SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Post-Draft Discussion Thread
|
Post by johnsilver52 on Jun 16, 2016 6:28:39 GMT -5
Ugh. I was reading the Speier article, and there was a quote from Rikard about Dalbec saying the scout (Vaughn Williams) had "strong convictions about him as a hitter". So I went on here and checked the scout's track record of signings to see if his convictions can be counted on. Willie Ethington Brandon Magee Devin Marrero Jeremy Rivera Shaq Thompson In short, no. No they cannot. At least we can say pretty confidently he won't be worse than Shaq Thompson, considering its just about mathematically impossible. Pretty sure he has to be the worst hitter in the history of professional baseball. In order for that list to be complete you have to include the players he scouted that we didn't sign as well. I'm also pretty sure there are plenty of scouts with similar or even worse track records. I wouldn't read too much into it either way. I doubt he was the only scout watching Marrero from Boston and as everyone knows. both Shaq and Magee were both 100% football players before baseball anyway. Ethington? Had hopes for him and a personal disappointment, especially with him being cut loose so early after being given that 100k over slot bonus.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jun 16, 2016 8:05:11 GMT -5
With a few signings in the books it's not looking good for getting Groome anywhere near slot. Pick # 35 got 3.2 million and pick #40 got over 3 million. If I'm Groome I'm not taking less than 4 million after seeing those deals.
I am also shocked Quantrill got over slot money coming off injury.
|
|
|
Post by thebogeyman on Jun 16, 2016 8:36:58 GMT -5
With a few signings in the books it's not looking good for getting Groome anywhere near slot. Pick # 35 got 3.2 million and pick #40 got over 3 million. If I'm Groome I'm not taking less than 4 million after seeing those deals. I am also shocked Quantrill got over slot money coming off injury. I am not sure it matters much as he is getting more than those picks no matter what. #2 (Cin) went 1.5 million under slot and #4 (Col) went 500k under slot. Presumably, #3 (Atl) will also come in under slot to make up for the over slot lottery and 2nd round picks by Cin and Atl.
|
|
|
Post by ancientsoxfogey on Jun 16, 2016 10:35:03 GMT -5
I consider Chatman's and Nogosek's early signings to be positive news about signing Groome. If the Sox were worried about scrounging up enough money to sign Groome they might have tried to squeeze these two a little harder to get more money to play with, and negotiations would have taken longer. The fact that they signed these guys right away, pocketed a little but not overly much cap room, and moved on signifies to me that they have a specific plan in mind as to how much it's going to take to sign Groome and how they are going to accumulate the space they need.
|
|
|
Post by ramireja on Jun 16, 2016 11:20:36 GMT -5
I consider Chatman's and Nogosek's early signings to be positive news about signing Groome. If the Sox were worried about scrounging up enough money to sign Groome they might have tried to squeeze these two a little harder to get more money to play with, and negotiations would have taken longer. The fact that they signed these guys right away, pocketed a little but not overly much cap room, and moved on signifies to me that they have a specific plan in mind as to how much it's going to take to sign Groome and how they are going to accumulate the space they need. I agree. If I had to guess right now, I'd say 4.0 mill is the magic number. They could currently offer Groome 3.7 from the Chatham and Nogosek savings + 5% extra cap. I'm hoping they can pull the additional 300k from Anderson/Marrero/Espinal but that might be optimistic. I anticipate another 350k from the senior signs that I hope is used for Quintana (maybe mostly for him) and the unranked HS players (e.g., maybe a 150k bonus to Michael Wilson).
|
|
|
Post by MLBDreams on Jun 16, 2016 11:35:00 GMT -5
I noticed the Yankees signed from #7 to #10 round players with $10K each. Pretty way below from the slot values. Hope the Red Sox can do same thing to their #7-#10 round players with $10K offer. Two senior college players from #7 & #9 rounds. But we don't know whether the FO able to convince with their #8 & #10 players since they can return back to college if $10K isn't good enough for them to sign.
|
|
|
Post by sammo420 on Jun 16, 2016 11:50:24 GMT -5
I noticed the Yankees signed from #7 to #10 round players with $10K each. Pretty way below from the slot values. Hope the Red Sox can do same thing to their #7-#10 round players with $10K offer. Two senior college players from #7 & #9 rounds. But we don't know whether the FO able to convince with their #8 & #10 players since they can return back to college if $10K isn't good enough for them to sign. Without looking, the Yankees probably signed future peanut venders in 7-10. The Sox at least seem to try to grab seniors with "some" chance of giving us something back other than savings. Long shots? yeah. But they're better than no shots.
|
|
|
Post by ramireja on Jun 16, 2016 12:08:01 GMT -5
I noticed the Yankees signed from #7 to #10 round players with $10K each. Pretty way below from the slot values. Hope the Red Sox can do same thing to their #7-#10 round players with $10K offer. Two senior college players from #7 & #9 rounds. But we don't know whether the FO able to convince with their #8 & #10 players since they can return back to college if $10K isn't good enough for them to sign. Its highly unlikely that our #8 and #10 round signings would sign for that low. I've only seen ~10k bonuses accepted by senior signs since the new CBA rules. If we get Marrero or Espinal for underslot at all, its a win and helpful. I'd still expect them to sign for between 50k-100k though.
|
|
|
Post by telson13 on Jun 16, 2016 12:19:10 GMT -5
With a few signings in the books it's not looking good for getting Groome anywhere near slot. Pick # 35 got 3.2 million and pick #40 got over 3 million. If I'm Groome I'm not taking less than 4 million after seeing those deals. I am also shocked Quantrill got over slot money coming off injury. Completely agree about Quantrill. Early in the season I questioned whether the Sox might be served taking him at 12 and going under-slot. So much for that theory. Then again, Groome. Who'd've thunk it? As for near-slot, I'm not sure. Depends on how you define near. I mean, they've got about $500k to play with with the 5% overage and the savings on Chatham and Nogosek (which I thought was a deal and a very good pick). So they're close to $4M, already with a couple of Srs. left and a third-rounder who was picked high and should go pretty well under-slot. Both Wentz and Trammell were seen as possible low-mid-teens picks (think of mocks sending Trammell to the Sox) who slid due to bonus demands. I think the Sox sign Groome, and probably for $3.8-4.0M. But worst-case scenario is that they're stuck with pick-13 next year in a deeper draft.
|
|
|
Post by bosox81 on Jun 16, 2016 12:46:09 GMT -5
I noticed the Yankees signed from #7 to #10 round players with $10K each. Pretty way below from the slot values. Hope the Red Sox can do same thing to their #7-#10 round players with $10K offer. Two senior college players from #7 & #9 rounds. But we don't know whether the FO able to convince with their #8 & #10 players since they can return back to college if $10K isn't good enough for them to sign. Without looking, the Yankees probably signed future peanut venders in 7-10. The Sox at least seem to try to grab seniors with "some" chance of giving us something back other than savings. Long shots? yeah. But they're better than no shots. I have to say, though, I think I prefer the Yanks' strategy of signing more seniors, if it increased the quality of our 2nd to 4th round picks.
|
|
|
Post by grandsalami on Jun 16, 2016 12:48:52 GMT -5
“@weei: ESPN’s Keith Law: Teams believe Jason Groome was ‘upset’ to be drafted by Red Sox t.co/iannbBysguThe Red Sox made one of the most interesting selections in the 2016 MLB draft as they selected high school left-hander Jason Groome No. 12 overall. Groome was once thought as a No. 1 overall pick, but slid all the way down to No. 12. Being the No. 12 overall pick, the slot value for that pick is $3,192,800 and many believe he’s seeking top five draft pick money, which may have scared some teams away. Appearing on Buster Olney’s podcast, ESPN’s Keith Law said teams believe Groome was upset to be selected by the Red Sox as he had a deal with another team picking after the Red Sox for more money. He did add he believes eventually Groome will sign for around $4 million.
|
|
|
Post by ramireja on Jun 16, 2016 12:49:30 GMT -5
Without looking, the Yankees probably signed future peanut venders in 7-10. The Sox at least seem to try to grab seniors with "some" chance of giving us something back other than savings. Long shots? yeah. But they're better than no shots. I have to say, though, I think I prefer the Yanks' strategy of signing more seniors, if it increased the quality of our 2nd to 4th round picks. Its an interesting thing to consider. Either grabbing like 4 seniors for super savings, or a couple of seniors, and then going slightly below slot on 3-5 other places while at the same time not reaching too far (Chatham as a 2nd rounder and Anderson as a 3rd rounder aren't insane by any means). Not sure what I prefer...I think its very situation specific and we'd need to know more about how negotiations went behind the scenes.
|
|
|
Post by ramireja on Jun 16, 2016 12:52:13 GMT -5
“@weei: ESPN’s Keith Law: Teams believe Jason Groome was ‘upset’ to be drafted by Red Sox t.co/iannbBysguThe Red Sox made one of the most interesting selections in the 2016 MLB draft as they selected high school left-hander Jason Groome No. 12 overall. Groome was once thought as a No. 1 overall pick, but slid all the way down to No. 12. Being the No. 12 overall pick, the slot value for that pick is $3,192,800 and many believe he’s seeking top five draft pick money, which may have scared some teams away. Appearing on Buster Olney’s podcast, ESPN’s Keith Law said teams believe Groome was upset to be selected by the Red Sox as he had a deal with another team picking after the Red Sox for more money. He did add he believes eventually Groome will sign for around $4 million. Well thats interesting. That said, I highly doubt Groome was upset to be drafted by his favorite team ("the money doesn't matter to me"). I pretty sure if anyone was upset, it was his agent. Lets hope this doesn't throw a wrench into negotiations. 4 mill is completely fair and doable. Lets get it done without much fuss, even if it takes a couple of weeks.
|
|
|
Post by kingofthetrill on Jun 16, 2016 12:53:07 GMT -5
I noticed the Yankees signed from #7 to #10 round players with $10K each. Pretty way below from the slot values. Hope the Red Sox can do same thing to their #7-#10 round players with $10K offer. Two senior college players from #7 & #9 rounds. But we don't know whether the FO able to convince with their #8 & #10 players since they can return back to college if $10K isn't good enough for them to sign. According to my notes, the Yankees also only drafted 3 of the MLB top 200 players in their 10 rounds, and they were rounds 1-3 which are the only three they have not signed yet. The Yankees added 4 of the MLB top 200 later in the draft, but they had the fewest in the division in the first 10 rounds. Baltimore had 5, Boston and Toronto had 6, and Tampa Bay had 7. It's also worth nothing that Tampa Bay, Baltimore, and Toronto had one more pick than Boston and New York. I also believe that Boston drafted 6 more MLB top 200 players in later rounds, the Yankees added 4, and the Blue Jays, Orioles, and Rays added 1 each.
|
|
|
Post by FenwayFanatic on Jun 16, 2016 13:05:17 GMT -5
Upset to be drafted by the Red Sox? There is literally video of him and his family's reaction. Keith Law can be a real douche sometimes.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jun 16, 2016 13:07:57 GMT -5
Not discounting your conclusion but it could easily be explained away. He was excited and then found out that the number Boston is offering his lower than the number he heard from his agent on this other team.
Not saying that happened but, in this case, it's a complete viable explanation for what we saw and what Law said.
|
|
|
Post by ramireja on Jun 16, 2016 13:18:00 GMT -5
Not discounting your conclusion but it could easily be explained away. He was excited and then found out that the number Boston is offering his lower than the number he heard from his agent on this other team. Not saying that happened but, in this case, it's a complete viable explanation for what we saw and what Law said. His agent was upset, and/or is using this as a negotiation chip. Thats the explanation. I highly, highly doubt Groome himself is upset.
|
|
|
Post by thegoodthebadthesox on Jun 16, 2016 13:30:19 GMT -5
Ugh. I was reading the Speier article, and there was a quote from Rikard about Dalbec saying the scout (Vaughn Williams) had "strong convictions about him as a hitter". So I went on here and checked the scout's track record of signings to see if his convictions can be counted on. Willie Ethington Brandon Magee Devin Marrero Jeremy Rivera Shaq Thompson In short, no. No they cannot. At least we can say pretty confidently he won't be worse than Shaq Thompson, considering its just about mathematically impossible. Pretty sure he has to be the worst hitter in the history of professional baseball. How do you check scouts' signing records? That's a neat feature.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jun 16, 2016 13:30:24 GMT -5
More likely, yes. Either way, not sure this is about Keith Law.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jun 16, 2016 13:37:49 GMT -5
Callis' just posted his mailbox and addressed a question regarding Groome.
- He says the industry rumor is that SD was going to give him $5M - He believes that Boston will get it's other signings done and then offer him what's left - He believes Boston could fit Groome and, at least, one of Quintana, Shepherd, Fitzgerald, Jones, Belge and Berger.
|
|
|
Post by kingofthetrill on Jun 16, 2016 13:50:06 GMT -5
I know that this is silly, but I wonder how funny it would be if a team poached another team's nepotism pick. I mean, the picks are clearly being wasted if you're drafting Lovullo's kid, Ken Griffey Jr's football playing son, or Ken Williams grand daughter, so why not have a little fun with it?
|
|
|
Post by ramireja on Jun 16, 2016 13:53:53 GMT -5
Callis' just posted his mailbox and addressed a question regarding Groome. - He says the industry rumor is that SD was going to give him $5M- He believes that Boston will get it's other signings done and then offer him what's left - He believes Boston could fit Groome and, at least, one of Quintana, Shepherd, Fitzgerald, Jones, Belge and Berger. I'm calling that rumor at least partial BS and definitely a negotiating tactic. If Quantrill went underslot....maybe. But he didn't, in fact, he went overslot. The next two Padre slots had slot values of just over 2 mill. Were the Padres really going to draft Groome with one of those positions, and a senior in the other slot? First, I don't think thats even allowed (isn't there a rule that offers need to meet a certain % of the slot recommendation in the early rounds?). Second, even if they saved two mill on one of those slots, once you add that to the other position, its still shy of 5 mill, and you still need money to sign Quantrill overslot. Once you add in the 5% and senior signs later its possible by the slimmest of margins, but you're punting on the rest of the draft. Thats outlandish. Bottom line -- if the Padres really had a deal lined up, they would have almost certainly gone underslot at #8, or simply selected Groome at #8, and they didn't.
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Jun 16, 2016 14:03:48 GMT -5
Callis' just posted his mailbox and addressed a question regarding Groome. - He says the industry rumor is that SD was going to give him $5M- He believes that Boston will get it's other signings done and then offer him what's left - He believes Boston could fit Groome and, at least, one of Quintana, Shepherd, Fitzgerald, Jones, Belge and Berger. I'm calling that rumor at least partial BS and definitely a negotiating tactic. If Quantrill went underslot....maybe. But he didn't, in fact, he went overslot. The next two Padre slots had slot values of just over 2 mill. Were the Padres really going to draft Groome with one of those positions, and a senior in the other slot? First, I don't think thats even allowed (isn't there a rule that offers need to meet a certain % of the slot recommendation in the early rounds?). Second, even if they saved two mill on one of those slots, once you add that to the other position, its still shy of 5 mill, and you still need money to sign Quantrill overslot. Once you add in the 5% and senior signs later its possible by the slimmest of margins, but you're punting on the rest of the draft. Thats outlandish. Bottom line -- if the Padres really had a deal lined up, they would have almost certainly gone underslot at #8, or simply selected Groome at #8, and they didn't. The rule you're thinking of is the rule that you have to offer your draftee a certain percentage of the slot value in order to get a compensatory pick in next year's draft if he doesn't sign-- which isn't applicable here. Maybe the Padres were planning on signing Quantrill underslot and give the rest to Groome, but when Groome went to the Red Sox, they just decided to give the extra money to Quantrill? Seems kind of dumb, but plausible.
|
|
|
Post by ramireja on Jun 16, 2016 14:21:15 GMT -5
I'm calling that rumor at least partial BS and definitely a negotiating tactic. If Quantrill went underslot....maybe. But he didn't, in fact, he went overslot. The next two Padre slots had slot values of just over 2 mill. Were the Padres really going to draft Groome with one of those positions, and a senior in the other slot? First, I don't think thats even allowed (isn't there a rule that offers need to meet a certain % of the slot recommendation in the early rounds?). Second, even if they saved two mill on one of those slots, once you add that to the other position, its still shy of 5 mill, and you still need money to sign Quantrill overslot. Once you add in the 5% and senior signs later its possible by the slimmest of margins, but you're punting on the rest of the draft. Thats outlandish. Bottom line -- if the Padres really had a deal lined up, they would have almost certainly gone underslot at #8, or simply selected Groome at #8, and they didn't. The rule you're thinking of is the rule that you have to offer your draftee a certain percentage of the slot value in order to get a compensatory pick in next year's draft if he doesn't sign-- which isn't applicable here. Maybe the Padres were planning on signing Quantrill underslot and give the rest to Groome, but when Groome went to the Red Sox, they just decided to give the extra money to Quantrill? Seems kind of dumb, but plausible. Yeah, I have a hard time buying the idea that they would throw Quantrill extra money. Once they know Groome is gone, why not spend the extra money on their next picks (or after Round 11 with a strategy that we used when we took 5 consecutive Top 200 HS player)? I mean I guess its the Padres who have made very questionable decisions in the last 2-3 years (minus the Kimbrel trade), but that still seems absurd. I well say though, that I looked back at the Padres total pool which was 12.8 mill, so I suppose its conceivable...but once you give 5 to Groome, ~4 to Quantrill...that leaves like 3.8 mill for another 1st rounder (2.15 mill slot value), their early 2nd rounder (1.3 mill slot value), a supplemental second rounder (0.9 mill), and picks 3-10 (a total of ~2.6 mill) plus anything extra beyond 11. Sure, its possible, but I'm just not buying it. Cute story by the agent though.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jun 16, 2016 14:30:40 GMT -5
I don't know. They had close to $13Mn (pre-overage) in pool money. They also spent $1.7 on 3rd rounder Mason Thompson (a hit of just over $1Mn to their bonus pool). They could've easily used that money plus some more savings at 25 (Lauer was a bit under slot - they didn't need a "senior sign" to get bigger savings here, 48, 71 (I would think Lawson gets over-slot no?)
I'm surprised at the Quantrill bonus but I don't necessarily think that it renders the rumor BS.
|
|
|