SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
2017-18 Celtics Season Thread
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Nov 5, 2017 17:42:42 GMT -5
Danny is having a stare down with Colangelo. How about Nader and a 2nd? Is that worth a shot at Okafer playing well and wanting to stay a while? I don't see a ton of downside with that deal for us. Only thing is not being able to get another player at deadline. At the same time, if we stay healthy we really don't have a big need. I like Nader, but he can't hardly get time with Hayward and Morris out. Semi already passed him, so he is going to really struggle to get minutes. So I would do it, if the reports about Danny loving him are correct. What choice do the Sixers have? If someone was going to give up a first they would have already. Maybe an injury happens or something. If the Sixers want more maybe they should play him, it could only increase his value. His one game this year was good. The bigger problem is Okafor is really a project, so those teams planning on having late first round picks most likely don't want a project. We do, but won't even part with a late first. Which tells me Danny might love him, but he won't pay much for him. We could just offer a Noel type deal so they can save face. First round pick top 29 protected with Nader, if they don't get it they get a 2nd. Noel went for two second round picks and Anderson. I think Nader is equal or better than Anderson, so it's a fair offer.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Nov 5, 2017 22:34:58 GMT -5
Not to toot my own horn, but I really believed the sports media were wrong (duh!) about the Celtics defense without AB and Jae. Both are kind of overrated and the loss of IT absolutely helps as well. However, I never imagined they would be going with this beautiful switch everything zone defense they're playing right now. They don't look like a team that should play this well on defense, but seriously, if this were the Grizzlies people would be going nuts over the "grit and grind". Forget that, the C's flat out RIP AND TEAR on defense.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Nov 6, 2017 2:09:53 GMT -5
I don't know if AB and Jae were overrated, well AB was if you thought he was truly elite overall. No Thomas is huge. Rozier is a monster on D. Baynes is like an enforcer we haven't had since Perk. Guys like Theis we just didn't have last year. Also our rebounding is huge. Like I kept saying last year, it's hard to be good defensively when you can't rebound. Teams aren't getting all the extra shots they did last year. So I don't blame it on those guys. We just have a better more complete team this year. We can match-up big and small against teams this year, not just small like last year. AB is really helping the Pistons and Crowder would really help the Cavs if they knew how to use him.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Nov 6, 2017 4:51:20 GMT -5
Cavs lost again last night lol.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Nov 6, 2017 7:28:49 GMT -5
I’m not going to dig it up but there wS a write up a couple days ago cautioning on the Celtics defense being for real. In short, it basically pointed out they’ve played poor offensive teams so far (SSS and you can argue our games vs those teams dragged down their averages) and opponents are missing open 3s at an unsustainable clip and there was one more stat I️ can’t recall.
I️ believe in this defense but I️ don’t know if it’s THIS good. 8 straight with teams under 95 points is insanity.
I️ agree with UMaSS on why we are better. More length - more rebounding and more versatility.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Nov 6, 2017 7:32:08 GMT -5
I’m so impressed with how easy Kyrie has made the transition with regards to his attitude on wanting to be an all around player and leader. He doesn’t care about his stats; he’s getting guys involved, leading by example on defense and taking over when they need him to. It’s nice to see and he’s starting to get credit for it.
The comments he’s made about Stevens make me feel good. My biggest fear when Hayward went down was losing Kyrie and him bolting when his contract was up; now I’m hopeful he wants his number in the rafters.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Nov 6, 2017 7:49:56 GMT -5
Were the Sixers once again stupid to not extend Okafor? Is he worth more with a second yr attached even at what 6 mil than without the second yr? Obviously he isn't worth much for 3/4 of a season. I am really enjoying this team and have to ask, how good are they? Time will tell.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Nov 6, 2017 8:30:55 GMT -5
I don't know if AB and Jae were overrated, well AB was if you thought he was truly elite overall. No Thomas is huge. Rozier is a monster on D. Baynes is like an enforcer we haven't had since Perk. Guys like Theis we just didn't have last year. Also our rebounding is huge. Like I kept saying last year, it's hard to be good defensively when you can't rebound. Teams aren't getting all the extra shots they did last year. So I don't blame it on those guys. We just have a better more complete team this year. We can match-up big and small against teams this year, not just small like last year. AB is really helping the Pistons and Crowder would really help the Cavs if they knew how to use him. I think AB and Jae are really good defensive players and they were at some point close to being elite, but the narrative about them would make you think they were Draymond Green or something, like the Celtics were a bad defensive team that lost its two best defenders. That's not entirely true because they defended poorly last year as well and the increase in length would at the very least offset their departure. They're also limited in what they can or can't do. AB's size keeps him from being really elite and Jae's inability to guard quicker guards or power forwards also hamper the team's versatility and that's key. Previously the Celtics had a 2 that couldn't guard 3s, a 3 that couldn't guard 2s or 4s, and a 1 that couldn't guard sh*t from hitting the toilet. Now it seems like everyone can guard anyone to some level of competency. It's great.
|
|
wcp3
Veteran
Posts: 3,860
|
Post by wcp3 on Nov 6, 2017 10:38:57 GMT -5
AB was very good, but somewhat limited on D due to his size. I haven’t looked at the numbers, but my impression was that he was a much better on-the-ball defender than he was guarding off the ball.
For whatever reason, Crowder was never the same defensive player after his ankle injury. He was still good, but very far from irreplaceable.
Those two guys are good individually, but AB (and obviously Isaiah) forced the Celtics to have to play small consistently. The Celtics are bigger defensively at every positions this year, which has helped turn them into a very good defensive rebounding team. It’s a lot harder to be great defensively when you can’t rebound, so that’s been one of the reasons they’re so much better on that end.
(They also just seem to play great team defense, which, combined with their length at all positions, is an excellent combo.)
|
|
|
Post by philarhody on Nov 6, 2017 11:24:57 GMT -5
Tom Haberstroh was on Simmons' Ringer Podcast saying that there was no greater discrepancy between the scout eye test and Avery Bradley's advanced defensive metrics. Effort only gets you so far when you're 6'2 and being asked to switch onto wings. As for Crowder, he's too slow to really be more than a decent outside shooter who can defend opposing power forwards. I think we are seeing that last year's conference finals run was orchestrated with a lot of smoke and mirrors.
Meanwhile Danny Ainge is coming up roses in all manner of transactions. Even Marcus Morris seems like a potential upgrade to Bradley with the subsequent uptick in minutes for Smart and Rozier.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Nov 6, 2017 11:42:47 GMT -5
Is this team deeper than last years squad? I️ believe it may be; you kind of have to count Hayward in the analysis because he was part of the roster Danny put together and I️ find it kind of amazing that they could turn over so much of the roster and supposedly consolidate talent to have more high end but still come out with better depth.
|
|
|
Post by Oregon Norm on Nov 6, 2017 11:46:36 GMT -5
Hard to overstate how big those two were yesterday. These are guards, each with a little less than 30 minutes on the court, and between them they pulled down 15 rebounds. In fact the team has out-rebounded every opponent but two. That's also because of better height at just about all the positions and better rebounders. That should put to rest all the chatter about the need for some sort of godsend for cleaning the boards. They have a lot of players, including guards, all of whom add up to a team that does just that.
|
|
ianrs
Veteran
Posts: 2,451
|
Post by ianrs on Nov 6, 2017 12:38:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Nov 6, 2017 13:18:32 GMT -5
Okafor was great his one season at Duke - you have reason to not want him but the garbage in those articles shouldn’t be one of them
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Nov 6, 2017 22:35:10 GMT -5
Sloppy game on defense, nice to see a win nonetheless. Kyrie and Tatum were amazing, everyone else was pretty meh. I'll take it!
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Nov 6, 2017 22:46:29 GMT -5
Geeze, the Celtics might never lose now. Tatum is probably the best rookie out there this year and Kyrie with his best game as a Celtic. It's pretty incredible but even without Hayward, they still might be contenders. I will withhold judgments about the Cavs until Isaah comes back, but I still love to laugh at them in the meantime.
|
|
|
Post by Oregon Norm on Nov 7, 2017 1:30:10 GMT -5
Sloppy game on defense, nice to see a win nonetheless. Kyrie and Tatum were amazing, everyone else was pretty meh. I'll take it! Forget about Phil Jackson, Irving may be the real Zenmaster. Early yet, but he appears to elevate his game in sync with the perceived need, given the way the team is playing. It seems to me that his skills are so advanced he could easily take 20-25 shots a night and be one of the league leaders in pts/game. He isn't doing that unless he has to. The ego is subsumed. It's also one of the tenets in Sun Tzu's "The Art of War". Resources are not to be flaunted, but hidden away till needed. The element of surprise is everything.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Nov 7, 2017 7:28:31 GMT -5
Kyrie has been amazing, and i agree with Norm. He’s embracing the role of point guard and leader and doing what needs to be done to win. He’s buying into an all around team system that needs leaders but relies on the whole to be successful and he seems to be eating it up. If they can extend him, that trade was a steal. I realize a great player could be had with that Brooklyn pick but Kyrie is showing me he’s a super star.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Nov 7, 2017 7:35:58 GMT -5
The shot Tatum hit to put them up 4 was incredible. Smart threw the pass down at his ankles. One of the more under-rated parts of a PG game is hitting a shooter up in the chest with a pass so they can catch and shoot in rhythm. It affects percentages big time. Tatum should have missed that shot based on where the pass was but instead he’s cool calm and collected.
Remember when he was going to take too many difficult midrange shots, he was going to be inefficient and it was going to take him time to find NBA 3 point range? Or when he was going to be a defensive liability? Welp, about that...
I hesitate to say this because I love how he’s playing and be a complimentary efficient player, but his 52% from 3 point range is too high. He needs to shoot more, but he’s still taking 3 a game right now so I’m good with him picking his spots and slowly becoming more aggressive.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Nov 7, 2017 7:50:58 GMT -5
I don’t want to get ahead of ourselves but Semi is a player and he’s not playing because Brad doesn’t have other options. He also gets his role and wants to be a 3 and D monster. Once he masters that I’m sure he will slowly expand his game but great teams have great role players who know and embrace that role. Usually they are veterans not rookies but whatever... this is how much the Celtics will be paying this guy for the next 4 years.... it’s amazing how much bang for your buck you can get when you can basically skip the development part of things...
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Nov 7, 2017 8:54:30 GMT -5
Their role players have been huge this year. Brown has taken a sizable step forward. Tatum has not just proven to be NBA-ready, but also slid in seamlessly into more of a secondary role. His defense has been a surprise and he's taking the right shots. Rosier continues to mature. Baynes has improved their rebounding and is a useful release valve on offense. Ojeleye is almost the archetypical three and d player. Theis has been a welcome surprise-- his rim protection and pick and roll game look legit, and he's also flashed an outside shot. Larkin and Nader don't look overmatched.
To be this good this early while having only three or four carryover rotation players is also a huge testament to the quality of the coaching.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Nov 7, 2017 9:15:56 GMT -5
Their role players have been huge this year. Brown has taken a sizable step forward. Tatum has not just proven to be NBA-ready, but also slid in seamlessly into more of a secondary role. His defense has been a surprise and he's taking the right shots. Rosier continues to mature. Baynes has improved their rebounding and is a useful release valve on offense. Ojeleye is almost the archetypical three and d player. Theis has been a welcome surprise-- his rim protection and pick and roll game look legit, and he's also flashed an outside shot. Larkin and Nader don't look overmatched. To be this good this early while having only three or four carryover rotation players is also a huge testament to the quality of the coaching. Last night Tatum started the game somewhat poorly, he took some bad shots and he just looked off. He came back in the 2nd quarter looking much better and that carried over to the 3rd quarter. That ability to turn a performance around and not just chuck the ball hoping it would fall is another testament to how mature he is for a rookie. Guys his age rarely make adjustments on the fly and yet the Celtics don't win the game if he doesn't do that. Tatum is awesome, he plays a very smart game. And agree 100% on the coaching. Maybe finally Stevens will win his long overdue COTY.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Nov 7, 2017 9:59:46 GMT -5
I will say the Hawks were in that game because of good 3 point shooting. The numbers have suggested the Celtics opponents have been missing a lot of open 3s. Will be interesting to see if the law of averages comes back to hurt them a bit. Nice to get a win against a hot shooting team though. The Lakers and Warriors can both bomb away.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Nov 7, 2017 11:39:14 GMT -5
Is the other shoe going to drop or are the Celtics really this good? Could they be just scratching the surface given how young and new to playing together they are? It would be hard to believe they aren't going to get significantly better based on those 2 things and with GH coming back next year. Danny and Brad have done well. Yes this team is deeper, longer and tougher. It just seems like they have all the pieces and they are still putting the puzzle together. On D it is as it is coached, they are on a string moving together cutting off angles and lanes. The great thing about D is that it isn't like shooting, which can come and go. Playing great defense is a mindset and these guys get it. And yes Kyrie Erving has been so impressive in so many ways. He is playing tough D, he is creating and looking for others, he is dominating when needed, he is leading by example playing unselfishly and his handle is other worldly. Zen like yes! Yes and Kyrie has said it, Tatum needs to start being more assertive with his shots. He can create, he can finish and he can shoot so its time for him to get more involved. Yup Smart and Rozier are assassins off the bench and Semi is just scratching the surface, I believe. Theis and Baynes bring more rim protection than past bench bigs and Morris has hardly contributed yet. I know they will come back to Earth but sure is fun to watch and dream.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Nov 7, 2017 11:45:10 GMT -5
I will say the Hawks were in that game because of good 3 point shooting. The numbers have suggested the Celtics opponents have been missing a lot of open 3s. Will be interesting to see if the law of averages comes back to hurt them a bit. Nice to get a win against a hot shooting team though. The Lakers and Warriors can both bomb away. Anytime you win against a team that shots 50% from three it's a good night.
|
|
|