SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
|
Post by ematz1423 on Feb 26, 2024 8:38:21 GMT -5
I'm not getting my hopes up but time is ticking on Montgomery and Snell to get into ST so that they aren't too far behind in ramping up. It does seem that perhaps Boras is making one last ploy here by floating news to Olney/Gammons in the hopes that maybe he can squeeze every last $ out. Would have to think either way a signing might be imminent for Montgomery. Snell, who knows there hasn't been much in the way of rumors in regards to him.
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Feb 26, 2024 8:48:19 GMT -5
I haven't seen this much smoke between the Red Sox and a Boras client since they were just about to re-sign Bogaerts (right before the Padres dumped $280 million in his lap). I'll believe it when Da Real Matt Jones from Spokane, WA reports it.
To be fair, it's hard to see what team is in a position right now to play the Padres' role with Montgomery. Cardinals...?
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on Feb 26, 2024 9:26:25 GMT -5
Just take it at face value. They were obviously negotiating for Montgomery and now there is chatter that things are moving forward. The Red Sox are not being used as a boogeyman, they're the only team that hasn't publicly said they're out on Montgomery.
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 16,737
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Feb 26, 2024 9:26:46 GMT -5
Encouraging. Maybe by tonight Breslow will have an agreement hammered out with Montgomery and Boras.
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Feb 26, 2024 9:38:14 GMT -5
Just take it at face value. They were obviously negotiating for Montgomery and now there is chatter that things are moving forward. The Red Sox are not being used as a boogeyman, they're the only team that hasn't publicly said they're out on Montgomery.I was mostly being facetious. At this point I'll be surprised if they don't sign him. But is this true that all other teams are publicly out on Montgomery? Phillies, Cardinals, Angels, Giants...? I know the Giants have suggested they're done spending but they also keep getting linked to Chapman, so...
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on Feb 26, 2024 9:46:04 GMT -5
The Phillies said they'd be interested in a one or two year deal only and that Boras hasn't been willing to negotiate with them. The Angels said they're done spending when spring training started. Not sure about the Cards, but nobody has brought them up for anybody in a long time.
|
|
cdj
Veteran
Posts: 15,827
|
Post by cdj on Feb 26, 2024 9:57:16 GMT -5
Cards added 3 rotation members already iirc
|
|
|
Post by ematz1423 on Feb 26, 2024 9:57:58 GMT -5
Alex Cora confirmed the Zoom call but said it happened prior to ST so it was about 2 weeks ago. This sounds like just regurgitated news we already knew, this has Boras spin zone written all over it.
|
|
asm18
Veteran
Posts: 2,913
Member is Online
|
Post by asm18 on Feb 26, 2024 10:03:37 GMT -5
Just take it at face value. They were obviously negotiating for Montgomery and now there is chatter that things are moving forward. The Red Sox are not being used as a boogeyman, they're the only team that hasn't publicly said they're out on Montgomery. I was mostly being facetious. At this point I'll be surprised if they don't sign him. But is this true that all other teams are publicly out on Montgomery? Phillies, Cardinals, Angels, Giants...? I know the Giants have suggested they're done spending but they also keep getting linked to Chapman, so... That seems like a fair guess as to other possible candidates. Although from what we know the Phillies are focusing on re-signing Zach Wheeler, the Cardinals already have their rotation full of 35 year olds, the Angels are weird, and the Giants don't seem to attracted to someone like Montgomery's profile based on their recent history of free agent pitchers. I know the inclination when something like this comes out is to credit it to Boras media manipulation, but if he's hypothetically trying to get another team to seal the deal with Montgomery through leaking to Buster Olney, it's unclear who the heck the audience would be. Something interesting (to me at least) in all this is very little Boston media seems to be reporting or providing insight on this. Rob Bradford has floated it a bit, Alex Speier had said they were monitoring his market, and Gammons obviously has some Boston ties. Everywhere else there is very little smoke, at least from the Red Sox beat. The Masslive guys (Cotillo, McAdam) and Carrabis have been pessimistic for some time the team will spend, but otherwise there hasn't been a Red Sox-connected person out there being like, "Yeah, it's all posturing, they're going to sign Montgomery." I wonder to what extent this lack of local smoke is because Breslow is new and might not have his go-to guy for leaking info yet?
|
|
|
Post by harv on Feb 26, 2024 10:18:17 GMT -5
I hope they sign Mongomery, I really do. He would help. But let's not be fooled into thinking he is some sort of transformative player, he is not. At best, with no injuries, he is a solid #3. The pitching staff with him will be better than without him, but it still will not be playoff caliber unless we get best case seasons from several others.
|
|
nomar
Veteran
Posts: 11,579
Member is Online
|
Post by nomar on Feb 26, 2024 10:20:22 GMT -5
I hope they sign Mongomery, I really do. He would help. But let's not be fooled into thinking he is some sort of transformative player, he is not. At best, with no injuries, he is a solid #3. The pitching staff with him will be better than without him, but it still will not be playoff caliber unless we get best case seasons from several others. I’ll take this form of complaining over what we’ve gotten all winter
|
|
|
Post by crossedsabres8 on Feb 26, 2024 10:31:43 GMT -5
Offering Yamamoto $300M, Signing Montgomery and Giolito, swapping Sale for Grissom, and making a few trades for legitimate depth to add pitching prospects would be a wonderful offseason.
I understand one of those things hasn't happened yet, but it puts in perspective how maybe this offseason hasn't been as bad as you'd think.
|
|
|
Post by 0ap0 on Feb 26, 2024 10:34:34 GMT -5
I hope they sign Mongomery, I really do. He would help. But let's not be fooled into thinking he is some sort of transformative player, he is not. At best, with no injuries, he is a solid #3. The pitching staff with him will be better than without him, but it still will not be playoff caliber unless we get best case seasons from several others. His presence greatly lengthens both the rotation and the bullpen, making this a solid decent roster instead of one that's a single misfortune away from being a bad one. He also would put the team in a much stronger place for building a 2025 rotation which would otherwise require a *ton* of moving parts.
|
|
asm18
Veteran
Posts: 2,913
Member is Online
|
Post by asm18 on Feb 26, 2024 10:42:17 GMT -5
Peter Abraham noted, "Things can change quickly in free agency. But Red Sox remain in a 'monitoring the situation' mode with Montgomery." There was downplaying by Cora that the Zoom meeting was two weeks ago...
Maybe this is confirmation bias, but I'm just not sure I buy this. If you're doing a Zoom meeting with Montgomery personally (which seems to be the implication from recent reports) I would imagine the principal people like Cora, Breslow, & Bailey are pitching him on coming to Boston, and there was at least some decent time and thought put into that process? That's not giving off the vibe of texting Scott Boras every once in while at 2 am being like "u up?" hoping they luck into a bargain.
|
|
cdj
Veteran
Posts: 15,827
|
Post by cdj on Feb 26, 2024 10:42:28 GMT -5
Offering Yamamoto $300M, Signing Montgomery and Giolito, swapping Sale for Grissom, and making a few trades for legitimate depth to add pitching prospects would be a wonderful offseason. I understand one of those things hasn't happened yet, but it puts in perspective how maybe this offseason hasn't been as bad as you'd think. It’s funny- if they signed Montgomery 2 months ago the discourse would be entirely different. I don’t think we’d be thinking that we’re contenders but we would be a lot more positive about the direction of the club
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on Feb 26, 2024 11:13:27 GMT -5
Expectations for Monty's contract are sky high elsewhere on the internet. I saw 5/130 with multiple opt outs.
Boras really is a wizard. He sets the expectations so high that you can agree to a player friendly contract and your fans will still come away thinking you're a golden god of negotiating. I saw an old MLBTR article the other day saying that he was demanding 7/210 for JD Martinez the year we signed him.
|
|
|
Post by harv on Feb 26, 2024 11:13:56 GMT -5
Offering Yamamoto $300M, Signing Montgomery and Giolito, swapping Sale for Grissom, and making a few trades for legitimate depth to add pitching prospects would be a wonderful offseason. I understand one of those things hasn't happened yet, but it puts in perspective how maybe this offseason hasn't been as bad as you'd think. It’s funny- if they signed Montgomery 2 months ago the discourse would be entirely different. I don’t think we’d be thinking that we’re contenders but we would be a lot more positive about the direction of the club I, for one, think its been a good off season whether or not they sign Montgomery. The only successful way to have a sustained contender, given the state of pitching, especially starters, is a grow your own approach. Good pitchers with team control are mostly just not available in trade. When they are, the price in prospects is 2 or more top 5. That's why Yamamoto was in such demand and commanded $325M. Pitchers generally hit free agency around or after 30, require a high price and a long contract. They're a big injury risk and even so you can only afford one. Right now only 2 of our top 10 and 4 of our top 20 prospects are pitchers, something that has to change. Brining in Breslow and other pitching related front office and developmental people is a great start. The moves you reference also move the Sox in that direction. There was and is not much that can be done to make this year's team a contender. Moving to build a steady stream of pitching prospects, if it is successful, may brighten longer term prospects, especially with a strong young core of position players that appears to be emerging.
|
|
|
Post by wcsoxfan on Feb 26, 2024 11:18:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by dcb26 on Feb 26, 2024 11:29:17 GMT -5
Expectations for Monty's contract are sky high elsewhere on the internet. I saw 5/130 with multiple opt outs. Boras really is a wizard. He sets the expectations so high that you can agree to a player friendly contract and your fans will still come away thinking you're a golden god of negotiating. I saw an old MLBTR article the other day saying that he was demanding 7/210 for JD Martinez the year we signed him. Exactly this, it's the same thing over and over again. Stage 1: player is valued at [X] dollars. Stage 2: Boras demands 2.2 times [X] dollars for player, fans go insane with rage at Boras. Stage 3: Player signs for 1.2 times [X] dollars, fans mock Boras for being a failure. Player (and Boras) profit.
|
|
|
Post by notstarboard on Feb 26, 2024 11:40:12 GMT -5
Expectations for Monty's contract are sky high elsewhere on the internet. I saw 5/130 with multiple opt outs. Boras really is a wizard. He sets the expectations so high that you can agree to a player friendly contract and your fans will still come away thinking you're a golden god of negotiating. I saw an old MLBTR article the other day saying that he was demanding 7/210 for JD Martinez the year we signed him. If that deal were actually on the table, I don't think there's a prayer he would still be a free agent. If he's getting 5 years, I wouldn't want the Sox to be on the hook for more than the 5/105 Fangraphs crowdsource, and with no opt outs, especially given the current state of the market. At this point I'm expecting something like 3/70 (25, 25, 20) with a couple of opt outs. Basically Bellinger-lite.
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Feb 26, 2024 11:42:46 GMT -5
Expectations for Monty's contract are sky high elsewhere on the internet. I saw 5/130 with multiple opt outs. Boras really is a wizard. He sets the expectations so high that you can agree to a player friendly contract and your fans will still come away thinking you're a golden god of negotiating. I saw an old MLBTR article the other day saying that he was demanding 7/210 for JD Martinez the year we signed him. If that deal were actually on the table, I don't think there's a prayer he would still be a free agent. If he's getting 5 years, I wouldn't want the Sox to be on the hook for more than the 5/105 Fangraphs crowdsource, and with no opt outs, especially given the current state of the market. At this point I'm expecting something like 3/70 (25, 25, 20) with a couple of opt outs. Basically Bellinger-lite. Hmm, I'm starting to sense an overcorrection of expectations here... I'd still be pretty surprised if he signs for less than 9 figures and 5 years. It's really rare for top free agents to undershoot the fangraphs crowdsource estimates (though Bellinger did...).
|
|
|
Post by pappyman99 on Feb 26, 2024 11:45:53 GMT -5
Expectations for Monty's contract are sky high elsewhere on the internet. I saw 5/130 with multiple opt outs. Boras really is a wizard. He sets the expectations so high that you can agree to a player friendly contract and your fans will still come away thinking you're a golden god of negotiating. I saw an old MLBTR article the other day saying that he was demanding 7/210 for JD Martinez the year we signed him. I guess…. I mean he did not work Magic with Bellinger. That’s someone who probably could have gotten a clean 6 year $150 million deal with no opt outs. Definitely sure he thought he was getting a $200 million deal Mlbtradrumors predicted $264 million. What they and boras failed To realize was that the idiots in FA last year (Padres, Mets, etc) took a big backseat this offseason due to their stupid deals
|
|
asm18
Veteran
Posts: 2,913
Member is Online
|
Post by asm18 on Feb 26, 2024 11:51:01 GMT -5
Expectations for Monty's contract are sky high elsewhere on the internet. I saw 5/130 with multiple opt outs. Boras really is a wizard. He sets the expectations so high that you can agree to a player friendly contract and your fans will still come away thinking you're a golden god of negotiating. I saw an old MLBTR article the other day saying that he was demanding 7/210 for JD Martinez the year we signed him. If that deal were actually on the table, I don't think there's a prayer he would still be a free agent. If he's getting 5 years, I wouldn't want the Sox to be on the hook for more than the 5/105 Fangraphs crowdsource, and with no opt outs, especially given the current state of the market. At this point I'm expecting something like 3/70 (25, 25, 20) with a couple of opt outs. Basically Bellinger-lite. Not to belabor this point, but Montgomery is eligible for a QO the next time he is a free agent (assuming he stays with his team the whole season, which was not the case when the Rangers traded for him.) Imagine how the discussion over the Montgomery pursuit would be this winter if draft compensation was required to get him, and he was a year older? It's still preferable for a player to have an opt-out in a vacuum, but it might not be a slam dunk for him to want to enter free agency again. In comparsion, Bellinger will be 29 next year and will shed the QO offered this winter by the Cubs.
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Feb 26, 2024 11:56:39 GMT -5
If that deal were actually on the table, I don't think there's a prayer he would still be a free agent. If he's getting 5 years, I wouldn't want the Sox to be on the hook for more than the 5/105 Fangraphs crowdsource, and with no opt outs, especially given the current state of the market. At this point I'm expecting something like 3/70 (25, 25, 20) with a couple of opt outs. Basically Bellinger-lite. Not to belabor this point, but Montgomery is eligible for a QO the next time he is a free agent (assuming he stays with his team the whole season, which was not the case when the Rangers traded for him.) Imagine how the discussion over the Montgomery pursuit would be this winter if draft compensation was required to get him, and he was a year older? It's still preferable for a player to have an opt-out in a vacuum, but it might not be a slam dunk for him to want to enter free agency again. In comparsion, Bellinger will be 29 next year and will shed the QO offered this winter by the Cubs. For just this reason (and the fact that he's not likely to have a better platform year than he just had) I don't think he (or Snell) should mess with opt outs at all. Just take the biggest total value you can get, and if that's "only" $90-100 million, so be it.
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on Feb 26, 2024 11:57:22 GMT -5
Expectations for Monty's contract are sky high elsewhere on the internet. I saw 5/130 with multiple opt outs. Boras really is a wizard. He sets the expectations so high that you can agree to a player friendly contract and your fans will still come away thinking you're a golden god of negotiating. I saw an old MLBTR article the other day saying that he was demanding 7/210 for JD Martinez the year we signed him. I guess…. I mean he did not work Magic with Bellinger. That’s someone who probably could have gotten a clean 6 year $150 million deal with no opt outs. Definitely sure he thought he was getting a $200 million deal Mlbtradrumors predicted $264 million. What they and boras failed To realize was that the idiots in FA last year (Padres, Mets, etc) took a big backseat this offseason due to their stupid deals Bellinger is a great example of what I was talking about. None of the computers think he is worth his year one salary, and he got two player options on top of it. But because there were some batshit crazy numbers floating around early, the Cubs are being feted in the press and social media today. And I don't mean to say that they shouldn't have agreed to the deal.
|
|
|