SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Predicting The 2025 Opening Day Roster
|
Post by scottysmalls on Sept 26, 2024 7:52:57 GMT -5
I'm as high as anyone on Abreu, and trading him for an Abreu equivalent pitcher is going to lead to a continuation of the last three years. These quotes today were extremely underwhelming, even accounting for the massive grain of salt needed to be applied. Abreu and one of our cost controlled starters should bring a significanty better starter (and clear a roster spot) Hypothetically would be down for a Crawford + Abreu for a better SP trade the problem is who? Which starter is both better enough than Crawford to make it worth attaching Abreu and has a team open to trading him? If you could get Webb/Kirby/Gilbert obviously you’d do it, but those guys aren’t getting moved. Once youre down to the Bailey Ober’s of the world I think the Red Sox start saying no. It’s a really tight window and I’m not sure there’s a pitcher that fits.
|
|
|
Post by SlugLife on Sept 26, 2024 8:19:58 GMT -5
Exactly. At some point you have to trade from a position of strength to address glaring areas of weakness. The Red Sox are the envy of most of baseball with their collection of young, controllable position players, but this roster desperately needs starting pitching, relief pitching, and right-handed power.
|
|
|
Post by bojacksoxfan on Sept 26, 2024 8:27:03 GMT -5
Don't want to take the discussion too far off topic and I certainly don't mean to use this as a defense of my earlier points on whether Abreu nets you a TOR guy but . . . In his rookie of the year article, [https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5790069/2024/09/25/mlb-awards-2024-keith-law-picks/], Law mentions that Wells and Abreu are platoon guys that WAR overrates bc they don't get "penalized" by not facing lefties. So, as I understand it, the theory would be that if he DID face lefties, he wouldn't be a 3 WAR player? Again, I don't mean this to be a "see I told you that we're not getting [insert pitching target] for Abreu" because I don't know enough about WAR to know if this is rubbish or not (though it would seem to make sense). But does it make sense? The fact that Abreu has been a platoon player so far definitely limits his value. The question for me is whether he is destined to forever be no more than a platoon player.
He has a career wRC+ of 43 against lefties in 70 PAs. That's surely below replacement-level, so if he got more PAs against them and hit like that, yeah, I think his WAR would go down. But maybe if he got more looks at lefties he could adjust and get better at hitting them?
Thanks for looking that career wRC+ up. Yeah, that's negative WAR range for a corner OF for sure. I'd guess he'd have to get that up to 70-75 in order to be replacement level and WAR neutral. I think it would make sense for a less competitive team to give him a shot vL to see if he can get there, but a team like the Sox probably ought to be looking for Refsnyders to take those ABs anyway.
|
|
|
Post by 0ap0 on Sept 26, 2024 8:27:22 GMT -5
I am coming around to this line of thinking as well, the "need" for an SP is overblown around here. Houck is 11th in the league in fWAR, Bello was 43rd and Crawford 45. There's your 1,2 and 3 starters right there if that's sustainable or even improvable in the case of Bello and Crawford. While WAR isn't always the greatest way to measure SPs it's something. I'd still push some chips in for Fried/Burnes/Snell if I was Breslow but if the bidding reaches a level that makes Breslow uncomfortable then bow out, chances are unfortunately to get one of those guys you probably have to make a deal that makes you uncomfortable at least on the back end. The question on where do you really easily improve this team has been one that I have seen you bring up before and I'm now right there with you. At the end of the day who knows maybe the right strategy is to sign an SP or two in that 2nd/3rd tier that they see something in, to bolster the bullpen and go with the team as currently constructed otherwise. Hard question to answer, glad I'm not Breslow and have to be the one to figure that out. Right. Houck is a middle-of-the-road #1 pitcher, Bello is a middle-of-the-road #2, and the rest of the staff are very competent middle-to-back-of-the-rotation starters. I'm coming around to the opinion that doubling down on this strategy is how you end up with a juggernaut of a .500 team. Again.
|
|
|
Post by SlugLife on Sept 26, 2024 8:29:48 GMT -5
I like the Reds as an Abreu trade partner. Trying to win'ish, cheap owner, zero good major league OFs or OF prospects as far as I can tell. Am I off my rocker is Rhett Lowder in the ballpark? Abreu's got 3.7 WAR in 159 games...
The Reds are funny, because they're kind of in the same position as the Red Sox, with too many young hitters and not enough pitching, though they're overloaded on right-handed hitters (Steer, Stephenson, Encarnacion-Strand, India, McLain, Hinds, Marte, not to mention the head-scratching singing of switch-hitting Candelario). I could see the Reds trading Abreu for someone like Spencer Steer, or Christian Encarnacion-Strand, or Jonathan India, but probably not for a pitcher; I think they're counting on Greene, Lodolo, Abbott, Lowder, and Burns filling their rotation spots for the foreseeable future. I also think that Yoshida for Candelario (who plays 1B and 3B) could work for both teams as a swap of expensive players who don't really fit their current rosters.
|
|
|
Post by SlugLife on Sept 26, 2024 8:35:35 GMT -5
Who do you think that is?
Looking at the current free agent crop, I'm intrigued by Yusei Kikuchi. Probably won't cost more than 3-4 years at $15-$20 million, won't cost a draft pick, and has been pretty effective down the stretch for Houston. He's also pitched effectively in the AL East.
|
|
|
Post by fenwaydouble on Sept 26, 2024 8:43:36 GMT -5
Don't want to take the discussion too far off topic and I certainly don't mean to use this as a defense of my earlier points on whether Abreu nets you a TOR guy but . . . In his rookie of the year article, [https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5790069/2024/09/25/mlb-awards-2024-keith-law-picks/], Law mentions that Wells and Abreu are platoon guys that WAR overrates bc they don't get "penalized" by not facing lefties. So, as I understand it, the theory would be that if he DID face lefties, he wouldn't be a 3 WAR player? Again, I don't mean this to be a "see I told you that we're not getting [insert pitching target] for Abreu" because I don't know enough about WAR to know if this is rubbish or not (though it would seem to make sense). But does it make sense? The fact that Abreu has been a platoon player so far definitely limits his value. The question for me is whether he is destined to forever be no more than a platoon player.
He has a career wRC+ of 43 against lefties in 70 PAs. That's surely below replacement-level, so if he got more PAs against them and hit like that, yeah, I think his WAR would go down. But maybe if he got more looks at lefties he could adjust and get better at hitting them?
Raises the question of which is more valuable: a guy who gets you 3 WAR in 400 PA vs. righties but can't play vs. lefties, or a guy who gets you 3 WAR in 600 PA by performing moderately well against both RHP and LHP. The first guy gives you a higher ceiling (combine him with a guy like Refsnyder and you're getting All Star-level production), but it requires you to eat another roster spot.
My guess is teams would prefer the steadier guy at a position like SS. But right field? Since everybody is going to carry at least one extra outfielder anyway, I don't think having a platoon out there is that big a deal.
|
|
|
Post by rkarp on Sept 26, 2024 8:53:45 GMT -5
Abreu, Masa, Wong all good players that may be passed by June by better players coming up. all have value, even Masa with his contract. none on their own, or perhaps even all together, return a TOR pitcher.
Pivetta looking more appealing for 3/$45?
|
|
|
Post by grandsalami on Sept 26, 2024 9:01:09 GMT -5
I think we need to figure out how to balance out our lineup. Obviously, it's left-handed heavy and a number of our young players who will be impacting the big league club shortly are also left-handed. I think we need to figure out how we balance that out to not leave ourselves so susceptible to left-handed pitching. We can never have enough starting pitching. We can never have enough quality starting pitching so I think looking at starting pitching is the other area of focus for us.
|
|
|
Post by ematz1423 on Sept 26, 2024 9:15:33 GMT -5
The fact that Abreu has been a platoon player so far definitely limits his value. The question for me is whether he is destined to forever be no more than a platoon player.
He has a career wRC+ of 43 against lefties in 70 PAs. That's surely below replacement-level, so if he got more PAs against them and hit like that, yeah, I think his WAR would go down. But maybe if he got more looks at lefties he could adjust and get better at hitting them?
Raises the question of which is more valuable: a guy who gets you 3 WAR in 400 PA vs. righties but can't play vs. lefties, or a guy who gets you 3 WAR in 600 PA by performing moderately well against both RHP and LHP. The first guy gives you a higher ceiling (combine him with a guy like Refsnyder and you're getting All Star-level production), but it requires you to eat another roster spot.
My guess is teams would prefer the steadier guy at a position like SS. But right field? Since everybody is going to carry at least one extra outfielder anyway, I don't think having a platoon out there is that big a deal.
Personally I think you nailed it, a team needs a 4th OFer anyway so I have no problems at all with a guy who accumulates 3 WAR in 400 or so PAs that has a strong platoon partner/ 4th OFer that can mash lefties. For reference the Sox accumulated 6.7 fWAR in RF which was 6th in the MLB, if I ran my search correctly anyway. The next highest team was Tampa at 4.3. Not really sure how that math adds up for the 6.7 fWAR? Since Abreu was slightly less than half that, it makes sense why I and many on the board are conflicted at the idea of dealing Abreu. Not to mention there is the very real possibility that Abreu can improve enough vs lefties to at least be playable more often than not out there.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Sept 26, 2024 9:46:20 GMT -5
Those numbers for Sox RFers are great but didn't they get there by having Refsnyder having a career year?
Anyway. In terms of how to construct a roster, I don't disagree that it can be worked around. Especially for a team that SHOULD be able to pay a bit more for a 4th OF.
But for trade value, I'd think the guy who requires another player to ensure his value remains the same doesn't have as much as you'd think just by looking at his WAR.
Of course, as others have pointed out, this is all assuming he can't improve against lefties. And maybe he can.
|
|
|
Post by ematz1423 on Sept 26, 2024 9:54:49 GMT -5
Those numbers for Sox RFers are great but didn't they get there by having Refsnyder having a career year? Anyway. In terms of how to construct a roster, I don't disagree that it can be worked around. Especially for a team that SHOULD be able to pay a bit more for a 4th OF. But for trade value, I'd think the guy who requires another player to ensure his value remains the same doesn't have as much as you'd think just by looking at his WAR. Of course, as others have pointed out, this is all assuming he can't improve against lefties. And maybe he can. Refsnyder had 1.2 fWAR in 93 games only 20 starts in RF. The fWAR breakout is Abreu 3.1, O'Neill 2.4 and Refsnyder at 1.2 fWAR in RF. That's just their yearly WAR totals though so now that I look into how that got totaled it's not a correct representation since O'Neill and Ref played other positions than RF. Still would probably add up to 4+ fWAR in RF this year for the Sox if somehow you actually parsed all their WAR totals for who was playing RF and when.
|
|
|
Post by rkarp on Sept 26, 2024 10:19:13 GMT -5
Those numbers for Sox RFers are great but didn't they get there by having Refsnyder having a career year? Anyway. In terms of how to construct a roster, I don't disagree that it can be worked around. Especially for a team that SHOULD be able to pay a bit more for a 4th OF. But for trade value, I'd think the guy who requires another player to ensure his value remains the same doesn't have as much as you'd think just by looking at his WAR. Of course, as others have pointed out, this is all assuming he can't improve against lefties. And maybe he can. Refsnyder had 1.2 fWAR in 93 games only 20 starts in RF. The fWAR breakout is Abreu 3.1, O'Neill 2.4 and Refsnyder at 1.2 fWAR in RF. That's just their yearly WAR totals though so now that I look into how that got totaled it's not a correct representation since O'Neill and Ref played other positions than RF. Still would probably add up to 4+ fWAR in RF this year for the Sox if somehow you actually parsed all their WAR totals for who was playing RF and when. if Duran is still on the team next season, and I hope he is, isn't it a pretty much sure thing Anthony gets 120+ games in RF next season? I love Abreu. I have no issue with him being a 4th OF/sometime DH. but he cannot play CF. can he play LF? maybe Anthony can play all 3 OF spots and he will move around and have Abreu sub in RF/DH only? seemingly if Refs is back, Abreu had greater value in a deal, no? I simply do not see Abreu or Masa blocking Anthony playing every day. assuming left to right is Duran-Cedanne-Anthony, then Refs, Abreu and Masa, one or two can/should be moved. Abreu is clearly the better all around player, but would also return the most in a trade. Masa arguably is the best hitter, but has the weight of his contract in his deal.
|
|
|
Post by ematz1423 on Sept 26, 2024 10:36:52 GMT -5
Refsnyder had 1.2 fWAR in 93 games only 20 starts in RF. The fWAR breakout is Abreu 3.1, O'Neill 2.4 and Refsnyder at 1.2 fWAR in RF. That's just their yearly WAR totals though so now that I look into how that got totaled it's not a correct representation since O'Neill and Ref played other positions than RF. Still would probably add up to 4+ fWAR in RF this year for the Sox if somehow you actually parsed all their WAR totals for who was playing RF and when. if Duran is still on the team next season, and I hope he is, isn't it a pretty much sure thing Anthony gets 120+ games in RF next season? I love Abreu. I have no issue with him being a 4th OF/sometime DH. but he cannot play CF. can he play LF? maybe Anthony can play all 3 OF spots and he will move around and have Abreu sub in RF/DH only? seemingly if Refs is back, Abreu had greater value in a deal, no? I simply do not see Abreu or Masa blocking Anthony playing every day. assuming left to right is Duran-Cedanne-Anthony, then Refs, Abreu and Masa, one or two can/should be moved. Abreu is clearly the better all around player, but would also return the most in a trade. Masa arguably is the best hitter, but has the weight of his contract in his deal. Couple things here, no there is no such thing a sure thing with prospects so I'm not personally penciling Anthony in for anything. Also Anthony could be playing the bulk of his time in LF since Duran, and Rafaela are both better defenders. Abreu doesn't make sense to me as a 4th OFer if two of the other OFers playing the bulk of the time are going to be LHH in Duran and Anthony. I guess you could go with an all LHH OF vs righties but it sounds to me like Breslow wants to try and balance the lineup. Would be very hard to do with an all LHH OF playing the bulk of the games. If we're removing the likelihood Anthony or Duran are dealt which IMO we should then yes Abreu makes the most sense to trade this offseason this has been where I think all roads lead to but you have to find the right trade partner willing to pay his value or near his value.
|
|
|
Post by ephus on Sept 26, 2024 10:44:48 GMT -5
Feeling pretty subdued on this first day of irrelevance and thinking maybe I won't get fired up by tweets, or over-parse statements from the FO this year. My plan is to wait until moves are made, look into the players coming this way, focus on things like splits and what people in the know say about spin rate and bat speed; then I'll take a little time to reflect before I comment. Is that weird? Maybe. But that's where I'm at.
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on Sept 26, 2024 11:12:57 GMT -5
Feeling pretty subdued on this first day of irrelevance and thinking maybe I won't get fired up by tweets, or over-parse statements from the FO this year. My plan is to wait until moves are made, look into the players coming this way, focus on things like splits and what people in the know say about spin rate and bat speed; then I'll take a little time to reflect before I comment. Is that weird? Maybe. But that's where I'm at. When you're snowed in with nothing to do and someone on Twitter has a novel theory about the meaning behind Juan Soto's wife's Instagram beach vacation pictures you'll get sucked right back in.
|
|
|
Post by ephus on Sept 26, 2024 11:23:50 GMT -5
Feeling pretty subdued on this first day of irrelevance and thinking maybe I won't get fired up by tweets, or over-parse statements from the FO this year. My plan is to wait until moves are made, look into the players coming this way, focus on things like splits and what people in the know say about spin rate and bat speed; then I'll take a little time to reflect before I comment. Is that weird? Maybe. But that's where I'm at. When you're snowed in with nothing to do and someone on Twitter has a novel theory about the meaning behind Juan Soto's wife's Instagram beach vacation pictures you'll get sucked right back in. Damn right. And I will hate myself for doing it.
|
|
|
Post by trotnixon7 on Sept 26, 2024 12:09:39 GMT -5
Ownership could operate in 1 of 2 ways..
1. Make smaller moves, have the kids come up and hope they produce as rookies and hope it's good enough to "compete" into late Aug and maybe sneak in (maybe not) while being much lower in payroll than they should
2. See this as the beginning of a strong window to compete with the leagues best and supplement this young core with aggressive moves and actually get into the top 3 or 4 in payroll.
As of now? I'd be stunned if they pick option 2. Henry doesn't seem to worried about competing.
|
|
|
Post by Darwin's Curve on Sept 26, 2024 12:19:52 GMT -5
Ownership could operate in 1 of 2 ways.. 1. Make smaller moves, have the kids come up and hope they produce as rookies and hope it's good enough to "compete" into late Aug and maybe sneak in (maybe not) while being much lower in payroll than they should 2. See this as the beginning of a strong window to compete with the leagues best and supplement this young core with aggressive moves and actually get into the top 3 or 4 in payroll. As of now? I'd be stunned if they pick option 2. Henry doesn't seem to worried about competing. The current "young core" only exists because the Sox made smaller moves, had the kids come up, and hoped they produced as rookies (or took a step forward.) It's why we have Abreu, Rafaela (and Houck established as a #1.) Maybe the young core gets supplemented by more promising rookies, kind of like Baltimore has done over the past few years.
|
|
|
Post by carmenfanzone on Sept 26, 2024 12:21:54 GMT -5
I am bewildered by the sentiment on this board that the Sox are almost there and that there don't need to be many upgrades to get them to the promised land. First, I don't think making the playoffs should be the goal. Winning the World Series should be the goal. Second, with three games left in the season they are 80-79. It is a .500 team and it's hard to find ways to improve? Yes, there were a lot of injuries. But all that shows is that the team did not make adequate decisions regarding depth players. They did not resign Turner and thus when Casas got hurt we got Dalbec, and others they had to pull off the scrap heap. With regards to starting pitching, which was a weakness the year before, they lost Sale and Paxton and signed only Giolito. His injury left them a starter short in April. And the starters they have coming back are not championship caliber ( excepting Houck) or totally unproven. Which rotation would you rather have: Sale, Price, Porcello, Eovaldi, and Rodriguez (2018 Championship rotation) Houck, Bello, Crawford, Giolito, and ? (Current pro projected rotation for next year with no additions) The Red Sox are currently 16th in WHIP and 17th in ERA this year. That is not World Series caliber pitching. And they are set to lose Jansen, Martin and Pivetta with Giolito and Whitlock returning from injury and none of their highly rated prospects being pitchers. They need pitching help. All kinds. They need righthand hitting. They need to make sure their middle infield defense is better even if Story gets hurt again. They need to make sure they have the depth to withstand the inevitable injuries. The big 4 prospects might provide some of that depth. But they aren't going to provide the pitching help that is needed unless you trade one or more for pitching. It is either that or free agents.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Sept 26, 2024 12:51:59 GMT -5
Ownership could operate in 1 of 2 ways.. 1. Make smaller moves, have the kids come up and hope they produce as rookies and hope it's good enough to "compete" into late Aug and maybe sneak in (maybe not) while being much lower in payroll than they should 2. See this as the beginning of a strong window to compete with the leagues best and supplement this young core with aggressive moves and actually get into the top 3 or 4 in payroll. As of now? I'd be stunned if they pick option 2. Henry doesn't seem to worried about competing. I'm not naive to think that the last line is DEFINITELY false. Maybe it's true. The actions over the course of the last few years certainly support that narrative. But the behavior also supports the narrative that they were going to build this thing back up (like they said when they fired DD) and not going to sacrifice the future for present wins (what Breslow said this past offseason). Sure, orgs "spin" things to make themselves look better but if the behavior matches what they say, shouldn't we be open to the possibility that they are doing what they said they would? Admittedly, it's going to be a LOT harder to defend the "they are doing what they told us they'd do" narrative if they don't get aggressive this offseason. Of course, trades require two teams and FAs have to WANT to come here so it's not ALL up to Boston.
|
|
jimoh
Veteran
Posts: 4,171
|
Post by jimoh on Sept 26, 2024 12:55:14 GMT -5
Stats to ponder: 1985 Boston Red Sox Statistics ; Record: 81-81-1, Finished 5th in AL_East
|
|
|
Post by greenmonster on Sept 26, 2024 13:03:03 GMT -5
The following article might be worth pondering for the posters that have such high expectations for the Red Sox Big5. I am certainly not routing against any of them, but history does not support across the board success (especially not the first year) for prospects. In fact, history would suggest that only 2-3 of the 5 will be considered successful. Pruning the entire major league team to clear a spot for an unproven prospect, regardless of how good they might eventually be seems like a mistake. I think they need to come up with reasonable expectations, bat 7th or 8th in the lineup and and grow into their role whatever that might be. www.royalsreview.com/2011/2/14/1992424/success-and-failure-rates-of-top-mlb-prospects#:~:text=About%2070%25%20of%20Baseball%20America,20%20succeed%20in%20the%20majors.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Sept 26, 2024 13:17:03 GMT -5
For those saying you wouldn't trade anyone, what's your 2026 lineup when, presumably, all of Campbell, Mayer, and Anthony are ready? They have to move SOMEONE. Right now they stand to have all of Story, Mayer, Grissom, Devers, Casas, and Campbell until 2027. In the OF its Duran, Rafaela, Abreu, Anthony, and maybe Campbell until 2028. Yoshida until 2027. That's 11 guys for 8 spots (catcher can take care of itself, hence the omission). They HAVE to trade guys if the prospects pan out. It would be a gross misuse of resources not to. The question is who and when. I don't think anyone said this? But I think I came closest to saying this when I said they didn't have to trade any of their best players or top prospects this offseason (since this thread is about opening day 2025, not 2026). I then went on to say that trading Abreu or Hamilton could make some sense. For the record, I would consider all of these guys potentially tradeable: Abreu Hamilton Rafaela Yoshida Grissom Valdez Story And, you know, never say never about anyone. Like dcb26's scenario of signing Soto and then trading Duran is not crazy to me. Mostly I am just taking issue with vague calls to deal Duran or Casas for pitching, without specifying which pitcher anyone even has in mind.
Literally you, higher on that page. Lol. You know, I really think it would be totally fine if the Red Sox didn't trade away any of their best players or prospects. I like having those guys!
|
|
|
Post by philsbosoxfan on Sept 26, 2024 13:18:00 GMT -5
Abreu and one of our cost controlled starters should bring a significanty better starter (and clear a roster spot) Hypothetically would be down for a Crawford + Abreu for a better SP trade the problem is who? Which starter is both better enough than Crawford to make it worth attaching Abreu and has a team open to trading him? If you could get Webb/Kirby/Gilbert obviously you’d do it, but those guys aren’t getting moved. Once youre down to the Bailey Ober’s of the world I think the Red Sox start saying no. It’s a really tight window and I’m not sure there’s a pitcher that fits. White Sox/Crochet but the Sox would need to negotiate an extension before they trade. I do think one of the Mariners starters gets moved but not for a package that includes a pitcher. Same/same with Miami. Abreu and Myer would make an attractive package. Seattle has the exact opposite situation as the Sox, Miami is more balanced but still pitcher heavy. ADD: For Crochet, Crawford isn't the only pitcher option, Priester or Fitts along with some of our excess like Valdez or Hamilton might also be more appealing to both sides.
|
|
|