|
Post by rjp313jr on Sept 26, 2019 10:52:33 GMT -5
Jonathan Jones update: highest graded corner thru 3 weeks in the NFL (PFF) He has really stood out this year. He's been breaking up a lot of plays this season. Between him and Gilmore, this might be one of the best corner combinations the Patriots have ever had. If you add in JMac it is without a doubt the best corner combination. I’m tempted to bring JC Jackson in as the 4th too but he still gambles too much.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Sept 26, 2019 11:40:55 GMT -5
For some context last year Jones was rated 64, so far in a limited sample size he's at an 86. Gilmore 78.2 currently, 90.7 last year, McCourty 84.3 currently, 79.1 last year and Jackson 48.5 currently, 73.7 last year. I actually think Jackson has a chance to become a Gilmore type guy. It took Gilmore some time and he has that physical ability to cover anyone in Football, with his size and speed. I wouldn't say he has an issue of gambling too much, your just remember his most recent play. If anything he can be too physical which could be a ton of flags this year. www.pff.com/news/pro-top-10-cornerbacks-by-passer-rating-in-2018Let's not forget Jackson allowed the lowest passer rating of any CB in the league last year, yet that somehow only equaled a rating of 73.7 from PFF which doesn't make much sense.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Sept 26, 2019 14:37:37 GMT -5
For some context last year Jones was rated 64, so far in a limited sample size he's at an 86. Gilmore 78.2 currently, 90.7 last year, McCourty 84.3 currently, 79.1 last year and Jackson 48.5 currently, 73.7 last year. I actually think Jackson has a chance to become a Gilmore type guy. It took Gilmore some time and he has that physical ability to cover anyone in Football, with his size and speed. I wouldn't say he has an issue of gambling too much, your just remember his most recent play. If anything he can be too physical which could be a ton of flags this year. www.pff.com/news/pro-top-10-cornerbacks-by-passer-rating-in-2018Let's not forget Jackson allowed the lowest passer rating of any CB in the league last year, yet that somehow only equaled a rating of 73.7 from PFF which doesn't make much sense. I miss seeing the game by game grades. Jackson’s sample size was rather small last year. PFF watches film and grades players on each play based on their positioning etc. So if Jackson was in coverage and there were some drops or bad throws he gets credit for low passer rating but PFF will lower his grade if they feel he wasn’t in tight coverage. So my guess is that’s what they felt they saw on film. It’s just a guess but it would make sense.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Sept 26, 2019 16:16:06 GMT -5
Rather small? He played 13 regular season games and 3 playoff games. He was the full-time starter playing huge minutes and snaps for eight straight games to end the year. Even just his regular season is well over a half season of starter level snap counts.
He also had the 7th best forced incompletion rate and 12th best coverage grade of all CBs. So it wasn't he got lucky with bad throws while he wasn't in position. It's why I brought up the he gambles too much, which really can't be true if he has the 12th best coverage grade.
Only thing that might make sense is if he's not good against the run and that dragged his grade down.
The human element of PFF makes them different, but also means very small samples could mean very little. So much is subjective depending on who is grading the player, just like DRS in Baseball. Heck RJP posted that Bedard said Jones had what 5 pass broken up in a game, Football Reference has him at 3 for the season. That type of crap really changes how you grade a player.
I like Jones, very good slot corner. Him getting injured killed us against the Eagles when we also didn't have Butler. Yet I also don't see the top CB in the league, like not even close. That guy is Gilmore and he proves it almost every game.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Sept 26, 2019 17:54:40 GMT -5
Jackson had 398 snaps on defense last year or less than 38% of the teams snaps. It’s a relatively small sample. Gilmore had 1014 for comparison sake.
I’m high on Jackson. I think he has the potential to be a number 1 corner in a couple years.
I don’t think Jones is the best corner in football. Not by a long shot. Just think he’s breaking out and am extremely happy they locked him up for 4 years on that deal. Saved a lot of money.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Sept 27, 2019 7:59:17 GMT -5
Rather small? He played 13 regular season games and 3 playoff games. He was the full-time starter playing huge minutes and snaps for eight straight games to end the year. Even just his regular season is well over a half season of starter level snap counts. He also had the 7th best forced incompletion rate and 12th best coverage grade of all CBs. So it wasn't he got lucky with bad throws while he wasn't in position. It's why I brought up the he gambles too much, which really can't be true if he has the 12th best coverage grade. Only thing that might make sense is if he's not good against the run and that dragged his grade down. The human element of PFF makes them different, but also means very small samples could mean very little. So much is subjective depending on who is grading the player, just like DRS in Baseball. Heck RJP posted that Bedard said Jones had what 5 pass broken up in a game, Football Reference has him at 3 for the season. That type of crap really changes how you grade a player. I like Jones, very good slot corner. Him getting injured killed us against the Eagles when we also didn't have Butler. Yet I also don't see the top CB in the league, like not even close. That guy is Gilmore and he proves it almost every game. That was me. What I've noticed w/Bedard is that he allocates stats to multiple people (as is done with Sacks by the industry). For example, he has Devin McCourty with 2.5 interceptions (have much of the 3 games but would assume there may have been a tip in there?). So Jones' 5 PBU's indicated he contributed to 5. I'm guessing PFF assigns the stats (outside of sacks/tackles) to 1 person only for each defensive play.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Sept 27, 2019 8:11:28 GMT -5
Know nothing about the guy, but he's the new full back with Devlin out the rest of the year.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Sept 27, 2019 12:56:22 GMT -5
Jackson had 398 snaps on defense last year or less than 38% of the teams snaps. It’s a relatively small sample. Gilmore had 1014 for comparison sake. I’m high on Jackson. I think he has the potential to be a number 1 corner in a couple years. I don’t think Jones is the best corner in football. Not by a long shot. Just think he’s breaking out and am extremely happy they locked him up for 4 years on that deal. Saved a lot of money. Last year Jackson only played in 13 games, he was inactive for 3 games to start the year. Jones played all 16 games and had 515 snaps. Jackson also added 148 snaps in the post season, are those included in the stats? It's not a small sample size comparing it to Jones. Per game is almost the same. Gilmore is just an animal. Jones has played 132 snaps so far this season and he's never had a PFF grade for a season even in the 70's, yet is now at 86. If I remember right his high was 68 two years ago and like 64 last year. I'm a numbers guy and that 86 means about as much as Jackson's 48.5 for me.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Sept 27, 2019 15:14:27 GMT -5
Jackson had 398 snaps on defense last year or less than 38% of the teams snaps. It’s a relatively small sample. Gilmore had 1014 for comparison sake. I’m high on Jackson. I think he has the potential to be a number 1 corner in a couple years. I don’t think Jones is the best corner in football. Not by a long shot. Just think he’s breaking out and am extremely happy they locked him up for 4 years on that deal. Saved a lot of money. Last year Jackson only played in 13 games, he was inactive for 3 games to start the year. Jones played all 16 games and had 515 snaps. Jackson also added 148 snaps in the post season, are those included in the stats? It's not a small sample size comparing it to Jones. Per game is almost the same. Gilmore is just an animal. Jones has played 132 snaps so far this season and he's never had a PFF grade for a season even in the 70's, yet is now at 86. If I remember right his high was 68 two years ago and like 64 last year. I'm a numbers guy and that 86 means about as much as Jackson's 48.5 for me. It was regular season and i don’t even know what you’re arguing at this point. I tried to offer up and explanation on what could MAYBE cause PFF grade to be low despite the stats you quoted. It wasn’t my opinion on Jackson and it certainly had nothing to do with Jones. Jones 86 grade only means he’s been playing great so far this season and I don’t think we needed the grade to let us know that.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Sept 27, 2019 15:24:49 GMT -5
This didn’t really have anything to do with the conversation but since it came up, playoff snaps:
San Diego:
Jackson 94% Jones 11%
KC:
Jackson: 98% - all but one Jones: 79%
Rams:
Jackson: 45% Jones: 98% - all but one
Matchups - would be interesting to see the counts had Chung not gotten hurt.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Sept 27, 2019 15:54:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Sept 28, 2019 7:18:04 GMT -5
Forget the player here and the specific stats. This offers some insight into PFF analysis. This like 7 of 25 targets. 12 uncatchable or drops One step separation I think they care more about the last one than the actual completions. Is the player in position? Is the player making the play? Tackle, breakup when possible, etc)
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Sept 28, 2019 8:09:05 GMT -5
Since you guys are talking about snap counts and all I want to point at this years D.
Talk about depth, their are over 20 guys who have had significant snaps thru 3 games. How good will they end up being, how long? They play a lot of bad offensive teams.
A lot more fun to watch than the bend don't break D also.
|
|
|
Post by ryan24 on Sept 28, 2019 9:56:04 GMT -5
Any predictions on final score tomorrow? Neither team has played anyone any good. 1-17 records combined. Bills D is very good. Be interesting to see how much TB gets hit.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Sept 28, 2019 11:02:14 GMT -5
Any predictions on final score tomorrow? Neither team has played anyone any good. 1-17 records combined. Bills D is very good. Be interesting to see how much TB gets hit. 16-10 patriots
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Sept 28, 2019 11:26:35 GMT -5
Any predictions on final score tomorrow? Neither team has played anyone any good. 1-17 records combined. Bills D is very good. Be interesting to see how much TB gets hit. The Bills don't have the offense to keep up with the Pats. That defense really is legit though, Tremaine Edmunds is an animal.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Sept 28, 2019 12:43:33 GMT -5
34-10
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Sept 28, 2019 14:48:13 GMT -5
I can't wait for the game as Josh Allen has really started to impress me. He still makes a ton of mistakes, but Brown, Beasley, and Knox have given him weapons and he's making a bunch of plays. I want to see what a strong armed QB with some weapons can do against our D, while also being a running threat.
|
|
|
Post by ryan24 on Sept 28, 2019 18:21:47 GMT -5
Pats catch a break here. Not playing the game in December.
|
|
|
Post by ryan24 on Sept 28, 2019 18:25:41 GMT -5
Also got a break not playing the fins in December. course as bad has the fins are probably would not make a diff.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Sept 28, 2019 20:35:47 GMT -5
the Bills will have 3 turnovers and the Pats will cruise
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Sept 29, 2019 0:58:38 GMT -5
Also got a break not playing the fins in December. course as bad has the fins are probably would not make a diff. Wait, I'm confused. Why wouldn't they want to face the fins in december?
|
|
|
Post by marrcus on Sept 29, 2019 1:29:22 GMT -5
"16-10 patriots " I hope that score doesn't include a missed PAT.
24-16 Pats sounds ok and yes I assume the kicking game is where it should be.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Sept 29, 2019 10:01:30 GMT -5
Sounds like Edleman is a go. Burkhead traveled with the team, but the thoughts are that Michel will get more touches than usual so he may not play or will be limited.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Sept 29, 2019 10:35:01 GMT -5
No Hightower
This game could be closer than I thought.
|
|