc. to get us over the hump. Clemens really never again had someone to help anchor a staff. Look at the record when he started and the record when others started during this time period and it shows you how management failed the Red Sox for this time period until the sale to Henry's group. The Boddicker deal worked out alright, but you're correct in that it underscored the desperation philosophy of "Win it NOW". Lou Gorman was desperate to win it while Mrs. Yawkey was still alive and it led to a lot of bad decisions. Mix in that the Sox were old school and hardly sabermetric by any stretch and basically the Sox found ways to give up young talent as Bagwell is a prime example and try desperately to squeeze out the final productivity of a Larry Andersen, a Tony Pena, a Jeff Reardon, a Jack Clark, a Frank Viola, an Ivan Calderon, an Andre Dawson - you get the picture. And the Matt Young signing....yeesh. Wes Gardner was originally dealt for in 1986 (with Schiraldi for Ojeda) to be the Sox closer but got hurt and was never really that good. He gave them some decent starts in 1988 but that was as good as it got. Mike Smithson was very fringe. Kind of a 5th/6th starter/long man out of the Sox 88 bullpen. Dennis Lamp was a good long man in 1988 and excellent in 1989. Pretty useless after that. Dana Kiecker and Tom Bolton along with Greg Harris teamed up to save the Sox rotation when John Dopson went down in 1990. Those three were never anywhere near as good again, except that Greg Harris went back to being a really good setup man and he took Jeff Gray's place (you might recall he was coming into his own when he had a stroke). This lead them to the mess they were when Dan Duquette took over and he did a great job with them in 1995, much like Theo did in 2003, much like Cherington did in 2013. It's easier to clean up the mess of others than your own I would suspect.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jan 10, 2014 15:47:46 GMT -5
I think an owner has every right to try to win it all before they die, which is what I'm expecting from DET each year.
|
|
|