SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
September Rankings Discussion
|
Post by brianthetaoist on Aug 29, 2015 7:55:55 GMT -5
I actually think that beyond about 15, the system is thinner than it has been in years. But the current top 8 is outrageous, even without considering that we've graduated Bogaerts, Betts, Vazquez, Bradley, Swihart, Rodriguez, Castillo (not that he was ever counted, but it's still a talent addition), Holt, and Wright in the last two years. This is something I've been thinking recently, as well. I'm not sure how important it is because the top-end is so good, but I don't think it's all that deep right now. Although it's possible that the top is *so* good that it's making the rest of the system pale a little in comparison. Because the top ... boy, oh boy. I'm a big Margot fan, but I still have him as #4/5. I've got: Moncada Devers Espinoza Margot Benintendi Owens Guerra Kopech Johnson Travis I think the players within tiers could probably be ranked in almost any order depending on your preference. Owens, for instance, could be high if you value advancement over ceiling; I think he's looked really good so far in MLB. Espinoza certainly could be #2 if you value almost limitless potential. But that top six are really tremendous. The Sox will get serious WAR out of those six.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Aug 29, 2015 11:36:48 GMT -5
I actually think that beyond about 15, the system is thinner than it has been in years. But the current top 8 is outrageous, even without considering that we've graduated Bogaerts, Betts, Vazquez, Bradley, Swihart, Rodriguez, Castillo (not that he was ever counted, but it's still a talent addition), Holt, and Wright in the last two years. This is something I've been thinking recently, as well. I'm not sure how important it is because the top-end is so good, but I don't think it's all that deep right now. Although it's possible that the top is *so* good that it's making the rest of the system pale a little in comparison. This is something that has come up for me the past 2 or 3 months, but I also think it's the phenomenon you describe in your last sentence that causes it, in part. Consider, say Wendell Rijo. Among the youngest players at the level, not excelling but holding his own. Couldn't you see him around 10-12 most years? Another phenomenon is how some guys, like Coyle and Cecchini, have completely fallen off the map. I can't remember guys plummeting together the way they have. And the other point is that a few of the guys in that second 10 are there based on potential, but statistically aren't backing it up. Hard to get excited about Chavis and Ball based solely on the stat lines. But if you've seen a Chavis BP, and have seen him in-game where it's pretty obvious he's pressing, you know why he needs to stay in the top 15. (Related note: I think I'm getting Ball in Potomac next weekend if the rotation holds, so looking forward to seeing what the heck his deal is.)
|
|
|
Post by humanbeingbean on Aug 29, 2015 12:49:38 GMT -5
This is something I've been thinking recently, as well. I'm not sure how important it is because the top-end is so good, but I don't think it's all that deep right now. Although it's possible that the top is *so* good that it's making the rest of the system pale a little in comparison. This is something that has come up for me the past 2 or 3 months, but I also think it's the phenomenon you describe in your last sentence that causes it, in part. Consider, say Wendell Rijo. Among the youngest players at the level, not excelling but holding his own. Couldn't you see him around 10-12 most years? Another phenomenon is how some guys, like Coyle and Cecchini, have completely fallen off the map. I can't remember guys plummeting together the way they have. And the other point is that a few of the guys in that second 10 are there based on potential, but statistically aren't backing it up. Hard to get excited about Chavis and Ball based solely on the stat lines. But if you've seen a Chavis BP, and have seen him in-game where it's pretty obvious he's pressing, you know why he needs to stay in the top 15. (Related note: I think I'm getting Ball in Potomac next weekend if the rotation holds, so looking forward to seeing what the heck his deal is.) Can't you attribute Cecchini and Coyle's plummeting to being blocked? There's simply no room for either of them, especially when Guerra, Moncada, and Devers are infielders and are some of the top prospects in baseball, so that must have had a deep impact on them. I feel like if they were traded to a team willing to give them a shot, they'd rebound, or at least hit a little better, as they'd just feel better, I suppose. Can't forget about that psychological aspect. (Granted, I know they both haven't shown much of anything, and aren't exactly in the Sox's long term plans. On a human level, I hope maybe they're traded for next to nothing and given a shot with some new scenery. Who knows?)
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Aug 29, 2015 15:18:15 GMT -5
This is something that has come up for me the past 2 or 3 months, but I also think it's the phenomenon you describe in your last sentence that causes it, in part. Consider, say Wendell Rijo. Among the youngest players at the level, not excelling but holding his own. Couldn't you see him around 10-12 most years? Another phenomenon is how some guys, like Coyle and Cecchini, have completely fallen off the map. I can't remember guys plummeting together the way they have. And the other point is that a few of the guys in that second 10 are there based on potential, but statistically aren't backing it up. Hard to get excited about Chavis and Ball based solely on the stat lines. But if you've seen a Chavis BP, and have seen him in-game where it's pretty obvious he's pressing, you know why he needs to stay in the top 15. (Related note: I think I'm getting Ball in Potomac next weekend if the rotation holds, so looking forward to seeing what the heck his deal is.) Can't you attribute Cecchini and Coyle's plummeting to being blocked? There's simply no room for either of them, especially when Guerra, Moncada, and Devers are infielders and are some of the top prospects in baseball, so that must have had a deep impact on them. I feel like if they were traded to a team willing to give them a shot, they'd rebound, or at least hit a little better, as they'd just feel better, I suppose. Can't forget about that psychological aspect. (Granted, I know they both haven't shown much of anything, and aren't exactly in the Sox's long term plans. On a human level, I hope maybe they're traded for next to nothing and given a shot with some new scenery. Who knows?) Coyle can be attributed to injuries, IMO. Cecchini has not answered the big question about lack of power in the 2nd half of 2013 in AA and I think he tried to change his swing to compensate which screwed up what he did well. There just aren't many .100 ISO guys without speed or a good k-rate that are going to do well in the majors, because pitchers won't be afraid to throw strikes to them.
|
|
|
Post by greatscottcooper on Aug 30, 2015 8:00:07 GMT -5
By this time next year we could be having a four way argument on who should be #1 between Devers, Benintendi, Moncada, and Espinoza.
|
|
|
Post by brianthetaoist on Aug 30, 2015 8:10:56 GMT -5
This is something I've been thinking recently, as well. I'm not sure how important it is because the top-end is so good, but I don't think it's all that deep right now. Although it's possible that the top is *so* good that it's making the rest of the system pale a little in comparison. This is something that has come up for me the past 2 or 3 months, but I also think it's the phenomenon you describe in your last sentence that causes it, in part. Consider, say Wendell Rijo. Among the youngest players at the level, not excelling but holding his own. Couldn't you see him around 10-12 most years? Another phenomenon is how some guys, like Coyle and Cecchini, have completely fallen off the map. I can't remember guys plummeting together the way they have. And the other point is that a few of the guys in that second 10 are there based on potential, but statistically aren't backing it up. Hard to get excited about Chavis and Ball based solely on the stat lines. But if you've seen a Chavis BP, and have seen him in-game where it's pretty obvious he's pressing, you know why he needs to stay in the top 15. (Related note: I think I'm getting Ball in Potomac next weekend if the rotation holds, so looking forward to seeing what the heck his deal is.) Yeah, I thought a little more about that after I wrote it down and started to be more convinced of the same point ... Rijo's a good example. Mauricio Dubon's another good counter-point. Some years, we'd be trying to talk ourselves into him being a legit top prospect, but I can't remember the last time he was mentioned. Plus you've got a few of the ideal kind of 15-25 guys in folks like Logan Allen or Yoan Aybar, talented young guys who could move up. I think the AA-AAA depth got hollowed out pretty quickly, though. Partially because the cream of it is now in Boston and partially because the second tier didn't progress much (in the case of Marrero or Escobar) or just completely cratered (Cecchini and to a lesser extent Coyle). In the end, though, I think the general tendency to rate farm systems on their top 10 or so is actually probably a good way to think of it. Those are the guys who are going to make a difference at the major league level, by and large. Ball in Potomac next weekend? Which day? Maybe I'll take my boys down there ...
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Aug 30, 2015 9:47:28 GMT -5
I think it's Ball on Saturday and Stankiewicz on Sunday. Check the probables thread.
|
|
ianrs
Veteran
Posts: 2,451
|
Post by ianrs on Aug 30, 2015 14:59:01 GMT -5
Judging from how frequently even I myself have changed my own personal rankings, I think a few things are clear (or maybe they aren't, given frequency of change).
The top 5 and top 8 are pretty much set in stone. Top 5: Some ordering of Moncada, Devers, Benintendi, Espinoza, and Margot. Top 8: Add Owens, Johnson, Guerra to above.
My guess at the site's top 10 rankings, given Chris' clues: 1. Moncada 2. Devers 3. Margot 4. Benintendi 5. Espinoza 6. Guerra 7. Owens 8. Johnson 9. Kopech 10. Travis
Excited for the release. Its been a great season to be a Soxprospects fan.
|
|
|
Post by James Dunne on Aug 30, 2015 16:21:03 GMT -5
By this time next year we could be having a four way argument on who should be #1 between Devers, Benintendi, Moncada, and Espinoza. Not if Benintendi has graduated.
|
|
|
Post by chavopepe2 on Aug 30, 2015 16:23:44 GMT -5
By this time next year we could be having a four way argument on who should be #1 between Devers, Benintendi, Moncada, and Espinoza. Not if Benintendi has graduated. I'll give 2-1 odds that Moncada graduates before Benintendi.
|
|
|
Post by thelavarnwayguy on Aug 30, 2015 17:40:24 GMT -5
I'd take those odds. For sure. Moncada has more overall talent but it's much more raw. Benintendi has the plate discipline and ability to drive the ball already. A much more mature bat plus he has acceptable defensive ability already. I could see Moncada struggle more at higher levels than Benintendi. Don't get me wrong, both should be exceptional prospects and mlb starters.
|
|
|
Post by jrffam05 on Aug 31, 2015 8:33:33 GMT -5
By this time next year we could be having a four way argument on who should be #1 between Devers, Benintendi, Moncada, and Espinoza. I think you could already have that argument. While Devers and Moncada would be the majority preference, there's an legitimate argument for Espinoza based on ceiling and age advancement, and Benintendi based on his overall game and chance to move quickly. I'll take a crack at guessing the new rankings, doesn't change what I posted mine were, because I know everyone is interested in my rankings. I'm pretty sure Moncada will be our new #1 when the rankings changes come out. I believe that is the third month in a row that we had a new #1 in the system. Dudes on fire and a statistical slump for Devers might be enough to sway a split SP staff. For #3 being unanimous, it's kind of a tough clue. National rankings would suggest it is Margot, but Benintendi or Espinoza have the hype behind them to jump to third. Since it's unanimous I'm guessing it has to be Margot, (Espinoza is my second guess). #9 being unanimous is like guessing if Hillary was going to run for president. It's obviously Kopech. Espinoza is favored over Benintendi in August by the staff, so I'm guessing that holds, as both of them jump up a tier. Owens jumps Johnson on a split decision based on Owen's MLB performance and Johnson's injury. What's hard to figure out is if Guerra beats or splits these pitchers. 6-8 is the toughest part of the guess IMO, and I just flipped Guerra into 7th spot last minute. So my guess of the new SP rankings. 1. Moncada 2. Devers 3. Margot 4. Espinoza 5. Benintendi 6. Owens (leaps Johnson after staff was split on him) 7. Guerra 8. Johnson 9. Kopech 10. Guessing Travis holds, unless Shaw takes the spot
|
|
|
Post by brianthetaoist on Aug 31, 2015 12:45:54 GMT -5
And they're up ... no complaints from me except for a very minor quibble: I'd definitely give Moncada a 3-8 instead of a 3-7. I think he's got legit elite upside. He's got "best player in baseball" kind of talent.
Like I said before, I think 2-6 could be ranked in almost any order, depending on what you like in a prospect. Which is one thing I love about that 6.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Aug 31, 2015 12:47:59 GMT -5
Wow, can't help but notice Cecchini and Coyle down to 32 and 43. Epic collapse.
|
|
|
Post by beantown on Aug 31, 2015 13:08:45 GMT -5
Top 10 is flat out ridiculous. My only disagreement is with moncada's ceiling. I think I've finally joined the (growing?) camp that believes he deserves an 8. The potential there is enormous
|
|
dd
Veteran
Posts: 979
|
Post by dd on Aug 31, 2015 13:11:19 GMT -5
Details(Click above to see the spreadsheet.)Summary: - Yoan Moncada is the new number 1, up from 2 last month. His ceiling is now maxed at 8.
- Rafael Devers, first last week, is now 2nd.
- Henry Owens moved up from 5 to 4 in spite of his ceiling going the other way from 7 to 6.
- A rarely mentioned prospect, Anderson Espinoza, has moved up to 5. He was 7th last month.
- Andrew Benintendi, followed Espinoza, moving up from 8 to 6.
- Javier Guerra slipped from 6 to 7.
- Brian Johnson fell from 4 to 8.
- Travis Shaw went from 14 to 12 and his grade from 3 to 4.
- Trey Ball went the other way, down 2 to 12 from 14.
- Nick Longhi jumped from 19 to 15.
- Teddy Stankiewicz up from 20 to 18.
- Pat Light just barely stayed in the top 20, falling by 5 from 15 last month.
- Logan Allen, ranked 35 after the draft and 28 last month moved up another 6 spots to 22.
- Luis Alexander Basabe is up from 30 to 23.
- Willams Jerez dropped from 23 to 26.
- Heath Hembree up from 34 to 27.
- Jonathan Aro down 3 landing at 28.
- Dayan Diaz up from 33 to 29.
- Noe Ramirez up from 35 to 31
- Garin Cecchini dropped another 5 and is now at # 32. In April he was in the top 10.
- Jalen Beeks up from 41 to 35.
- Austin Rei at 37, down 11. That's down 16 since the first post draft ranking.
- Ben Taylor, first ranked last month at # 45, rose to 38.
- Ranked for the first time is Austin Glorius at 41. (IMO he deserves a top 10 ranking just for his name!)
- Sean Coyle is down to 43 from 37 and from 15 at the end of April.
- Tate Matheny at 48, down 10.
- Roniel Raudes is ranked for the first time at 51.
- # 54 is Jake Cosart, down from 44 last month and 24 on 4/30.
- Simon Mercedes fell from 47 to 56.
- Kyri Washington fell from 50 to 58.
- Jeremy Rivera and Jorge Marban both made the top 60 for the first time in the last two spots.
- Falling out of the top 60 this month are:
- Tzu-Wei Lin (from 55). (3 years ago he was # 22.)
- Jagger Rusconi (56)
- Gerson Bautista (57)
- Karsten Whitsen (59)
[/ul]
|
|
|
Post by Mike Andrews on Aug 31, 2015 14:59:14 GMT -5
And they're up ... no complaints from me except for a very minor quibble: I'd definitely give Moncada a 3-8 instead of a 3-7. I think he's got legit elite upside. He's got "best player in baseball" kind of talent. Like I said before, I think 2-6 could be ranked in almost any order, depending on what you like in a prospect. Which is one thing I love about that 6. I agree with this and have made the change. I also changed Guerra's ceiling back to 7, that was an error.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Aug 31, 2015 15:04:14 GMT -5
And they're up ... no complaints from me except for a very minor quibble: I'd definitely give Moncada a 3-8 instead of a 3-7. I think he's got legit elite upside. He's got "best player in baseball" kind of talent. Like I said before, I think 2-6 could be ranked in almost any order, depending on what you like in a prospect. Which is one thing I love about that 6. I agree with this and have made the change. I also changed Guerra's ceiling back to 7, that was an error. Had the same reaction here. Nice job pointing that out, Brain Toast.
|
|
|
Post by jondrink on Aug 31, 2015 17:11:04 GMT -5
Great job on the rankings Read the summary and details Longhi grade up from 3 to 4 still have 3 on website page
|
|
|
Post by okin15 on Aug 31, 2015 17:31:11 GMT -5
couldn't agree more with the Owens jump (though I can tell some don't). He has really shown that the early-season results were him fooling around with his pitch mix.
I also don't feel the system is quite as deep as it has been. Very few surprise guys have come in to fill the 12-25 range (and maybe it's partly that some of those first page guys are falling, rather than ascending the rankings), while we've graduated a good group of players the last two years, and that might get worse with Shaw and Owens possibly graduating. Still, a strong system for sure, and lots of young talent in the majors.
One minor note: Still slightly surprised with Margot and Guerra. Maybe this is a discussion for the main page (and I think it's been made there) but if the rest of the top 6 have first division starter makeup, it just seems like Margot has fallen off a touch from what Bradley and Betts did at AA/AAA. And Guerra has legit power, but given his lack of scouting pedigree, and limited track record, I can't put him in my own top eight. I mean, Shaw has done basically the same thing this year, but at the highest level. Just my 2 cents (and I guess I've already given them once on the previous page).
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Aug 31, 2015 17:33:53 GMT -5
Great job on the rankings Read the summary and details Longhi grade up from 3 to 4 still have 3 on website page His grade was not increased. May have been a typo when Dick posted that was since fixed, or just a mistake.
|
|
|
Post by jhenrywaugh, prop. on Aug 31, 2015 21:16:26 GMT -5
Two guys I'm curious about. That they are so peripheral should imply how solid these rankings are. Great job, guys.
Stankiewicz is still relatively high, stuff isn't plus and his stats are fairly pedestrian. What keeps him so high?
Almonte isn't even ranked. Young for Lowell, high walks but no one is hitting him. I know we've seen this before (Sergio Gomez comes to mind), but was surprised he wasn't in the top 60.
All that said, there are several guys to dream on (relatively speaking) 40-60. To me, that might be more impressive then the loaded top 10. 15 years ago we'd be talking up kids like Rei, Lakins, Steen, Brakeman, Raudes, Cosart. This is the machine Theo spoke of building when he took over as GM.
|
|
|
Post by brianthetaoist on Sept 1, 2015 13:14:50 GMT -5
I agree with this and have made the change. I also changed Guerra's ceiling back to 7, that was an error. Had the same reaction here. Nice job pointing that out, Brain Toast. Cool, thanks guys ... as always, nice job on the rankings. Not sure if it's because most of what I think about prospects comes through these boards anyway but i rarely have any but the most mild disagreements with any of the rankings. Two of the guys I was excited about this year were Cosart and Whitson. That didn't go too well.
|
|
|
Post by gosox1 on Sept 2, 2015 10:42:04 GMT -5
Why is there no mention in the top 40 of Aaron Wilkerson??? Am I missing something. He just got eastern league pitcher of the week a week after jumping up to AA....You guys don't mention that anywhere either? I vote for Aaron Wilkerson in the top 20..
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Sept 2, 2015 11:17:57 GMT -5
Why is there no mention in the top 40 of Aaron Wilkerson??? Am I missing something. He just got eastern league pitcher of the week a week after jumping up to AA....You guys don't mention that anywhere either? I vote for Aaron Wilkerson in the top 20.. Wilkerson is a nice org pitcher. He sits 88-90. Has strong feel and good command. Also throws a short, tight slider at 83-85 and a 12-to-6 curve around 73-74. But the stuff isn't overwhelming. There's a reason when rotations he's been in have gotten crowded, he's been the one to move to a piggyback role. And we haven't ignored him or anything - he was voted our Pitcher of the Month for May. Maybe he gets a cup of coffee as a reliever, but the stuff isn't really there for him to be a top prospect. He's another one who could probably be in the back end of that top 60 somewhere, and he does tend to get votes for such, even in months like this one where he doesn't make it.
|
|
|