|
Post by iakovos11 on Apr 13, 2022 7:51:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Apr 13, 2022 8:50:23 GMT -5
By process of elimination, Salem will be Cruz or Uberstine, with the other following. I presume the former.
|
|
|
Post by jaffinator on Apr 13, 2022 9:21:22 GMT -5
I know he's not rated highly by the site, but I'm excited to see Chih-Jung Liu this year. At times, he showed stuff that was honestly pretty exciting. Bello is doing it a level higher and a year younger, with his secondaries a touch more advanced, but I'd honestly compare them as smaller guys who play two pretty good secondaries off an electric fb. If Liu's slider ticks up (a huge if admittedly) I wouldn't necessarily even say there was much difference between the two in terms of stuff alone.
That said, the org doesn't seem to have huge plans for him, and I take it from his current ranking that there hasn't been much chatter amongst scouts about him either. Maybe an indication that the professionals don't like him as much, probably for completely reasonable reasons.
|
|
|
Post by RedSoxStats on Apr 13, 2022 9:22:02 GMT -5
Jacob Webb was dominant last night. He has the second-highest swing and miss rate of all minor league pitchers >50 pitches thrown.
|
|
|
Post by iakovos11 on Apr 13, 2022 10:10:49 GMT -5
He's 23 in Low-A. I'd think (hope) that if keeps rolling like this, that he'll be on promotion watch soon. I wonder if if his high 90's velocity is back at all?
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Apr 13, 2022 10:11:51 GMT -5
That video looks like a legit prospect more than an org reliever, regardless of being old for the level.
|
|
|
Post by iakovos11 on Apr 13, 2022 10:14:38 GMT -5
Wasn't trying to knock him for that, just saying I hope gets to the more age appropriate level soon if he keeps looking like this.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Apr 13, 2022 12:06:43 GMT -5
Wasn't trying to knock him for that, just saying I hope gets to the more age appropriate level soon if he keeps looking like this. My post was in response to reading his scouting report, not your post. And I mentioned the age thing because that would be the first response to my post. He looks like a legit arm, not org filler.
|
|
|
Post by iakovos11 on Apr 13, 2022 12:08:50 GMT -5
Groom with 4K's, no BB's and 1 hit through 4 innings. Just 44 pitches.
|
|
|
Post by vermontsox1 on Apr 13, 2022 12:36:41 GMT -5
Groom with 4K's, no BB's and 1 hit through 4 innings. Just 44 pitches. Finished with a line of 5IP 1H 0ER 0BB 4K (49 pitches, 33 strikes)
|
|
cdj
Veteran
Posts: 14,532
|
Post by cdj on Apr 13, 2022 12:38:15 GMT -5
Terrific to see the AA rotation prospects shove
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on Apr 13, 2022 12:50:37 GMT -5
Can't really tell from the video, but I saw Groome throw a couple of 89 MPH fastballs in on the hands of a RHB that might have been a cutter
|
|
|
Post by ramireja on Apr 13, 2022 13:08:35 GMT -5
Going to give a nod to the SP podcast and to Chris and Ian. If you've been listening to the podcast recently, then you would have heard about Jacob Webb already. (They didn't tell me to do this). Nice find fellas!
|
|
|
Post by jaffinator on Apr 13, 2022 13:17:34 GMT -5
Can't really tell from the video, but I saw Groome throw a couple of 89 MPH fastballs in on the hands of a RHB that might have been a cutter The line for the day was pretty good all things considered, but watching it now unless the stuff improves significantly I just don't see the future on him. And that would be the requirement to be an end of the rotation guy. A low 90s fb with secondaries that are above average isn't a winning hand anymore. Obviously, I'm not throwing in the towel on the guy because something always could, but unless something changes in a fairly significant way I just don't see it.
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on Apr 13, 2022 13:51:44 GMT -5
I only watched the first couple innings and had similar thoughts, but then I checked the log and saw he got a bunch of swinging strikes the last 3 innings so I bit my tongue.
|
|
|
Post by jaffinator on Apr 13, 2022 14:11:54 GMT -5
I only watched the first couple innings and had similar thoughts, but then I checked the log and saw he got a bunch of swinging strikes the last 3 innings so I bit my tongue. I'd have to re-watch, but I remember being impressed control wise. Once he established he could dot the fastball and curve, I think he induced some chase. I'd have to watch it again though.
|
|
|
Post by ematz1423 on Apr 13, 2022 14:21:57 GMT -5
Can't really tell from the video, but I saw Groome throw a couple of 89 MPH fastballs in on the hands of a RHB that might have been a cutter The line for the day was pretty good all things considered, but watching it now unless the stuff improves significantly I just don't see the future on him. And that would be the requirement to be an end of the rotation guy. A low 90s fb with secondaries that are above average isn't a winning hand anymore. Obviously, I'm not throwing in the towel on the guy because something always could, but unless something changes in a fairly significant way I just don't see it. Groome has a long way to go but rich hill has carved out quite a nice career with the type of stuff you're describing. An upper 90s fastball is obviously helpful but it's not like it's a necessity to be effective.
|
|
|
Post by James Dunne on Apr 13, 2022 14:26:43 GMT -5
A four-pitch pitcher with command who sits 90-92 can still be a back-end guy. There's not a lot of room for error, but there are still guys out there doing it. With Henry Owens (to use the example that has become almost a trope), it wasn't just that he only threw 89, it's that he consistently left the fastball up where folks could mash it.
|
|
|
Post by jaffinator on Apr 13, 2022 15:02:49 GMT -5
A four-pitch pitcher with command who sits 90-92 can still be a back-end guy. There's not a lot of room for error, but there are still guys out there doing it. With Henry Owens (to use the example that has become almost a trope), it wasn't just that he only threw 89, it's that he consistently left the fastball up where folks could mash it. A four pitch pitcher with that array can, but the question is whether this four pitch pitcher can. The curve is the only secondary he has at the moment that reasonably looks above average. That's gonna put a lot of pressure on the command, and while it was good in this one it wasn't so good that it was mistake-free. There was a fastball in the first that cruised in at 89 that made me cringe. Again, none of this is to say that Groome can't make it. His command will improve even further, and he'll probably be able to iron things like that out complete. But as you noted, the margins there are razor thin. For me, a complete non-expert in a field with many experts, it just doesn't look like enough as-is. Like I said though, he has time to figure some of this stuff out and to add to his arsenal further. We'll see.
|
|
|
Post by jaffinator on Apr 13, 2022 15:05:06 GMT -5
The line for the day was pretty good all things considered, but watching it now unless the stuff improves significantly I just don't see the future on him. And that would be the requirement to be an end of the rotation guy. A low 90s fb with secondaries that are above average isn't a winning hand anymore. Obviously, I'm not throwing in the towel on the guy because something always could, but unless something changes in a fairly significant way I just don't see it. Groome has a long way to go but rich hill has carved out quite a nice career with the type of stuff you're describing. An upper 90s fastball is obviously helpful but it's not like it's a necessity to be effective. Hill's curveball is comfortably plus and I probably would have called plus-plus in his best years. I agree that an upper 90s fb isn't necessary, but it's a tough world out there without it and without a top tier secondary to hang your hat on.
|
|
|
Post by iakovos11 on Apr 13, 2022 15:11:44 GMT -5
I wonder if his velocity is still 90-92? If so, can he get it back to that 92-94 range pre-TJ. That could make difference.
I like the fact that he's still striking guys out. He did last year in AA and that continued today, 4K's in 5IP, not Walter or Bello, but not bad.
|
|
|
Post by jaffinator on Apr 13, 2022 15:17:40 GMT -5
I wonder if his velocity is still 90-92? If so, can he get it back to that 92-94 range pre-TJ. That could make difference. I like the fact that he's still striking guys out. He did last year in AA and that continued today, 4K's in 5IP, not Walter or Bello, but not bad. The highest I saw him on the gun today was 93, but I could have easily missed something. To be fair to the guy, Harrisburg looked ridiculously overmatched. Groome was totally in control, and while there was a hard hit out or two, the one hit was a weak grounder that he picked off first base iirc. The man never had to take things out of cruise control at all. Just thinking about where things go from here. edit: I actually thought he looked more "comfortable" overall than Bello did. But "comfort" is not really a predictive metric.
|
|
|
Post by James Dunne on Apr 13, 2022 15:48:40 GMT -5
When Groome's landing his follow-through right, his delivery looks very low-effort in a good way. He's consistently very smooth in the upper body, things can get a little weird with the legs sometimes. Definitely looks more like a starter's delivery than Bello, who has more moving parts and looks like he whips his arm a little more.
Groome topping out around 93 sounds right.
|
|
|
Post by ematz1423 on Apr 13, 2022 16:05:37 GMT -5
It's also his first start of the year and he's likely not fully stretched out. Wouldn't surprise me if he can gain a consistent tick or two as the season progresses. He's also only 23, so still plenty of room for progression. We've seen plenty of pitchers add velocity as they develop.
|
|
cdj
Veteran
Posts: 14,532
|
Post by cdj on Apr 13, 2022 16:12:03 GMT -5
He’s also massive so he probably gets pretty good extension too. 93 from him is probably gonna look a little different than 93 from a guy who is 6’1
He seems like a backend starter to me
|
|