SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Patriots 2022 Offseason Thread
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jan 18, 2022 11:32:10 GMT -5
It's all about Mac Jones. Getting the pieces he can grow with, don't pull a Brady and not give him the weapons he needs.
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Jan 18, 2022 11:52:38 GMT -5
I posit that it’s more important to build up the defense so that Mac isn’t forced into as many come-from-behind situations than it is to acquire offensive skill position players. Mac is not ready at this point in his career to consistently throw 30+ times a game in shootouts. He may never have the arm strength to be the guy you want throwing deep outside the numbers consistently. They had success in 2021 by not putting too much on him and leading with a strong run game and defense. They should continue that formula next year.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,044
|
Post by mobaz on Jan 18, 2022 13:00:57 GMT -5
www.espn.com/nfl/insider/insider/story/_/id/33087396/nfl-exec-predictions-2022-quarterback-shuffling-trades-coach-changes-future-teams-aaron-rodgers-russell-wilsonJeremy Fowler ($) rumblings from executives on 2022. One of note: I'd do a 2023 2nd converting to a 1st, if there's a decent chance he's recharged. He's due $11M as a 5th year option and then needs a new contract too though. He'd slot into Agholor's space in 2023 but they'd be a combined $26M cap hit in 2022. Can only save $5m of $15m cap by cutting Agholor, can save $10m by trading him (somehow). I'd mostly feel better with Ridley at full freight than a rookie at pick 21 given the league wide crapshoot for WRs. Mac was better with Agholor on the field than not (can't find the split I saw before Saturday's game) but certainly didn't translate to touches for Nelson.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jan 18, 2022 16:45:01 GMT -5
I was talking about the draft, not free agency. I go heavy on offense in the draft, then heavy on D in free agency.
The cap situation is a little confusing. I've seen 27 million multiple times, so that's what I had in my head. Yet Sportrac has when around 18 million and Pats cap is 2.5 million. Yet Pats cap is doing come crazy things, like counting all salaries, not just the top 51 which makes zero sense. Yet he makes some good points, like Myers is likely 4 million, which caught me by surprise.
Can you post June 1st McCourty, how does that work? That's the difference in 2 to 6 million. If it's 18, with 6 million for McCourty then I take back my previous statements on the cap.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jan 19, 2022 7:07:08 GMT -5
Brady always had weapons here, at least from 2007 onward. You can argue once Gronk quit they didn’t have enough, but we can’t say the Patriots didn’t give Brady weapons. In fact, he always had 2-3 ELITE pass catchers at their positions.
Moss/Welker w/ Faulk as a RB Transitioned to
Welker/Gronk/Hernandez
Transitioned to
Gronk/Edelman supported by backs like Vareen and White
They failed to add another guy soon enough and then Gronk quit and Edelmans knees gave out.
But make no mistake those were Elite pass catchers in their roles. They just didn’t have the traditional guy other than Moss, but that was part of their genius, they exploited the salary restrictions of the slot, TE and pass catching back as well as the matchups for those guys.
So all that being said, I’m finally on board with UMASS that they need to get Mac a REAL weapon.
However, I agree with JMEI that this defense needs an overhaul and needs a lot of focus.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jan 19, 2022 7:56:51 GMT -5
I was talking about the draft, not free agency. I go heavy on offense in the draft, then heavy on D in free agency. The cap situation is a little confusing. I've seen 27 million multiple times, so that's what I had in my head. Yet Sportrac has when around 18 million and Pats cap is 2.5 million. Yet Pats cap is doing come crazy things, like counting all salaries, not just the top 51 which makes zero sense. Yet he makes some good points, like Myers is likely 4 million, which caught me by surprise. Can you post June 1st McCourty, how does that work? That's the difference in 2 to 6 million. If it's 18, with 6 million for McCourty then I take back my previous statements on the cap. I'm not sure that's true. Pats Cap indicated that he's counting only Top 51 for 2022. He has a post that indicates all the reasons he is differing from others.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,044
|
Post by mobaz on Jan 19, 2022 10:03:15 GMT -5
Kiper mock is up ($) www.espn.com/nfl/insider/draft2022/insider/story/_/id/33093803/nfl-mock-draft-2022-mel-kiper-predictions-all-32-first-round-picks-teams-aidan-hutchinson-malik-willis-nakobe-deanOf interest to me, where did WR go? 10. NY Jets, Drake London, WR, USC 13. Cleveland, Garrett Wilson, WR, Ohio State 19. Philly, Chris Olave, WR, Ohio State (If Philly takes a WR for the 3rd year in a row...) 21. Patriots, Jameson Williams, WR, Alabama (YESSS PLEASE, but even with ACL doubt he falls this far)
26. Miami, Jahan Dotson, WR, Penn State (If Miami takes a WR again...) And again, thank the heavens we aren't looking for a QB this year; the FA/Trade market might be more ripe but the draft is tough. I like Pickett and Corral but wouldn't bet my next 3 years on them being effective starters. Mel has Willis at 11 (WFT), Pickett at 18 (NO), Corral at 20 (PITT) and Howell at 28 (Det). Seems like he's just matching up clear needs with guys available.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,044
|
Post by mobaz on Jan 19, 2022 10:28:03 GMT -5
Kiper mock is up ($) www.espn.com/nfl/insider/draft2022/insider/story/_/id/33093803/nfl-mock-draft-2022-mel-kiper-predictions-all-32-first-round-picks-teams-aidan-hutchinson-malik-willis-nakobe-deanOf interest to me, where did WR go? 10. NY Jets, Drake London, WR, USC 13. Cleveland, Garrett Wilson, WR, Ohio State 19. Philly, Chris Olave, WR, Ohio State (If Philly takes a WR for the 3rd year in a row...) 21. Patriots, Jameson Williams, WR, Alabama (YESSS PLEASE, but even with ACL doubt he falls this far)
26. Miami, Jahan Dotson, WR, Penn State (If Miami takes a WR again...) And again, thank the heavens we aren't looking for a QB this year; the FA/Trade market might be more ripe but the draft is tough. I like Pickett and Corral but wouldn't bet my next 3 years on them being effective starters. Mel has Willis at 11 (WFT), Pickett at 18 (NO), Corral at 20 (PITT) and Howell at 28 (Det). Seems like he's just matching up clear needs with guys available. Must be Mock Day. Brugler ($) with 2 rounds. theathletic.com/3075920/2022/01/19/two-round-2022-nfl-mock-draft-dane-bruglers-mock-2-0-has-a-new-no-1-pick-and-more-surprises/Same exercise: 10. NY Jets — Garrett Wilson, WR, Ohio State 13. Cleveland — Treylon Burks, WR, Arkansas (I'd love him for the Pats too) **Pats go with Nakobe Dean, LB, Georgia**22. Las Vegas Raiders — Drake London, WR, USC 27. Buffalo Bills — Jameson Williams, WR, Alabama (ooof, not good for us) 28. Detroit Lions (from Los Angeles) — Chris Olave, WR, Ohio State 31. Tennessee Titans — Jahan Dotson, WR, Penn State 39. Chicago Bears — George Pickens, WR, Georgia 49. New Orleans Saints — Jalen Tolbert, WR, South Alabama 54. New England Patriots — John Metchie, WR, Alabama (I worry he doesn't move the needle enough)63. Atlanta Falcons (from Tennessee) — David Bell, WR, Purdue
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jan 19, 2022 11:53:47 GMT -5
Kiper mock is up ($) www.espn.com/nfl/insider/draft2022/insider/story/_/id/33093803/nfl-mock-draft-2022-mel-kiper-predictions-all-32-first-round-picks-teams-aidan-hutchinson-malik-willis-nakobe-deanOf interest to me, where did WR go? 10. NY Jets, Drake London, WR, USC 13. Cleveland, Garrett Wilson, WR, Ohio State 19. Philly, Chris Olave, WR, Ohio State (If Philly takes a WR for the 3rd year in a row...) 21. Patriots, Jameson Williams, WR, Alabama (YESSS PLEASE, but even with ACL doubt he falls this far)
26. Miami, Jahan Dotson, WR, Penn State (If Miami takes a WR again...) And again, thank the heavens we aren't looking for a QB this year; the FA/Trade market might be more ripe but the draft is tough. I like Pickett and Corral but wouldn't bet my next 3 years on them being effective starters. Mel has Willis at 11 (WFT), Pickett at 18 (NO), Corral at 20 (PITT) and Howell at 28 (Det). Seems like he's just matching up clear needs with guys available. Must be Mock Day. Brugler ($) with 2 rounds. theathletic.com/3075920/2022/01/19/two-round-2022-nfl-mock-draft-dane-bruglers-mock-2-0-has-a-new-no-1-pick-and-more-surprises/Same exercise: 10. NY Jets — Garrett Wilson, WR, Ohio State 13. Cleveland — Treylon Burks, WR, Arkansas (I'd love him for the Pats too) **Pats go with Nakobe Dean, LB, Georgia**22. Las Vegas Raiders — Drake London, WR, USC 27. Buffalo Bills — Jameson Williams, WR, Alabama (ooof, not good for us) 28. Detroit Lions (from Los Angeles) — Chris Olave, WR, Ohio State 31. Tennessee Titans — Jahan Dotson, WR, Penn State 39. Chicago Bears — George Pickens, WR, Georgia 49. New Orleans Saints — Jalen Tolbert, WR, South Alabama 54. New England Patriots — John Metchie, WR, Alabama (I worry he doesn't move the needle enough)63. Atlanta Falcons (from Tennessee) — David Bell, WR, Purdue I’d love Metchie there.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jan 19, 2022 12:28:23 GMT -5
Brady always had weapons here, at least from 2007 onward. You can argue once Gronk quit they didn’t have enough, but we can’t say the Patriots didn’t give Brady weapons. In fact, he always had 2-3 ELITE pass catchers at their positions. Moss/Welker w/ Faulk as a RB Transitioned to Welker/Gronk/Hernandez Transitioned to Gronk/Edelman supported by backs like Vareen and White They failed to add another guy soon enough and then Gronk quit and Edelmans knees gave out. But make no mistake those were Elite pass catchers in their roles. They just didn’t have the traditional guy other than Moss, but that was part of their genius, they exploited the salary restrictions of the slot, TE and pass catching back as well as the matchups for those guys. So all that being said, I’m finally on board with UMASS that they need to get Mac a REAL weapon. However, I agree with JMEI that this defense needs an overhaul and needs a lot of focus. I'm talking about Bradys early years and then the last few when they traded Cooks. Brady spent about half his career with so so weapons. Mac Jones right now has no elite weapons, there's no one that will become an elite weapon either. It's early, I've barely even started to scout the draft so I could easily change my mind, yet if a guy like Dotson is there at 21 I take him. Then go CB/free safety second, then OG or a guy like Kyren Williams RB a perfect fit. I'm not really worried about the D as long as you can resign Jackson. No team in the NFL looks good when missing their #2 and #3 CBs. You have a long list of young guys that can get better and guys like Perkins, Wade and McGrone that basically didn't play. I basically believe Phillips in that the talent is much better than they showed.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jan 19, 2022 12:34:45 GMT -5
I was talking about the draft, not free agency. I go heavy on offense in the draft, then heavy on D in free agency. The cap situation is a little confusing. I've seen 27 million multiple times, so that's what I had in my head. Yet Sportrac has when around 18 million and Pats cap is 2.5 million. Yet Pats cap is doing come crazy things, like counting all salaries, not just the top 51 which makes zero sense. Yet he makes some good points, like Myers is likely 4 million, which caught me by surprise. Can you post June 1st McCourty, how does that work? That's the difference in 2 to 6 million. If it's 18, with 6 million for McCourty then I take back my previous statements on the cap. I'm not sure that's true. Pats Cap indicated that he's counting only Top 51 for 2022. He has a post that indicates all the reasons he is differing from others. Yeah he just added that because he was being called out, go read his earlier posts. He's talking about his number being lower because of future contracts, they don't matter unless they are in the top 51 and that's not going to be the case. He has Jake Bailey at $4 million, that's just crazy. He's counting signing Meyers at $4 million. He makes some very good points, yet he's making moves and transactions not just looking at cap space.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,044
|
Post by mobaz on Jan 19, 2022 12:35:35 GMT -5
Must be Mock Day. Brugler ($) with 2 rounds. theathletic.com/3075920/2022/01/19/two-round-2022-nfl-mock-draft-dane-bruglers-mock-2-0-has-a-new-no-1-pick-and-more-surprises/Same exercise: 10. NY Jets — Garrett Wilson, WR, Ohio State 13. Cleveland — Treylon Burks, WR, Arkansas (I'd love him for the Pats too) **Pats go with Nakobe Dean, LB, Georgia**22. Las Vegas Raiders — Drake London, WR, USC 27. Buffalo Bills — Jameson Williams, WR, Alabama (ooof, not good for us) 28. Detroit Lions (from Los Angeles) — Chris Olave, WR, Ohio State 31. Tennessee Titans — Jahan Dotson, WR, Penn State 39. Chicago Bears — George Pickens, WR, Georgia 49. New Orleans Saints — Jalen Tolbert, WR, South Alabama 54. New England Patriots — John Metchie, WR, Alabama (I worry he doesn't move the needle enough)63. Atlanta Falcons (from Tennessee) — David Bell, WR, Purdue I’d love Metchie there. I think I'd rather Bell than Metchie if they wait until the 2nd round. Brugler's type of outcome is pretty solid, but I think Burks, London and Williams could singlehandedly change this team and don't feel the same about any other receiver. None of the receivers are as good as Chase last year, but could easily be a few better than Waddle or Smith.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jan 19, 2022 12:43:03 GMT -5
I think I'd rather Bell than Metchie if they wait until the 2nd round. Brugler's type of outcome is pretty solid, but I think Burks, London and Williams could singlehandedly change this team and don't feel the same about any other receiver. None of the receivers are as good as Chase last year, but could easily be a few better than Waddle or Smith. Isn't Bell a slow possession WR?
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jan 19, 2022 13:25:38 GMT -5
But which of Miguel's numbers are wrong. The only thing I don't know about is Bailey's incentive clause. Do you know that to be wrong? It's a big number that I'd expect to get reworked but it doesn't seem like he's making that up.
Myers getting the 2nd round tender is a virtual lock so why not use it the projection? Jakob getting Right of First Refusal as well seems like a good bet. He recently removed Gunner's tender. All makes sense.
DMac's contract voids so there is no Post June designation. He's off the team with 6.45 in dead money unless/until a re-work is done. He's also wouldn't be Top 51 for that reason. So it looks like Spotrac is counting 1 less of the future salaries than Miguel.
And on the Top 51, is correcting a mistake (if that's what happened) some sort of weakness in your mind?
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,044
|
Post by mobaz on Jan 19, 2022 14:28:34 GMT -5
I think I'd rather Bell than Metchie if they wait until the 2nd round. Brugler's type of outcome is pretty solid, but I think Burks, London and Williams could singlehandedly change this team and don't feel the same about any other receiver. None of the receivers are as good as Chase last year, but could easily be a few better than Waddle or Smith. Isn't Bell a slow possession WR? Pretty much, but he does that well. I feel like Metchie was a product of opportunity more than talent; SOMEONE had to catch all those balls in Billy O's O. But hence me aiming higher than either of them.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jan 19, 2022 14:51:21 GMT -5
But which of Miguel's numbers are wrong. The only thing I don't know about is Bailey's incentive clause. Do you know that to be wrong? It's a big number that I'd expect to get reworked but it doesn't seem like he's making that up. Myers getting the 2nd round tender is a virtual lock so why not use it the projection? Jakob getting Right of First Refusal as well seems like a good bet. He recently removed Gunner's tender. All makes sense. DMac's contract voids so there is no Post June designation. He's off the team with 6.45 in dead money unless/until a re-work is done. He's also wouldn't be Top 51 for that reason. So it looks like Spotrac is counting 1 less of the future salaries than Miguel. And on the Top 51, is correcting a mistake (if that's what happened) some sort of weakness in your mind? If you make a pro bowl, you get level three which is equal to a 2nd round tender. So no that number isn't wrong. It's the he starts making moves like giving out tenders. You can say likely right? Well it's a slam dunk Bailey isn't going to be paid 4 million, the money isn't guaranteed and what a stupid rule treating all players that make the pro bowl as equals. If you are reporting cap numbers, report cap numbers, then you can do a second piece with moves you see as likely, which for me isn't Bailey at 4 million. He's saying the rework needs to be done before it expires. It was poorly written and would confuse the hell out of normal people that have just a basic understanding of the NFL cap. It's why he came back with another post stating he was only using the top 51, because given his first post it comes off that he wasn't. He knows his stuff, yet his delivery needs work.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jan 19, 2022 15:18:24 GMT -5
Isn't Bell a slow possession WR? Pretty much, but he does that well. I feel like Metchie was a product of opportunity more than talent; SOMEONE had to catch all those balls in Billy O's O. But hence me aiming higher than either of them. I wait for the athletic testing on a bunch of guys at WR, guys like Dotson not so much. Yet Metchie was a hot pick to be in the first this year after last year. As the third WR for Bama with Mac Jones at QB he had 55 catches 916 yards 6 TDs and a 16.7 average per catch. Add in his scouting reports talk about great speed at all three levels, the kind of speed that doesn't get caught from behind and that he's a very good route runner, I'm highly intrigued if you can get him in the second round. I stay away from possession receivers that lack speed, yet I'll admit I know very little about Bell right now. This team needs weapons that scare teams and open up the field. The fact Mac Jones played two years with Metchie is huge in my book and the fact Mac was able to make him look a lot better. With Mac Jones he looked like a big play weapon, this year his numbers look like a possession WR. Late round sleeper Kevin Austin Jr from Notre Dame. Only one year of production on a red shirt senior isn't good. Yet he's that big WR with great athletic ability and speed. He's currently no where, Walter football doesn't even have him ranked. Yet he's going to blow up the combine like Claypool. If he's there in the 4th and 5th rounds you need to gamble on guys like him. Yeah he's risky, yet his upside is rather big. I've seen 7th round grades on him, might be the most underrated WR in this class.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,044
|
Post by mobaz on Jan 19, 2022 16:16:01 GMT -5
Pretty much, but he does that well. I feel like Metchie was a product of opportunity more than talent; SOMEONE had to catch all those balls in Billy O's O. But hence me aiming higher than either of them. I wait for the athletic testing on a bunch of guys at WR, guys like Dotson not so much. Yet Metchie was a hot pick to be in the first this year after last year. As the third WR for Bama with Mac Jones at QB he had 55 catches 916 yards 6 TDs and a 16.7 average per catch. Add in his scouting reports talk about great speed at all three levels, the kind of speed that doesn't get caught from behind and that he's a very good route runner, I'm highly intrigued if you can get him in the second round. I stay away from possession receivers that lack speed, yet I'll admit I know very little about Bell right now.
This team needs weapons that scare teams and open up the field. The fact Mac Jones played two years with Metchie is huge in my book and the fact Mac was able to make him look a lot better. With Mac Jones he looked like a big play weapon, this year his numbers look like a possession WR. Late round sleeper Kevin Austin Jr from Notre Dame. Only one year of production on a red shirt senior isn't good. Yet he's that big WR with great athletic ability and speed. He's currently no where, Walter football doesn't even have him ranked. Yet he's going to blow up the combine like Claypool. If he's there in the 4th and 5th rounds you need to gamble on guys like him. Yeah he's risky, yet his upside is rather big. I've seen 7th round grades on him, might be the most underrated WR in this class. Bell has two things I like: a ridiculous freshman year and a lot of buzz last year of folks watching Rondale Moore and saying "isn't Bell really the star here?". I like guys that pop on tape unexpectedly. But athletic testing will be big, obv. Anyway, long way to go!
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jan 19, 2022 20:30:35 GMT -5
But which of Miguel's numbers are wrong. The only thing I don't know about is Bailey's incentive clause. Do you know that to be wrong? It's a big number that I'd expect to get reworked but it doesn't seem like he's making that up. Myers getting the 2nd round tender is a virtual lock so why not use it the projection? Jakob getting Right of First Refusal as well seems like a good bet. He recently removed Gunner's tender. All makes sense. DMac's contract voids so there is no Post June designation. He's off the team with 6.45 in dead money unless/until a re-work is done. He's also wouldn't be Top 51 for that reason. So it looks like Spotrac is counting 1 less of the future salaries than Miguel. And on the Top 51, is correcting a mistake (if that's what happened) some sort of weakness in your mind? If you make a pro bowl, you get level three which is equal to a 2nd round tender. So no that number isn't wrong. It's the he starts making moves like giving out tenders. You can say likely right? Well it's a slam dunk Bailey isn't going to be paid 4 million, the money isn't guaranteed and what a stupid rule treating all players that make the pro bowl as equals. If you are reporting cap numbers, report cap numbers, then you can do a second piece with moves you see as likely, which for me isn't Bailey at 4 million. He's saying the rework needs to be done before it expires. It was poorly written and would confuse the hell out of normal people that have just a basic understanding of the NFL cap. It's why he came back with another post stating he was only using the top 51, because given his first post it comes off that he wasn't. He knows his stuff, yet his delivery needs work. But it's a projection. He's clearly stating that. He's doing all the work that CAN be done prior to the new league yr. The only one that is also likely but CANT be done without other transactions being made (a deal or tag for JC). Meanwhile, the ONLY way Spotracs can be true is if NE reworks DMacs deal in such a way that, purely by coincidence, gives him the exact cap hit of his current deal of it were NOT automatically voiding. So yes, he's giving us what the cap space will likely be at the start of the new league year given: 1. What we KNOW to be true. 2. What is VERY likely (tender for RFAs) 3. No "illegal" moves (tagging JC without the space to do so). Feels like that is a more useful # than 1 that uses a cap hit like that for DMac when, even if it was reworked would likely not result in that number. FWIW, until the league posted the official carryover, Spotrac was using a number that also had 0 chance of happening.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jan 20, 2022 0:23:36 GMT -5
If you make a pro bowl, you get level three which is equal to a 2nd round tender. So no that number isn't wrong. It's the he starts making moves like giving out tenders. You can say likely right? Well it's a slam dunk Bailey isn't going to be paid 4 million, the money isn't guaranteed and what a stupid rule treating all players that make the pro bowl as equals. If you are reporting cap numbers, report cap numbers, then you can do a second piece with moves you see as likely, which for me isn't Bailey at 4 million. He's saying the rework needs to be done before it expires. It was poorly written and would confuse the hell out of normal people that have just a basic understanding of the NFL cap. It's why he came back with another post stating he was only using the top 51, because given his first post it comes off that he wasn't. He knows his stuff, yet his delivery needs work. But it's a projection. He's clearly stating that. He's doing all the work that CAN be done prior to the new league yr. The only one that is also likely but CANT be done without other transactions being made (a deal or tag for JC). Meanwhile, the ONLY way Spotracs can be true is if NE reworks DMacs deal in such a way that, purely by coincidence, gives him the exact cap hit of his current deal of it were NOT automatically voiding. So yes, he's giving us what the cap space will likely be at the start of the new league year given: 1. What we KNOW to be true. 2. What is VERY likely (tender for RFAs) 3. No "illegal" moves (tagging JC without the space to do so). Feels like that is a more useful # than 1 that uses a cap hit like that for DMac when, even if it was reworked would likely not result in that number. FWIW, until the league posted the official carryover, Spotrac was using a number that also had 0 chance of happening. Umm he's saying that's not true though, if McCourty redoes his deal before it voids those amounts stay the same, add in the new deal. They only reach 6 plus million without a new deal. Sportrac just like with Brady waits, no new deal they change the data as it happens. He says you can tag Jackson without the cap space, as long as you get under for the start of the new year. He actually predicts they will tag him without a new deal. First tweet he shows the Patriots cap space, you have to spend 20 minutes reading like a 100 tweets before you figure out its a prediction, not the actual number. I guess I don't see the point when he's not including a guy like Jackson, then predicting the Patriots will tag him. It's just confusing and it's a shame given he has the best numbers. It comes off he predicts McCourty not to resign, is that likely?
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jan 20, 2022 6:49:17 GMT -5
Id love to see this team add more speed, they need to on both sides of the ball. One free agent to watch is Isaiah McKenzie. He’s a free agent and torched the Patriots this year. He won’t get a big contract so he’s a legit target here. He’s also a kick and punt returner. Move on from Gunner and sign him, opens a roster spot for a real WR that does what Gunner does and then you can carry a rookie to develop as well.
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Jan 20, 2022 7:02:51 GMT -5
I don’t have any real confidence that a rookie wide receiver would come in and have an impact right away. The offensive system remains tough on WRs, with a lot of verbiage, checks at the line, etc. that most college WRs aren’t used to. Would rather they spend their draft capital elsewhere.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jan 20, 2022 7:19:55 GMT -5
But it's a projection. He's clearly stating that. He's doing all the work that CAN be done prior to the new league yr. The only one that is also likely but CANT be done without other transactions being made (a deal or tag for JC). Meanwhile, the ONLY way Spotracs can be true is if NE reworks DMacs deal in such a way that, purely by coincidence, gives him the exact cap hit of his current deal of it were NOT automatically voiding. So yes, he's giving us what the cap space will likely be at the start of the new league year given: 1. What we KNOW to be true. 2. What is VERY likely (tender for RFAs) 3. No "illegal" moves (tagging JC without the space to do so). Feels like that is a more useful # than 1 that uses a cap hit like that for DMac when, even if it was reworked would likely not result in that number. FWIW, until the league posted the official carryover, Spotrac was using a number that also had 0 chance of happening. Umm he's saying that's not true though, if McCourty redoes his deal before it voids those amounts stay the same, add in the new deal. They only reach 6 plus million without a new deal. Sportrac just like with Brady waits, no new deal they change the data as it happens. He says you can tag Jackson without the cap space, as long as you get under for the start of the new year. He actually predicts they will tag him without a new deal. First tweet he shows the Patriots cap space, you have to spend 20 minutes reading like a 100 tweets before you figure out its a prediction, not the actual number. I guess I don't see the point when he's not including a guy like Jackson, then predicting the Patriots will tag him. It's just confusing and it's a shame given he has the best numbers. It comes off he predicts McCourty not to resign, is that likely? But you're complaining about him "making a transaction" by including the tenders (a one-sided decision that require 0 negotiation) but are for using a number that requires a two-way, negotiated restructuring of a deal? And will still likely not be at that number. That's a tad inconcistent. On Jackson, you CAN'T include him. It's illegal bc they wouldn't have the space to do it without a bunch of moves that are not predictable right now. Listen, use what you want to use. I feel confident that Miguel's is a better projection for where things stand as of now coupled with very reasonable and likely assumptions (and are "if nothing else happens") that are also currently legal (again, if he included a tagged JC, they'd be over the cap which is illegal). When other moves are made (he has 2 podcasts up where he discussed options but I haven't listened yet) he'll update. If those moves put NE in a position to add a tag for JC, I'm sure he'll do so.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,044
|
Post by mobaz on Jan 20, 2022 11:07:10 GMT -5
Most of our negative Jonnu talk was in season thread but want to keep the convo going. Really disappointing.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jan 20, 2022 12:23:54 GMT -5
Umm he's saying that's not true though, if McCourty redoes his deal before it voids those amounts stay the same, add in the new deal. They only reach 6 plus million without a new deal. Sportrac just like with Brady waits, no new deal they change the data as it happens. He says you can tag Jackson without the cap space, as long as you get under for the start of the new year. He actually predicts they will tag him without a new deal. First tweet he shows the Patriots cap space, you have to spend 20 minutes reading like a 100 tweets before you figure out its a prediction, not the actual number. I guess I don't see the point when he's not including a guy like Jackson, then predicting the Patriots will tag him. It's just confusing and it's a shame given he has the best numbers. It comes off he predicts McCourty not to resign, is that likely? But you're complaining about him "making a transaction" by including the tenders (a one-sided decision that require 0 negotiation) but are for using a number that requires a two-way, negotiated restructuring of a deal? And will still likely not be at that number. That's a tad inconcistent. On Jackson, you CAN'T include him. It's illegal bc they wouldn't have the space to do it without a bunch of moves that are not predictable right now. Listen, use what you want to use. I feel confident that Miguel's is a better projection for where things stand as of now coupled with very reasonable and likely assumptions (and are "if nothing else happens") that are also currently legal (again, if he included a tagged JC, they'd be over the cap which is illegal). When other moves are made (he has 2 podcasts up where he discussed options but I haven't listened yet) he'll update. If those moves put NE in a position to add a tag for JC, I'm sure he'll do so. It's simple I want him just reporting the actual cap number as it happens, with zero him playing GM. If he wants to put out a second number with projected moves that's fine. McCourty cap number for example isn't what he claims till it voids. Let's see what happens. It's not illegal, you can go over the cap, as long as you get under for the start of the league year. For the record I have zero issues with him waiting, it's what a cap expert that's reporting a teams cap space should do.
|
|
|