|
Post by burythehammer on Jul 26, 2016 20:48:27 GMT -5
Yeah and right after that we'll trade Devers and Swihart for Mike Trout. Well, what do you think BTH? Will at least one of the remaining big 3 be gone? You've been predicting it from the beginning and you obviously know your man No, I don't think they will make another major deal but it wouldn't shock me.
|
|
|
Post by manfred on Jul 26, 2016 20:51:19 GMT -5
I love Robbie Ross. Will suck it up and eat innings in losses; will keep it close in games like this. Sometimes it's an adventure, sure.
Still, that little trade -- just sending Raunado -- was a dandy. If DD can do something like that, kudos.
Edit: I am embarrassed now.
|
|
bosox
Veteran
Posts: 2,117
|
Post by bosox on Jul 26, 2016 20:51:26 GMT -5
I guess we'll be seeing a lot more position players pitching in templeusox's version of the future Bobby Dalbec better keep the arm loose.
|
|
|
Post by benogliviesbrother on Jul 26, 2016 20:51:42 GMT -5
Have you noticed that The Trade Chip hit AA homer number 8 tonight?
|
|
|
Post by bigpupp on Jul 26, 2016 20:52:44 GMT -5
Although thinking about it - in the future relievers may be allowed to have bionic arms...
|
|
|
Post by Smittyw on Jul 26, 2016 20:54:11 GMT -5
Have you noticed that The Trade Chip hit AA homer number 8 tonight? No idea who you mean.
|
|
|
Post by Guidas on Jul 26, 2016 20:54:27 GMT -5
The plate ump is suffering from glaucoma. Or cateracts. Or myopia.
|
|
wcp3
Veteran
Posts: 3,833
|
Post by wcp3 on Jul 26, 2016 20:57:38 GMT -5
These pitchers are so incredibly soft.
|
|
|
Post by jodyreidnichols on Jul 26, 2016 20:57:54 GMT -5
The plate ump is suffering from glaucoma. Or cateracts. Or myopia. Is it me or are we getting consistently screwed at calls on balls and strikes lately???
|
|
|
Post by bosox81 on Jul 26, 2016 20:58:36 GMT -5
The plate ump is suffering from glaucoma. Or cateracts. Or myopia. Is it me or are we getting consistently screwed at calls on balls and strikes lately??? Lately?
|
|
|
Post by Guidas on Jul 26, 2016 20:58:46 GMT -5
Two consecutive walks to guys who are below the mendoza live vs lefties. Can't make this up.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Jul 26, 2016 20:59:17 GMT -5
The plate ump is suffering from glaucoma. Or cateracts. Or myopia. Is it me or are we getting consistently screwed at calls on balls and strikes lately??? I've noticed it ever since the strike zone was shown on tv.
|
|
|
Post by benogliviesbrother on Jul 26, 2016 21:01:05 GMT -5
I love Robbie Ross. Will suck it up and eat innings in losses; will keep it close in games like this. Sometimes it's an adventure, sure. Still, that little trade -- just sending Raunado -- was a dandy. If DD can do something like that, kudos. Edit: I am embarrassed now. Prophetic. Unfortunately.
|
|
|
Post by FenwayFanatic on Jul 26, 2016 21:11:26 GMT -5
John Farrell, pitching guru
|
|
|
Post by kman22 on Jul 26, 2016 21:27:05 GMT -5
If you had to have any part of the lineup due in the 9th, Pedroia, Bogaerts, and Ortiz are best-case scenario, right?
|
|
nomar
Veteran
Posts: 10,903
|
Post by nomar on Jul 26, 2016 21:29:25 GMT -5
If you had to have any part of the lineup due in the 9th, Pedroia, Bogaerts, and Ortiz are best-case scenario, right? In Farrell's batting orders? I guess. But Ortiz, Ramirez, Braldey is pretty damn close, since Pedroia and Ramirez are both batting ahead of Bradley when they shouldn't be.
|
|
|
Post by Guidas on Jul 26, 2016 21:29:48 GMT -5
Wait - Layne over Barnes because...?
|
|
|
Post by kman22 on Jul 26, 2016 21:30:30 GMT -5
If you had to have any part of the lineup due in the 9th, Pedroia, Bogaerts, and Ortiz are best-case scenario, right? In Farrell's batting orders? I guess. But Ortiz, Ramirez, Braldey is pretty damn close, since Pedroia and Ramirez are both batting ahead of Bradley when they shouldn't be. Well yeah, I meant in this lineup.
|
|
|
Post by kman22 on Jul 26, 2016 21:31:17 GMT -5
Wait - Layne over Barnes because...? Logical explanations are optional?
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Jul 26, 2016 21:31:29 GMT -5
Tommy Layne shouldn't be pitching MLB games.
|
|
|
Post by benogliviesbrother on Jul 26, 2016 21:33:50 GMT -5
If you had to have any part of the lineup due in the 9th, Pedroia, Bogaerts, and Ortiz are best-case scenario, right? It may not matter after Tommy's finished.
|
|
|
Post by bosox81 on Jul 26, 2016 21:35:57 GMT -5
If you had to have any part of the lineup due in the 9th, Pedroia, Bogaerts, and Ortiz are best-case scenario, right? I don't know. Pedroia looked clueless against KRod last night.
|
|
|
Post by benogliviesbrother on Jul 26, 2016 21:36:19 GMT -5
Wait - Layne over Barnes because...? Because he's on the team and JF likes to play in the game everyone that's on the team. That's my best guess.
|
|
|
Post by benogliviesbrother on Jul 26, 2016 21:38:37 GMT -5
If you had to have any part of the lineup due in the 9th, Pedroia, Bogaerts, and Ortiz are best-case scenario, right? I don't know. Pedroia looked clueless against KRod last night. With no GIDP possible, I kind of like Pedey's chances.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Jul 26, 2016 21:38:47 GMT -5
Walk off blast double play to end it, calling it now.
|
|