SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
How do you improve the Red Sox
|
Post by grandsalami on Jun 24, 2016 12:49:15 GMT -5
Bowden reporting very active discussions between Sox and Braves with Teheran and Vizciano as targets. Bownden, Duque the and Ferris all said no Moncada, but certainly Benintendi and a few more lower rated guys No he isn't
|
|
|
Post by grandsalami on Jun 24, 2016 13:04:41 GMT -5
“@jonmorosi: #Rays acquire Oswaldo Arcia from #Twins for player to be named later or cash. @mlb”
|
|
|
Post by deepjohn on Jun 24, 2016 13:08:19 GMT -5
Bowden reporting very active discussions between Sox and Braves with Teheran and Vizciano as targets. Bownden, Duque the and Ferris all said no Moncada, but certainly Benintendi and a few more lower rated guys So Benintendi for both of them would make sense but not in a package for one or the other. You don't trade position players with his projection for number 3 starters or relievers. Teheran this year has improved greatly to where he's in the top 20-30 pitchers. He's relied more on his 4 seamer and slider and he was a Conforto single away from a Father's Day perfect game. Jake Peavy is probably the best comp for Teheran, once you consider age, quality, and arsenal. Frank Wren signed Teheran to his Braves contract. Teheran and Vizciano for prospects would make sense ... But the bigger question is... Are the Braves willing to do a prospect deal? GMs hate giving up cost-controlled players at their peak for prospects since the prospects often go bust. The fans even more so hate to lose their favorite players for prospects they never heard of.
|
|
|
Post by ryantoworkman on Jun 24, 2016 13:24:45 GMT -5
I'm just passing along comments. Never offered an opinion on the report.I can see the Braves, using old school stats, seeing more value in Teheran, than might the Sox. I've seen Teheran as an NL starter, and have wondered if they might need a guy like him to get the guy they want? Repackaging Teheran for a guy like Fernandez? The Marlins are looking for arms, but are reported to not be offering anything from the ML roster. The problem is they have little to deal in the minors. Perhaps they could be enticed by a two for one offer? Perhaps something as follows: Benintendi and 3 prospects between 10 and 20 for Teheran and Vizciano. Teheran, EdRod, Elias and Dubon for Fernandez? Miami gets 2, possibly 3 starters in the deal, and a good SS prospect for 1 starter. Their rotation would be Chen, Teheran, EdRod, Elias and Koehler, or Conley. As opposed to Fernandez, Chen, Koehler, Conley and the best of the rest. It would be a gamble, but they would upgrade 3 rotation slots while losing ground on the #1 slot. That statement assumes Elias an upgrade over Koehler and Conley, and that is debateable. Sox would be Price, Fernandez, Wright, Porcello, Buchholz The bullpen would be Kimbrell, Vizciano, Kelly, Tazawa, Ross, Layne and Hembree. Koji can try to find what's missing on AAA rehab, as can Barnes. Oh, this wasn't directed at you. It was Bowden. There's a reason he's not employed as a GM anymore. Ditto Steve Philips. Touche' He'll never admit to being wrong however.
|
|
|
Post by ryantoworkman on Jun 24, 2016 13:26:20 GMT -5
Obviously the Teheran/Vizcaino rumors are the closest thing to a "quick fix". Maybe they expand it and the Red Sox get the pleasure of Nick Markakis over the rest of his contract to help make up for the loss of Benintendi. The Braves would also want a top pitching prospect so you're talking either Espinoza or Kopech. I really think the Sox will wind up making this type of move and most (maybe all?) of us are going to wind up unhappy and the Sox will say, we got young established talent, so look at what we did. Meanwhile, we'll be eating our hearts out watching the Braves kick butt next decade with their base of talent. And we might look back at what the Sox got for Lester and Lackey and wonder how the heck it is that the Braves were able to turn Miller and Teheran into what they wind up getting and we didn't do anywhere near as well. All I can say is I hope that E-Rod pitches lights out over the next month and prevents this from happening, but with Frank Wren aboard, I have a feeling that this is going to come to fruition and if it does I will not be a happy camper. That's the key; either ERod, or Buchholz steps up, or they're going to be forced into a bad move.
|
|
|
Post by deepjohn on Jun 24, 2016 13:27:20 GMT -5
Obviously the Teheran/Vizcaino rumors are the closest thing to a "quick fix". Maybe they expand it and the Red Sox get the pleasure of Nick Markakis over the rest of his contract to help make up for the loss of Benintendi. The Braves would also want a top pitching prospect so you're talking either Espinoza or Kopech. I really think the Sox will wind up making this type of move and most (maybe all?) of us are going to wind up unhappy and the Sox will say, we got young established talent, so look at what we did. Meanwhile, we'll be eating our hearts out watching the Braves kick butt next decade with their base of talent. And we might look back at what the Sox got for Lester and Lackey and wonder how the heck it is that the Braves were able to turn Miller and Teheran into what they wind up getting and we didn't do anywhere near as well. All I can say is I hope that E-Rod pitches lights out over the next month and prevents this from happening, but with Frank Wren aboard, I have a feeling that this is going to come to fruition and if it does I will not be a happy camper. I'd be in the camp of very happy if they trade prospects for Teheran and/or Vizcaino. Because I think other teams would be very, very unhappy. I would assume (as I did with Kimbrel) that the prospects going back would be the fair market price, at the time of the trade, and that DDo had explored all other trade options. That said, I am a huge fan of Benny Baseball. But I wouldn't want my fanboy feelings to keep the team from having a last chance at an epic season with Big Papi.
|
|
|
Post by humanbeingbean on Jun 24, 2016 13:35:19 GMT -5
So Benintendi for both of them would make sense but not in a package for one or the other. You don't trade position players with his projection for number 3 starters or relievers. Teheran this year has improved greatly to where he's in the top 20-30 pitchers. He's relied more on his 4 seamer and slider and he was a Conforto single away from a Father's Day perfect game. Jake Peavy is probably the best comp for Teheran, once you consider age, quality, and arsenal. Frank Wren signed Teheran to his Braves contract. Teheran and Vizciano for prospects would make sense ... But the bigger question is... Are the Braves willing to do a prospect deal? GMs hate giving up cost-controlled players at their peak for prospects since the prospects often go bust. The fans even more so hate to lose their favorite players for prospects they never heard of. I'm sure that Braves fans are rioting in the streets even still after trading Shelby Miller for Inciarte/Swanson/Blair.
|
|
|
Post by telson13 on Jun 24, 2016 13:48:58 GMT -5
1) Call up Benintendi. Trial by fire. 2) Hope he catches the magical rookie hot streak 3) send him back down when Young comes back 4) he rakes in AA/AAA 5) call him up for the playoffs 6) Live happy ever after Or we can just watch Brentz and Lamarre embarrass themselves. I'm all for it. It worked for the Mets with Conforto: www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=16376&position=OFNot to mention, Benintendi is a superior defensive player and would have value in LF even if he doesn't set the world on fire with the bat.
|
|
|
Post by telson13 on Jun 24, 2016 13:49:16 GMT -5
“@jonmorosi: #Rays acquire Oswaldo Arcia from #Twins for player to be named later or cash. @mlb” Damn. That's how you know a young player's good: the Rays grab him.
|
|
|
Post by sox fan in nc on Jun 24, 2016 13:50:20 GMT -5
The Braves are still like 2 years away from being contenders. Why wouldn't they stockpile good young prospects a year or 2 away to go along with the haul they got for Shelby (AB, Kopech, Devers, ect)...I'm sure at this point the fans are understanding of this.
|
|
|
Post by telson13 on Jun 24, 2016 14:03:13 GMT -5
So Benintendi for both of them would make sense but not in a package for one or the other. You don't trade position players with his projection for number 3 starters or relievers. Teheran this year has improved greatly to where he's in the top 20-30 pitchers. He's relied more on his 4 seamer and slider and he was a Conforto single away from a Father's Day perfect game. Jake Peavy is probably the best comp for Teheran, once you consider age, quality, and arsenal. Frank Wren signed Teheran to his Braves contract. Teheran and Vizciano for prospects would make sense ... But the bigger question is... Are the Braves willing to do a prospect deal? GMs hate giving up cost-controlled players at their peak for prospects since the prospects often go bust. The fans even more so hate to lose their favorite players for prospects they never heard of. Funny, I mentioned Peavy independently of this. Look at Peavy's time with the Sox and tell me he was good. Then convince me that getting a younger version of the same style pitcher for two elite-level prospects, and several more valuable ones, is smart. Keep in mind, you'll have to prove that they need any starting pitching to begin with. Emphasis on **need**. Btw, I saw endless Cubs fans 2 years ago on ESPN and other comment boards decrying Epstein and his "5-year plan" like he was the son of the devil. Only one in five or so preached patience. Now, I'm sure those same (first 4 of 5) fans are calling this Cubs team the best ever, and between complaints about not making it better, claiming that they've always said Epstein is the best GM in history. Seriously, just...an awful, awful idea. Supported by the perfect comp to advocate **not** doing the trade, and then an appeal to build a team based on the whims of a fickle mob. Zoinks, Scoob.
|
|
|
Post by telson13 on Jun 24, 2016 14:16:05 GMT -5
Teheran this year has improved greatly to where he's in the top 20-30 pitchers. He's relied more on his 4 seamer and slider and he was a Conforto single away from a Father's Day perfect game. Jake Peavy is probably the best comp for Teheran, once you consider age, quality, and arsenal. Frank Wren signed Teheran to his Braves contract. Teheran and Vizciano for prospects would make sense ... But the bigger question is... Are the Braves willing to do a prospect deal? GMs hate giving up cost-controlled players at their peak for prospects since the prospects often go bust. The fans even more so hate to lose their favorite players for prospects they never heard of. I'm sure that Braves fans are rioting in the streets even still after trading Shelby Miller for Inciarte/Swanson/Blair. Haha! So true...yeah, I can't see them getting too upset at the prospect of Miller still on the Braves, and their team being...worse (is that possible?) Plus, all of that hope for the future must be exhausting.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Jun 24, 2016 14:34:16 GMT -5
Teheran this year has improved greatly to where he's in the top 20-30 pitchers. He's relied more on his 4 seamer and slider and he was a Conforto single away from a Father's Day perfect game. Jake Peavy is probably the best comp for Teheran, once you consider age, quality, and arsenal. Frank Wren signed Teheran to his Braves contract. Teheran and Vizciano for prospects would make sense ... But the bigger question is... Are the Braves willing to do a prospect deal? GMs hate giving up cost-controlled players at their peak for prospects since the prospects often go bust. The fans even more so hate to lose their favorite players for prospects they never heard of. Funny, I mentioned Peavy independently of this. Look at Peavy's time with the Sox and tell me he was good. Then convince me that getting a younger version of the same style pitcher for two elite-level prospects, and several more valuable ones, is smart. Keep in mind, you'll have to prove that they need any starting pitching to begin with. Emphasis on **need**. Btw, I saw endless Cubs fans 2 years ago on ESPN and other comment boards decrying Epstein and his "5-year plan" like he was the son of the devil. Only one in five or so preached patience. Now, I'm sure those same (first 4 of 5) fans are calling this Cubs team the best ever, and between complaints about not making it better, claiming that they've always said Epstein is the best GM in history. Seriously, just...an awful, awful idea. Supported by the perfect comp to advocate **not** doing the trade, and then an appeal to build a team based on the whims of a fickle mob. Zoinks, Scoob. I know Theo came up with the term bridge year(s) and was tarred and feathered for it and run out of Boston (kinda). But it was always true and we finally seem to be near the end of it. We needed a new core of players and now we have it. Oh and throw 2013 in there too. Thankfully no one panicked too badly and we held onto most of the future of the Red Sox. Because going out and signing 30 year olds whenever there's a hole in the roster does not work out well most of the time or so it seems. We shouldn't undo what has been done by panicking now either. I get that this is Papi's last year, but he already gave us 3 championships. We don't need a 4th if it means ripping up the future. He's not the Tom Brady of this team. This will be a winning team without him.
|
|
|
Post by deepjohn on Jun 24, 2016 14:38:31 GMT -5
Teheran this year has improved greatly to where he's in the top 20-30 pitchers. He's relied more on his 4 seamer and slider and he was a Conforto single away from a Father's Day perfect game. Jake Peavy is probably the best comp for Teheran, once you consider age, quality, and arsenal. Frank Wren signed Teheran to his Braves contract. Teheran and Vizciano for prospects would make sense ... But the bigger question is... Are the Braves willing to do a prospect deal? GMs hate giving up cost-controlled players at their peak for prospects since the prospects often go bust. The fans even more so hate to lose their favorite players for prospects they never heard of. Funny, I mentioned Peavy independently of this. Look at Peavy's time with the Sox and tell me he was good. Then convince me that getting a younger version of the same style pitcher for two elite-level prospects, and several more valuable ones, is smart. Keep in mind, you'll have to prove that they need any starting pitching to begin with. Emphasis on **need**. Btw, I saw endless Cubs fans 2 years ago on ESPN and other comment boards decrying Epstein and his "5-year plan" like he was the son of the devil. Only one in five or so preached patience. Now, I'm sure those same (first 4 of 5) fans are calling this Cubs team the best ever, and between complaints about not making it better, claiming that they've always said Epstein is the best GM in history. Seriously, just...an awful, awful idea. Supported by the perfect comp to advocate **not** doing the trade, and then an appeal to build a team based on the whims of a fickle mob. Zoinks, Scoob. Well, you may be seeing what you want to see, to confirm your bias, then? In the three years after his 25 year old season, Peavy had a 3.69 FIP, 3.13 ERA, and a 4.2% pop-up rate built mostly on good command and a great slider. Matt Cain is another good one (3.43 ERA, 3.86 FIP, 4.6% pop-ups). Cain and Peavy both had stellar ERAs in their next three seasons, which provides a lot of hope for Teheran boosters. It's obvious the Sox "need" starting pitching, if you're interested in having a greater confidence level of winning this year. (Said purely as a matter of statistical confidence), Buch, E-rod, et al, although they can be great sometimes, are simply too inconsistent. Both would probably be more consistently great in the bullpen in the playoffs or WS. The issue for Epstein now is the same as it is for DDo, do the Cubs trade prospects to improve their confidence level of winning this year? The hope is that DDo says yes, and Epstein no, and then the Sox beat the Cubs in the World Series with Teheran pitching a 7 inning shutout or two.
|
|
steveofbradenton
Veteran
Watching Spring Training, the FCL, and the Florida State League
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by steveofbradenton on Jun 24, 2016 14:45:25 GMT -5
Obviously the Teheran/Vizcaino rumors are the closest thing to a "quick fix". Maybe they expand it and the Red Sox get the pleasure of Nick Markakis over the rest of his contract to help make up for the loss of Benintendi. The Braves would also want a top pitching prospect so you're talking either Espinoza or Kopech. I really think the Sox will wind up making this type of move and most (maybe all?) of us are going to wind up unhappy and the Sox will say, we got young established talent, so look at what we did. Meanwhile, we'll be eating our hearts out watching the Braves kick butt next decade with their base of talent. And we might look back at what the Sox got for Lester and Lackey and wonder how the heck it is that the Braves were able to turn Miller and Teheran into what they wind up getting and we didn't do anywhere near as well. All I can say is I hope that E-Rod pitches lights out over the next month and prevents this from happening, but with Frank Wren aboard, I have a feeling that this is going to come to fruition and if it does I will not be a happy camper. I'd be in the camp of very happy if they trade prospects for Teheran and/or Vizcaino. Because I think other teams would be very, very unhappy. I would assume (as I did with Kimbrel) that the prospects going back would be the fair market price, at the time of the trade, and that DDo had explored all other trade options. That said, I am a huge fan of Benny Baseball. But I wouldn't want my fanboy feelings to keep the team from having a last chance at an epic season with Big Papi. I know we all, in a perfect world, like to send off Ortiz a winner. In my opinion, trading for Teheran and Vizcaino would NOT make us that much better with the way this team is comprised currently. I know we all drank the Kool-Aid over the 1st 2 months of the season and thought this team was Series bound. How could anyone stop this juggernaut? This team is not quite at that level yet. This team has lost much of its depth in their rotation (no Kelly and Owens at this time are not helpful). The bottom of our line-up looks terrible. Left-field is now a big problem. Ortiz somehow has hit like Ted, but may have difficulty replicating his 1st half in the second with two bad wheels. Bradley and Shaw have started to come back to the pack. Hanley is an enigma, and not sure what we can get from him over the last 3 months. Losing Carson Smith was bigger than many fans thought. Even Price and Kimbrel have not been quite themselves or as consistent as we'd hope for. To continue.....Koji may be close to finished. Tazawa is once again getting over-used. Layne (our logey) is absolutely terrible and should be moved. Barnes gives to many taters. Vazquez has been less than advertised. Now for the good news: the Killer B's have really grown up and look to be cornerstones for years. Bogie looks like one of the best 15 players in baseball, and Betts is close. And.....Benitendi and Moncada have looked as good as advertised and could be ready in 12 to 15 months at most. With that all said, WHY we would give up either of those 2 prospects (or Espinoza) to hopefully make Papi's last days more enjoyable, if the team is flawed? In the infield, I love our double play combination. In the outfield, I love our center fielder and right fielder. In the rotation, Price and Porcello we probably can count-on as solid #1 and #3. Wright has been amazing.....but he needs to do it for a full season. Erod, I still have hope for. Our closer is solid. In summary, I hope I'm VERY wrong, but they are really not a World Series team at the moment. They have a decent chance of playing ONE GAME as a Wild Card. You have all heard of "Anyone But Trump". Well I say: "Anyone But Beni, Moncada, and Espinoza!
|
|
|
Post by telson13 on Jun 24, 2016 14:55:11 GMT -5
Funny, I mentioned Peavy independently of this. Look at Peavy's time with the Sox and tell me he was good. Then convince me that getting a younger version of the same style pitcher for two elite-level prospects, and several more valuable ones, is smart. Keep in mind, you'll have to prove that they need any starting pitching to begin with. Emphasis on **need**. Btw, I saw endless Cubs fans 2 years ago on ESPN and other comment boards decrying Epstein and his "5-year plan" like he was the son of the devil. Only one in five or so preached patience. Now, I'm sure those same (first 4 of 5) fans are calling this Cubs team the best ever, and between complaints about not making it better, claiming that they've always said Epstein is the best GM in history. Seriously, just...an awful, awful idea. Supported by the perfect comp to advocate **not** doing the trade, and then an appeal to build a team based on the whims of a fickle mob. Zoinks, Scoob. Well, you may be seeing what you want to see, to confirm your bias, then? In the three years after his 25 year old season, Peavy had a 3.69 FIP, 3.13 ERA, and a 4.2% pop-up rate built mostly on good command and a great slider. Matt Cain is another good one (3.43 ERA, 3.86 FIP, 4.6% pop-ups). Cain and Peavy both had stellar ERAs in their next three seasons, which provides a lot of hope for Teheran boosters. It's obvious the Sox "need" starting pitching, if you're interested in having a greater confidence level of winning this year. (Said purely as a matter of statistical confidence), Buch, E-rod, et al, although they can be great sometimes, are simply too inconsistent. Both would probably be more consistently great in the bullpen in the playoffs or WS. The issue for Epstein now is the same as it is for DDo, do the Cubs trade prospects to improve their confidence level of winning this year? The hope is that DDo says yes, and Epstein no, and then the Sox beat the Cubs in the World Series with Teheran pitching a 7 inning shutout or two. Peavy threw 95 and struck out a lot of guys back then. He also pitched in a giant ballpark. Did you not notice how much "better" Peavy got in PacBell? Aren't you at least moderately concerned that Teheran will have an excess of Mike Torrez moments? ERod is inconsistent how? He just came back from injury. That's not inconsistency, it's recovery. You're advocating trading away two outstanding prospects, and likely a horde of others, for a half-season of Teheran. So, maybe 1-2 wins, provided he doesn't get battered with wall-ball doubles. If everything goes right, maybe he increases their playoff chances but what, 10%? They're just out of first as is, and have a run differential far better than Baltimore's. So you want to give up massive value for minimal return. Funny, too, that you would talk about me confirming my "bias," when you failed to include the article's **conclusions**...you know, where he says Teheran is likely to put up: "4.00 in the AL, once you adjust for league quality and the DH." So basically, you're itching to give up the future for...a right handed (slightly better) Wade Miley. Pardon me if I'm tremendously underwhelmed.
|
|
|
Post by deepjohn on Jun 24, 2016 14:56:15 GMT -5
I'd be in the camp of very happy if they trade prospects for Teheran and/or Vizcaino. Because I think other teams would be very, very unhappy. I would assume (as I did with Kimbrel) that the prospects going back would be the fair market price, at the time of the trade, and that DDo had explored all other trade options. That said, I am a huge fan of Benny Baseball. But I wouldn't want my fanboy feelings to keep the team from having a last chance at an epic season with Big Papi. WHY we would give up either of those 2 prospects (or Espinoza) to hopefully make Papi's last days more enjoyable, if the team is flawed? Because the team will never be as good as it is with Big Papi. If Babe Ruth was retiring this year, there would be the same urgency to win while you still had him! (I'm assuming that the prospects going back are the fair market value, and "blocked." Which means that Moncada, Espinoza, Kopech and Groome (assuming he's signed) would not be traded. Benintendi might be traded, because he is technically "blocked" at his most valuable CF position by Bradley and Betts.)
|
|
|
Post by dcsoxfan on Jun 24, 2016 15:01:44 GMT -5
The cost of acquiring an actual impact player at the trade deadline will likely be steeper for the Red Sox than it would be for a lot of teams due to their top heavy farm system. If you look back at trades involving potential impact players, it normall requires at least one truly elite prospect and a couple additional top 100 prospects. Teams trading for prospects in general demand both quantity and quality as a way of hedging their bets.
While the Red Sox are well-stocked with elite prospects, they don't have a number of non-elite top 100 types; any trade would likely require an overpay as the Red Sox would need to substitute elite prospects for Top 100 types.
|
|
|
Post by deepjohn on Jun 24, 2016 15:09:02 GMT -5
Well, you may be seeing what you want to see, to confirm your bias, then? In the three years after his 25 year old season, Peavy had a 3.69 FIP, 3.13 ERA, and a 4.2% pop-up rate built mostly on good command and a great slider. Matt Cain is another good one (3.43 ERA, 3.86 FIP, 4.6% pop-ups). Cain and Peavy both had stellar ERAs in their next three seasons, which provides a lot of hope for Teheran boosters. It's obvious the Sox "need" starting pitching, if you're interested in having a greater confidence level of winning this year. (Said purely as a matter of statistical confidence), Buch, E-rod, et al, although they can be great sometimes, are simply too inconsistent. Both would probably be more consistently great in the bullpen in the playoffs or WS. The issue for Epstein now is the same as it is for DDo, do the Cubs trade prospects to improve their confidence level of winning this year? The hope is that DDo says yes, and Epstein no, and then the Sox beat the Cubs in the World Series with Teheran pitching a 7 inning shutout or two. Peavy threw 95 and struck out a lot of guys back then. He also pitched in a giant ballpark. Did you not notice how much "better" Peavy got in PacBell? Aren't you at least moderately concerned that Teheran will have an excess of Mike Torrez moments? ERod is inconsistent how? He just came back from injury. That's not inconsistency, it's recovery. You're advocating trading away two outstanding prospects, and likely a horde of others, for a half-season of Teheran. So, maybe 1-2 wins, provided he doesn't get battered with wall-ball doubles. If everything goes right, maybe he increases their playoff chances but what, 10%? They're just out of first as is, and have a run differential far better than Baltimore's. So you want to give up massive value for minimal return. Funny, too, that you would talk about me confirming my "bias," when you failed to include the article's **conclusions**...you know, where he says Teheran is likely to put up: "4.00 in the AL, once you adjust for league quality and the DH." So basically, you're itching to give up the future for...a right handed (slightly better) Wade Miley. Pardon me if I'm tremendously underwhelmed. E-rod has always had consistency problems, because it turns out later he was tipping his pitches or had some other mechanical glitch. The advantage with Teheran is consistency down the stretch and in the playoffs and WS, when you want to keep your confidence interval (limiting the risk of poor performance) as tight as you can. I was in the bleachers for the playoff game with the archetypal Mike Torrez moment so you're preaching to the choir. But I try not to let my SSS anecdotal experience cloud what's best for the team. Flyball homers are inherently flukey (I keep reminding myself). ADD: and I'm assuming the prospects going back will be fair market value and "blocked". There are certain prospects who are untouchable, as I said above, and others like Benintendi who are technically "blocked" at CF and thus may have more value to another team than to us.
|
|
|
Post by deepjohn on Jun 24, 2016 15:35:26 GMT -5
The cost of acquiring an actual impact player at the trade deadline will likely be steeper for the Red Sox than it would be for a lot of teams due to their top heavy farm system. If you look back at trades involving potential impact players, it normall requires at least one truly elite prospect and a couple additional top 100 prospects. Teams trading for prospects in general demand both quantity and quality as a way of hedging their bets. While the Red Sox are well-stocked with elite prospects, they don't have a number of non-elite top 100 types; any trade would likely require an overpay as the Red Sox would need to substitute elite prospects for Top 100 types. The issue here, is will DDo be forced to add "sweeteners" when other teams put their prospect bids in. In the Kimbrel trade he needed to add Logan Allen to get the deal done, because other teams made prospect bids that forced the price up a little. But the price is the price, as long as you are not bidding in a vacuum, or against yourself, and have done due diligence in exploring all options (and not doing the trade is not an option). Obviously, hindsight cannot be considered, at the time of the trade. Technically, the winning bid is, by definition, always an "overpay," because other teams were willing to pay less.
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Jun 24, 2016 15:42:14 GMT -5
"I would do this deal because I assume it is a good deal because our front office is good and smart" -deepjohn, over and over again.
|
|
|
Post by deepjohn on Jun 24, 2016 15:44:07 GMT -5
"I would do this deal because I assume it is a good deal because our front office is good and smart" -deepjohn, over and over again. I will not take the bait. I will not take the bait.
|
|
|
Post by humanbeingbean on Jun 24, 2016 15:46:24 GMT -5
"I would do this deal because I assume it is a good deal because our front office is good and smart" -deepjohn, over and over again. And don't forget that every single prospect is blocked just because we have MLB players at their current position, and that they couldn't possibly slide to another one.
|
|
|
Post by deepjohn on Jun 24, 2016 15:53:11 GMT -5
"I would do this deal because I assume it is a good deal because our front office is good and smart" -deepjohn, over and over again. And don't forget that every single prospect is blocked just because we have MLB players at their current position, and that they couldn't possibly slide to another one. Assuming you are genuinely interested, a helpful answer is that a player who is "blocked" (by very high WAR players) at a team's more valuable position (usually CF or C) is worth more to another team which does not have a blocking player at that valuable position. (But I suspect you know this, and are trolling. In which case, nevermind.)
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Jun 24, 2016 15:57:26 GMT -5
And don't forget that every single prospect is blocked just because we have MLB players at their current position, and that they couldn't possibly slide to another one. Assuming you are genuinely interested, a helpful answer is that a player who is "blocked" (by very high WAR players) at a team's more valuable position (usually CF or C) is worth more to another team which does not have a blocking player at that valuable position. (But I suspect you know this, and are trolling. In which case, nevermind.) But apparently in the current market, average cost-controlled players are worth an absurd amount of prospects, even if all of them project to be a similar level player in a year or two. We're doing this backwards I think. Trade the players who are doing the blocking for an absurd amount of prospects...
|
|
|