SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Patriots 2023 Season Thread
cdj
Veteran
Posts: 15,866
|
Post by cdj on Dec 14, 2023 8:44:18 GMT -5
No, I’m saying Kraft seems to have made the decision already and whatever happens from here on out (win or loss) is irrelevant. Not that difficult of a position to ascertain. And lol zappe played 1 good half of football and what happened in the next half? Yet another shutout half, making it 3 of 4. Yeah man it’s really aged super poorly. He’s great lmao. Although you thought he was good when he didn’t get into the red zone the game prior against one of the worst pass defenses in the sport so I guess we must have different standards for qb performance Totally silliness in this thread. Now both Trubisky and Zappe are good nfl QB’s apparently and we were watching the pinnacle of offensive football on Thursday night. 55% completion with 3 td and 3 picks, QBR of 27.2…..what a monster lmao You just always focus on one thing don't you? That article says Kraft is upset that a 2-7 team lost and decides to fire/whatever our long time coach. So you believe Kraft wanted to get meaningless wins over a top draft pick? If that's actually what Kraft did, wow he's an idiot! That article and quotes clearly paint Kraft wanting horrible wins because it's on national TV. If true Kraft should step down and let his son take over. The owner at that point should have been 100% tank! Instead it seems he was 100% win, after losing top players at multiple positions for the year. I've been crystal clear that I view Zappe as a good backup QB, your response is he sucks. My take on how to improve offense is downfield passing, you laugh saying it will be a disaster. Results? Best half in 5 years since Brady. So you truly believe the only way to measure a QB is points? Let me guess you think ERA tells you everything about a pitcher? Difference from first half to 2nd half? The play calling, they stopped calling downfield passing plays. Same crap from last year, Zappe sucks and Mac Jones is better lol. Yeah like I said total silliness in this thread. Scoring zero points and not getting into the red zone is actually good now I guess. That one good half is EVERYTHING vs the majority of the time he has played where he doesn’t move the football. AND LOL at the comparison to ERA. He can’t score points, completes 55% of his passes, has the same amount of picks as touchdowns, and a QBR of 27. I highlighted all those things but yeah I’m basically just saying he has a bad ERA and is bad. Grow up You two need to come back to Earth with this Trubisky/Zappe nonsense. One is a backup no other team wanted. Nobody viewed him as an upgrade on their own backup QB. The other is a backup who gets booed off the field every game. They’re not good. You’re not going to go on a surprise run with them back there. They might beat other backup QBs or bad QBs. Is Zappe better than Mac Jones? Yes, everybody is at this point. He’s also willing to hang in there longer than Mac to deliver a throw with his feet set. But to act like Mac was the only thing wrong with the offense is wild. If the argument is Zappe is good relative to Mac or relative to me personally then sure, go for it! Relative to the rest of the league he is not. He’s a less heralded Chase Daniel At least Matt Flynn got 6 td in a game when people went nuts about him. You’re doing victory laps on one good half followed by a half where the D adjusted and shut him down lmao. Mac Jones played better for a full game against a better QB/team like a month and a half ago (and he’s awful) so plz stop with the “we haven’t seen somebody play like this since Tom!!” Kraft wanted to win this year, they haven’t won. It’s that simple. He could not have been more clear at the beginning of the year. Make it more than that if you want, I’m not getting into one of your silly circular arguments you’re well known for. We’ll see who is coaching to start the year next season. If Belichick is still there then Tom E should get flogged in public. You can have last word if you need it.
|
|
|
Post by costpet on Dec 14, 2023 9:57:08 GMT -5
When Brady was playing, they typically scored 31 points a game. If they did that this year, our record would be 10-2-1, favored to win the SB again. That shows you how good our defense has been. BB has always been a great defensive coach. Nothing has changed there. His priority is always defense and that’s how he’s drafted. However, when it comes to drafting offensive players, it’s hit or miss. He didn’t even want to draft Brady, but was forced to by one of his coaches. He drafted Brady in the 6th round just to shut up the coach (Dick Rubien). That’s lucky drafting, not intelligent drafting. All this means is that the game has changed. All the rules favor the offense now and BB is old school. He’s too old to change his ways and his record is showing that. If Mayo is the next coach, they will still have a good defense. But, offense had better be a priority or we’ll just keep losing forever and forever.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Dec 14, 2023 11:29:10 GMT -5
By the way, besides rooting for all the teams with 5 wins or less to win their games the rest of the year, we also want to root for all the teams we’ve played to win games as that will help our strength of schedule.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Dec 14, 2023 12:25:06 GMT -5
You just always focus on one thing don't you? That article says Kraft is upset that a 2-7 team lost and decides to fire/whatever our long time coach. So you believe Kraft wanted to get meaningless wins over a top draft pick? If that's actually what Kraft did, wow he's an idiot! That article and quotes clearly paint Kraft wanting horrible wins because it's on national TV. If true Kraft should step down and let his son take over. The owner at that point should have been 100% tank! Instead it seems he was 100% win, after losing top players at multiple positions for the year. I've been crystal clear that I view Zappe as a good backup QB, your response is he sucks. My take on how to improve offense is downfield passing, you laugh saying it will be a disaster. Results? Best half in 5 years since Brady. So you truly believe the only way to measure a QB is points? Let me guess you think ERA tells you everything about a pitcher? Difference from first half to 2nd half? The play calling, they stopped calling downfield passing plays. Same crap from last year, Zappe sucks and Mac Jones is better lol. Yeah like I said total silliness in this thread. Scoring zero points and not getting into the red zone is actually good now I guess. That one good half is EVERYTHING vs the majority of the time he has played where he doesn’t move the football. AND LOL at the comparison to ERA. He can’t score points, completes 55% of his passes, has the same amount of picks as touchdowns, and a QBR of 27. I highlighted all those things but yeah I’m basically just saying he has a bad ERA and is bad. Grow up You two need to come back to Earth with this Trubisky/Zappe nonsense. One is a backup no other team wanted. Nobody viewed him as an upgrade on their own backup QB. The other is a backup who gets booed off the field every game. They’re not good. You’re not going to go on a surprise run with them back there. They might beat other backup QBs or bad QBs. Is Zappe better than Mac Jones? Yes, everybody is at this point. He’s also willing to hang in there longer than Mac to deliver a throw with his feet set. But to act like Mac was the only thing wrong with the offense is wild. If the argument is Zappe is good relative to Mac or relative to me personally then sure, go for it! Relative to the rest of the league he is not. He’s a less heralded Chase Daniel At least Matt Flynn got 6 td in a game when people went nuts about him. You’re doing victory laps on one good half followed by a half where the D adjusted and shut him down lmao. Mac Jones played better for a full game against a better QB/team like a month and a half ago (and he’s awful) so plz stop with the “we haven’t seen somebody play like this since Tom!!” Kraft wanted to win this year, they haven’t won. It’s that simple. He could not have been more clear at the beginning of the year. Make it more than that if you want, I’m not getting into one of your silly circular arguments you’re well known for. We’ll see who is coaching to start the year next season. If Belichick is still there then Tom E should get flogged in public. You can have last word if you need it. Wow, when did I mention Trubisky? You are literally grouping me in with someone saying Trubisky is good starting QB, who literally compared him to Brady. Do you really think we are saying the same thing? If you think last game was a bad performance by a backup QB, that's on you, die on that hill. Major difference saying for example Brian Hoyer at his peak was a good backup QB/fringe starter versus saying he was a good starter. One is true, the other isn't Other teams tried to sign Zappe, I guess you missed that? You forget about last year? There's a reason I didn't start dumping on Mac Jones till Onwenu moved to RT and our OL improved greatly. It was only then that you could truly judge him. You are judging Zappe in games where the OL got man handled, if you think that's fair then that's on you. What I said would happen, happened and again the bar is good backup QB which in the NFL isn't a high bar. You have to agree with that no? Any team in the league would be ecstatic to have its backup QB after only one week of getting starter reps all year put up that performance down 3/4 of the team's best weapons. He went from zero chemistry with Henry and Juju to making huge plays. It was also a crazy short week with a Thursday game. OBR of 115.2, 67.9% completion percentage 3 TDs. Why? AY/A of 9.11. Yeah going deep lol. We can't have a circular argument about Kraft because you simply haven't answered the question once.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Dec 14, 2023 12:42:31 GMT -5
When Brady was playing, they typically scored 31 points a game. If they did that this year, our record would be 10-2-1, favored to win the SB again. That shows you how good our defense has been. BB has always been a great defensive coach. Nothing has changed there. His priority is always defense and that’s how he’s drafted. However, when it comes to drafting offensive players, it’s hit or miss. He didn’t even want to draft Brady, but was forced to by one of his coaches. He drafted Brady in the 6th round just to shut up the coach (Dick Rubien). That’s lucky drafting, not intelligent drafting. All this means is that the game has changed. All the rules favor the offense now and BB is old school. He’s too old to change his ways and his record is showing that. If Mayo is the next coach, they will still have a good defense. But, offense had better be a priority or we’ll just keep losing forever and forever. If you believe that, then why would you hire Mayo? It's the same with people wanting Vrabel, he's very similar to Bill, D, running the ball, etc. Wouldn't you go after a headcoach that's known for offense? A guy that can help you pick out your new QB and make sure he is successful? That's not Mayo or Vrabel, who are literally clones of our current coach. Now I don't fully agree with what you're saying, but wanting to move on from a defense coach given today's NFL makes sense. You just need the new headcoach to be an offensive guy, not a defensive one. You want a guy more like Josh McDaniels than those two. Mayo knows nothing about offense. Vrabel Titans let their star WR leave because they didn't want to pay him, but paid huge money to a RB which is the stupest thing you can do in modern day football. If we are really moving on from Bill, those two choices make zero sense. Go look at the best young offensive coordinators and if you love Mayo so much name him DC.
|
|
|
Post by redsoxfan2 on Dec 14, 2023 13:26:55 GMT -5
When you lose to a bad QB it's embarrassing. Yes, the Texans should be embarrassed. Sometimes everything clicks and they go off, but there's obviously a different feeling to losing to Josh Allen, Patrick Mahomes, or Tua than losing to Mitch Trubisky, Derek Carr, or Tommy Devito. No one is asking for firings in Texas because they've outperformed expectations despite having an embarrassing loss. It happens to everyone, even some of the best Patriots teams (Browns say hi) have had them. When you're good they usually just get called, "trap games".
There's nothing I find more annoying than, "he's better than you". OK, so the bar is being better than a 36 year old IT consultant? I think everyone understands that when they say Mitch Trubisky stinks, they're saying comparatively to the rest of the league. If you wouldn't want him as the QB of the team then you're acknowledging on some level he's not very good.
In regards to Bill vs Vrable/Mayo, here's the difference. Neither of those guys will be the GM which is what really did Bill in these last 4 years. Bill also had a terrible year coaching, though the defense has come around since their gauntlet of terrible QBs. I'm not completely sold on the defense. I thought the Chargers would have been a litmus test, but then they continued their woes against the Broncos. The Chargers also had an insane amount of bad drops. Still, they can beat up mediocre to bad teams better than anyone else right now which is a positive sign. I think the Chiefs and Bills will be another test. I'm aware the Dolphins had a lower ppg against the Patriots than their season average. Still, the main problem is he had a terrible year as both GM and coach, despite the defense turning it around.
They need a good coach. I don't care what side of the ball. If they're going with a defensive minded guy then they need to bring back McDaniels. I think he's perfect for the OC. He's really good at his job and he's been fired twice in embarrassing fashion. You won't need to worry about getting another guru at OC because there's no chance another team hires him as a HC for at least the next decade.
I certainly missed other teams tried to sign Zappe. When was this? He was freely available to every team that wanted him at the beginning of the season, but no one claimed him. I personally would have claimed him if I were another team who had questions at QB. I don't think Matt Corral would have been brought in if the Patriots believed in Zappe, let alone the waiving him. I'm just curious about when teams tried to sign him?
|
|
|
Post by costpet on Dec 14, 2023 14:17:15 GMT -5
I’m not saying Kraft SHOULD hire Mayo, I’m just saying Kraft indicated to Mayo back when he was looking for a head coaching job, that he would succeed BB when the time came. Mayo saw it as a promise and Kraft keeps his promises. BB coaching is not the problem. BB GMing is the problem. Give BB great players and he’ll do great things with them. The trouble is that BB can’t pick them for himself. Anyway, if BB is let go, I think Mayo is the next head coach with a new GM in place.
|
|
|
Post by benogliviesbrother on Dec 14, 2023 14:19:27 GMT -5
When you lose to a bad QB it's embarrassing. Yes, the Texans should be embarrassed. Sometimes everything clicks and they go off, but there's obviously a different feeling to losing to Josh Allen, Patrick Mahomes, or Tua than losing to Mitch Trubisky, Derek Carr, or Tommy Devito. No one is asking for firings in Texas because they've outperformed expectations despite having an embarrassing loss. It happens to everyone, even some of the best Patriots teams (Browns say hi) have had them. When you're good they usually just get called, "trap games". There's nothing I find more annoying than, "he's better than you". OK, so the bar is being better than a 36 year old IT consultant? I think everyone understands that when they say Mitch Trubisky stinks, they're saying comparatively to the rest of the league. If you wouldn't want him as the QB of the team then you're acknowledging on some level he's not very good. In regards to Bill vs Vrable/Mayo, here's the difference. Neither of those guys will be the GM which is what really did Bill in these last 4 years. Bill also had a terrible year coaching, though the defense has come around since their gauntlet of terrible QBs. I'm not completely sold on the defense. I thought the Chargers would have been a litmus test, but then they continued their woes against the Broncos. The Chargers also had an insane amount of bad drops. Still, they can beat up mediocre to bad teams better than anyone else right now which is a positive sign. I think the Chiefs and Bills will be another test. I'm aware the Dolphins had a lower ppg against the Patriots than their season average. Still, the main problem is he had a terrible year as both GM and coach, despite the defense turning it around. They need a good coach. I don't care what side of the ball. If they're going with a defensive minded guy then they need to bring back McDaniels. I think he's perfect for the OC. He's really good at his job and he's been fired twice in embarrassing fashion. You won't need to worry about getting another guru at OC because there's no chance another team hires him as a HC for at least the next decade. I certainly missed other teams tried to sign Zappe. When was this? He was freely available to every team that wanted him at the beginning of the season, but no one claimed him. I personally would have claimed him if I were another team who had questions at QB. I don't think Matt Corral would have been brought in if the Patriots believed in Zappe, let alone the waiving him. I'm just curious about when teams tried to sign him? My point, again, is this: if they are in the NFL, and especially if they are playing, they DO NOT STINK. They are wildly successful human beings getting paid millions of dollars to play a game. They are WINNING. And what I said was: they (or Mitch, in this case) are more successful at what they do then YOU ARE AT WHAT YOU DO (not as you are at playing football, as some dismissive poster claimed I said upstream). I mean is that so hard to digest? I find it ludicrous for Joe Schmo to say Joe Cool sux? To me it's beyond comical; it's depressing. Like, what are your bonafides to be passing judgement on these professionals? That is not the same as suggesting not being critical -- that's part of sports fandom. But it's the callous spurious mean-spiritedness I find troubling. Plus, it's often proven wrong. Geno Smith was hooted out of NY (for you who are impressed by booing) -- what a bust! Now he's a top 10'ish QB in Seattle. Closer to home: Pat Chung cast off, "stunk" in Philly, resurrected in NE; Jim Plunkett, College Football HoF'er & #1 overall pick, beaten down and almost out in NE but (much later wins two SBs with Raiders; Ninko; Vrabel; Troy Brown -- cut EIGHT times; and the list goes on and on and on ... I'll suggest sports performance is fluid. Some players are getting better, some are not; some are getting worse. Some performances are affected by health, by opponent (scheme or match-up), by coaching, by personal life -- the labels often stuck on players don't fit. Now, that is not to say Mitch = Tom Brady (nor did I suggest such earlier -- gosh, I give you guys plenty to disagree with but could you keep it real and not distort what I actually wrote to try to win your point? -- what I said was through Year 4 of their NFL careers their stats -- passer rating -- were not dissimilar). And this is fact. Not mentioned: Mitch was an effective ball carrier too. So I can on one hand say I would not want Mitch QB'ing my football team while on the other hand recognizing that he has sufficient talent (he is tall, strong, runs well, throws well) to beat my football team. He is also erratic and error-prone, which is why I would not want him as my QB. Plus, stories of locker room issues. But, still, he is a legitimate NFL talent. Btw, Zappe has started four NFL games and won three of them with a passer rating over 100 in those three wins. He seems like a nice enough kid, earnest, a hard worker by most accounts, throws a good enough ball, moves around okay -- can we give him a few more starts before pronouncing HE STINKS? Btw, that Bill didn't want to draft TB story is garbage. Btw, cool stat: over the 20 year run of TB & BB the Patriots ranked 3rd overall in both Defensive EPA & ST EPA. I wonder how many SBs Tommy would have won were me middle of the pack or lower? Btw, TB's Offense did not "average 31 PPG" Years 300 - 400 (< 25 ppg): 5 Years 400 - 495 (< 31 ppg): 9 Years 496 - infinity (31 ppg +): 4 Left out Year 1 (Drew) & Matt Cassel's 2008 year. Tl; dr: Why so much hating on the players?
|
|
|
Post by benogliviesbrother on Dec 14, 2023 14:21:35 GMT -5
I’m not saying Kraft SHOULD hire Mayo, I’m just saying Kraft indicated to Mayo back when he was looking for a head coaching job, that he would succeed BB when the time came. Mayo saw it as a promise and Kraft keeps his promises. BB coaching is not the problem. BB GMing is the problem. Give BB great players and he’ll do great things with them. The trouble is that BB can’t pick them for himself. Anyway, if BB is let go, I think Mayo is the next head coach with a new GM in place. Cite your work please. This sounds like something Bert Breer, or another of his ilk, was "feeling like," or "an impression" he was given.
|
|
|
Post by benogliviesbrother on Dec 14, 2023 14:23:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by costpet on Dec 14, 2023 14:31:05 GMT -5
A couple of years ago Mayo was interviewing for head coaching positions. All of a sudden he withdrew his name and named the DC of the Pats. Every indication was Kraft pulling him aside. I wasn’t there but it was obvious. If he’s not made HC, I want to see Mayo’s reaction.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,044
|
Post by mobaz on Dec 14, 2023 16:58:20 GMT -5
McShay got purged in the giant layoffs this summer. No fanfare for him, but I tended to like Mel's analysis (not showmanship) better than McShay's anyway. But they have a cool crew now doing draft content including Yates. Not deep (i.e. they spend all their effort on 1st round like most outlets, but that's LAME), but at least they are being thoughtful and have their own opinions. And I'm really thinking Daniels is gonna separate himself from the pack and go Top 6 (though I think there's minimal chance he goes above Maye).
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Dec 14, 2023 19:55:47 GMT -5
A couple of years ago Mayo was interviewing for head coaching positions. All of a sudden he withdrew his name and named the DC of the Pats. Every indication was Kraft pulling him aside. I wasn’t there but it was obvious. If he’s not made HC, I want to see Mayo’s reaction. Mayo isn’t the DC. They Patriots don’t have a named DC and Steve Belichick calls the plays.
|
|
|
Post by costpet on Dec 14, 2023 20:03:56 GMT -5
Maybe not officially, but I wonder why he pulled his name out of the head coaching hat so quickly. Something had to have been said. He probably got a good raise whatever was said.
|
|
cdj
Veteran
Posts: 15,866
|
Post by cdj on Dec 14, 2023 22:26:47 GMT -5
Raiders have 49 points at the beginning of the 3rd with their rookie mid round backup QB against the vaunted Chargers Electric Curtain defense who managed to shut the pats out a week and a half ago
This is what an actual good performance against a bad D looks like. Notice the “getting into the red zone” strategy. We should’ve tried that.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Dec 15, 2023 13:14:56 GMT -5
McShay got purged in the giant layoffs this summer. No fanfare for him, but I tended to like Mel's analysis (not showmanship) better than McShay's anyway. But they have a cool crew now doing draft content including Yates. Not deep (i.e. they spend all their effort on 1st round like most outlets, but that's LAME), but at least they are being thoughtful and have their own opinions. And I'm really thinking Daniels is gonna separate himself from the pack and go Top 6 (though I think there's minimal chance he goes above Maye). Not to digress too much but they also had previously hired The Draft Scout (Matt Miller) who provides a lot of good content.
|
|
|
Post by Montana Lemonious-Craig on Dec 15, 2023 14:15:31 GMT -5
Jack Jones’s pick six last night was phenomenal. I know he had an attitude, and I don’t know what happened behind closed doors, but it’s pretty clear he’s a special talent, and it really sucks that he’s not still on the Pats. Also hurts seeing Jakobi Meyers knowing he not only would be the best receiver on the Pats, but also the best QB. Bill really, really, really fahked up by letting him walk. Will never understand it
|
|
|
Post by benogliviesbrother on Dec 15, 2023 14:29:38 GMT -5
McShay got purged in the giant layoffs this summer. No fanfare for him, but I tended to like Mel's analysis (not showmanship) better than McShay's anyway. But they have a cool crew now doing draft content including Yates. Not deep (i.e. they spend all their effort on 1st round like most outlets, but that's LAME), but at least they are being thoughtful and have their own opinions. And I'm really thinking Daniels is gonna separate himself from the pack and go Top 6 (though I think there's minimal chance he goes above Maye). Not to digress too much but they also had previously hired The Draft Scout (Matt Miller) who provides a lot of good content. Yes. Due to needing ESPN+ to watch Bruins, I've read some of him. Seems like he grinds.
|
|
|
Post by redsoxfan2 on Dec 15, 2023 15:54:12 GMT -5
When you lose to a bad QB it's embarrassing. Yes, the Texans should be embarrassed. Sometimes everything clicks and they go off, but there's obviously a different feeling to losing to Josh Allen, Patrick Mahomes, or Tua than losing to Mitch Trubisky, Derek Carr, or Tommy Devito. No one is asking for firings in Texas because they've outperformed expectations despite having an embarrassing loss. It happens to everyone, even some of the best Patriots teams (Browns say hi) have had them. When you're good they usually just get called, "trap games". There's nothing I find more annoying than, "he's better than you". OK, so the bar is being better than a 36 year old IT consultant? I think everyone understands that when they say Mitch Trubisky stinks, they're saying comparatively to the rest of the league. If you wouldn't want him as the QB of the team then you're acknowledging on some level he's not very good. In regards to Bill vs Vrable/Mayo, here's the difference. Neither of those guys will be the GM which is what really did Bill in these last 4 years. Bill also had a terrible year coaching, though the defense has come around since their gauntlet of terrible QBs. I'm not completely sold on the defense. I thought the Chargers would have been a litmus test, but then they continued their woes against the Broncos. The Chargers also had an insane amount of bad drops. Still, they can beat up mediocre to bad teams better than anyone else right now which is a positive sign. I think the Chiefs and Bills will be another test. I'm aware the Dolphins had a lower ppg against the Patriots than their season average. Still, the main problem is he had a terrible year as both GM and coach, despite the defense turning it around. They need a good coach. I don't care what side of the ball. If they're going with a defensive minded guy then they need to bring back McDaniels. I think he's perfect for the OC. He's really good at his job and he's been fired twice in embarrassing fashion. You won't need to worry about getting another guru at OC because there's no chance another team hires him as a HC for at least the next decade. I certainly missed other teams tried to sign Zappe. When was this? He was freely available to every team that wanted him at the beginning of the season, but no one claimed him. I personally would have claimed him if I were another team who had questions at QB. I don't think Matt Corral would have been brought in if the Patriots believed in Zappe, let alone the waiving him. I'm just curious about when teams tried to sign him? My point, again, is this: if they are in the NFL, and especially if they are playing, they DO NOT STINK. They are wildly successful human beings getting paid millions of dollars to play a game. They are WINNING. And what I said was: they (or Mitch, in this case) are more successful at what they do then YOU ARE AT WHAT YOU DO (not as you are at playing football, as some dismissive poster claimed I said upstream). I mean is that so hard to digest? I find it ludicrous for Joe Schmo to say Joe Cool sux? To me it's beyond comical; it's depressing. Like, what are your bonafides to be passing judgement on these professionals? That is not the same as suggesting not being critical -- that's part of sports fandom. But it's the callous spurious mean-spiritedness I find troubling. Plus, it's often proven wrong. Geno Smith was hooted out of NY (for you who are impressed by booing) -- what a bust! Now he's a top 10'ish QB in Seattle. Closer to home: Pat Chung cast off, "stunk" in Philly, resurrected in NE; Jim Plunkett, College Football HoF'er & #1 overall pick, beaten down and almost out in NE but (much later wins two SBs with Raiders; Ninko; Vrabel; Troy Brown -- cut EIGHT times; and the list goes on and on and on ... I'll suggest sports performance is fluid. Some players are getting better, some are not; some are getting worse. Some performances are affected by health, by opponent (scheme or match-up), by coaching, by personal life -- the labels often stuck on players don't fit. Now, that is not to say Mitch = Tom Brady (nor did I suggest such earlier -- gosh, I give you guys plenty to disagree with but could you keep it real and not distort what I actually wrote to try to win your point? -- what I said was through Year 4 of their NFL careers their stats -- passer rating -- were not dissimilar). And this is fact. Not mentioned: Mitch was an effective ball carrier too. So I can on one hand say I would not want Mitch QB'ing my football team while on the other hand recognizing that he has sufficient talent (he is tall, strong, runs well, throws well) to beat my football team. He is also erratic and error-prone, which is why I would not want him as my QB. Plus, stories of locker room issues. But, still, he is a legitimate NFL talent. Btw, Zappe has started four NFL games and won three of them with a passer rating over 100 in those three wins. He seems like a nice enough kid, earnest, a hard worker by most accounts, throws a good enough ball, moves around okay -- can we give him a few more starts before pronouncing HE STINKS? Btw, that Bill didn't want to draft TB story is garbage. Btw, cool stat: over the 20 year run of TB & BB the Patriots ranked 3rd overall in both Defensive EPA & ST EPA. I wonder how many SBs Tommy would have won were me middle of the pack or lower? Btw, TB's Offense did not "average 31 PPG" Years 300 - 400 (< 25 ppg): 5 Years 400 - 495 (< 31 ppg): 9 Years 496 - infinity (31 ppg +): 4 Left out Year 1 (Drew) & Matt Cassel's 2008 year. Tl; dr: Why so much hating on the players? I think most people would understand when saying a guy stinks it's relative to their peers. I would never say Tacko Fall was a good basketball player, but he could beat me at 1-on-1. Tribusky's career hasn't been very good which is why the Bears gave up on him and no NFL team wants him to start for them. He made a plethora of mistakes which cost the Steelers a potential win against the Patriots. Compared to other NFL QBs, yes, he stinks. There are examples of guys who turned their careers around with a change of scenery. That doesn't mean they weren't bad players for their previous clubs. It just means they were able to figure it out elsewhere. If Mac Jones becomes a top 10 QB for the Titans, I'm not going to say he was good with the Patriots. He stunk and got better. Yes, Pat Chung was not good in Philly. It was good for everyone that he left and came back to New England. I agree performance can be fluid and that guys can get better and worse. Geno Smith had a career renaissance, but DK really helps that. I also wouldn't get too excited about him either as PFF doesn't have him as a top 12 QB. CBS sports has him at 15th in the power rankings. Which is still really good for a guy who was discarded! I think he ends up becoming a good backup within the next year or two or goes elsewhere to be a plugin guy until that franchise has a young QB they want to go with. I remember back in the day when the Bills had J.P Losman who was described as the kid with the golden arm and the lead head. Mean, for sure, but somewhat accurate. He had the physical tools to be elite, but like Tribusky, they're too error prone and make too many poor decisions. Losman had a pretty decent season, but for the most part wasn't very good, compared to his peers. I'm at a disagreement with CDJ though on Zappe. I thought his game against the Chargers was alright. He got screwed by a couple of big drops by guys that are not very good compared to their peers. The weather was terrible too. I think he was fine all things considered. Maybe the greatest 0 point game by a QB, ever! Against the Steelers Zappe was able to move the ball at will in the first half. It was fun to watch. I think he lost it a little bit in the 2nd half, but moreso I think Billy O just called plays to not lose the game. It was a very conservative game plan in the 2nd half. I also agree that the Brady store is garbage. If he didn't want Brady, I'm sure he had enough say to sway a GM to pick a different player at 199. I don't think GMs and coaches are going to go to war with one another over a 6th/7th round pick. There was a Jets scout who wanted Brady, but was turned down, but that's a scout. Which is actually interesting to think about that they could have had both.
|
|
|
Post by redsoxfan2 on Dec 15, 2023 16:50:32 GMT -5
Raiders have 49 points at the beginning of the 3rd with their rookie mid round backup QB against the vaunted Chargers Electric Curtain defense who managed to shut the pats out a week and a half ago This is what an actual good performance against a bad D looks like. Notice the “getting into the red zone” strategy. We should’ve tried that. I liked that Jackobi Meyers had a touchdown pass against the Chargers.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Dec 16, 2023 7:40:11 GMT -5
My point, again, is this: if they are in the NFL, and especially if they are playing, they DO NOT STINK. They are wildly successful human beings getting paid millions of dollars to play a game. They are WINNING. And what I said was: they (or Mitch, in this case) are more successful at what they do then YOU ARE AT WHAT YOU DO (not as you are at playing football, as some dismissive poster claimed I said upstream). I mean is that so hard to digest? I find it ludicrous for Joe Schmo to say Joe Cool sux? To me it's beyond comical; it's depressing. Like, what are your bonafides to be passing judgement on these professionals? That is not the same as suggesting not being critical -- that's part of sports fandom. But it's the callous spurious mean-spiritedness I find troubling. Plus, it's often proven wrong. Geno Smith was hooted out of NY (for you who are impressed by booing) -- what a bust! Now he's a top 10'ish QB in Seattle. Closer to home: Pat Chung cast off, "stunk" in Philly, resurrected in NE; Jim Plunkett, College Football HoF'er & #1 overall pick, beaten down and almost out in NE but (much later wins two SBs with Raiders; Ninko; Vrabel; Troy Brown -- cut EIGHT times; and the list goes on and on and on ... I'll suggest sports performance is fluid. Some players are getting better, some are not; some are getting worse. Some performances are affected by health, by opponent (scheme or match-up), by coaching, by personal life -- the labels often stuck on players don't fit. Now, that is not to say Mitch = Tom Brady (nor did I suggest such earlier -- gosh, I give you guys plenty to disagree with but could you keep it real and not distort what I actually wrote to try to win your point? -- what I said was through Year 4 of their NFL careers their stats -- passer rating -- were not dissimilar). And this is fact. Not mentioned: Mitch was an effective ball carrier too. So I can on one hand say I would not want Mitch QB'ing my football team while on the other hand recognizing that he has sufficient talent (he is tall, strong, runs well, throws well) to beat my football team. He is also erratic and error-prone, which is why I would not want him as my QB. Plus, stories of locker room issues. But, still, he is a legitimate NFL talent. Btw, Zappe has started four NFL games and won three of them with a passer rating over 100 in those three wins. He seems like a nice enough kid, earnest, a hard worker by most accounts, throws a good enough ball, moves around okay -- can we give him a few more starts before pronouncing HE STINKS? Btw, that Bill didn't want to draft TB story is garbage. Btw, cool stat: over the 20 year run of TB & BB the Patriots ranked 3rd overall in both Defensive EPA & ST EPA. I wonder how many SBs Tommy would have won were me middle of the pack or lower? Btw, TB's Offense did not "average 31 PPG" Years 300 - 400 (< 25 ppg): 5 Years 400 - 495 (< 31 ppg): 9 Years 496 - infinity (31 ppg +): 4 Left out Year 1 (Drew) & Matt Cassel's 2008 year. Tl; dr: Why so much hating on the players? I think most people would understand when saying a guy stinks it's relative to their peers. I would never say Tacko Fall was a good basketball player, but he could beat me at 1-on-1. Tribusky's career hasn't been very good which is why the Bears gave up on him and no NFL team wants him to start for them. He made a plethora of mistakes which cost the Steelers a potential win against the Patriots. Compared to other NFL QBs, yes, he stinks. There are examples of guys who turned their careers around with a change of scenery. That doesn't mean they weren't bad players for their previous clubs. It just means they were able to figure it out elsewhere. If Mac Jones becomes a top 10 QB for the Titans, I'm not going to say he was good with the Patriots. He stunk and got better. Yes, Pat Chung was not good in Philly. It was good for everyone that he left and came back to New England. I agree performance can be fluid and that guys can get better and worse. Geno Smith had a career renaissance, but DK really helps that. I also wouldn't get too excited about him either as PFF doesn't have him as a top 12 QB. CBS sports has him at 15th in the power rankings. Which is still really good for a guy who was discarded! I think he ends up becoming a good backup within the next year or two or goes elsewhere to be a plugin guy until that franchise has a young QB they want to go with. I remember back in the day when the Bills had J.P Losman who was described as the kid with the golden arm and the lead head. Mean, for sure, but somewhat accurate. He had the physical tools to be elite, but like Tribusky, they're too error prone and make too many poor decisions. Losman had a pretty decent season, but for the most part wasn't very good, compared to his peers. I'm at a disagreement with CDJ though on Zappe. I thought his game against the Chargers was alright. He got screwed by a couple of big drops by guys that are not very good compared to their peers. The weather was terrible too. I think he was fine all things considered. Maybe the greatest 0 point game by a QB, ever! Against the Steelers Zappe was able to move the ball at will in the first half. It was fun to watch. I think he lost it a little bit in the 2nd half, but moreso I think Billy O just called plays to not lose the game. It was a very conservative game plan in the 2nd half. I also agree that the Brady store is garbage. If he didn't want Brady, I'm sure he had enough say to sway a GM to pick a different player at 199. I don't think GMs and coaches are going to go to war with one another over a 6th/7th round pick. There was a Jets scout who wanted Brady, but was turned down, but that's a scout. Which is actually interesting to think about that they could have had both. I think the point is these guys are all NFL QBs so they have talent, their problem is they can’t sustain any level of consistency but one can get hot and that’s just what it is. If the guy is making all the throws and dropping dimes, and the receivers are making great catches, it’s kind of bogus to get mad at the team about that. Sometimes you just run into a guy at the wrong time.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Dec 16, 2023 9:17:09 GMT -5
I’m not feeling well so I was looking forward to today’s NFL games and then I looked at the schedule and I’m not sure I could be less interested.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,044
|
Post by mobaz on Dec 16, 2023 11:54:40 GMT -5
I’m not feeling well so I was looking forward to today’s NFL games and then I looked at the schedule and I’m not sure I could be less interested. Mullens vs Browning, the matchup we've all been waiting for! And another classic showdown in Indy between Minshew and Trubisky! What will Zach Moss have to say about that? The funny thing is all of these teams are in the playoff hunt and have a level of underdog friskiness, so they might actually be good games.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Dec 16, 2023 12:45:31 GMT -5
Wow, just like I said with Chargers, stop Mack, give your QB time and you can shred that D. Imagine watching that and thinking it's on Zappe. Raiders first game versus Chargers Mack 6 sacks, 2nd game zero sacks/zero QB hits. New coach assigned Mayer to neutralize him. Blame the OL and/or the OC for not stoping Mack! I'd agree if Zappe had all day to throw, that's not even close to what he had!
2nd half versus Steelers is Bill. That's his coaching style. Exactly like watching Vrabels Titans versus Brady in his last game in the playoffs. Run it, play it safe and run down the clock when you are up. Coaches and GMs are a pairing, GMs job is getting the best players for the coaches system. A HC is still highly involved in who teams sign and draft. You don't want what the Raiders GM did, but that shows you the dynamics of the relationship. Titans GM paid huge money for a RB because his coach was Vrabel. If you just want to hopefully get younger versions of Bill than sure guys like Vrabel and Mayo are good bets. If you really want to change from a defensive first team to an offensive one, you don't get those guys as head coaches! If your GM builds an offensive first team with those coaches, it's not going to work well, doesn't fit their coaching styles.
So much talk about our downfall is Bill the GM, I don't agree. I didn't hear anyone on here saying don't take Mac Jones. Heck even last year when Zappe outplayed Jones, everyone still wanted Jones as the starter. This team would have been good if Mac Jones would have played at even a good level. 2022 draft was very good, 2023 was about as good as it gets, that's fairly common for most GMs. No GMs nail the draft year after year.
Given we are almost certainly going after a rookie QB, bring in an offensive coach and that matches today's NFL. If Bill is gone, so are his sons most likely. So name Mayo DC, it's the next logical step to get him ready for being a HC, plus it keeps the D similar. Otherwise you're asking him to rebuild the coaching on both sides and that's certainly not ideal.
|
|
|
Post by benogliviesbrother on Dec 16, 2023 16:06:54 GMT -5
I’m not feeling well so I was looking forward to today’s NFL games and then I looked at the schedule and I’m not sure I could be less interested. Mullens vs Browning, the matchup we've all been waiting for! And another classic showdown in Indy between Minshew and Trubisky! What will Zach Moss have to say about that? The funny thing is all of these teams are in the playoff hunt and have a level of underdog friskiness, so they might actually be good games. Mullens v Browning has been very entertaining. Here's hoping the other games, including Sunday's, are near as entertaining.
|
|
|