SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
2017-18 Celtics Season Thread
|
Post by jimed14 on May 13, 2018 19:25:21 GMT -5
LeBron was averaging 34 points a game in the playoffs before today. He got 15 today. Not only that but the Cavs were probably in the low 20 percent land from 3 tonight. There was a lot of great defense by the Celtics, but Cleveland didn't try defensively and they missed a ton of open shots. 4-26 (15.4%)
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on May 13, 2018 19:27:23 GMT -5
Overreaction was the response after the Cavs dismantled the Raptors. I’ve said all along pre-and during-playoffs that this C’s team has a *real* chance, be it whatever double-digit %. You can call it overreaction, I call it them doing exactly what I posted a couple pages ago: isolating and taking away James’s effectiveness as a passer. This game was proof of concept. It doesn’t mean they *will* win, but it’s a pretty clear demonstration of “can” and “how.” Yes, we all know it’s possible. There is a path to victory no doubt. We destroyed Philly game 1 too then scratched and clawed the rest of the way. Expect the same. Except LeBron is on the other side this time. And just wait for the refs to show up to give LeBron everything he ever wanted.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on May 13, 2018 19:31:21 GMT -5
Jeff Van Gundy was one of the analysts for the game and as a former coach who was very successful I listen to what he has to say a little more than most. In his opinion the C's have more talent and are just plain better, he said this before the game. That says alot about the C's youth movement. I can't wait for next season and seeing how good they can be. Yes I know there is still this season but mentally we gave up on this season a long time ago and this is all just gravy, or whipped cream or whatever floats your boat.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on May 13, 2018 19:33:02 GMT -5
Yes, we all know it’s possible. There is a path to victory no doubt. We destroyed Philly game 1 too then scratched and clawed the rest of the way. Expect the same. Except LeBron is on the other side this time. And just wait for the refs to show up to give LeBron everything he ever wanted. Ohh that's definitely coming, especially at home and that's a huge part why LeBron is always favored. He gets the calls like Bird did back in the day. It comes with being a superstar.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on May 13, 2018 19:34:00 GMT -5
LeBron was averaging 34 points a game in the playoffs before today. He got 15 today. Not only that but the Cavs were probably in the low 20 percent land from 3 tonight. There was a lot of great defense by the Celtics, but Cleveland didn't try defensively and they missed a ton of open shots. 4-26 (15.4%) Even worse than I thought. That ain't happening again.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 13, 2018 20:25:03 GMT -5
The amount of bigs in this draft is crazy. On top of the guys already mentioned you have Robert Williams, Mitchell Robinson, Jontay Porter, Omari Spellman, and Brandon McCoy. Brandon McCoy a freshman from UNLV isn't in anyones first round mocks. He's 7'1'', 7'3'' wingspan, 255 pounds. While not a great athlete like Ayton, he isn't a bad one either. Averaged 16.9 points, 10.3 rebounds and 1.8 blocks. Has a very good motor and can shoot the ball. He's raw, but wow that's a lot of production from a raw prospect. I will take comfort in the fact that after we win the Championship next year, we might have 4 first round picks, with two in the lottery and one being top 5. Also the idea of Rozier and the Kings pick for a pick this year is very interesting. You'd have to love that player, but if you love the guy like Tatum it makes total sense. It would would be the final piece in this team being a super team. I look at Ayton and see a David Robinson type player. He's a beast, but I don't see anyone trading him. Maybe he’s been mentioned but Wendel Carter should be on this list. I think he’s going to be a really good pro. He was over shadowed at Duke and won’t be a number 1 guy in the pros but he could be really good all around. He does, but I want no part of Wendel Carter. One draft called him the biggest bust in the draft if he goes high. Then I read decent vertical, but not a run and jump athlete and lacks quickness. Not good on D. Talking about how he's always the last guy up the court. Comp is Monroe/Horford. Is any of that wrong ? One of those guys that needs to show at the combine he's a better athlete than he's shown so far. I just don't think he does, must projected lottery picks don't workout.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 13, 2018 20:27:23 GMT -5
A chance to win. Taking it to 6 or 7 isn’t the same as winning. You said yourself that you’d be “shocked” if the C’s won. To me, “shocked” denotes, idk, 10:1 or worse odds? Maybe 5:1 optimistically? Absolutely, it’s just one game (at home). At the same time, if the Cavs were a truly superior team, this sort of manhandling wouldn’t have happened. Telson, if you had said this after game 2, I would have said you were right and I was wrong. It wouldn't shock me if LeBron goes for 40 with little resistance as the Cavs blow the Celtics out the other way next game. Your reaction came one game too early imo. The Cavs win game 2, nothing has changed in this series. Just turned into a 5 game series rather than a 7 game series. Pedro truly superior teams don't get beat down in game one of a series.
|
|
rjp313jr
Veteran
Posts: 14,640
Member is Online
|
Post by rjp313jr on May 13, 2018 20:32:49 GMT -5
Maybe he’s been mentioned but Wendel Carter should be on this list. I think he’s going to be a really good pro. He was over shadowed at Duke and won’t be a number 1 guy in the pros but he could be really good all around. He does, but I want no part of Wendel Carter. One draft called him the biggest bust in the draft if he goes high. Then I read decent vertical, but not a run and jump athlete and lacks quickness. Not good on D. Talking about how he's always the last guy up the court. Comp is Monroe/Horford. Is any of that wrong ? One of those guys that needs to show at the combine he's a better athlete than he's shown so far. I just don't think he does, must projected lottery picks don't workout. I don’t know about his work ethic or getting up the court but it never stood out to me as an issue. No he’s not one of these super athletes but I think that can get over rated at times. I feel like he’s a good rebounder and he’s a pretty good shooter and a solid low post guy already. His shooting is under rated. I’d never take him over that top group but anywhere 8 and on makes sense. I wouldn’t trade back into the draft if that’s what your wondering, but I do believe the team that takes him will be getting a player. However, it could be a situation where he’s not good enough for the team who takes him because lottery teams need home runs, but if he went to a good team he’d be a steal. I’d put money on him being a long term really good pro but not all star level.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 13, 2018 20:42:03 GMT -5
He does, but I want no part of Wendel Carter. One draft called him the biggest bust in the draft if he goes high. Then I read decent vertical, but not a run and jump athlete and lacks quickness. Not good on D. Talking about how he's always the last guy up the court. Comp is Monroe/Horford. Is any of that wrong ? One of those guys that needs to show at the combine he's a better athlete than he's shown so far. I just don't think he does, must projected lottery picks don't workout. I don’t know about his work ethic or getting up the court but it never stood out to me as an issue. No he’s not one of these super athletes but I think that can get over rated at times. I feel like he’s a good rebounder and he’s a pretty good shooter and a solid low post guy already. His shooting is under rated. I’d never take him over that top group but anywhere 8 and on makes sense. I wouldn’t trade back into the draft if that’s what your wondering, but I do believe the team that takes him will be getting a player. However, it could be a situation where he’s not good enough for the team who takes him because lottery teams need home runs, but if he went to a good team he’d be a steal. I’d put money on him being a long term really good pro but not all star level. Who he's like athletically ? Monroe/Horford mix doesn't sound good.
|
|
rjp313jr
Veteran
Posts: 14,640
Member is Online
|
Post by rjp313jr on May 13, 2018 20:48:38 GMT -5
I don’t know about his work ethic or getting up the court but it never stood out to me as an issue. No he’s not one of these super athletes but I think that can get over rated at times. I feel like he’s a good rebounder and he’s a pretty good shooter and a solid low post guy already. His shooting is under rated. I’d never take him over that top group but anywhere 8 and on makes sense. I wouldn’t trade back into the draft if that’s what your wondering, but I do believe the team that takes him will be getting a player. However, it could be a situation where he’s not good enough for the team who takes him because lottery teams need home runs, but if he went to a good team he’d be a steal. I’d put money on him being a long term really good pro but not all star level. Who he's like athletically ? Monroe/Horford mix doesn't sound good. Idk hard to say. I don’t consider Horford and Monroe the same athlete but sure he’s not an above the rim guy and he’s not a slow footed stiff either.
|
|
rjp313jr
Veteran
Posts: 14,640
Member is Online
|
Post by rjp313jr on May 13, 2018 20:50:21 GMT -5
It’s hard to wrap the head around the fact that Tatum and Brown are really this good already and that’s holding me back on this team.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 13, 2018 20:56:50 GMT -5
Who he's like athletically ? Monroe/Horford mix doesn't sound good. Idk hard to say. I don’t consider Horford and Monroe the same athlete but sure he’s not an above the rim guy and he’s not a slow footed stiff either. Well Horford and Monroe aren't close, that's the point they are saying he's a mix of both. Which isn't good.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on May 13, 2018 21:02:04 GMT -5
Telson, if you had said this after game 2, I would have said you were right and I was wrong. It wouldn't shock me if LeBron goes for 40 with little resistance as the Cavs blow the Celtics out the other way next game. Your reaction came one game too early imo. The Cavs win game 2, nothing has changed in this series. Just turned into a 5 game series rather than a 7 game series. Pedro truly superior teams don't get beat down in game one of a series. Cleveland clearly isn't a superior team. LeBron is clearly the superior player though and I think this is far from over. www.weei.com/blogs/sara-civian/lebron-james-claims-zero-level-concern-after-game-1
|
|
rjp313jr
Veteran
Posts: 14,640
Member is Online
|
Post by rjp313jr on May 13, 2018 21:27:45 GMT -5
Idk hard to say. I don’t consider Horford and Monroe the same athlete but sure he’s not an above the rim guy and he’s not a slow footed stiff either. Well Horford and Monroe aren't close, that's the point they are saying he's a mix of both. Which isn't good. I guess I don’t understand that
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on May 13, 2018 22:17:32 GMT -5
My friends I was away during this beautiful basketball game as I was watching at my girlfriend's house and let me tell you that it was awesome. Don't buy into the "Cavs won't shoot this poorly again" talk, people said the same thing about Philly. At some point you just have to respect the best defense in the league. We can guard these guys pretty good and they can't guard sh*t. That's a good recipe.
Nobody on the Cavs can create mismatches against our guys except Lebron. Maybe they can get like Hill on Baynes, but what is Hill realistically going to do? Kevin Love can't post anyone. And the gorgeous part is that everyone on the rotation outside of Rozier and Baynes can guard Lebron for a few possessions and do it well enough. Everyone fights the screens and close on shooters. Unless the Cavs adjust and throw something completely unexpected at us, they're boned.
Now the one thing that scares me somewhat is that this is a pretty young team and their veteran leader is known for having more "timid" game from time to time. They're inconsistent and they could have 4 bad games in a row. I doubt they will coast, but that could happen for like a game and cost them. If, and this a pretty gigantic if as it was against the Sixers, if they remain focused I think this one is going to end up WELL.
There were like maybe 3-4 open 3s the Cavs got today where I think they could have made us pay, other than that it was all smooth. This defense is incredible.
Edit: Oh and one more thing: the refs were bullsh*t on the third quarter and that's the sole reason Cleveland got within 14.
|
|
|
Post by telson13 on May 13, 2018 23:20:59 GMT -5
Let’s all agree on this, though: This team hasn’t stopped surprising since opening tip-off. They’ve been a lot of things, but “dull” and “predictable” aren’t on the list.
|
|
|
Post by telson13 on May 13, 2018 23:22:56 GMT -5
Jeff Van Gundy was one of the analysts for the game and as a former coach who was very successful I listen to what he has to say a little more than most. In his opinion the C's have more talent and are just plain better, he said this before the game. That says alot about the C's youth movement. I can't wait for next season and seeing how good they can be. Yes I know there is still this season but mentally we gave up on this season a long time ago and this is all just gravy, or whipped cream or whatever floats your boat. Makes you wonder what it’s going to be like with Kyrie, Hayward, and that second overall pick from the Lakers!
|
|
|
Post by telson13 on May 13, 2018 23:32:56 GMT -5
“ By the time James took a seat, he had racked up seven turnovers. That’s a lot for the man who only had eight overall in Round 2.” I said it pre-series: James’s dangerousness lies in his supreme well-roundedness. He’s awesome because he can do everything. So Stevens is going to find a way to neutralize James’s prowess as a passer, and without that dimension, his floor genius is limited. He might’ve gotten his share of assists, but they came at a high price.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on May 14, 2018 6:12:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on May 14, 2018 6:26:42 GMT -5
If the Celtics win this series IMO it puts Stevens at the forefront of coaching in the NBA, the next Popovich. Not to take anything away from the players as they deserve a ton of credit for buying in, for their toughness and for their performance but Stevens is the architect and leader. If they take down the King without their 2 best players and a depleted bench it will be nothing short of miraculous. His teams go beyond expectations each and every year, every player that plays for him has their best years. IT, Jae, Evan Turner, Bradley and now Horford is playing as well as he ever has. They out work the opposition regularly and that is what puts them over the top when they exceed expectations. My expectations were exceeded weeks ago. The mental and physical toughness this team shows is remarkable and makes the future that much more brighter.
|
|
|
Post by telson13 on May 14, 2018 13:19:45 GMT -5
Omg that is incredible. It’s so accurate it’s ridiculous.
|
|
|
Post by telson13 on May 14, 2018 13:23:17 GMT -5
If the Celtics win this series IMO it puts Stevens at the forefront of coaching in the NBA, the next Popovich. Not to take anything away from the players as they deserve a ton of credit for buying in, for their toughness and for their performance but Stevens is the architect and leader. If they take down the King without their 2 best players and a depleted bench it will be nothing short of miraculous. His teams go beyond expectations each and every year, every player that plays for him has their best years. IT, Jae, Evan Turner, Bradley and now Horford is playing as well as he ever has. They out work the opposition regularly and that is what puts them over the top when they exceed expectations. My expectations were exceeded weeks ago. The mental and physical toughness this team shows is remarkable and makes the future that much more brighter. Exceptionally well-put.
|
|
|
Post by Oregon Norm on May 14, 2018 15:37:26 GMT -5
Despite all the negative reaction as players went down - how they were dead in the water, who they should trade, why individual players were less than useless - the team reflects quite a few of the core values the Celtics have always had. They stockpiled talent, players took on roles and they stuck to them (yes even Baynes cloging the middle, pulling down boards, and knocking down an occasional three), the coaches installed offensive and defensive schemes that work for that talent, and the players give up individual accomplishments for the good of the cause.
This is what they've done for a very long time. Those old enough to remember Sam and K.C. Jones, Satch Sanders, Paul Westphal and John Havlicek, Wayne Embry, Don Nelson, Dennis Johnson, and many, many, others will know exactly what I'm talking about. I've followed them since I was a kid and Gene Conley played for them. Those values never get old despite the flavor of the month and the drastic changes that the 3-pt. line introduced along with the athleticism of modern players. The focus this team has is unbelievable, unless you remember who the Celtics were, then it fits perfectly.
That to my mind is the real reason why Golden State is so good, because they have all of those elements in place. It's also why this Boston team has pushed aside all the useless chatter so many of the talking heads throw out. I was scanning a piece from SBNation where they talked about how the Celtics weren't as athletic as the 76ers and I immediately stopped reading. Was the writer equating Simmons' height versus Rozier's as athleticism? The guy has great court vision which that height certainly can't hurt, and when he gets to the basket he's almost impossible to stop - that height thing again. But he has no outside shot to speak of so he's literally useless from beyond the arc. Rozier is supremely athletic and when he's on from distance he's deadly. He's just not 6' 10". Certainly Boston has no one like Embiid, with a deluxe 70's post-up game and a modern 3-Pt. twist. Horford's skills are vastly different but very valuable, and Baynes is just a big body who sticks to his knitting for the most part.
But those wings? You've got to be kidding me. Philly has no combo like Brown and Tatum. I still can't figure out why so many people are surprised these gifted young players got better as they got more and more playing time. Westphal sat on the Celtics bench for years before he got his chance in Phoenix and proceeded to torch nets all around the league.
It's the vision thing and it's why we're not coaches. They see a hell of a lot further than we do, to a future that has that talent maturing and wreaking havoc in the regular season and the playoffs. Here we are.
|
|
|
Post by Coreno on May 14, 2018 20:50:34 GMT -5
Omg that is incredible. It’s so accurate it’s ridiculous. Smh, the disrespect to Mook Morris.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on May 14, 2018 21:21:32 GMT -5
Tomorrow night is the draft lottery, positive thoughts people, positive thoughts.
2,3,2,3,2,3,2,3,2,3,2,3,2,3,2,3
|
|
|