SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Boston Celtics 2016-17 Season Discussion
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 17, 2017 10:47:13 GMT -5
Is there some issue that I don't know about where Amir Johnson isn't allowed to play more than a certain amount of minutes? There is the issue that Amir Johnson is a not a very good basketball player to put it kindly. He's the only one who can possibly keep the Bulls Off the glass
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Apr 17, 2017 11:00:07 GMT -5
He's also continued to be a plus-minus monster despite looking increasingly athletically limited. He's still one of those "does all the little stuff guys"-- box out, set good screens, play good help defense, etc.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Apr 17, 2017 11:32:01 GMT -5
He's also continued to be a plus-minus monster despite looking increasingly athletically limited. He's still one of those "does all the little stuff guys"-- box out, set good screens, play good help defense, etc. I think that's at least partly because of his limited minutes. It's like you can get away with some Amir, but get greedy and you're going to get buried. I know that the eye test frequently lies, but it doesn't lie all that much to the point that Amir is actually heavy minutes material.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 17, 2017 14:01:34 GMT -5
WCP3- Removing Turner and giving his minutes to Brown and Rozier is the issue. They are young inconsistent players. Turner was a 4 win share player last year, that really helped our D. You remove your most important bench player it's going to really hurt your bench. Add that to no Sullinger and now you can't play KO with either Johnson or Sullinger, thus we have a massive rebounding problem.
There's a reason why I've been saying we need another rebounding big all year long! If your going to play Horford and KO together for major minutes we are going to get killed on the glass. We lost mainly because the Bulls got 17 more rebounds than we did! That's very hard to do in the NBA. Everyone is bashing KO for 4 rebounds in what 28 mins, what about Horford playing 40 minutes and getting only 7 rebounds? KO is a stretch big, Horford is a max player he needs to do more on the glass.
Anyone that doesn't think Smart shot selection is bad needs to wake up and stop being a Homer. Come on the he's not bad, because there are players like Waiters and Young argument is laughable. He took 9 shots and 7 were from deep. Now he made a couple this game, but that won't continue. He needs to stop taking so many 3's. He can take as many corner 3's as he wants, otherwise he needs to stop. I don't know what's worse watching Smart take so many bad shots or listening to people trying to always defend him. I don't know how you look at his numbers over a full season and don't see a problem.
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Apr 17, 2017 14:15:06 GMT -5
The fact that almost half of Smart's shots are three-pointers means he's less inefficient than you think. His TS% this year was .486, which is bad but tolerable. It puts him in the neighborhood of Rodney Stuckey (.483), Emmanuel Mudiay (.483), J.R. Smith (.484), Evan Turner (.491), Josh Richardson (.493) and Tony Allen (.493).
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Apr 17, 2017 14:44:03 GMT -5
You make more excuses for KO then anyone out there. Horford was bad too. That that doesn't make KO anymore useful in a big situation. He did the same thing last year in the playoffs too.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 17, 2017 15:32:00 GMT -5
He's also continued to be a plus-minus monster despite looking increasingly athletically limited. He's still one of those "does all the little stuff guys"-- box out, set good screens, play good help defense, etc. I think that's at least partly because of his limited minutes. It's like you can get away with some Amir, but get greedy and you're going to get buried. I know that the eye test frequently lies, but it doesn't lie all that much to the point that Amir is actually heavy minutes material. I could maybe get behind your point if the alternative wasn't KO and Zeller when rebounding is killing them. Crowder also needs to not suck
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Apr 17, 2017 15:55:13 GMT -5
I could maybe get behind your point if the alternative wasn't KO and Zeller when rebounding is killing them. Crowder also needs to not suck I think KO is overall just a little bit better than Amir, but I understand what you mean. This team desperately needed to upgrade at the 4/5, a guy like Noel would have been so perfect on our team that at this point I have to believe I like hurting myself for still thinking about it. I just can't let go.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 17, 2017 16:13:55 GMT -5
The fact that almost half of Smart's shots are three-pointers means he's less inefficient than you think. His TS% this year was .486, which is bad but tolerable. It puts him in the neighborhood of Rodney Stuckey (.483), Emmanuel Mudiay (.483), J.R. Smith (.484), Evan Turner (.491), Josh Richardson (.493) and Tony Allen (.493). What are those players proving? You have one player in that group that's known as a good shooter in Smith. This season is his lowest since his age 19 rookie season. He missed major time with injury and went threw the problems with his baby. Players like Allen and Turner while very useful players don't attempt a ton of 3's and most of there value comes from other things, like D, rebounding and assists. I just don't see how these players help prove your point that Smarts shot selection isn't down right bad. He shot 28.4% from 3 and yet he still took almost half his shots from deep! In yesterday's game he took 9 shots and 7 of them were 3's. He's basically Jared Sullinger shooting 3's. Everyone including our coach thought Sullinger need to stop taking so many 3's. Yet for some reason you keep acting like Smarts not that bad. I just don't get it.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 17, 2017 16:29:17 GMT -5
You make more excuses for KO then anyone out there. Horford was bad too. That that doesn't make KO anymore useful in a big situation. He did the same thing last year in the playoffs too. Well you sure didn't bring up Horford, a max player, starter, playing 40 minutes. You just want on a rant about our backup stretch big. KO isn't the problem if he's used correctly. You need to pair him with a good rebounding big, yet we don't have one to pair him with. That's on Danny and the reason I've been saying we needed one all year long. KO- 23 minutes 7 points, 3 blocks, 2 steals, 3 assists, 4 rebounds. Yes he's a horrible player. Smart and Bradley played 66 minutes and had 5 rebounds combined Jerebko, Green, Brown and Zeller played 24 minutes and had 3 rebounds. Your hate for KO is crazy.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 17, 2017 16:32:23 GMT -5
By the way, I'm still fine with the Celtics not making a trade. To me this year is still gravy.
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Apr 17, 2017 16:52:14 GMT -5
The fact that almost half of Smart's shots are three-pointers means he's less inefficient than you think. His TS% this year was .486, which is bad but tolerable. It puts him in the neighborhood of Rodney Stuckey (.483), Emmanuel Mudiay (.483), J.R. Smith (.484), Evan Turner (.491), Josh Richardson (.493) and Tony Allen (.493). What are those players proving? You have one player in that group that's known as a good shooter in Smith. This season is his lowest since his age 19 rookie season. He missed major time with injury and went threw the problems with his baby. Players like Allen and Turner while very useful players don't attempt a ton of 3's and most of there value comes from other things, like D, rebounding and assists. I just don't see how these players help prove your point that Smarts shot selection isn't down right bad. He shot 28.4% from 3 and yet he still took almost half his shots from deep! In yesterday's game he took 9 shots and 7 of them were 3's. He's basically Jared Sullinger shooting 3's. Everyone including our coach thought Sullinger need to stop taking so many 3's. Yet for some reason you keep acting like Smarts not that bad. I just don't get it. I've bolded my point above. Surprise-- it's the first sentence. Smart is a defense-first player who is no more inefficient than guys like Tony Allen or Evan Turner. He gets there in a different way than Allen or Turner, but the end result is the same, efficiency-wise. 28.4% from 3 equates to 42.6% from 2. That's not good, but it's good enough for a player who adds value in other areas. Sullinger was a good rebounder, but struggled with every other aspect of his game (including health). He needed to be able to score efficiently to stay in the league, but the same logic doesn't apply to Smart. It's also not like Smart is jacking up shots. His 11.2 FGA/36M this year ranked 8th on the team, just behind Rozier and Brown. That's despite the fact that he takes a lot of end-of-shot-clock shots that other players don't want to get up for fear of dragging their shooting percentages down.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 17, 2017 17:34:42 GMT -5
Side note... Carmelo and his wife split up.. wonder if that punches his ticket out of NY now.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Apr 17, 2017 18:45:40 GMT -5
That's be a nice stat that Bradley and Smart had only 5 rebounds versus KO if KO wasn't 7 feet tall.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 17, 2017 23:34:24 GMT -5
What are those players proving? You have one player in that group that's known as a good shooter in Smith. This season is his lowest since his age 19 rookie season. He missed major time with injury and went threw the problems with his baby. Players like Allen and Turner while very useful players don't attempt a ton of 3's and most of there value comes from other things, like D, rebounding and assists. I just don't see how these players help prove your point that Smarts shot selection isn't down right bad. He shot 28.4% from 3 and yet he still took almost half his shots from deep! In yesterday's game he took 9 shots and 7 of them were 3's. He's basically Jared Sullinger shooting 3's. Everyone including our coach thought Sullinger need to stop taking so many 3's. Yet for some reason you keep acting like Smarts not that bad. I just don't get it. I've bolded my point above. Surprise-- it's the first sentence. Smart is a defense-first player who is no more inefficient than guys like Tony Allen or Evan Turner. He gets there in a different way than Allen or Turner, but the end result is the same, efficiency-wise. 28.4% from 3 equates to 42.6% from 2. That's not good, but it's good enough for a player who adds value in other areas. Sullinger was a good rebounder, but struggled with every other aspect of his game (including health). He needed to be able to score efficiently to stay in the league, but the same logic doesn't apply to Smart. It's also not like Smart is jacking up shots. His 11.2 FGA/36M this year ranked 8th on the team, just behind Rozier and Brown. That's despite the fact that he takes a lot of end-of-shot-clock shots that other players don't want to get up for fear of dragging their shooting percentages down. You mean Smart is no more inefficient than a 35 year old Tony Allen? Go look at the numbers, even with his decline as he's got older his career number is still .529. That's like saying Gerald Green is better than Paul Pierce, yes this year when Pierce is old as dirt. To reach Tony Allen in his prime Smart will have to get his numbers up to .550 range. Do you think that happens? Sullinger was very good defensively. Not like Smart hasn't had his share of injuries. Sullinger just needs to stay in shape. You can convert his 28.4% all you want, it doesn't change the fact he shoots 28.4% from deep. I just don't understand how one of them should stop it per coach and GM, but the other one is just fine taking even more 3's. I think a center shooting 28% from deep is a lot better than a PG. Smart is a bad shooter, he shouldn't be taking a bunch of shots. Just because he doesn't take a bunch of shots, that doesn't mean his shot selection is good. Smart had 9 heaves all year, not some crazy high number that would drastically change his shooting numbers.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 17, 2017 23:44:47 GMT -5
That's be a nice stat that Bradley and Smart had only 5 rebounds versus KO if KO wasn't 7 feet tall. Yea the fact they played about 3 times the minutes doesn't matter right? You just can't get over the fact he's 7 feet can you? He's not a post player like Johnson. Look at his stats, he impacts the game on a ton of levels. If you pair him with a good rebounder you would be fine. The problem is playing him with Horford. We need another rebounding big.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Apr 18, 2017 1:01:04 GMT -5
That's be a nice stat that Bradley and Smart had only 5 rebounds versus KO if KO wasn't 7 feet tall. Look at his stats, he impacts the game on a ton of levels. Yeah except for the one stat that actually matters in rebounding. His "stat" line probably looks great besides that. The one thing a 7 foot big man is supposed to do is rebound. If he was 5 inches shorter and a lot quicker, you'd have a case but he'd be a small forward if that were the case too. You need to rebound as a big man in the NBA or you are essentially useless. That is what it comes down to. Rebounding the basketball is arguably the most important thing in basketball besides dribbling and passing.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 18, 2017 2:10:37 GMT -5
So Horford is useless? All year long you keep complaining about our backup player, yet you say almost nothing about Horford. The guy that's our starter making max level money. As far as skills go shooting has to be #1 right now. That's his job as a floor spacer. The main problem is playing Horford and KO together, as both aren't great rebounders. This team needs another player like Johnson. This is all about having a flawed roster, not KO. He is far away from useless if used correctly.
|
|
wcp3
Veteran
Posts: 3,861
Member is Online
|
Post by wcp3 on Apr 18, 2017 6:25:37 GMT -5
Look at his stats, he impacts the game on a ton of levels. Yeah except for the one stat that actually matters in rebounding. His "stat" line probably looks great besides that. The one thing a 7 foot big man is supposed to do is rebound. If he was 5 inches shorter and a lot quicker, you'd have a case but he'd be a small forward if that were the case too. You need to rebound as a big man in the NBA or you are essentially useless. That is what it comes down to. Rebounding the basketball is arguably the most important thing in basketball besides dribbling and passing. Lol.
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Apr 18, 2017 7:18:53 GMT -5
I've bolded my point above. Surprise-- it's the first sentence. Smart is a defense-first player who is no more inefficient than guys like Tony Allen or Evan Turner. He gets there in a different way than Allen or Turner, but the end result is the same, efficiency-wise. 28.4% from 3 equates to 42.6% from 2. That's not good, but it's good enough for a player who adds value in other areas. Sullinger was a good rebounder, but struggled with every other aspect of his game (including health). He needed to be able to score efficiently to stay in the league, but the same logic doesn't apply to Smart. It's also not like Smart is jacking up shots. His 11.2 FGA/36M this year ranked 8th on the team, just behind Rozier and Brown. That's despite the fact that he takes a lot of end-of-shot-clock shots that other players don't want to get up for fear of dragging their shooting percentages down. You mean Smart is no more inefficient than a 35 year old Tony Allen? Go look at the numbers, even with his decline as he's got older his career number is still .529. That's like saying Gerald Green is better than Paul Pierce, yes this year when Pierce is old as dirt. To reach Tony Allen in his prime Smart will have to get his numbers up to .550 range. Do you think that happens? Sullinger was very good defensively. Not like Smart hasn't had his share of injuries. Sullinger just needs to stay in shape. You can convert his 28.4% all you want, it doesn't change the fact he shoots 28.4% from deep. I just don't understand how one of them should stop it per coach and GM, but the other one is just fine taking even more 3's. I think a center shooting 28% from deep is a lot better than a PG. Smart is a bad shooter, he shouldn't be taking a bunch of shots. Just because he doesn't take a bunch of shots, that doesn't mean his shot selection is good. Smart had 9 heaves all year, not some crazy high number that would drastically change his shooting numbers. Compare it to Evan Turner (career .490 TS%) or Rajon Rondo (career .500 TS%), then. A 30% three-point shooter is still more efficient than a 40% long-two shooter, which means Smart is roughly on par with those two from an overall efficiency point of view. No one is arguing that Smart is a good shooter. The point is that he's just good enough to be a useful player despite his bad shooting.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 18, 2017 7:50:08 GMT -5
He is similar to Turner, even though Turner does have a better eFG%. Though that's not saying much. The thing with Rondo is his eFG% is a lot better, it's his FT shooting that drags down his TS%. This is why I question his shot selection. He needs to get to the line to be effective as his FT shooting is his best shooting skill right now. So driving to lane, posting up and learning thing like the pump fake to draw fouls. Otherwise your looking at what he is now, just barely good enough to allow him to get minutes and allow his other skills to play. When his 3 point shooting isn't going he's a useless player and really hurts the team.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 18, 2017 11:15:43 GMT -5
He's not useless when his shot isn't falling and that's kind of the point
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Apr 18, 2017 11:37:19 GMT -5
He's not good enough at "everything else" to make up for his awful shooting. Smart is not a great basketball player. He's serviceable and in some nights he could be pretty damn good, but he's inconsistent, he lacks the tools to be ever be a threat going to the hoop, his shot is wonky and when he's off he's a black hole on offense. He's utterly average when you combine everything and honestly that's not good enough for a guy playing over 30 minutes on a playoff team. I'd be plenty okay if he was getting Rozier's minutes, so if we do get the first overall pick I'd take Fultz like a maniac and either reduce Smart's minutes or punt him away completely.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Apr 18, 2017 12:16:22 GMT -5
The offseason ridiculousness has already started and it's not even the offseason yet:
Knicks writer said that Porzingis could be had for a top pick and a player.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 18, 2017 19:15:46 GMT -5
This is how Horford needs to rebound regularly. He's capable of battling he just doesn't do it enough
|
|
|