|
Post by pasadenasox on Apr 22, 2013 0:50:17 GMT -5
Matt Barnes (POR) - 1 G, 6.0 IP, 1-0, 1.50 ERA, 5 H, 1 R, 1 ER, 1 BB/7 K, 1.00 WHIP, 10.50 K/9, 1.17 G/F, .217 BAA, .598 OPSA
William Cuevas (SAL) - 2 G, 10.0 IP, 1-0, 0.90 ERA, 3 H, 1 R, 1 ER, 2 BB/11 K, 0.50 WHIP, 9.90 K/9, 0.60 G/F, .091 BAA, .264 OPSA
Terry Doyle (PAW) - 1 G, 7.0 IP, 1-0, 1.29 ERA, 2 H, 1 R, 1 ER, 1 BB/6 K, 0.43 WHIP, 7.71 K/9, 0.62 G/F, .083 BAA, .328 OPSA
Anthony Ranaudo (POR) - 2 G, 10.2 IP, 2-0, 0.85 ERA, 4 H, 1 R, 1 ER, 4 BB/4 11 K, 0.75 WHIP, 9.82 K/9, 1.50 G/F, .129 BAA, .469 OPSA
Brandon Workman (POR) - 1 G, 7.0 IP, 1-0, 0.00 ERA, 4 H, 0 R, 0 BB/9 K, 0.57 WHIP, 11.57 K/9, 1.33 G/F, .182 BAA, .364 OPSA
Vote for your choice and discuss in the thread below. As always, please vote based on weekly performance rather than prospect status or ranking.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 22, 2013 7:29:08 GMT -5
I have to go Ranaudo. Harder to take the ball twice and do it then once.
|
|
|
Post by hammerhead on Apr 22, 2013 8:34:26 GMT -5
I'm going with Ranaudo too although it's not letting me vote
|
|
|
Post by iakovos11 on Apr 22, 2013 9:42:26 GMT -5
Why Ranaudo over Cuevas? Cuevas pitched as much and had better stats across the board other than G/F ration (and ERA if you really think that has meaning).
|
|
|
Post by sammo420 on Apr 22, 2013 12:56:16 GMT -5
I'm going with Ranaudo too although it's not letting me vote Nosripts? if so temporarily disable all for this page and you can vote.
|
|
|
Post by Matt Huegel on Apr 23, 2013 10:19:38 GMT -5
Why Ranaudo over Cuevas? Cuevas pitched as much and had better stats across the board other than G/F ration (and ERA if you really think that has meaning). Yeah, don't understand that either. I voted for Cuevas, although Workman made me pause. Cuevas got it because of the larger sample size.
|
|
|
Post by pasadenasox on Apr 23, 2013 23:57:45 GMT -5
It's still very close, please vote!
|
|