SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
2018 Red Sox roster building
|
Post by jimed14 on Dec 31, 2017 9:51:47 GMT -5
Two years of Xander is worth at least as much as one year of Machado. Anything more than that is absurd.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Dec 31, 2017 10:40:36 GMT -5
I'd like to also add in a separate post that a extension could be more feasible if you offer Macahado the short stop position right away. It's the position he desires to play, and it's the position he was born to play in (once again, sorry to repeat). If the Sox were able to offer this position over the Yankees, I'd feel REALLY good about resigning him. We can all agree that Manny would NEVER play short stop in Yankees uniform, right?!! Playing a position that Machado wants to play in is a risk that can also pay off in your benefit. If you show Manny that you'd be willing to pay top dollar for his service and to play him in a position he WANTS to play in, then that works in your favor. I'd be very surprised if Machado agreed to an extension instead of just playing things out. His agent has to know that the Yankees are flush with cash (among other teams) and that there will be a huge demand for his services. Doubt they'd want to lock into the first big offer they see. And no I don't agree that Machado would NEVER play SS in a Yankee uniform. Why couldn't he? Because of Gregorius? Between Machado, Gregorius, and Torres I'm sure they could figure out an alignment that works for everybody. It's not like they have the team captain Jeter refusing to step aside for A-Rod. Anything can happen, but the most likely scenario is that Machado does get dealt, does play out the year with his new team, and then signs a massive contract with another team, most likely the Yankees. The Red Sox are a possibility, but it's hard to see the Sox signing Machado to that kind of money and then trying to be able to extend Sale and/or Betts - especially if Price doesn't opt out. I just assumed that Gregorius would stick at short stop, Manny would play third, and Torres would play second. That's all of their natural positions outside of Torres. I suppose you could be right by moving Gregorius over to somewhere else, like 2nd or 3rd base, and money is probably the biggest benefactor of convincing Didi to do that. However, if the Sox traded for Machado right now and offered 320-340 million over 10 years and offered him the short stop position, that'd be really enticing to turn down if I'm Macahado.
|
|
|
Post by Addam603 on Dec 31, 2017 11:00:35 GMT -5
I guess long story short is if you feel EXTREMELY strongly about your chances to resign him, then go for it. That gives you another superstar to pair with Mookie, Devers, and Beni. If he resigns, then a deal of Bogaerts, E-Rod, and maybe one good prospect is fair in my opinion. But I don’t see that happening, so no thanks.
|
|
|
Post by jiant2520 on Dec 31, 2017 13:52:58 GMT -5
Yeah... the key is definitely resigning him and I really don't see him not testing the market next offseason.
If the Sox didn't have a SS currently, I could see taking a chance on Machado for a year, hoping he enjoys Boston and hopefully being a SS would help in that regard.
Since we have Bogey, who is a top 10 SS and I think he will have a bounce back season, we are not adding all Machados value, as we are subtracting Bogeys value too.
Machado is the better player for sure, but how much better is the team after adding Machado and subtracting Bogey, while accounting for their upcoming contracts. What else does Boston lose to get Machado? What does Boston get for Bogey, if he is not in the Machado deal?
I think to get Machado without Bogey, we would need to discuss Groome, Chavis, Mata... probably two of them.
Then trade Bogey for.... prospects (lesser) to replace those traded for Machado?
I don't see it really... I think we should keep the prospects and Bogey. If after the season Machado is enticed to play for Boston, and Boston feels like Bogey will cost too much as a Boris (yes I did it) represented player, we can try to sign Machado and trade Bogey then. Perhaps Pomeranz is gone and we can trade Bogey for a replacement SP.
Just my two cents.
|
|
|
Post by fenwaythehardway on Dec 31, 2017 17:53:34 GMT -5
I guess long story short is if you feel EXTREMELY strongly about your chances to resign him, then go for it. That gives you another superstar to pair with Mookie, Devers, and Beni. If he resigns, then a deal of Bogaerts, E-Rod, and maybe one good prospect is fair in my opinion. But I don’t see that happening, so no thanks. Why do people think one year of Machado equals TWO years of Bogaerts PLUS three years of Eduardo PLUS goodies? Arguably the Red Sox should be the ones getting a sweetener back in a Bogaerts/Machado deal. Also, this trade still makes no sense for either side.
|
|
|
Post by mredsox89 on Dec 31, 2017 18:50:21 GMT -5
This whole Machado to Boston feels like leverage by the Sox to get Boras to buckle on JDM, and leverage for the Orioles to get value from some other team. This deal makes no sense
|
|
|
Post by thelavarnwayguy on Dec 31, 2017 22:55:37 GMT -5
It could also be making Machado more expensive for the Yankees to obtain, or even stopping it altogether. There are very few teams in a position to acquire Machado and a big part of that may be not just going to a contender who needs him but going to a team which can actually sign him long term. With the Dodgers presumably not being in position to add him easily, 2 of those teams are in the AL East. Machado being so young and such a stud probably means special consideration for the Orioles, even to an AL east team. The Orioles absolutely need premium value back on this deal and what other options do they have, if extension signability is a big factor on this? They need the Redsox and Yanks in this bidding war.
DD or Cashman would move mountains for this guy. He's a potential MVP candidate every year. I wouldn't be a bit surprised if DD snags him. They could move Devers to 1st and maybe still add Martinez and Bingo, we are right there with the Yankees again.
|
|
|
Post by larrycook on Dec 31, 2017 23:19:49 GMT -5
I guess long story short is if you feel EXTREMELY strongly about your chances to resign him, then go for it. That gives you another superstar to pair with Mookie, Devers, and Beni. If he resigns, then a deal of Bogaerts, E-Rod, and maybe one good prospect is fair in my opinion. But I don’t see that happening, so no thanks. Why do people think one year of Machado equals TWO years of Bogaerts PLUS three years of Eduardo PLUS goodies? Arguably the Red Sox should be the ones getting a sweetener back in a Bogaerts/Machado deal. Also, this trade still makes no sense for either side. Baltimore reportedly turned down three players from the cubs for manny. Not sure why they would not demand more from us. Bogey, Rodriguez, groome and chavis???
|
|
|
Post by jiant2520 on Jan 1, 2018 1:44:39 GMT -5
Let them demand all they want...
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jan 1, 2018 2:18:31 GMT -5
Why do people think one year of Machado equals TWO years of Bogaerts PLUS three years of Eduardo PLUS goodies? Arguably the Red Sox should be the ones getting a sweetener back in a Bogaerts/Machado deal. Also, this trade still makes no sense for either side. Baltimore reportedly turned down three players from the cubs for manny. Not sure why they would not demand more from us. Bogey, Rodriguez, groome and chavis??? What three players? I highly doubt they turned down 3 players like Bogaerts, ERod and Groome.
|
|
|
Post by sparkygian on Jan 1, 2018 4:11:37 GMT -5
Heard Oriole's turned down A. Russell, JDM, and Brooks Robinson. DD can beat that package if he really wants to win a ring. You can do it, DD. Go get that big bat!!
|
|
|
Post by philsbosoxfan on Jan 1, 2018 6:31:37 GMT -5
Peter Gammons
@pgammo 37m37 minutes ago More New Year's, Fangraphs project the Yanks/Red Sox each 91-71 w/+104 RD, in playoffs w/Astros, Indians, Angels, Dodgers, Cubs, Nats, Cards, D'Backs
|
|
|
Post by philsbosoxfan on Jan 1, 2018 7:47:21 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2018 10:18:28 GMT -5
Sox send Porcello Groome Bogaerts Travis Johnson/Mata Ball and Holt. Boston eats 11 million of Porcello's contract. Sign Cobb or Lynn.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2018 10:41:38 GMT -5
And if Baltimore doesn't like that package . Pomeranz ERod Groome Bogaerts Travis and Holt. If Machado and JDM are Dombrowski's plan to win it all he's going to need to do something drastic. Lose good players or go over the luxary tax or both
|
|
|
Post by Addam603 on Jan 1, 2018 11:03:01 GMT -5
Sox send Porcello Groome Bogaerts Travis Johnson/Mata Ball and Holt. Boston eats 11 million of Porcello's contract. Sign Cobb or Lynn. ...
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Jan 1, 2018 11:49:38 GMT -5
And if Baltimore doesn't like that package . Pomeranz ERod Groome Bogaerts Travis and Holt. If Machado and JDM are Dombrowski's plan to win it all he's going to need to do something drastic. Lose good players or go over the luxary tax or both That is a package that might send the Sox back 10 years, but welcome!!
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Jan 1, 2018 12:22:05 GMT -5
And if Baltimore doesn't like that package . Pomeranz ERod Groome Bogaerts Travis and Holt. If Machado and JDM are Dombrowski's plan to win it all he's going to need to do something drastic. Lose good players or go over the luxary tax or both And then what about next year? Are you an Orioles fan?
|
|
|
Post by Smittyw on Jan 1, 2018 12:32:17 GMT -5
Hey, I didn't know Peter Angelos posted here...whew.
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Jan 1, 2018 12:43:45 GMT -5
We’re getting into trade proposal subforum territory here. As a reminder, general discussion of potential acquisitions is OK here, especially when it’s based off a widely reported rumor. However, try to keep specific trade proposals to the Machado thread in the trade proposal subforum. Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by Oregon Norm on Jan 1, 2018 13:15:11 GMT -5
Echoing jmei, here... please, please keep the off-the-cuff trade stuff out of this thread. If you've got credible information on proposals, that's cool. Post the links, the twitter feeds, whatever. The rest of it just takes up space.
|
|
|
Post by telson13 on Jan 1, 2018 13:17:21 GMT -5
Jimed is on the money. Two years of X alone is worth one of Machado plus the draft pick, at least. Four years of Rodriguez is a gross overpay. And a lot of these proposals don’t warrant a response, they’re so ludicrous. It’s Cafardo country in here.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2018 13:35:58 GMT -5
Understood.Not an Orioles fan at all. Just starting posting the other day . Learning the ropes. I was in an accident 4 months ago. Lost a lot of memories. But Sox Prospects has been the one thing that feels familiar my only sanity is the Boston Red Sox. Sorry I will stay in line
|
|
|
Post by Addam603 on Jan 1, 2018 14:38:06 GMT -5
Understood.Not an Orioles fan at all. Just starting posting the other day . Learning the ropes. I was in an accident 4 months ago. Lost a lot of memories. But Sox Prospects has been the one thing that feels familiar my only sanity is the Boston Red Sox. Sorry I will stay in line I went through something marginally similar when I broke my leg and needed surgery. This site provided a lot of time for me while recovering. Nothing wrong with throwing out ideas. Everyone does it and not all of them are to the liking of the other people here. The thing “wrong” with the ideas you threw out to me is the sheer volume of your proposal, in terms of talent and years of control. Too much going to the Orioles and not enough coming back.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2018 15:01:35 GMT -5
Thank you Addam603 . I read an earlier post that the Orioles had turned down 3 players from the Cubs. Just thought volume with a salary dump included could build a stronger roster for2018
|
|
|