|
Post by James Dunne on Jun 25, 2018 16:54:34 GMT -5
Yo, here's a picture collage of those awful camo 4th of July hats teams wore in 2012, with a picture of Bobby Valentine. And here's the box score of that day; www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/OAK/OAK201207040.shtmlWhy? Because Bobby Valentine in that camo-B Sox hat leaving in Aaron Cook to face 28 batters is literally the only thing that could make this thread worse.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Jun 25, 2018 17:15:38 GMT -5
So if that's the case, what did you mean by: Literally nobody said you called him a criminal. You called him a "bad dude" because he "associates with drug dealers." What is it about drug dealers that makes him a "bad dude" that isn't the relevant "criminal activity" that makes them drug dealers? FTH assumed that I wanted to call him criminal first off. Secondly, I don't like people who are involved with bad drug dealers like this one in any shape or form. The facetime conversation may apply that Hanley is close with this bad person in some way unless Hanley is a complete weirdo and facetimes everyone, which I wouldn't put that past Hanley either. Why I think Hanley is a bad dude in this case. If you're not separating yourself from scum like this and you're not alerting the authorities of this scumbag, you are not doing the right thing. Hence the bad dude comment. My posts have had nothing to do with FTH. So you're saying that Hanley is a "bad dude" because he associates with drug dealers who engage in criminal activity. More or less what you just denied saying. Cool. I'm going to stop there because the only options left are you'll either get it, won't ever get it, or get it and just will deny getting it to be contrarian.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Jun 25, 2018 17:32:39 GMT -5
FTH assumed that I wanted to call him criminal first off. Secondly, I don't like people who are involved with bad drug dealers like this one in any shape or form. The facetime conversation may apply that Hanley is close with this bad person in some way unless Hanley is a complete weirdo and facetimes everyone, which I wouldn't put that past Hanley either. Why I think Hanley is a bad dude in this case. If you're not separating yourself from scum like this and you're not alerting the authorities of this scumbag, you are not doing the right thing. Hence the bad dude comment. My posts have had nothing to do with FTH. So you're saying that Hanley is a "bad dude" because he associates with drug dealers who engage in criminal activity. More or less what you just denied saying. Cool. I'm going to stop there because the only options left are you'll either get it, won't ever get it, or get it and just will deny getting it to be contrarian. I have never denied anything besides Hanley being a criminal. I made that part clear. You said in the post before this one that "Literally nobody said you called him a criminal." FTH assumed that I wanted to call him a criminal. The only part where I could be wrong about in all of this is if Hanley facetimes literally everybody on phone calls. If he does, then I'm wrong about him being a bad guy. In that case, he more or less makes bad decisions socially. You got to admit Chris that the facetime call is the sketchy part in all of this. Literally the only people who facetime people are the people who are close socially. I'll stop posting about it too because I'm tired of talking about it.
|
|
|
Post by benogliviesbrother on Jun 25, 2018 19:11:28 GMT -5
The LoLs are fat and abundant in this thread. Biblical proportions might be in reach.
Catch your respective breath and please carry on.
|
|
|
Post by benogliviesbrother on Jun 25, 2018 19:13:13 GMT -5
Speaking of Biblical, WWJD? Jesus would never associate with criminals! Um, would he?
|
|
|
Post by swingingbunt on Jun 25, 2018 20:19:52 GMT -5
Speaking of Biblical, WWJD? Jesus would never associate with criminals! Um, would he? Sure he did. But he didn't FaceTime with criminals. That's where we draw the line around these here parts.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Jun 25, 2018 20:55:30 GMT -5
Speaking of Biblical, WWJD? Jesus would never associate with criminals! Um, would he? Sure he did. But he didn't FaceTime with criminals. That's where we draw the line around these here parts. This post gets 5 out of 5 stars. Excellent snark there.
|
|