SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
2017 Trade Deadline Thread (Red Sox discussion)
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Jul 12, 2017 16:30:46 GMT -5
I like Frazier. Great team guy. Durable. Contract year. Hitting in Fenway during the summer may spike his numbers (Like Beltre). I'm sure during the 1st month of the year hitting in Comiskey isn't fun. He'll be cheaper and has more of a track record than Moustakas. I echo this. With Frazier's pull rate and flyball rate, he would be taylor made for Fenway Park Who do you guys like better, Frazier or Chavis? That's probably where the ask starts.
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 16,642
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jul 12, 2017 16:57:59 GMT -5
So, while a trade for Neshek, if not too pricey, would be welcome, I wonder if the answer might be waiting on Smith. Then, I also wonder if, come playoffs, the Sox could drop to Sale, Porcello, and Price as starters and make Pomeranz a kind of Andrew Miller guy. His fastball has been harder recently and might play up even more in short stints. I am all for not trading for a 3B. Lin and Marrero will probably come back to Earth with a thud, but if they keep defending, that's fine. That puts me in the stand pat category, I guess. The only exception would be a bigger trade that helps for a while... but I don't know what that would be. I wouldn't count on Smith coming back. He has yet to do anything resembling a rehab. He still has injury issues. At best he'd come back in September and I tend to doubt it, and if he did, who knows how effective he would be? They will probably need an upgrade in the pen just like they need one at 3b.
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 16,642
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jul 12, 2017 17:00:41 GMT -5
I echo this. With Frazier's pull rate and flyball rate, he would be taylor made for Fenway Park Who do you guys like better, Frazier or Chavis? That's probably where the ask starts. Honestly, if I were the White Sox GM Hahn that's who I'd want for Frazier and if he doesn't back off a demand like that then I wouldn't pull the trigger on Frazier even though I think he fits the Sox the best. I am a believer in Chavis' bat. That said, it would not surprise me in the least to see Chavis go for Frazier. I think Dombrowski would make a move like that. I'd prefer to cross my fingers that Devers is ready than pay that kind of a price. I'd rather pursue a lesser 3b like a Freese as insurance.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Jul 12, 2017 17:12:23 GMT -5
I echo this. With Frazier's pull rate and flyball rate, he would be taylor made for Fenway Park Who do you guys like better, Frazier or Chavis? That's probably where the ask starts. Lin and Chavis.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Jul 12, 2017 17:33:39 GMT -5
So, while a trade for Neshek, if not too pricey, would be welcome, I wonder if the answer might be waiting on Smith. Then, I also wonder if, come playoffs, the Sox could drop to Sale, Porcello, and Price as starters and make Pomeranz a kind of Andrew Miller guy. His fastball has been harder recently and might play up even more in short stints. I am all for not trading for a 3B. Lin and Marrero will probably come back to Earth with a thud, but if they keep defending, that's fine. That puts me in the stand pat category, I guess. The only exception would be a bigger trade that helps for a while... but I don't know what that would be. Smith won't be back until after the trade deadline, the Sox can't wait on him and make a decision based off his return. The Sox are probably getting a bullpen piece regardless. If the playoffs started tomorrow, Pomeranz would be the Sox number 2 starter in the playoff rotation. A lot can change between now and the end of September however.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Jul 12, 2017 17:36:21 GMT -5
So, while a trade for Neshek, if not too pricey, would be welcome, I wonder if the answer might be waiting on Smith. Then, I also wonder if, come playoffs, the Sox could drop to Sale, Porcello, and Price as starters and make Pomeranz a kind of Andrew Miller guy. His fastball has been harder recently and might play up even more in short stints. I am all for not trading for a 3B. Lin and Marrero will probably come back to Earth with a thud, but if they keep defending, that's fine. That puts me in the stand pat category, I guess. The only exception would be a bigger trade that helps for a while... but I don't know what that would be. I wouldn't count on Smith coming back. He has yet to do anything resembling a rehab. He still has injury issues. At best he'd come back in September and I tend to doubt it, and if he did, who knows how effective he would be? They will probably need an upgrade in the pen just like they need one at 3b. Smith is slated to start throwing right around this week. Unless he suffers another setback, he should be back by August. Smith is a great pitcher when he's pitching, the Sox just have to get him back on the mound again.
|
|
|
Post by sox fan in nc on Jul 12, 2017 17:40:22 GMT -5
Who do you guys like better, Frazier or Chavis? That's probably where the ask starts. Lin and Chavis.
|
|
|
Post by sox fan in nc on Jul 12, 2017 17:43:18 GMT -5
idk. Chavis seems to be a heavy ask for Frazier. We're talking about maybe 3 or 4 teams that may be in play.
|
|
|
Post by jackiebradleyjrjr on Jul 12, 2017 18:19:31 GMT -5
idk. Chavis seems to be a heavy ask for Frazier. We're talking about maybe 3 or 4 teams that may be in play. I'm sure they'll ask. Heck, I think jimed's right they'll probably ask for even more. But you're right, given the number of decent options at third currently on the market, plus we are not as desperate as we were a few weeks ago, plus I can't think of many teams in major need of a third baseman (Yankees? Cards.... maybe?), I can't imagine DD would give up anything close to Chavis.... at least I hope. Please don't.... I'm more concerned that he'll give Chavis up for a reliever. That's where there's greater demand and less supply.
|
|
|
Post by grandsalami on Jul 12, 2017 18:37:35 GMT -5
Let's trade for Felix Hernandez!!
(I miss those days)
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Jul 13, 2017 6:36:31 GMT -5
idk. Chavis seems to be a heavy ask for Frazier. We're talking about maybe 3 or 4 teams that may be in play. I'm sure they'll ask. Heck, I think jimed's right they'll probably ask for even more. But you're right, given the number of decent options at third currently on the market, plus we are not as desperate as we were a few weeks ago, plus I can't think of many teams in major need of a third baseman (Yankees? Cards.... maybe?), I can't imagine DD would give up anything close to Chavis.... at least I hope. Please don't.... I'm more concerned that he'll give Chavis up for a reliever. That's where there's greater demand and less supply. To be clear, I prefer Lin and Chavis to Frazier.
|
|
nomar
Veteran
Posts: 11,532
Member is Online
|
Post by nomar on Jul 13, 2017 10:56:01 GMT -5
I've slowly moved down the spectrum of wanting to keep Chavis (and Lin) this year.
The farm is thin and we have a solid division lead over a Yankee team who's offense is due for serious second half regression. I'm fine with adding Neshek or 3B, but I wouldn't want to give up Lin, Chavis, or even Ockimey to do it.
If we can't, then oh well. I wouldn't want to hurt the farm much more than we already have though. Chavis is just getting onto top 100 lists and while he's far from perfect, you can't teach his batspeed. He's a top 5 prospect for us now. Trading him for a stopgap with our farm hurting would just be shortsighted IMO.
|
|
|
Post by iakovos11 on Jul 13, 2017 14:35:03 GMT -5
I've slowly moved down the spectrum of wanting to keep Chavis (and Lin) this year. The farm is thin and we have a solid division lead over a Yankee team who's offense is due for serious second half regression. I'm fine with adding Neshek or 3B, but I wouldn't want to give up Lin, Chavis, or even Ockimey to do it. If we can't, then oh well. I wouldn't want to hurt the farm much more than we already have though. Chavis is just getting onto top 100 lists and while he's far from perfect, you can't teach his batspeed. He's a top 5 prospect for us now. Trading him for a stopgap with our farm hurting would just be shortsighted IMO. I'm ok with trading Ockimey for Frazier. Would rather not trade Chavis for Frazier, though.
|
|
nomar
Veteran
Posts: 11,532
Member is Online
|
Post by nomar on Jul 13, 2017 15:21:07 GMT -5
I've slowly moved down the spectrum of wanting to keep Chavis (and Lin) this year. The farm is thin and we have a solid division lead over a Yankee team who's offense is due for serious second half regression. I'm fine with adding Neshek or 3B, but I wouldn't want to give up Lin, Chavis, or even Ockimey to do it. If we can't, then oh well. I wouldn't want to hurt the farm much more than we already have though. Chavis is just getting onto top 100 lists and while he's far from perfect, you can't teach his batspeed. He's a top 5 prospect for us now. Trading him for a stopgap with our farm hurting would just be shortsighted IMO. I'm ok with trading Ockimey for Frazier. Would rather not trade Chavis for Frazier, though. In recent years our LHB always seem to explode in Portland. His stock is probably going to rise next year. Totally fair opinion of course, but I think I'd rather hold onto him. On the flip side, Frazier is a great fit for Fenway and may be a relatively cheap extension candidate if he really does fit well here and we get Sandoval's contract off the books (in Castillo fashion).
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Jul 13, 2017 19:23:28 GMT -5
In recent years our LHB always seem to explode in Portland. Like who?
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 16,642
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jul 13, 2017 20:43:38 GMT -5
I'm ok with trading Ockimey for Frazier. Would rather not trade Chavis for Frazier, though. In recent years our LHB always seem to explode in Portland. His stock is probably going to rise next year. Totally fair opinion of course, but I think I'd rather hold onto him. On the flip side, Frazier is a great fit for Fenway and may be a relatively cheap extension candidate if he really does fit well here and we get Sandoval's contract off the books (in Castillo fashion). With Devers around, Frazier would be strictly a rental. They have a 22 million dollar DH and a young 1b in Sam Travis that they like. And as it's been covered before, the Red Sox cannot get Sandoval's contract off the books like they did with Castillo based on Panda's service time. They're stuck with his contract thru 2019 no matter what.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Jul 13, 2017 22:22:46 GMT -5
In recent years our LHB always seem to explode in Portland. His stock is probably going to rise next year. Totally fair opinion of course, but I think I'd rather hold onto him. On the flip side, Frazier is a great fit for Fenway and may be a relatively cheap extension candidate if he really does fit well here and we get Sandoval's contract off the books (in Castillo fashion). With Devers around, Frazier would be strictly a rental. They have a 22 million dollar DH and a young 1b in Sam Travis that they like. And as it's been covered before, the Red Sox cannot get Sandoval's contract off the books like they did with Castillo based on Panda's service time. They're stuck with his contract thru 2019 no matter what. I can see the Sox resigning Frazier to a short term deal if he were up to it. He's probably better then Travis overall and he can platoon with Devers at third base. I'm not sure the Sox should count on both Devers and Travis both as starting options to start the 2018 season. It's good to have great competition. Plus, how much longer can you count on Hanley at this point?
|
|
|
Post by redsoxfan2 on Jul 13, 2017 22:25:18 GMT -5
Would it make sense to trade Chavis for Frazier, but only if the White Sox take on Pablo's contract? He's a half-year rental who hasn't hit all that well this season, but still showing some good pop. The White Sox would be essentially buying a prospect.
Depends really on what the White Sox are being offered for him, but I think it would make some sense as they're losing Frazier after the year, they aren't likely to contend next year and wont have a lot of salary commitments through 2019. They would need to eat the full 2.5 years remaining.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Jul 13, 2017 22:29:01 GMT -5
Would it make sense to trade Chavis for Frazier, but only if the White Sox take on Pablo's contract? He's a half-year rental who hasn't hit all that well this season, but still showing some good pop. The White Sox would be essentially buying a prospect. Depends really on what the White Sox are being offered for him, but I think it would make some sense as they're losing Frazier after the year, they aren't likely to contend next year and wont have a lot of salary commitments through 2019. They would need to eat the full 2.5 years remaining. The White Sox wouldn't take on the Sandoval money for anything less than Devers, and I still don't think they'd do that. Sandoval is about to be DFA'D most likely. He didn't even play in Pawtucket tonight.
|
|
|
Post by redsoxfan2 on Jul 13, 2017 22:34:16 GMT -5
Would it make sense to trade Chavis for Frazier, but only if the White Sox take on Pablo's contract? He's a half-year rental who hasn't hit all that well this season, but still showing some good pop. The White Sox would be essentially buying a prospect. Depends really on what the White Sox are being offered for him, but I think it would make some sense as they're losing Frazier after the year, they aren't likely to contend next year and wont have a lot of salary commitments through 2019. They would need to eat the full 2.5 years remaining. The White Sox wouldn't take on the Sandoval money for anything less than Devers, and I still don't think they'd do that. Sandoval is about to be DFA'D most likely. He didn't even play in Pawtucket tonight. Yeah, not really expecting Pablo to give the White Sox anything of value, but if they aren't contending this year or next with the limited salaries committed on their roster as they go into full rebuild mode then buying prospects would make sense. Now, if the price is Devers that's a no-go as the Red Sox aren't a team in desperate need to shed salary. I'd kick the tires at least, but probably won't happen. Maybe they consider it for eating 60% of the contract?
|
|
|
Post by jbuttah on Jul 13, 2017 22:35:46 GMT -5
Would it make sense to trade Chavis for Frazier, but only if the White Sox take on Pablo's contract? He's a half-year rental who hasn't hit all that well this season, but still showing some good pop. The White Sox would be essentially buying a prospect. Depends really on what the White Sox are being offered for him, but I think it would make some sense as they're losing Frazier after the year, they aren't likely to contend next year and wont have a lot of salary commitments through 2019. They would need to eat the full 2.5 years remaining. The White Sox wouldn't take on the Sandoval money for anything less than Devers, and I still don't think they'd do that. Sandoval is about to be DFA'D most likely. He didn't even play in Pawtucket tonight. Hard to believe a MLB team with all their resources, especially one like the Sox, would sign Sandoval to a 5/95 contract that most on this board disagreed with to some extent. I mean he's been a disaster from the very beginning with no flashes of talent befitting such a contract.
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 16,642
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jul 13, 2017 23:34:37 GMT -5
With Devers around, Frazier would be strictly a rental. They have a 22 million dollar DH and a young 1b in Sam Travis that they like. And as it's been covered before, the Red Sox cannot get Sandoval's contract off the books like they did with Castillo based on Panda's service time. They're stuck with his contract thru 2019 no matter what. I can see the Sox resigning Frazier to a short term deal if he were up to it. He's probably better then Travis overall and he can platoon with Devers at third base. I'm not sure the Sox should count on both Devers and Travis both as starting options to start the 2018 season. It's good to have great competition. Plus, how much longer can you count on Hanley at this point? I don't think the Sox would give anything resembling big money or a long-term deal to Frazier, who I think can probably get a multiple year deal playing 3b, which has been his position. I think the Sox are going to have to go with the young kids Devers and Travis. If they want to get in on any of those free agents in the winter of 2018 and/or have money to throw at Betts, Bogaerts, Sale, or Porcello down the road, the Red Sox need to have some cheap young talent who won't see a big payday for awhile. Unless the Sox try to get a star for 1b, I think Travis will be the 1b in 2018 and whether it's in August or May next year Devers should finally resolve the long-standing 3b issue for the Red Sox. They don't need Frazier to block him or platoon with him. Devers will be an everyday player. However, in 2017, Frazier is a perfect fit for the Red Sox, but despite the fact that he has money left to pay on his contract, I don't think the Red Sox get him for a song. The Yankees have a lot of mediocrity themselves at 3b, could use the help this season, and could block the Sox from getting what they need, so I'd think the Yankees would be a possible landing spot for Frazier.
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 16,642
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jul 13, 2017 23:38:04 GMT -5
Would it make sense to trade Chavis for Frazier, but only if the White Sox take on Pablo's contract? He's a half-year rental who hasn't hit all that well this season, but still showing some good pop. The White Sox would be essentially buying a prospect. Depends really on what the White Sox are being offered for him, but I think it would make some sense as they're losing Frazier after the year, they aren't likely to contend next year and wont have a lot of salary commitments through 2019. They would need to eat the full 2.5 years remaining. It's no secret in baseball that Sandoval is washed up both offensively and defensively. No team is going to take on that contract unless the Red Sox pay at least 90% of it. And while the White Sox probably would jump on Chavis for Frazier, there's no way they're investing $50 million for him. Perhaps they would for Devers, but there's no reason for the Red Sox to shoot themselves in the foot like that.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Jul 14, 2017 1:25:33 GMT -5
As to redsoxchamps post, I just can't see the Sox handing the keys to both Devers and Travis next year and expect both to start everyday. Platoon was a bad word to use with Devers next year, but I'm sure a right handed bat against a tough lefty to give him a rest next year wouldn't be a bad thing.
I kind of can't see Frazier getting a huge deal unless he explodes offensively to whichever team he gets traded to. He's been a good but not a great player ever since he got traded to the AL. I just don't see a big market for him.
I'd prefer a bigger bat then Frazier this off-season (like JD Martinez and convert him to first base), but I'd be okay with a cheaper Todd Frazier too. He has played both first and third base in the past.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Jul 14, 2017 2:44:02 GMT -5
The White Sox wouldn't take on the Sandoval money for anything less than Devers, and I still don't think they'd do that. Sandoval is about to be DFA'D most likely. He didn't even play in Pawtucket tonight. Yeah, not really expecting Pablo to give the White Sox anything of value, but if they aren't contending this year or next with the limited salaries committed on their roster as they go into full rebuild mode then buying prospects would make sense. Now, if the price is Devers that's a no-go as the Red Sox aren't a team in desperate need to shed salary. I'd kick the tires at least, but probably won't happen. Maybe they consider it for eating 60% of the contract? Why would the White Sox pay 16-24 million with Sandoval for a prospect like Chavis? You can spend 3-5 million on a prospect with higher upside in the international free agent market or you can spend 3-5 million on a first and second round talent in the draft. So why would ANY team spend that much for Chavis who has high risk attached to him? I would be ticked off if the Red Sox spent that much on a prospect like Chavis if the Sox were rebuilding. I know fans want to dump bad and give up little doing it but it's just not realistic.
|
|
|