SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
2017 Trade Deadline Thread (Red Sox discussion)
|
Post by geostorm on Jul 18, 2017 21:20:17 GMT -5
Would it be surprising if nothing got done tonight; that the reports were more to try to manipulate the involved teams, for a tidbit more after having them already submit what was thought to be their respective final offers?
|
|
nomar
Veteran
Posts: 11,533
|
Post by nomar on Jul 18, 2017 21:22:21 GMT -5
If Lucroy would come very cheap given his expiring contract and terrible numbers, I wouldn't mind taking a flyer. His upside is still high and our catchers are somehow still even worse than this version of Lucroy.
|
|
|
Post by theghostofjoecronin on Jul 18, 2017 21:28:04 GMT -5
None of these options inspire confidence in fixing our power outage. Nope. But there's still a week for Kansas City to keep losing and become sellers....that's when we swoop in on Moustakas.
|
|
nomar
Veteran
Posts: 11,533
|
Post by nomar on Jul 18, 2017 21:29:48 GMT -5
None of these options inspire confidence in fixing our power outage. Nope. But there's still a week for Kansas City to keep losing and become sellers....that's when we swoop in on Moustakas. I'm already anxious waiting to hear about a new job I interviewed for. I don't want to start worrying about losing Groome for a rental. I would probably lose my mind.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Jul 18, 2017 21:32:02 GMT -5
Would it be surprising if nothing got done tonight; that the reports were more to try to manipulate the involved teams, for a tidbit more after having them already submit what was thought to be their respective final offers? Heyman is speculating that the trade will become official once the Yankees game ends. It seems like a done deal.
|
|
nomar
Veteran
Posts: 11,533
|
Post by nomar on Jul 18, 2017 21:33:43 GMT -5
FWIW Moustakas is a dead pull hitter with only 2 opposite field HR since the start of 2016. Not a good fit for Fenway IMO.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Jul 18, 2017 21:34:09 GMT -5
Did the Yankees really give up Rutherford for this package?
That's so bad if they did.
|
|
nomar
Veteran
Posts: 11,533
|
Post by nomar on Jul 18, 2017 21:34:30 GMT -5
Would it be surprising if nothing got done tonight; that the reports were more to try to manipulate the involved teams, for a tidbit more after having them already submit what was thought to be their respective final offers? Heyman is speculating that the trade will become official once the Yankees game ends. It seems like a done deal. Yup. Rutherford + Clarkin. No clue which relievers are actually involved.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Jul 18, 2017 21:35:14 GMT -5
Heyman is speculating that the trade will become official once the Yankees game ends. It seems like a done deal. Yup. Rutherford + Clarkin. No clue which relievers are actually involved. Lol, that's such a bad trade for the Yankees.
|
|
|
Post by taftreign on Jul 18, 2017 21:36:10 GMT -5
Heyman is speculating that the trade will become official once the Yankees game ends. It seems like a done deal. Yup. Rutherford + Clarkin. No clue which relievers are actually involved. Clippard would head to Chicago to offset salary as well.
|
|
nomar
Veteran
Posts: 11,533
|
Post by nomar on Jul 18, 2017 21:36:15 GMT -5
Yup. Rutherford + Clarkin. No clue which relievers are actually involved. Lol, that's such a bad trade for the Yankees. Kahnle could make that fair IMO.
|
|
|
Post by tizzle on Jul 18, 2017 21:43:16 GMT -5
Yup. Rutherford + Clarkin. No clue which relievers are actually involved. Lol, that's such a bad trade for the Yankees. If they take on all, or close to all, of Robertson's salary, then certainly terrible.
|
|
|
Post by geostorm on Jul 18, 2017 21:43:23 GMT -5
Mark Feisand -
Source: Tyler Clippard is part of the package that would head to the White Sox if/when the Robertson/Frazier/Kahnle deal is completed.
"Again, Kahnle is the piece of the deal that cost Yankees the most. White Sox were looking for "a big ask" for him according to an AL exec."
|
|
|
Post by sparkygian on Jul 18, 2017 22:16:12 GMT -5
I feel like the Dave Dombrowski strategy for the Red Sox was to go for it now. The Red Sox had a very strong, young nucleus, that just needed some complimentary pieces around them to be a championship level team for at least a few years. DD has given up a lot of young talent to go get those complimentary pieces the Sox need to get a championship in the next year or two. Frazier is a distraction from that, imo. I feel like DD making a 'big' move to get Frazier, or any other rental, second-tier talent for a slight upgrade at a sore spot on the team, is not a move that fits in line with all the previous moves DD made over the last couple of years. It's not that 'big' move that will take the team over the top, imo. So why make the move, and give up prospects, if later in the season it's gonna be necessary to make a big splash move to take the team over the top, which will require giving up more prospects. The Sox don't have a whole lot of good prospects left, right? So put all the effort and chips into one big move that will be a huge boost to the chances of the Sox bringing home a championship this winter. Assuming a Frazier type move is made, it will be like punting the season away. Last years Sox playoff squad had both Ortiz, and a red-hot Ramirez. Yet the Sox offense was pretty much shut down by Cleveland. This season the Sox won't have either, and Frazier won't remedy that. Yes the Sox have Sale now, and maybe Price is ready to kick it up a notch in the postseason, but the offense needs to kick it up a lot going up against other playoff pitching squads. It'll be a quick playoff appearance this year for the Sox, just like last year, although they might win a Sale start (although we've seen a few times an outstanding Sale performance shot down by miserable offense). A Frazier type move is punting the season away, imo.
So then next year the team will have Devers. Assuming he has a decent rookie season. Assuming the Sox make the playoffs again. Will a 21 year old rookie in his first playoffs appearance be able to carry a team with his power, like Ortiz was? That's a big if. Chances are not that high of that happening, I'm assuming. So then what? Now we're waiting for 2019? This team's envelope to win was built for now, or at least by next year, by the many big moves DD has made. So how about a good finishing touch is made to bring a championship, instead of a lot of effort over a bandaid.
|
|
|
Post by tizzle on Jul 18, 2017 22:25:16 GMT -5
So, what would people be willing to give up for Zach Britton?
|
|
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jul 18, 2017 23:01:30 GMT -5
Very disappointed the Red Sox didn't come away with Frazier. While his overall numbers don't look much better than Mitch Moreland's, Frazier has been trending the right way, and given what the Red Sox sorely lack, he would have been the ideal solution.
I'm very curious to hear what Gammons or somebody else has to say about how close the Red Sox were to getting Frazier. On Saturday morning the speculation was that the Red Sox were on the verge of getting him for Trey Ball and another player, speculated to be Cosart, but that the deal was supposedly scotched because of Cosart's medicals.
I thought the Red Sox and White Sox would simply substitute another similar type player and get the deal done, but instead nothing happened, and perhaps the White Sox looked around for better options, one in which they could dump Robertson's contract and get some impact prospects by bundling Frazier along with Kahnle?
For the Red Sox, the price to get Kahnle would have been prohibitive as the Sox have already invested too much in middle relief help, and they certainly don't want to go over the threshold to pay Robertson. Frazier was the real get for them, and certainly not worth giving up a top prospect or an upper 2nd tier type prospect like Chavis.
So now what? There's nobody terribly exciting. Lowrie is having his nice season. I like TJ Rivera, even though he doesn't walk much. He has a pretty good hit tool and has hit in the minors at all stops and is hitting with the Mets in a tough ballpark. He could be a good option to either be the guy at 3b the rest of the season or platoon with Devers.
I can't imagine that Rivera would come cheaply, though. He's not a big contract, has service time remaining, and the Mets have a hole at 3b if they deal him, I think.
I'm hoping the Sox don't have to spend too much to get a 3b or a setup man. I have a feeling, with all the competition for relievers, that Neshek's price will go up, although the Yanks at this point should be eliminated as a competitor for Neshek, right?
|
|
|
Post by grandsalami on Jul 18, 2017 23:18:02 GMT -5
Sox Were never interested
Interesting
|
|
|
Post by telson13 on Jul 18, 2017 23:18:18 GMT -5
Very disappointed the Red Sox didn't come away with Frazier. While his overall numbers don't look much better than Mitch Moreland's, Frazier has been trending the right way, and given what the Red Sox sorely lack, he would have been the ideal solution. I'm very curious to hear what Gammons or somebody else has to say about how close the Red Sox were to getting Frazier. On Saturday morning the speculation was that the Red Sox were on the verge of getting him for Trey Ball and another player, speculated to be Cosart, but that the deal was supposedly scotched because of Cosart's medicals. I thought the Red Sox and White Sox would simply substitute another similar type player and get the deal done, but instead nothing happened, and perhaps the White Sox looked around for better options, one in which they could dump Robertson's contract and get some impact prospects by bundling Frazier along with Kahnle? For the Red Sox, the price to get Kahnle would have been prohibitive as the Sox have already invested too much in middle relief help, and they certainly don't want to go over the threshold to pay Robertson. Frazier was the real get for them, and certainly not worth giving up a top prospect or an upper 2nd tier type prospect like Chavis. So now what? There's nobody terribly exciting. Lowrie is having his nice season. I like TJ Rivera, even though he doesn't walk much. He has a pretty good hit tool and has hit in the minors at all stops and is hitting with the Mets in a tough ballpark. He could be a good option to either be the guy at 3b the rest of the season or platoon with Devers. I can't imagine that Rivera would come cheaply, though. He's not a big contract, has service time remaining, and the Mets have a hole at 3b if they deal him, I think. I'm hoping the Sox don't have to spend too much to get a 3b or a setup man. I have a feeling, with all the competition for relievers, that Neshek's price will go up, although the Yanks at this point should be eliminated as a competitor for Neshek, right? Bring up Devers and try out Callahan. See what they've got while putting out feelers. Devers almost certainly can't be worse than what they have, and Callahan might be lightning in a bottle. Short of mortgaging he future for Britton, I don't see a definitive big move out there. As much talk as there is about offense and relief, the Sox have viable internal relief options and great starting pitching, plus Kimbrel. They can pitching-and-defense it.
|
|
|
Post by grandsalami on Jul 18, 2017 23:23:45 GMT -5
If the Sox were never interested in Frazier then who the hell are they targeting.
|
|
|
Post by tizzle on Jul 18, 2017 23:31:09 GMT -5
If the Sox were never interested in Frazier then who the hell are they targeting. Devers.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Jul 18, 2017 23:44:55 GMT -5
If the Sox were never interested in Frazier then who the hell are they targeting. Jed. DD is a softie, he wants to bring Lowrie home.
|
|
|
Post by philsbosoxfan on Jul 19, 2017 0:04:10 GMT -5
Sox should trade for Rafael Devers & Carson Smith to give their second half the boost they need.
|
|
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jul 19, 2017 0:10:22 GMT -5
Yup. Rutherford + Clarkin. No clue which relievers are actually involved. Lol, that's such a bad trade for the Yankees. I wouldn't LOL over that trade. If Rutherford is indeed a LF rather than a CF then the Yankees didn't make a bad trade. They have Frazier and Judge in the outfield corners for the foreseeable future. Rutherford was not going to dislodge either one of them. If he was a CF, then I could see the need for the Yankees to keep him. It kind of reminds me of the Red Sox parting with Margot to get Kimbrel. I don't know how good Clarkin is. I've looked at his numbers and they're good, but I don't know how good he projects to. I do know that the Yankees, who have gotten killed in their pen over the past few months, and have lost a bunch of close games, now have quality and quantity in their pen between Chapman, Betances, Kahnle, Robertson, Green, and Warren. That's a really strong bullpen, and as amazing as Kimbrel has been, I'd now take the Yankees' bullpen over the Red Sox and that includes a healthy Joe Kelly. The Yankees have weaknesses at 1b/3b and Frazier helps address that and makes their roster stronger. Meanwhile the Red Sox have guys like Deven Marrero on the roster. The Yankees offense was already better and now it's much better and as a bonus the Red Sox will not be addressing their offense's biggest issue, power. And now the Yankees bullpen is better than the Sox. The Red Sox still have the superior rotation, but that's their edge. Everything else now tilts toward the Yankees and they have a good shot at taking back the east. And they haven't even approached their window where they're supposed to have their youngsters mature (they're ahead of schedule) why having the money to go crazy in that 2018-2019 offseason. The White Sox did well in their end of the deal, but I wouldn't be laughing at the Yankees. They dealt from a position of strength or surplus like Dombrowski likes to say.
|
|
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jul 19, 2017 0:12:23 GMT -5
Sox should trade for Rafael Devers & Carson Smith to give their second half the boost they need. Devers makes as much sense as anything else but I wouldn't pin any major hopes on Carson Smith. We have no idea how good he can be at this point or even if he makes it back without experiencing any setbacks. Workman looks like a keeper, but the Sox need another arm for the pen, somebody you're comfortable turning the game over to in the 8th to bridge the lead to Kimbrel for the 9th.
|
|
|
Post by philsbosoxfan on Jul 19, 2017 0:37:32 GMT -5
For the Sox to match that, based on BA rankings, we'd have lost Groome (87) plus plus plus. Rutheford is ranked 36th. Glad DD passed.
|
|
|