SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Could Jesús Luzardo light the way?
|
Post by ephus on Jan 3, 2024 13:16:44 GMT -5
With the Dylan Cease sweepstakes getting a little too rich, what does a potential Luzardo deal look like?
I wonder if picking up a big chunk of Kenley's money to solify their back-end, and then added Mayer they would bite. It is a lot but would add a cost controlled started with a projection of 3+ WAR.
|
|
|
Post by Smittyw on Jan 3, 2024 16:04:54 GMT -5
Baseball Trade Values shows Duran, Houck, and Yorke as a slight overpay for the Sox. Or, substitute Winck and Valdez for Houck if you prefer. These may be rose-colored glasses talking, but I think you could cobble together an appealing package of ML ready (or close) pieces that are now somewhat redundant, without touching the system's Big Three.
I just want some Jesus Lizard references in gameday threads...doesn't seem like too much to ask.
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 15,671
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jan 3, 2024 16:25:33 GMT -5
Baseball Trade Values shows Duran, Houck, and Yorke as a slight overpay for the Sox. Or, substitute Winck and Valdez for Houck if you prefer. These may be rose-colored glasses talking, but I think you could cobble together an appealing package of ML ready (or close) pieces that are now somewhat redundant, without touching the system's Big Three. I just want some Jesus Lizard references in gameday threads...doesn't seem like too much to ask. If all it took was Duran, Houck, and Yorke.... With others seeking pitching, I dont see how a deal is consummated without including 1 of the big 3, particularly Mayer. If Breslow could pull off a deal like that without touching the big 3, he's one helluva PoBO. I honestly don't think you get Luzardo without touching a top prospect. I do think the Sox might ultimately wind up with Luzardo but I think it'll cost one of Duran, Rafaela, or Abreu, one of Crawford or Houck and one of the Big 3, most likely Mayer, and possibly a promising A ball level player. I'd just as soon overpay in free agency and keep the farm system and major league depth intact.
|
|
ematz1423
Veteran
Posts: 5,360
Member is Online
|
Post by ematz1423 on Jan 3, 2024 16:41:10 GMT -5
I pretty much agree with everything RedSoxChamps is saying, Luzardo would be great if the package is something like Duran, Houck and Yorke, I'd probably toss in an extra guy in the 5-10 range and another in the 11-20 range to be honest too. The system is accumulating depth so I think it'd be fine, I doubt Miami bites on a pu-pu platter of solid players though. Don't see it happening without a top 3 prospect going back.
I'm also with them on the idea that I'd rather just sign someone in FA and keep the farm and ML depth intact. I really don't see Luzardo and his 3 years of control really fitting in with the window we are looking at for the next great Sox team as I think this year we're probably looking at a down year, maybe a WC run. Then depending on who is left in the farm that didn't go in theoretical Luzardo deal is going to need at least a year to really get up to speed of the ML ballgame. Long story short, I don't find this offseason to be the offseason to push the type of chips in to acquire a guy like Luzardo with only 3 years left of control.
|
|
|
Post by freddysthefuture2003 on Jan 3, 2024 21:37:37 GMT -5
Baseball Trade Values shows Let me stop you right there...
|
|
|
Post by soxaddict on Jan 3, 2024 22:58:13 GMT -5
I pretty much agree with everything RedSoxChamps is saying, Luzardo would be great if the package is something like Duran, Houck and Yorke, I'd probably toss in an extra guy in the 5-10 range and another in the 11-20 range to be honest too. The system is accumulating depth so I think it'd be fine, I doubt Miami bites on a pu-pu platter of solid players though. Don't see it happening without a top 3 prospect going back. I'm also with them on the idea that I'd rather just sign someone in FA and keep the farm and ML depth intact. I really don't see Luzardo and his 3 years of control really fitting in with the window we are looking at for the next great Sox team as I think this year we're probably looking at a down year, maybe a WC run. Then depending on who is left in the farm that didn't go in theoretical Luzardo deal is going to need at least a year to really get up to speed of the ML ballgame. Long story short, I don't find this offseason to be the offseason to push the type of chips in to acquire a guy like Luzardo with only 3 years left of control. Agree with this. Luzardo will cost Mayer or Anthony and then some. A deal like that is a "put you over the top deal", and they're not there at the moment and not sure what they're going to be over the next three seasons.
|
|
|
Post by bcpatsox18 on Jan 4, 2024 8:49:33 GMT -5
I pretty much agree with everything RedSoxChamps is saying, Luzardo would be great if the package is something like Duran, Houck and Yorke, I'd probably toss in an extra guy in the 5-10 range and another in the 11-20 range to be honest too. The system is accumulating depth so I think it'd be fine, I doubt Miami bites on a pu-pu platter of solid players though. Don't see it happening without a top 3 prospect going back. I'm also with them on the idea that I'd rather just sign someone in FA and keep the farm and ML depth intact. I really don't see Luzardo and his 3 years of control really fitting in with the window we are looking at for the next great Sox team as I think this year we're probably looking at a down year, maybe a WC run. Then depending on who is left in the farm that didn't go in theoretical Luzardo deal is going to need at least a year to really get up to speed of the ML ballgame. Long story short, I don't find this offseason to be the offseason to push the type of chips in to acquire a guy like Luzardo with only 3 years left of control. Agree with this. Luzardo will cost Mayer or Anthony and then some. A deal like that is a "put you over the top deal", and they're not there at the moment and not sure what they're going to be over the next three seasons. It certainly could be a put you over the top deal in certain situations, but it’s also the type of deal you make if you ever want to be in that discussion. He’s got 3 arb years left and is 25- that’s the type of player worth trading a top prospect for. However I don’t think it takes one of the big 3 to get it done. I think something like Duran, yorke, Gonzalez, and Mikey Romero could get it done.
|
|
|
Post by Smittyw on Jan 4, 2024 8:55:12 GMT -5
Baseball Trade Values shows Let me stop you right there... Thanks, I'm well aware it's not real life...more a conversation starter than anything. I agree with this as well. By the time our window really opens, Mayer, Anthony, and Teel will likely all be in the majors playing key roles. I'm not really interested in touching those three guys at this point. Luzardo would be cool, but just give me Montgomery or even Snell, I guess.
|
|
|
Post by ephus on Jan 4, 2024 11:20:15 GMT -5
I mostly agree with what folks are saying, but I think the timeline is tighter and adding a cost-controlled pitcher this year lets the team make a serious run at someone like Max Fried would give the team a solid rotation heading into 2025. As several folks have mentioned, the farm has achieved legitimate depth and I think SS is a position where the team is particularly strong, which I why I’d be open to moving Mayer in the right deal. With good health and development in ‘24 and of the group of Yoeilin, Zanetello, Romero, Paulino, Mr. Anderson could be system top-10 guys by September. Therefore, I am ok making a move this year.
|
|
|
Post by funkybuddha on Jan 4, 2024 12:00:56 GMT -5
I mostly agree with what folks are saying, but I think the timeline is tighter and adding a cost-controlled pitcher this year lets the team make a serious run at someone like Max Fried would give the team a solid rotation heading into 2025. As several folks have mentioned, the farm has achieved legitimate depth and I think SS is a position where the team is particularly strong, which I why I’d be open to moving Mayer in the right deal. With good health and development in ‘24 and of the group of Yoeilin, Zanetello, Romero, Paulino, Mr. Anderson could be system top-10 guys by September. Therefore, I am ok making a move this year. I see where you are going with this and it makes sense but I'm not sure I agree completely. Do love Luzardo and would love to get him. Also agree that it would take one of the big 3 plus to make it happen. If I was Miami I wouldn't move him for less than that. However I am not sure I agree Sox are deep at SS. Story has never been able to stay healthy since being acquired. He is now and hopefully will be but based on past performance I don't think you can count on it for even a full season much less the next few seasons. Add to that, other than defensively, he hasn't exactly performed all that well. I know the defense is outstanding and the most important thing. Of the players you mention I believe the only one with a true defensive SS profile is Zanetello and he is way to early in his career to count on. Cespedes and Anderson look to have more of a 3B profile and Romero/Paulino 2B. Mayer had a down year last year (injured) but is still a blue chip until he proves otherwise. If he develops he will be far more valuable than Luzardo, not taking anything away from how good he is. Add that Burnes, Buehler and Fried are all FA's next year and possibly Sasaki available and it just seems to be that it would be wise to hold on to the 3 and see where the Sox are in July.
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 15,671
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jan 4, 2024 12:07:58 GMT -5
I mostly agree with what folks are saying, but I think the timeline is tighter and adding a cost-controlled pitcher this year lets the team make a serious run at someone like Max Fried would give the team a solid rotation heading into 2025. As several folks have mentioned, the farm has achieved legitimate depth and I think SS is a position where the team is particularly strong, which I why I’d be open to moving Mayer in the right deal. With good health and development in ‘24 and of the group of Yoeilin, Zanetello, Romero, Paulino, Mr. Anderson could be system top-10 guys by September. Therefore, I am ok making a move this year. I see where you are going with this and it makes sense but I'm not sure I agree completely. Do love Luzardo and would love to get him. Also agree that it would take one of the big 3 plus to make it happen. If I was Miami I wouldn't move him for less than that. However I am not sure I agree Sox are deep at SS. Story has never been able to stay healthy since being acquired. He is now and hopefully will be but based on past performance I don't think you can count on it for even a full season much less the next few seasons. Add to that, other than defensively, he hasn't exactly performed all that well. I know the defense is outstanding and the most important thing. Of the players you mention I believe the only one with a true defensive SS profile is Zanetello and he is way to early in his career to count on. Cespedes and Anderson look to have more of a 3B profile and Romero/Paulino 2B. Mayer had a down year last year (injured) but is still a blue chip until he proves otherwise. If he develops he will be far more valuable than Luzardo, not taking anything away from how good he is. Add that Burnes, Buehler and Fried are all FA's next year and possibly Sasaki available and it just seems to be that it would be wise to hold on to the 3 and see where the Sox are in July. Spot on. I agree with all you write, but would also add that just because Max Fried is a free agent next year and save the money for him makes sense, can we really count on the Sox to win a bidding war for Fried if other big market teams get involved which is likely to happen given the need for front line pitching?
|
|
|
Post by ephus on Jan 4, 2024 12:25:07 GMT -5
I see where you are going with this and it makes sense but I'm not sure I agree completely. Do love Luzardo and would love to get him. Also agree that it would take one of the big 3 plus to make it happen. If I was Miami I wouldn't move him for less than that. However I am not sure I agree Sox are deep at SS. Story has never been able to stay healthy since being acquired. He is now and hopefully will be but based on past performance I don't think you can count on it for even a full season much less the next few seasons. Add to that, other than defensively, he hasn't exactly performed all that well. I know the defense is outstanding and the most important thing. Of the players you mention I believe the only one with a true defensive SS profile is Zanetello and he is way to early in his career to count on. Cespedes and Anderson look to have more of a 3B profile and Romero/Paulino 2B. Mayer had a down year last year (injured) but is still a blue chip until he proves otherwise. If he develops he will be far more valuable than Luzardo, not taking anything away from how good he is. Add that Burnes, Buehler and Fried are all FA's next year and possibly Sasaki available and it just seems to be that it would be wise to hold on to the 3 and see where the Sox are in July. Spot on. I agree with all you write, but would also add that just because Max Fried is a free agent next year and save the money for him makes sense, can we really count on the Sox to win a bidding war for Fried if other big market teams get involved which is likely to happen given the need for front line pitching? I can't be mad at Buddha's take, but here is the issue I have with the idea that the Red Sox won't go all in in the future. Giving a pitcher $220-$300M makes a lot more sense when you are a player or two away and ready to take that final step. With a couple moves this year, either now or at the deadline, we could be there next spring.
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 15,671
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jan 4, 2024 12:30:01 GMT -5
Spot on. I agree with all you write, but would also add that just because Max Fried is a free agent next year and save the money for him makes sense, can we really count on the Sox to win a bidding war for Fried if other big market teams get involved which is likely to happen given the need for front line pitching? I can't be mad at Buddha's take, but here is the issue I have with the idea that the Red Sox won't go all in in the future. Giving a pitcher $220-$300M makes a lot more sense when you are a player or two away and ready to take that final step. With a couple moves this year, either now or at the deadline, we could be there next spring. Maybe, but they'll be competing with some deep pocketed teams that could be in the same or better position and the bidding could go a lot higher than anticipated- are the Sox willing to overpay more on dollars and or years if it comes down to it? Maybe, but I'm not convinced based on what I've seen the past 5 years.
|
|
|
Post by bg23 on Jan 4, 2024 14:53:52 GMT -5
Jesus Luzardo bWAR by season: 2019: 0.6 2020: 0.8 (annualized to 2.2) 2021: -1.5 2022: 2.0 2023: 4.1
He has started more than 20 games in a season once. He was very good last year, and outside of injuries (which would be my primary concern), was very good in 2022 as well. Is a pitcher with this many question marks worth one of the Sox top three prospects + when we do not even know yet if we will be truly competitive over his three years of control? I think I want to see the next wave of prospects actually show some promise at the highest level and finish better than last (the front office investing some FA $$ to increase the talent level of the roster would be nice as well) before we start pushing chips into the middle of the table by trading for players with major questions marks.
|
|
|
Post by bcpatsox18 on Jan 4, 2024 15:14:52 GMT -5
Jesus Luzardo bWAR by season: 2019: 0.6 2020: 0.8 (annualized to 2.2) 2021: -1.5 2022: 2.0 2023: 4.1 He has started more than 20 games in a season once. He was very good last year, and outside of injuries (which would be my primary concern), was very good in 2022 as well. Is a pitcher with this many question marks worth one of the Sox top three prospects + when we do not even know yet if we will be truly competitive over his three years of control? I think I want to see the next wave of prospects actually show some promise at the highest level and finish better than last (the front office investing some FA $$ to increase the talent level of the roster would be nice as well) before we start pushing chips into the middle of the table by trading for players with major questions marks. This is exactly the reasoning I have as to why I don’t think it will take one of the top three to pry him away. Chris Sale cost your top prospect, and he had already been well established. Same with Josh Beckett. Luzardo is very good but doesn’t have the track record that usually comes with having to part with a top 3 system prospect, top 20 in baseball type guys.
|
|
|
Post by ephus on Jan 4, 2024 18:48:55 GMT -5
Jesus Luzardo bWAR by season: 2019: 0.6 2020: 0.8 (annualized to 2.2) 2021: -1.5 2022: 2.0 2023: 4.1 He has started more than 20 games in a season once. He was very good last year, and outside of injuries (which would be my primary concern), was very good in 2022 as well. Is a pitcher with this many question marks worth one of the Sox top three prospects + when we do not even know yet if we will be truly competitive over his three years of control? I think I want to see the next wave of prospects actually show some promise at the highest level and finish better than last (the front office investing some FA $$ to increase the talent level of the roster would be nice as well) before we start pushing chips into the middle of the table by trading for players with major questions marks. Certainly not going to die on this hill, but yes he started 20 games once and 18 games twice and wasn’t exclusively a starter until he got to Miami. Injury concerns? Sure. But he threw 178 innings last year is projected to throw 181 this year, which is the same as Giolito.
|
|
|