SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
2016 Boston Celtics Offseason Thread
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jul 5, 2016 9:28:00 GMT -5
Next years Nets pick needs to be off limits
|
|
|
Post by thebogeyman on Jul 5, 2016 9:51:00 GMT -5
And hit 65% of his FTs while shooting 2/7 from the field. This is basically what we knew about him. He's an athletic guy who can penetrate and get to the line but can't shoot. If Jaylen Brown never shoots the ball better than Russell Westbrook but becomes a top ten player in the league, will you be the person saying "told you he can't shoot." Ugh. I never said he won't become a star or learn to shoot, but I don't think making it to the line 17 times in a summer league game and overall not shooting well (based on the box score), is anything to be excited about.
|
|
|
Post by tjb21 on Jul 5, 2016 9:59:54 GMT -5
Not sure I would make any type of realistic trade at this point.
They need to sign a huge FA next off-season and they have no idea who that will be at this point. I'd get that sorted out first, then see who's available via trade.
Just one way of going about it.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jul 5, 2016 10:17:57 GMT -5
I guess the only question I have regarding the "dont' trade assets" comment is whether or not certain players will remain assets if they pine away on the bench, not improving their value (that's a question, albeit one that reeks of my opinion, admittedly).
I do still wonder what Philly might reasonably accept for Noel. He would still fit that Rim Protector/Crasher that Stevens likes. Obviously, I would continue to hold onto anything resembling the 3rd pick (whether it be Brown or the BRK picks). But maybe, when Philly comes to their senses, there is another deal to be made.
|
|
wcp3
Veteran
Posts: 3,848
|
Post by wcp3 on Jul 5, 2016 10:36:31 GMT -5
I don't expect Ainge to make any major trades unless a guy like Paul George or Westbrook (unexpectedly) becomes available.
Short of that, the Celtics as currently constructed should improve on a 48-win season and could finish as high as 2 in the East if everything breaks right ... and they have another potential top 5 pick on the way next year. Not a bad position to be in with zero bad contracts at the moment.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jul 5, 2016 10:56:16 GMT -5
Haha yea in 8 games, 5 that he started. That small sample size proves nothing. The fact that in playoffs Stevens went with Hunter over Young tells me a lot more. Hunter has already earned Stevens trust. Stevens has also said that Hunters shooting is something the Celtics could really use. Well it shouldn't tell you much that Stevens played Hunter over one of the worst players to ever wear a Celtics jersey, but agreed that the sample size was pretty small. Hunter was drafted because he was a shooter primarily, so what else is Stevens going to say about him? He has logged minutes, but I don't know how he's earned "trust" when he hasn't produced at all yet. The choice between him and Young is basically choosing between (currently) bad or (currently) horrible. I like Hunter's stroke, and his length, but he's got to learn to play better D and start actually converting his looks or he will have a short NBA career. Young is just bad. He's an average athlete who does everything linearly. His straight line layup attempts are just sad. He gets blocked more than anyone I've seen in a while. And while he has a good 3 point stroke, it's not all that quick to compensate for his lack of fluidity. And his defensive awareness is inexistant to the point where it'd be hard to keep him on the floor even if his offense was above average. The biggest thing on his side right now is youth. James Young in no way deserves the label of one of worst players to ever wear a Celtics Jersey, not yet anyway. He's very young and raw. I think we need to move on because we just don't have the roster space and playing time he needs to develop. Not because he has no talent. I also wouldn't call Young an average athlete. His biggest problem is Basketball IQ at this point. He is thinking things through way to much, rather than just playing. He reminds me a ton of Gerald Green. One day light will go on and he'll become a useful role player. Chances are though that happens with another team. He needs to be on a rebuilding team, not a team that's trying to win . Hunter has earned Stevens trust, as he said so. Asked at end of year what Hunter did to start earning playing time, he said his improved D was the reason. Hunter came from a small low level College, so it was expected that he would need time to adjust to playing against better competition. His two biggest question marks coming out of College was D and level of competition. So fact that he improved D enough in rookie year to earn minutes is a huge plus in my book. I think Stevens understands how good of a shooter Hunter is better than you do. He gets to see him everyday in practice. Just think Bradley and his first two years. He couldn't shoot well during games, but Doc kept telling people he's a good shooter, he makes them in practice all the time. By year three he was a good shooter. Young players take time to develop.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jul 5, 2016 11:05:22 GMT -5
If Jaylen Brown never shoots the ball better than Russell Westbrook but becomes a top ten player in the league, will you be the person saying "told you he can't shoot." Ugh. I never said he won't become a star or learn to shoot, but I don't think making it to the line 17 times in a summer league game and overall not shooting well (based on the box score), is anything to be excited about. Getting to line 17 times even in a summer league game is very good. Add in fact that he was going against Simmons for a bunch of those and it's impressive. He was also 1-3 from 3 point range. Overall not a bad start at all.
|
|
|
Post by chavopepe2 on Jul 5, 2016 11:11:51 GMT -5
I guess the only question I have regarding the "dont' trade assets" comment is whether or not certain players will remain assets if they pine away on the bench, not improving their value (that's a question, albeit one that reeks of my opinion, admittedly). I do still wonder what Philly might reasonably accept for Noel. He would still fit that Rim Protector/Crasher that Stevens likes. Obviously, I would continue to hold onto anything resembling the 3rd pick (whether it be Brown or the BRK picks). But maybe, when Philly comes to their senses, there is another deal to be made. Which players are you referring to? Young and Hunter don't really have any value at this point. I like Rozier and think he helps fill the roll that Turner left, but sure, if you could get a better player for him then go for it. Same thing with Smart. I'm fine with trading him if you think it's an upgrade and giving Rozier his minutes. But don't trade the BKN picks, don't trade Brown, and don't flush the longer term good contracts like Crowder for a rental.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jul 5, 2016 12:44:52 GMT -5
It is mostly the Rozier/Smart and Jerebko/Mickey "overlaps". I would also say that it sucks that the value of Young/Hunter may have no chance to improve and those 1st round assets that we once had could trickle away to nothing.
Agree on the don't trades. I know some love Sullinger but I can't see them going too far on a contract for him (or Zeller) and cutting into cap space next year (are we just waiting for Hayward??). So maybe letting them go alleviates some of the playing time concerns.
Not sure I have a REAL concern. Just thought I'd put the roster consolidation discussion back on the table now that the major wave of FA is over.
|
|
|
Post by tizzle on Jul 5, 2016 18:12:37 GMT -5
Neither of those are valid comparisons to what Durant did. Not even close. Why? Because our superteam wouldn't be as good as GSW's? It is exactly the same except he went to an already good team that had it's cap under control whereas we would have needed to sign and trade multiple people in one offseason to create the team from scratch (like we did with Pierce, KG, and Allen). Let's not forget that while not as good as GSW, the Celts were a 3rd place team last season with 48 wins. It's not like he was choosing between rescuing the Sixers fro sucking or jumping on with one of the best teams. He met with six good teams. It's not "exactly the same" and it's frankly ridiculous that you think it is. Those Celtic "superteams" you're referring to were built thru the draft and trades, not great players deciding to get together and cakewalk to titles. And there hasn't been a Celtic team (at least in about a half century) that was so good they threatened to render the entire season a formality. Even if they were, I don't fault any GM for making their team as great as they can- that's their job. But I do blame supposed great players who try to take shortcuts to titles at the expense of the league's competitive balance.
|
|
|
Post by thebogeyman on Jul 5, 2016 18:46:58 GMT -5
Why? Because our superteam wouldn't be as good as GSW's? It is exactly the same except he went to an already good team that had it's cap under control whereas we would have needed to sign and trade multiple people in one offseason to create the team from scratch (like we did with Pierce, KG, and Allen). Let's not forget that while not as good as GSW, the Celts were a 3rd place team last season with 48 wins. It's not like he was choosing between rescuing the Sixers fro sucking or jumping on with one of the best teams. He met with six good teams. It's not "exactly the same" and it's frankly ridiculous that you think it is. Those Celtic "superteams" you're referring to were built thru the draft and trades, not great players deciding to get together and cakewalk to titles. And there hasn't been a Celtic team (at least in about a half century) that was so good they threatened to render the entire season a formality. Even if they were, I don't fault any GM for making their team as great as they can- that's their job. But I do blame supposed great players who try to take shortcuts to titles at the expense of the league's competitive balance. Golden State was build more through the draft (Curry, Klay, and Green) than the Celtics team in 2008 (Pierce and Rondo). The Celtics added the last two pieces with trades and GSW added one piece in signing KD. The only reason you or anyone else cares is because KD is one of the best three players in the league. Him joining any team automatically makes them a top contender. If he joined the Celtics after we signed Horford, we would have been favorites in the East and you would have been psyched. I bet you wouldn't have cared if Horford signed with GSW instead of KD. Your logic re: GMs v. players forming superteams makes no sense because guess what; in order to sign, the GM had to want KD to sign. If he had traded for KD instead of signing him as a FA it would magically be okay? KD has worked his ass off his whole life and should be able to go wherever the eff he wants to go and play with whoever he wants to play with. No one tells you which jobs you should take.
|
|
|
Post by tizzle on Jul 5, 2016 18:57:02 GMT -5
It's not "exactly the same" and it's frankly ridiculous that you think it is. Those Celtic "superteams" you're referring to were built thru the draft and trades, not great players deciding to get together and cakewalk to titles. And there hasn't been a Celtic team (at least in about a half century) that was so good they threatened to render the entire season a formality. Even if they were, I don't fault any GM for making their team as great as they can- that's their job. But I do blame supposed great players who try to take shortcuts to titles at the expense of the league's competitive balance. Golden State was build more through the draft (Curry, Klay, and Green) than the Celtics team in 2008 (Pierce and Rondo). The Celtics added the last two pieces with trades and GSW added one piece in signing KD. The only reason you or anyone else cares is because KD is one of the best three players in the league. Him joining any team automatically makes them a top contender. If he joined the Celtics after we signed Horford, we would have been favorites in the East and you would have been psyched. I bet you wouldn't have cared if Horford signed with GSW instead of KD. Your logic re: GMs v. players forming superteams makes no sense because guess what; in order to sign, the GM had to want KD to sign. If he had traded for KD instead of signing him as a FA it would magically be okay? KD has worked his ass off his whole life and should be able to go wherever the eff he wants to go and play with whoever he wants to play with. No one tells you which jobs you should take. I really don't see any reason to continue responding to this.
|
|
|
Post by FenwayFanatic on Jul 5, 2016 19:48:10 GMT -5
So do the C's target Hayward next season, get that other max guy, then maybe work a trade for the final piece?
Next year has to be the last phase of the rebuilding process given the free agents available, the Brooklyn picks and Isaiah's contract.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jul 5, 2016 20:31:31 GMT -5
Bulpett sees the Cs core as:
Thomas, Bradley, Horford, Olynyk, Crowder, Smart, Rozier, Mickey and Brown. Still room for Johnson and Jerebko. Also doesn't mean Young and Hunter couldn't earn time.
Feels Sully and Zeller will get offers that Boston won't match.
Also says the word is that Danny is still holding firm on his predraft trade offers.
|
|
|
Post by tizzle on Jul 5, 2016 20:34:13 GMT -5
So do the C's target Hayward next season, get that other max guy, then maybe work a trade for the final piece? Next year has to be the last phase of the rebuilding process given the free agents available, the Brooklyn picks and Isaiah's contract. Yeah, we should definitely be chasing a max guy next offseason. Whether it's Hayward I wouldn't be sure. It depends on the draft. Several of the top guys are 3s and combo forwards. If we get, say, Josh Jackson to go with Brown (assuming he shows real potential this year) and Crowder, then I'm not sure Hayward is a great fit.
|
|
|
Post by FenwayFanatic on Jul 6, 2016 5:35:15 GMT -5
They could also trade the picks. I named Hayward partially because I believe he would come here. Im not sure endorsement babies like Westbrook and Griffin would.
Maybe Millsap or Lowry although idk much about either.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jul 6, 2016 11:45:52 GMT -5
Just watched yesterday's summer league game. I was not impressed with our young Frenchman. He can't jump just like Sullinger and I don't see a good athlete. He has quick feet and seems nimble for his size, but very disappointed in him as an athlete. Sullinger is just thick like a tree trunk, with a massive lower body. He just looks fat and overweight. Though he did make a few nice moves in post. In no way do I see a young Larry Johnson like some people said.
Bentil one handed jam when he drove the lane was a thing of beauty and shows he is an NBA athlete. On the other hand his post D was just bad. One pump fake and he was in the air fouling the guy. He can really score, rest is a work in progress.
Jackson in limited minutes looked very good defensively.
James Young looked a lot better than last year. He made a few plays.
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Jul 6, 2016 12:00:24 GMT -5
Yabusele could definitely be in better shape, and I imagine the goal is to put him on a pro conditioning program and see whether he can lose the extra weight. He's not an elite athlete, but he's quick and long and has a very well-rounded package of skills. Probably not a star, but getting a solid rotation player at 16 is nothing to be upset about.
|
|
wcp3
Veteran
Posts: 3,848
|
Post by wcp3 on Jul 6, 2016 12:08:07 GMT -5
Lol, that's a lot of conclusions to be drawing from a single summer league game.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jul 6, 2016 12:23:39 GMT -5
Lol, that's a lot of conclusions to be drawing from a single summer league game. They were observations not conclusions. You don't need more than one game to tell that a guy is fat and can't jump. Did you watch the game?
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jul 6, 2016 12:42:27 GMT -5
Yabusele could definitely be in better shape, and I imagine the goal is to put him on a pro conditioning program and see whether he can lose the extra weight. He's not an elite athlete, but he's quick and long and has a very well-rounded package of skills. Probably not a star, but getting a solid rotation player at 16 is nothing to be upset about. If he's that level of an athlete I think it's fair to question picking him over Ellenson who has more size and is just as skilled if not more.
|
|
|
Post by tjb21 on Jul 6, 2016 12:49:33 GMT -5
There were a lot of players available at #16 better than Yabusele, even Danny would agree. He was trying to keep the roster as clean as possible, so they could sign 2 max deals and trade for another larger contract.
Anyone know why Davis fell so far in the draft? Injury?
|
|
wcp3
Veteran
Posts: 3,848
|
Post by wcp3 on Jul 6, 2016 12:55:39 GMT -5
Lol, that's a lot of conclusions to be drawing from a single summer league game. They were observations not conclusions. You don't need more than one game to tell that a guy is fat and can't jump. Did you watch the game? Yes.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jul 6, 2016 17:58:38 GMT -5
No chance I'm giving up on James Young. Team needs shooting and the kid can shoot. I don't pay any attention to his numbers in limited action it's all about getting comfortable. There will be opportunity. Injuries happen and if his defense and maturity take a jump he will have an opportunity. We knew he was a project when drafted so the fact he's been a project shouldn't change much. Kid is still just 20.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jul 6, 2016 18:08:22 GMT -5
There were a lot of players available at #16 better than Yabusele, even Danny would agree. He was trying to keep the roster as clean as possible, so they could sign 2 max deals and trade for another larger contract. Anyone know why Davis fell so far in the draft? Injury? Well than Danny made a big mistake. Chances we signed two max players was always slim. If by miracle we got Durant you could easily trade a player like Young to clear the cap space or roster space if needed. Look at Golden State they got Durant without cap room to even sign him. They had to trade Bogut first. In NBA draft you should always take best player available. Davis fell due to poor workouts. Reports say he was flat out bad and was outplayed by most of the other prospects.
|
|
|