SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Bryan Reynolds requests trade
nomar
Veteran
Posts: 10,819
Member is Online
|
Post by nomar on Dec 3, 2022 14:13:31 GMT -5
Strap in for the next 15 pages of this thread.
|
|
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Dec 3, 2022 14:14:37 GMT -5
Reynolds is going to get Pit a massive haul. I wonder if a package of Casas, Rafaela and then a lottery ticket type like Perales would get it done, that comes out to roughly even on baseball trade values, and I think Bloom would need to consider it. Only thing is the Pirates just signed Carlos Santana to play 1B so Casas may not interest them as much. I hope not. I'm not as extreme as Woba Fett, but in spirit, I'm with him. I only worry about health when it comes to Casas. I don't worry about his ability to become a middle of the order slugger sooner or later. I want no part of him not being a big part of the Sox future because I think he will be. Reynolds would be perfect for RF. But I wouldnt part with Casas, Bello, Mayer, or Bleis. Everybody else is available. Does that get a deal done? Probably not, but I wouldn't pull the trigger on a Reynolds deal with any of those 4 in it. I'd clear out a bunch of the next tier, guys like Mata, Lugo, even Yorke or Romero, but none of those top 4. They're welcome to Dalbec too if they want him. Lol
|
|
|
Post by awalkinthepark on Dec 3, 2022 14:18:09 GMT -5
Reynolds is going to get Pit a massive haul. I wonder if a package of Casas, Rafaela and then a lottery ticket type like Perales would get it done, that comes out to roughly even on baseball trade values, and I think Bloom would need to consider it. Only thing is the Pirates just signed Carlos Santana to play 1B so Casas may not interest them as much. I feel very strongly that "lottery ticket" should refer to like the Freddy Valdez/Grant Gambrell types they got in the Benintendi deal. Perales is a top 10 prospect in the system! He's also a 19 year old pitcher with 37 professional innings under his belt. I think he has a long way to go before he is considered a legitimate prospect, but hey, what do I know.
|
|
ematz1423
Veteran
Posts: 5,335
Member is Online
|
Post by ematz1423 on Dec 3, 2022 14:21:24 GMT -5
I feel very strongly that "lottery ticket" should refer to like the Freddy Valdez/Grant Gambrell types they got in the Benintendi deal. Perales is a top 10 prospect in the system! He's also a 19 year old pitcher with 37 professional innings under his belt. I think he has a long way to go before he is considered a legitimate prospect, but hey, what do I know. Well you are on IMHO one of if not the absolute source for red sox prospects who now has perales ranked 10th In the system so ya I'm going to say perales is certainly a "legitimate" prospect and not a lotto ticket.
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on Dec 3, 2022 14:26:50 GMT -5
Casas for Reynolds seems like a fair and plausible trade to me
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Dec 3, 2022 14:27:01 GMT -5
I feel very strongly that "lottery ticket" should refer to like the Freddy Valdez/Grant Gambrell types they got in the Benintendi deal. Perales is a top 10 prospect in the system! He's also a 19 year old pitcher with 37 professional innings under his belt. I think he has a long way to go before he is considered a legitimate prospect, but hey, what do I know. I think for purposes of this discussion, you're pretty far off the map if you're thinking he'd just be a throw-in in a trade. Even if you think soxprospects is way overrating him and he should be like #30 rather than #10, that's still not a "lottery ticket" in my book; that's a prospect that has some real value beyond just "ehh, might turn into something, you never know."
|
|
|
Post by awalkinthepark on Dec 3, 2022 14:36:34 GMT -5
He's also a 19 year old pitcher with 37 professional innings under his belt. I think he has a long way to go before he is considered a legitimate prospect, but hey, what do I know. I think for purposes of this discussion, you're pretty far off the map if you're thinking he'd just be a throw-in in a trade. Even if you think soxprospects is way overrating him and he should be like #30 rather than #10, that's still not a "lottery ticket" in my book; that's a prospect that has some real value beyond just "ehh, might turn into something, you never know." Well, I guess agree to disagree. I find it pretty hard to believe another org would place a lot of value on Perales right now.
|
|
ematz1423
Veteran
Posts: 5,335
Member is Online
|
Post by ematz1423 on Dec 3, 2022 14:49:38 GMT -5
I think for purposes of this discussion, you're pretty far off the map if you're thinking he'd just be a throw-in in a trade. Even if you think soxprospects is way overrating him and he should be like #30 rather than #10, that's still not a "lottery ticket" in my book; that's a prospect that has some real value beyond just "ehh, might turn into something, you never know." Well, I guess agree to disagree. I find it pretty hard to believe another org would place a lot of value on Perales right now.
Why are you on this site then? He's ranked #10 here. I'm going to believe this great sites ranking over you claiming he doesn't have much value.
|
|
|
Post by orion09 on Dec 3, 2022 14:52:17 GMT -5
Team can't afford to trade young, inexpensive players just as they're in position to help the major league team. It would take A LOT for me to trade Casas or Bello. I'm not sure Bryan Reynolds qualifies as "A LOT" in my book. Yeah, the whole reason we need to make free agent additions at shortstop and RF is because we don’t have young players ready. Trading our top position player prospects only moves the problem around. It would be different if we had a solid core and were only one piece away - or if we had a lot of prospect depth. It’s not like we have four top shortstop prospects and can deal one of them. If we go out a sign a shortstop, I would be more open to filling the last position player hole (RF) via trade - or vice versa. Still think trading heavily from the next core is a mistake
|
|
|
Post by awalkinthepark on Dec 3, 2022 15:14:09 GMT -5
Well, I guess agree to disagree. I find it pretty hard to believe another org would place a lot of value on Perales right now.
Why are you on this site then? He's ranked #10 here. I'm going to believe this great sites ranking over you claiming he doesn't have much value. Let's say this another way then. What odds would you give Luis Perales even making the majors, at all? It can't be higher than ~15-20%, no? With the bust rate of pitching prospects I don't know how you can go any higher than that, especially considering he is a 19 year old with practically no innings under his belt, and already has an injury history to boot.
He is a nice prospect, but it's not like the 10th ranked prospect in any organization is something to hang your hat on. He currently has a 35+ FV on Fangraphs, which is probably a bit low as that is from earlier this year. But he can't be more than a 40. And Fangraphs tags 40 FV pitchers as worth about $1 million. So I don't really know what it is I am supposedly missing here.
|
|
|
Post by greatscottcooper on Dec 3, 2022 15:20:10 GMT -5
Why are you on this site then? He's ranked #10 here. I'm going to believe this great sites ranking over you claiming he doesn't have much value. Let's say this another way then. What odds would you give Luis Perales even making the majors, at all? It can't be higher than ~15-20%, no? With the bust rate of pitching prospects I don't know how you can go any higher than that, especially considering he is a 19 year old with practically no innings under his belt, and already has an injury history to boot.
He is a nice prospect, but it's not like the 10th ranked prospect in any organization is something to hang your hat on. He currently has a 35+ FV on Fangraphs, which is probably a bit low as that is from earlier this year. But he can't be more than a 40. And Fangraphs tags 40 FV pitchers as worth about $1 million. So I don't really know what it is I am supposedly missing here.
This would be a nice argument if we we’re taking about a 1x1 trade. We are not, we almost never are. To suggest Perales is worthless and assume teams don’t know who he is is very short sighted. For all we know said team heavily scouted him and was disappointed he signed with us. After all, one bird in the bush gets you half way to one in hand. You have no ideal how much a team could love Perales as the 2nd or 3rd guy in a deal.
|
|
ematz1423
Veteran
Posts: 5,335
Member is Online
|
Post by ematz1423 on Dec 3, 2022 15:41:30 GMT -5
Why are you on this site then? He's ranked #10 here. I'm going to believe this great sites ranking over you claiming he doesn't have much value. Let's say this another way then. What odds would you give Luis Perales even making the majors, at all? It can't be higher than ~15-20%, no? With the bust rate of pitching prospects I don't know how you can go any higher than that, especially considering he is a 19 year old with practically no innings under his belt, and already has an injury history to boot.
He is a nice prospect, but it's not like the 10th ranked prospect in any organization is something to hang your hat on. He currently has a 35+ FV on Fangraphs, which is probably a bit low as that is from earlier this year. But he can't be more than a 40. And Fangraphs tags 40 FV pitchers as worth about $1 million. So I don't really know what it is I am supposedly missing here.
What are the odds any prospects make the majors? Don't really want to get in a back and forth here saying the same thing but this site you are posting on has perales ranked #10 as a 19 year old with limited innings. Obviously there's something in his stuff they really like or he wouldn't be ranked that high. If you want to classify him as a lotto ticket/throw away in a deal then why bother checking this site? Sounds like you put more stock into fangraphs or other prospect sites if that's your opinion of once again a top 10 rated prospect on the premier red sox prospects sites as far as I know of.
|
|
|
Post by awalkinthepark on Dec 3, 2022 15:52:58 GMT -5
Let's say this another way then. What odds would you give Luis Perales even making the majors, at all? It can't be higher than ~15-20%, no? With the bust rate of pitching prospects I don't know how you can go any higher than that, especially considering he is a 19 year old with practically no innings under his belt, and already has an injury history to boot.
He is a nice prospect, but it's not like the 10th ranked prospect in any organization is something to hang your hat on. He currently has a 35+ FV on Fangraphs, which is probably a bit low as that is from earlier this year. But he can't be more than a 40. And Fangraphs tags 40 FV pitchers as worth about $1 million. So I don't really know what it is I am supposedly missing here.
What are the odds any prospects make the majors? Don't really want to get in a back and forth here saying the same thing but this site you are posting on has perales ranked #10 as a 19 year old with limited innings. Obviously there's something in his stuff they really like or he wouldn't be ranked that high. If you want to classify him as a lotto ticket/throw away in a deal then why bother checking this site? Sounds like you put more stock into fangraphs or other prospect sites if that's your opinion of once again a top 10 rated prospect on the premier red sox prospects sites as far as I know of. How would you describe a "lottery ticket" type then? To me that means high risk high reward, which I think precisely describes Perales.
Regardless, fine, replace Perales in the deal with someone else, who knows if the Pirates even like him. The primary return is Casas and Rafaela, but those 2 alone won't get a deal done. There would need to be another prospect in there.
|
|
ematz1423
Veteran
Posts: 5,335
Member is Online
|
Post by ematz1423 on Dec 3, 2022 16:06:50 GMT -5
What are the odds any prospects make the majors? Don't really want to get in a back and forth here saying the same thing but this site you are posting on has perales ranked #10 as a 19 year old with limited innings. Obviously there's something in his stuff they really like or he wouldn't be ranked that high. If you want to classify him as a lotto ticket/throw away in a deal then why bother checking this site? Sounds like you put more stock into fangraphs or other prospect sites if that's your opinion of once again a top 10 rated prospect on the premier red sox prospects sites as far as I know of. How would you describe a "lottery ticket" type then? To me that means high risk high reward, which I think precisely describes Perales.
Regardless, fine, replace Perales in the deal with someone else, who knows if the Pirates even like him. The primary return is Casas and Rafaela, but those 2 alone won't get a deal done. There would need to be another prospect in there.
. Fair enough I get it. But ya I'm not trading Casas and raefella for Reynolds let alone them plus a lotto ticket. I think raefellas defense makes him a guaranteed major league player at some point and Casas bat makes him a ML starter at 1st. I get you need to give to get but I just don't think the Sox are to the point where they should sell two surplus value players for Reynolds who just wouldn't push them over the top if you ask me. You trade a haul for Reynolds when you are a piece maybe two away from legit WS contender.
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Dec 3, 2022 16:24:35 GMT -5
How would you describe a "lottery ticket" type then? To me that means high risk high reward, which I think precisely describes Perales.
Regardless, fine, replace Perales in the deal with someone else, who knows if the Pirates even like him. The primary return is Casas and Rafaela, but those 2 alone won't get a deal done. There would need to be another prospect in there.
. Fair enough I get it. But ya I'm not trading Casas and raefella for Reynolds let alone them plus a lotto ticket. I think raefellas defense makes him a guaranteed major league player at some point and Casas bat makes him a ML starter at 1st. I get you need to give to get but I just don't think the Sox are to the point where they should sell two surplus value players for Reynolds who just wouldn't push them over the top if you ask me. You trade a haul for Reynolds when you are a piece maybe two away from legit WS contender.Every time I read this line, I mentally start stammering and gesticulating wildly at the Phillies. But in addition to that point... how are the Red Sox not exactly a piece or two from "legit WS contender"? Like there has been much discussion here about how they're going to spend their $75 million under the CBT cap. And if the team you envision once they've done that doesn't quite seem like a legit WS contender, okay, fair enough. But if they added Reynolds plus $68 million of FA spending (accounting for his salary)? And had a lineup of, say: Reynolds Devers Bogaerts (28 million) Story Brantley (12 million) Casas Verdugo Kiké McGuire/Vazquez (7 million) And a rotation of: Sale Paxton Eovaldi (17 million) Whitlock Bello Pivetta Hill (4 million) Crawford/Mata/Walter Plus a new and improved bullpen... How is that not a "legit WS contender"?
|
|
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Dec 3, 2022 16:49:02 GMT -5
. Fair enough I get it. But ya I'm not trading Casas and raefella for Reynolds let alone them plus a lotto ticket. I think raefellas defense makes him a guaranteed major league player at some point and Casas bat makes him a ML starter at 1st. I get you need to give to get but I just don't think the Sox are to the point where they should sell two surplus value players for Reynolds who just wouldn't push them over the top if you ask me. You trade a haul for Reynolds when you are a piece maybe two away from legit WS contender.Every time I read this line, I mentally start stammering and gesticulating wildly at the Phillies. But in addition to that point... how are the Red Sox not exactly a piece or two from "legit WS contender"? Like there has been much discussion here about how they're going to spend their $75 million under the CBT cap. And if the team you envision once they've done that doesn't quite seem like a legit WS contender, okay, fair enough. But if they added Reynolds plus $68 million of FA spending (accounting for his salary)? And had a lineup of, say: Reynolds Devers Bogaerts (28 million) Story Brantley (12 million) Casas Verdugo Kiké McGuire/Vazquez (7 million) And a rotation of: Sale Paxton Eovaldi (17 million) Whitlock Bello Pivetta Hill (4 million) Crawford/Mata/Walter Plus a new and improved bullpen... How is that not a "legit WS contender"? How about instead of "legit WS contender", it's phrased differently? I mean, we're moving to the point where sub .500 teams can make the wild card and eventually the world series. That's not what's being meant, though. For me, it's a team that is a 90 win team without having too many things needing to break right. I mean we can agree that the Dodgers, Astros, And Yankees have been on a different level the past 5 years, consistently winning 90 plus games per year? The Red Sox won 92 games in 2021 but a lot had to break right. You picked them to win 82 games in 2022 because you figured the breaks would go the other way. That's not a consistent 90 plus win talent base. They're not there. A guy like Reynolds improves the talent base but at what cost? Casas? Bleis? A combo? We disagree re: the talent base. I'm sure you see them as 85 wins at the moment before anything happens, not counting the Martin and Rodriguez signings. I think they're a 75-80 win talent base before the offseason kicks into full gear. Either way that's not on the level of the best teams in baseball and there are other teams on higher levels at the moment. I think the time to get a player to put you over the top is when you already have a consistent 90 plus win base to start from. Of course in this day and age, a 111 win team can bounced out of the playoffs by an 89 win team. But if you're going for it as an 85 win team and you strip the system to do so eventually you're looking at a 75 win team. So I think they're not at the place where getting a player to put them over the top makes sense, post season tournament not withstanding. Frankly, Reynolds is a good player but I certainly dont think he's good enough to part with needed top prospects. I know the defense isn't the same but I'd rather keep the prospects and sign Haniger. I do have a feeling Bloom will very much be in on Reynolds and I do worry about who he'll part with. I have no desire to see Casas get dealt.
|
|
|
Post by oldfaithful2019 on Dec 3, 2022 16:50:39 GMT -5
If the Pirates respect his request, then I really hope the Sox are willing to get this done. Try to have Bednar added to the deal and as I suggested in the trade proposal sub forum, offer Cassas/ Mayer ( assuming we sign a SS), Raffaella and Tanner Houk. Reynolds as leadoff hitter, significant outfield upgrade and 3 years of cost control. Bednar to stregthen the pen even further with proven closer to compete with Barnes and Martin for top dog. Reynolds is exactly the type of roster improvement the Sox need to make and yes the cost will be high.
|
|
|
Post by manfred on Dec 3, 2022 16:50:57 GMT -5
. Fair enough I get it. But ya I'm not trading Casas and raefella for Reynolds let alone them plus a lotto ticket. I think raefellas defense makes him a guaranteed major league player at some point and Casas bat makes him a ML starter at 1st. I get you need to give to get but I just don't think the Sox are to the point where they should sell two surplus value players for Reynolds who just wouldn't push them over the top if you ask me. You trade a haul for Reynolds when you are a piece maybe two away from legit WS contender.Every time I read this line, I mentally start stammering and gesticulating wildly at the Phillies. But in addition to that point... how are the Red Sox not exactly a piece or two from "legit WS contender"? Like there has been much discussion here about how they're going to spend their $75 million under the CBT cap. And if the team you envision once they've done that doesn't quite seem like a legit WS contender, okay, fair enough. But if they added Reynolds plus $68 million of FA spending (accounting for his salary)? And had a lineup of, say: Reynolds Devers Bogaerts (28 million) Story Brantley (12 million) Casas Verdugo Kiké McGuire/Vazquez (7 million) And a rotation of: Sale Paxton Eovaldi (17 million) Whitlock Bello Pivetta Hill (4 million) Crawford/Mata/Walter Plus a new and improved bullpen... How is that not a "legit WS contender"? I’d call that an unlikely WS contender, but I agree with your point overall. I don’t get the argument against making moves. It seems to be “we only have really good players in 2/3 of our positions, so we shouldn’t commit much to filling the holes, because that 2/3 isn’t enough on its own.” Let’s set names aside. If the Sox get an All-star SS X (teehee), a really good OF Y , and solid DH Z, this lineup is strong. Why argue against move 1 because 2 and 3 haven’t happened yet?
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Dec 3, 2022 17:05:44 GMT -5
Every time I read this line, I mentally start stammering and gesticulating wildly at the Phillies. But in addition to that point... how are the Red Sox not exactly a piece or two from "legit WS contender"? Like there has been much discussion here about how they're going to spend their $75 million under the CBT cap. And if the team you envision once they've done that doesn't quite seem like a legit WS contender, okay, fair enough. But if they added Reynolds plus $68 million of FA spending (accounting for his salary)? And had a lineup of, say: Reynolds Devers Bogaerts (28 million) Story Brantley (12 million) Casas Verdugo Kiké McGuire/Vazquez (7 million) And a rotation of: Sale Paxton Eovaldi (17 million) Whitlock Bello Pivetta Hill (4 million) Crawford/Mata/Walter Plus a new and improved bullpen... How is that not a "legit WS contender"? How about instead of "legit WS contender", it's phrased differently? I mean, we're moving to the point where sub .500 teams can make the wild card and eventually the world series. That's not what's being meant, though. For me, it's a team that is a 90 win team without having too many things needing to break right.I mean we can agree that the Dodgers, Astros, And Yankees have been on a different level the past 5 years, consistently winning 90 plus games per year? The Red Sox won 92 games in 2021 but a lot had to break right. You picked them to win 82 games in 2022 because you figured the breaks would go the other way. That's not a consistent 90 plus win talent base. They're not there.A guy like Reynolds improves the talent base but at what cost? Casas? Bleis? A combo? We disagree re: the talent base. I'm sure you see them as 85 wins at the moment before anything happens, not counting the Martin and Rodriguez signings. I think they're a 75-80 win talent base before the offseason kicks into full gear. Either way that's not on the level of the best teams in baseball and there are other teams on higher levels at the moment. I think the time to get a player to put you over the top is when you already have a consistent 90 plus win base to start from. Of course in this day and age, a 111 win team can bounced out of the playoffs by an 89 win team. But if you're going for it as an 85 win team and you strip the system to do so eventually you're looking at a 75 win team. So I think they're not at the place where getting a player to put them over the top makes sense, post season tournament not withstanding. Frankly, Reynolds is a good player but I certainly dont think he's good enough to part with needed top prospects. I know the defense isn't the same but I'd rather keep the prospects and sign Haniger. I do have a feeling Bloom will very much be in on Reynolds and I do worry about who he'll part with. I have no desire to see Casas get dealt. I actually think "90 win team without too many things having to break right" is a pretty decent shorthand for what we're talking about. And my point would be precisely that the Red Sox probably can't quite get there just through free agent signings, but adding a trade like this to boot really would get them to that level.
It's true that I was very prescient in my prediction for 2022, and the main takeway from that is that you ought to trust my predictions. But for serious though... there are several differences between the roster as it was constructed going into 2022 and what it could be going into 2023. First, the emergence of Bello and Crawford means the starting rotation has a lot more depth. The recent bullpen additions means Whitlock really can be given some run in the rotation as well. I'm pretty bullish on Casas (though to be fair I was somewhat bullish on Dalbec a year ago). A decent FA addition (or trade acquisition!) should make RF much stronger.
And just as a reminder, all the projections pre-2022 had them as a mid-8os win team; I just arbitrarily predicted a few things would go wrong to set them back to 82, ad as it turned out even more things went wrong and they ended up at 78.
I don't think the Red Sox are an 85-win roster *now* by any means. But with reasonable projections for further FA additions I think they can get up to the mid-high 80s, which is already a playoff caliber team. And then a trade for a guy like Reynolds (or Murphy) puts them up to that 90-win threshold.
|
|
|
Post by scottysmalls on Dec 3, 2022 17:16:24 GMT -5
I don’t think this would get it done but I think my personal threshold would be something like a Rafaela/Paulino/Drohan package. I can get why, but would rather they not move one of their top 4 (including Bello).
|
|
|
Post by jdb on Dec 3, 2022 17:22:44 GMT -5
At what point would it be better to just pay Nimmo and give up a 2nd and the $1M of international money?
|
|
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Dec 3, 2022 17:24:57 GMT -5
How about instead of "legit WS contender", it's phrased differently? I mean, we're moving to the point where sub .500 teams can make the wild card and eventually the world series. That's not what's being meant, though. For me, it's a team that is a 90 win team without having too many things needing to break right.I mean we can agree that the Dodgers, Astros, And Yankees have been on a different level the past 5 years, consistently winning 90 plus games per year? The Red Sox won 92 games in 2021 but a lot had to break right. You picked them to win 82 games in 2022 because you figured the breaks would go the other way. That's not a consistent 90 plus win talent base. They're not there.A guy like Reynolds improves the talent base but at what cost? Casas? Bleis? A combo? We disagree re: the talent base. I'm sure you see them as 85 wins at the moment before anything happens, not counting the Martin and Rodriguez signings. I think they're a 75-80 win talent base before the offseason kicks into full gear. Either way that's not on the level of the best teams in baseball and there are other teams on higher levels at the moment. I think the time to get a player to put you over the top is when you already have a consistent 90 plus win base to start from. Of course in this day and age, a 111 win team can bounced out of the playoffs by an 89 win team. But if you're going for it as an 85 win team and you strip the system to do so eventually you're looking at a 75 win team. So I think they're not at the place where getting a player to put them over the top makes sense, post season tournament not withstanding. Frankly, Reynolds is a good player but I certainly dont think he's good enough to part with needed top prospects. I know the defense isn't the same but I'd rather keep the prospects and sign Haniger. I do have a feeling Bloom will very much be in on Reynolds and I do worry about who he'll part with. I have no desire to see Casas get dealt. I actually think "90 win team without too many things having to break right" is a pretty decent shorthand for what we're talking about. And my point would be precisely that the Red Sox probably can't quite get there just through free agent signings, but adding a trade like this to boot really would get them to that level. It's true that I was very prescient in my prediction for 2022, and the main takeway from that is that you ought to trust my predictions. But for serious though... there are several differences between the roster as it was constructed going into 2022 and what it could be going into 2023. First, the emergence of Bello and Crawford means the starting rotation has a lot more depth. The recent bullpen additions means Whitlock really can be given some run in the rotation as well. I'm pretty bullish on Casas (though to be fair I was somewhat bullish on Dalbec a year ago). A decent FA addition (or trade acquisition!) should make RF much stronger. And just as a reminder, all the projections pre-2022 had them as a mid-8os win team; I just arbitrarily predicted a few things would go wrong to set them back to 82, ad as it turned out even more things went wrong and they ended up at 78.
I don't think the Red Sox are an 85-win roster *now* by any means. But with reasonable projections for further FA additions I think they can get up to the mid-high 80s, which is already a playoff caliber team. And then a trade for a guy like Reynolds (or Murphy) puts them up to that 90-win threshold.
I picked them for 83 wins so you were closer. I need to stop being so damn optimistic. Lol Personally I like Crawford as a reliever more than as a starter, but he has a way to go in either role. I'm not big on Dalbec but if he's healthy I'm in on Casas. I think that moose has a decent hit tool, serious power and expanding knowledge of the strike zone. I think he's at the point where he's learning which pitches are close enough to swing at without losing his plate discipline. Eventually he'll strike earlier in the count and pitchers will respond by nibbling and he'll be smart enough to adjust and get himself ahead in counts to the point he punishes pitchers or he takes his walks. And to reiterate my point, soon a sub .500 team can legitimately claim to have world series aspirations and we're only about 10 years away from expansion and even more damn teams in the playoffs. Finishing .500 won't matter anymore. Some day some losing team will be hoisting the World Series trophy.
|
|
|
Post by dirtywaterinla on Dec 3, 2022 17:29:06 GMT -5
If Casas or Bello get traded for Reynolds, I’ll be livid. Completely flies in the face of the objectives that the FO has laid forth the past 3 seasons of developing controllable talent.
|
|
|
Post by worldbfree on Dec 3, 2022 17:29:37 GMT -5
If the Pirates respect his request, then I really hope the Sox are willing to get this done. Try to have Bednar added to the deal and as I suggested in the trade proposal sub forum, offer Cassas/ Mayer ( assuming we sign a SS), Raffaella and Tanner Houk. Reynolds as leadoff hitter, significant outfield upgrade and 3 years of cost control. Bednar to stregthen the pen even further with proven closer to compete with Barnes and Martin for top dog. Reynolds is exactly the type of roster improvement the Sox need to make and yes the cost will be high. I completely agree if you can have Bednar thrown in. I am not worried about losing Rafaela in a deal. I am all but certain that Reynolds will be a much better player. Getting two affordable players at positions of need is exactly what Bloom should be doing. The Sox were close in 2021 and they can turn things around quickly if they get better health along with the right talent acquisitions.
|
|
cdj
Veteran
Posts: 14,048
Member is Online
|
Post by cdj on Dec 3, 2022 17:38:17 GMT -5
If Casas or Bello get traded for Reynolds, I’ll be livid. Completely flies in the face of the objectives that the FO has laid forth the past 3 seasons of developing controllable talent. Reynolds is controllable talent That said, I also would not be happy
|
|
|