|
Post by iakovos11 on May 24, 2022 6:52:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Addam603 on May 24, 2022 8:49:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by GyIantosca on May 24, 2022 9:52:35 GMT -5
Let’s go Bello and Groome.
|
|
nomar
Veteran
Posts: 11,497
|
Post by nomar on May 24, 2022 10:37:51 GMT -5
Salem vs Strasburg lol
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on May 24, 2022 10:45:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by LoneStarSox on May 24, 2022 11:46:27 GMT -5
Pretty strong outing for Groome. ~62% of his pitches for strikes, 9 K’s against 2 BB’s over 6. I’ll take it.
|
|
|
Post by Addam603 on May 24, 2022 12:00:35 GMT -5
Groome now has a sub 3.00 ERA across 50+ innings in AA. If he keeps up this quality of results, he could see a late season promotion to Worcester.
|
|
steveofbradenton
Veteran
Watching Spring Training, the FCL, and the Florida State League
Posts: 1,838
|
Post by steveofbradenton on May 24, 2022 12:18:54 GMT -5
Jay Groome has been somewhat forgotten. All of us are excited about Bello, Walter, and Gonzalez. But Jay has finally got healthy and is showing his true potential. The pitching in the system has definitely taken a step in the right direction. Exciting to see!!
One unearned run in 6-innings is just the latest strong effort.
|
|
|
Post by RedSoxStats on May 24, 2022 13:30:36 GMT -5
Seems like a pretty substantial gap between results on paper and scouting looks in person on Groome.
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on May 24, 2022 14:11:03 GMT -5
Groome's K/BB/GB rates are all in the ballpark of the Eastern League average. His stuff superficially looks fringey for an MLB starter in 2022 to me. I think he's going to need to improve by a lot to be useful in the majors. People smarter than me can argue if he's a good or bad candidate to take a step forward in the next year or two.
|
|
|
Post by ematz1423 on May 24, 2022 14:23:45 GMT -5
Groome's numbers are looking solid. It looks like he's at about 130 IP since coming back from TJ so one would think that's mostly behind him now. The reports on his "stuff" doesn't sound over powering at all that's for sure. However he is listed at 6 foot 6 so I wonder if that allows his FB to play up a tick? You don't see many guys on the mound his size and less lefty. Will it be enough to allow him success at the ML level? I'm not so sure but was just a thought I had on him anyway. Either way hopefully there's a little more projection left in his stuff that will allow him to be a major leaguer.
|
|
|
Post by Addam603 on May 24, 2022 17:28:49 GMT -5
Worcester lineup tweet has Keller getting the start, not Bello. But a separate tweet has Bello. Probably just a mistake to not include Bello in the lineup tweet, but something to keep an eye on.
Also to monitor, Downs did not play on Sunday and he’s not in the lineup tonight either. He was removed from Saturday’s game with side discomfort, so hopefully this doesn’t linger too long.
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on May 24, 2022 18:09:58 GMT -5
Damn, Paulino jumped on Strasburg's first pitch fastball and missed a HR by a few feet
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on May 24, 2022 18:22:09 GMT -5
Lopez smoked a line drive but was out after a great play by the 1B. Brainer, Hickey and Kavadas drew walks. Who is this bum on the mound anyway
|
|
|
Post by lennsakata on May 24, 2022 20:14:08 GMT -5
Nice start by Gabriel Jackson tonight. You take away his two starts at the end of April and he’s really been quite good despite the nearly 5.00 era overall…no homeruns, good/reasonable whip in all of his other starts
|
|
|
Post by ancientsoxfogey on May 24, 2022 20:45:52 GMT -5
As of this moment the Sox full-season organizations are undefeated and outscoring their opponents today by a combined 40-5. I bet you'd have to go back quite a ways to find a more dominant performance by the organization as a whole.
|
|
|
Post by sarasoxer on May 24, 2022 21:21:10 GMT -5
As of this moment the Sox full-season organizations are undefeated and outscoring their opponents today by a combined 40-5. I bet you'd have to go back quite a ways to find a more dominant performance by the organization as a whole. Very probably true. I wish the cumulative team records would be more encouraging tho.
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on May 24, 2022 21:29:57 GMT -5
Speier with a great tidbit - After two starts, Bello is the only International League pitcher with multiple 10K games this season.
|
|
|
Post by Underwater Johnson on May 24, 2022 22:30:36 GMT -5
Groome could throw a no-no in his AAA debut and the scouts would say "yeah, but his stuff wasn't great."
|
|
cdj
Veteran
Posts: 15,647
Member is Online
|
Post by cdj on May 24, 2022 23:03:51 GMT -5
Groome could throw a no-no in his AAA debut and the scouts would say "yeah, but his stuff wasn't great." Counterpoint: a lot of ppl with ok stuff pitch well in AA. 89-93 with average secondaries isn’t exactly eye-catching. Maybe his size allows the fastball to play up a tick but if the curveball never returns to its former plus self then it’s gonna be hard for him to make it. It’s not impossible but there will be very little margin for error in the bigs for him
|
|
|
Post by James Dunne on May 24, 2022 23:30:52 GMT -5
Groome could throw a no-no in his AAA debut and the scouts would say "yeah, but his stuff wasn't great." If his stuff wasn't great they would say that, yes.
|
|
|
Post by Underwater Johnson on May 24, 2022 23:59:56 GMT -5
Groome could throw a no-no in his AAA debut and the scouts would say "yeah, but his stuff wasn't great." If his stuff wasn't great they would say that, yes. Touché.
Embrace the narrative.
Groome can't even get credit for a hypothetical no-no.
"Hey, did you hear? Jay Groome threw a no-hitter in his Worcester debut!" "Yeah, but I heard that it wasn't that good."
|
|
|
Post by James Dunne on May 25, 2022 0:06:25 GMT -5
I mean, he'd get full credit for the no-hitter. The millions of readers of the SoxProspects.com Cup of Coffee would see it in the morning headlines. Scouts aren't there to read you the box score.
I'm not entirely sure what your point is. Are you of the opinion that scouts are predisposed against liking the stuff of Jay Groome? Is there a reason you think they'd be more complimentary of Brandon Walter or Chris Murphy? Stuff isn't just velocity, it's command profile, secondary pitches, all sorts of things. The thing with Groome is that he's got a very good secondary (his curve) and a couple pretty okay ones, but the command on the fastball isn't consistent enough for him to succeed just by mixing his pitches well like it does against Double-A hitters. We saw an extreme example of this with Henry Owens not so many years ago. The curve and the changeup were enough to make minor leaguers miss, but major league hitters who are good at identifying the fastball were crushing him because he left it up too much and he didn't have the velocity to get away with those kinds of mistakes.
|
|
|
Post by Underwater Johnson on May 25, 2022 1:11:04 GMT -5
I'm of the opinion that Groome doesn't get credit for getting guys out and preventing runners from scoring, when that's his only job. In his last start, he threw 6 shutout innings and worked out of several jams but he only struck out one guy, so were they actually six not-so-great shutout innings? Three of his six starts thus far this season resulted in game scores of 65+, while only two of Murphy's eight starts have scored as high. You could say that those are only results, and you'd be right. And unless Murphy has grown at least a couple inches and put on at least a couple stone since he was last measured, he's probably too small to be in a big-league rotation. But his stuff might play in relief.
I also believe that Groome has faced more than his share of adversity in his still young life, including a 45-month stretch in which he pitched only 4 innings in actual games, and I still think of him as a work in progress. He's still barely a year removed from that unforeseen break. Noah Song last pitched 33 months ago, with no TJ to recover from, and I'd bet money that the Navy has kept him in good shape and I'd also bet money that he gets a lot more benefit of the doubt from scouts on his road back.
That's my opinion of Jay Groome and I'll pull for him even if scouts say his stuff is not as good as his results and he's a Henry Owens comp (I'll be pulling for Murphy and Song too, of course, because I'm a Sox fan who follows Sox prospects; I'm not a fan who follows national prospect lists or a scout who doesn't care about laundry). Still, I have to wonder why the FO put Groome on the 40-man. They should be able to see that he won't be able to get big-leaguers out and they should probably let him be some other club's fool's gold.
|
|
nomar
Veteran
Posts: 11,497
|
Post by nomar on May 25, 2022 7:35:12 GMT -5
Inconsistent playing time be damned, it’s been a nice season for Hickey. 157 wRC+, 21.4 BB%, 19.4 K%, .227 ISO.
Would like to see Hickey and Kavadas move up to Greenville soon.
|
|