|
Post by braziliansox on Jul 15, 2017 7:56:53 GMT -5
#Source re: #WhiteSox -#RedSox Frazier deal: "Not quite done - but has legs. Almost in the medicals stage. Don't expect a great return."
This is a tweet from Brian Bilek, he covers the white sox for FutureSox.
Somebody asked if Chavis would be considered "a great return" and he said yes fwiw.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Jul 15, 2017 8:08:49 GMT -5
#Source re: #WhiteSox -#RedSox Frazier deal: "Not quite done - but has legs. Almost in the medicals stage. Don't expect a great return." This is a tweet from Brian Bilek, he covers the white sox for FutureSox. Somebody asked if Chavis would be considered "a great return" and he said yes fwiw. Yeap The Sox could absolutely get a deal done for Frazier, even done by the end of the night like reported but all these fake reports will make a person's head spin. The Gordon Hayward decision day was the worst and probably the worst day of rumors in Twitter history.
|
|
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jul 15, 2017 8:20:07 GMT -5
I think the return is BS but there is a lot of buzz that Frazier is coming. I read somewhere that it would be something like Ockimey, Darwinzon Hernandez and Lozada which sounded more realistic, lets wait. I like Ockimey a good deal but I could go for that kind of a deal. Hernandez is who I had in mind as being expendable for Frazier.
|
|
|
Post by grandsalami on Jul 15, 2017 10:34:57 GMT -5
coupla tweets Sat a.m., nothing reliable Nathan Evans ☘️ @naters508 19m19 minutes ago 👀Sources👀: #RedSox and #WhiteSox close to a deal sending Frazier to Red Sox & 2 minor league pitching prospects to White Sox sox @talkingsox 57m57 minutes ago SOURCE: #WhiteSox and the #RedSox have come to terms on Todd Frazier deal. The package is "headlined" by Bryan Mata and Michael Chavis. those two tweets contradict each other...
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Jul 15, 2017 11:31:01 GMT -5
Please don't be Mata AND Chavis.
Edit: Gee those are some reliable sources there grandsalami, almost gave me heart attack for no reason.
|
|
jimoh
Veteran
Posts: 4,171
|
Post by jimoh on Jul 15, 2017 11:33:34 GMT -5
more unreliable tweets
Boston Sports Report @bostonsports_15 33m33 minutes ago More REPORTS: #RedSox #WhiteSox , Todd Frazier trade talks "heating up". Rumored return for Chicago: 2 minor leaguers
Carmen Matthews @carmo_Sox 1h1 hour ago More I'm hearing #WhiteSox will send Todd Frazier to #RedSox for minor leaguers Ball & Cosart. @jared_Carrabis @jcmccaffrey @peteabe any truth?
Ryan (R) @crashsports1 36m36 minutes ago More Hearing #WhiteSox balked at one of #RedSox prospect medicals. Sounds like Cosart. Deal still expected but may be Ball + other guy not Cosart
|
|
|
Post by doctorduck21 on Jul 15, 2017 11:48:45 GMT -5
Man the one thing I dislike about the trade deadline is waiting to get official reports. I like Frazier but those tweets have a major difference in price. Ockimey and Hernandez sound the most reasonable. Ball and Cosart would be a steal but I can't see the White Sox being dumb enough to take two players who might never make the majors. I rather not think about if it's Mata and Chavis. That's way too high a price
|
|
|
Post by mredsox89 on Jul 15, 2017 12:09:14 GMT -5
So the "reported" "packages" are anywhere from Mata & Chavis to Ball & Cosart? Talk about extreme.
Don't really want them to move Ockimey, but I'd get it if they did
Also, getting Frazier would almost certainly just be a rental, and they'd let him walk after this season, right? Because if that's the case, the Mata/Chavis combination would be brutal. Admittedly I'm not sold on Chavis and you'd be selling really high on him, but Mata has a chance, albeit still a long ways away, from being spectacular
|
|
|
Post by grandsalami on Jul 15, 2017 12:11:12 GMT -5
Please don't be Mata AND Chavis. Edit: Gee those are some reliable sources there grandsalami, almost gave me heart attack for no reason. I didn't post those tweets. Someone (JIMOH) here did. I just quoted them.
|
|
|
Post by soxcentral on Jul 15, 2017 12:19:13 GMT -5
I very much like the idea of sending 2 of the Rule 5 candidates, even 3 if necessary. Ball, Cosart, Hernandez, Shepherd, Buttrey, etc. Anyone but Callahan.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Jul 15, 2017 12:33:57 GMT -5
I didn't post those tweets. Someone (JIMOH) here did. I just quoted them. Oh right, my bad. Damn jimoh, don't do that to me.
|
|
|
Post by bigpupp on Jul 15, 2017 12:53:52 GMT -5
Sure, I'd prefer to keep quite a few interesting guys in the organization, but I'd be perfectly fine with giving up any two prospects not in the top 6 for Frazier.
|
|
jimoh
Veteran
Posts: 4,171
|
Post by jimoh on Jul 15, 2017 13:04:59 GMT -5
|
|
jimoh
Veteran
Posts: 4,171
|
Post by jimoh on Jul 15, 2017 13:34:49 GMT -5
Somebody overlaid Fenway on Frazier's spray chart; not sure where this is from or what it covers
|
|
|
Post by grandsalami on Jul 15, 2017 13:35:34 GMT -5
Somebody overlaid Fenway on Frazier's p[ray chart; not sure where this is from or what it covers Im not falling for that again... Not after we saw A-gon's overlay when we traded for him
|
|
jimoh
Veteran
Posts: 4,171
|
Post by jimoh on Jul 15, 2017 13:50:23 GMT -5
Somebody overlaid Fenway on Frazier's p[ray chart; not sure where this is from or what it covers Im not falling for that again... Not after we saw A-gon's overlay when we traded for him So if the weatherman predicts sun and there is a surprise storm, you just stop looking at radar?
|
|
|
Post by bigpupp on Jul 15, 2017 13:51:52 GMT -5
Somebody overlaid Fenway on Frazier's p[ray chart; not sure where this is from or what it covers Im not falling for that again... Not after we saw A-gon's overlay when we traded for him If Frazier basically ties his career high in OPS when he comes here like A-gon did then I'd be good with it.
|
|
|
Post by grandsalami on Jul 15, 2017 14:50:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by lancect on Jul 15, 2017 14:58:44 GMT -5
No Frank Thomas and A=Fraud, that's not "a good one". Just dumb and not happening, Dombrowski and John Henry aren't picking up Cabrera and 6/180!
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Jul 15, 2017 15:20:44 GMT -5
Somebody overlaid Fenway on Frazier's p[ray chart; not sure where this is from or what it covers Im not falling for that again... Not after we saw A-gon's overlay when we traded for him AGon was pretty damn good for the Red Sox. He stole some votes from Ellsbury in 2011 which cost him the MVP.
|
|
|
Post by mredsox89 on Jul 15, 2017 16:06:10 GMT -5
Rosenthal basically just said it seems almost inevitable that Boston ends up wth Frazier at this point.
I'm very curious to see what he would cost the Sox as a rental
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jul 15, 2017 17:33:04 GMT -5
Sure, I'd prefer to keep quite a few interesting guys in the organization, but I'd be perfectly fine with giving up any two prospects not in the top 6 for Frazier. Wow, glad you're not the GM! Maybe two guys outside the top 20, not top 6.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jul 15, 2017 17:35:18 GMT -5
#Source re: #WhiteSox -#RedSox Frazier deal: "Not quite done - but has legs. Almost in the medicals stage. Don't expect a great return." This is a tweet from Brian Bilek, he covers the white sox for FutureSox. Somebody asked if Chavis would be considered "a great return" and he said yes fwiw. Yeap The Sox could absolutely get a deal done for Frazier, even done by the end of the night like reported but all these fake reports will make a person's head spin. The Gordon Hayward decision day was the worst and probably the worst day of rumors in Twitter history. Not even close. There were no reports he was going anywhere else, just a delay in the official announcement.
|
|
|
Post by bigpupp on Jul 15, 2017 17:39:55 GMT -5
Sure, I'd prefer to keep quite a few interesting guys in the organization, but I'd be perfectly fine with giving up any two prospects not in the top 6 for Frazier. Wow, glad you're not the GM! Maybe two guys outside the top 20, not top 6. I actually meant to type 7, but who would you miss? Ockimey? Dalbec? Maybe Beeks? I wouldn't bat an eye at getting Frazier for any of those guys.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jul 15, 2017 17:51:25 GMT -5
I'm not trading Flores straight up for Frazier, nevermind add a Ockimey, Dalbec, Beeks, Johnson, Brannen, Scherff or Shawaryn. I wouldn't trade any of those guys for Frazier.
A couple of lower guys and I would gladly do it, otherwise no.
Edit there are a bunch of guys in the 20-40 range I wouldn't trade either.
|
|