SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
2018 Patriots/NFL offseason thread
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Apr 23, 2018 9:58:54 GMT -5
I got to say, this is probably the most intriguing first round of a Patriots draft I've felt ever. Could go a million directions (more so than usual).
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 23, 2018 13:03:28 GMT -5
No way they should have to trade both firsts for Jackson. If they do, it’s a mistake.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Apr 23, 2018 13:28:41 GMT -5
No way they should have to trade both firsts for Jackson. If they do, it’s a mistake. true
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 23, 2018 15:58:04 GMT -5
Anyone willing to go on record with a guess on how the Pats draft goes? Here's my guess: 1. Patriots trade up into the pre-teens for a QB (23 and 31) (Jackson or falling Rosen). 2. Patriots get a defensive "steal" at 43 and trade down from 63. (3rd and a 4th) 3. Patriots trade for a player with pick 198 (swap into the 7th) 4. They don't pick an OT until late and everyone freaks What I'd rather they do is keep their top 3 picks (fat chance) and get three of the following: a defensive stud, an OT, a tight end and a 2nd tier QB (Rudolph or Lauletta), and have them actually be smarter than everyone else with the QB (a Garoppolo not a Mallett). I like the idea of Jackson, Mayfield or Rosen but think the team isn't deep enough where it should pay up for one of them. I also hope they get an RB in the middle rounds. Hoping Allen/Barkley go 1/2. I think that sets up the Pats better later in the draft. 1) Very different values on Rosen and Jackson. If they love Rosen and he drops to teens trading both picks could make sense. Still not sure you'd have to if it's the teens though compared to pick number 10. I like Jackson, but not sure I want to trade both picks for him though. One of the reasons I like him is he could fall and provide good value. You might get him at 23 without trading. I'm willing to bet one or two of these QBs drop. 2) Could very well happen, a ton of very good defenders should be there at 43, but a ton of very good offensive players will be there also. Given this draft that is a great spot. Trading down from 63 is also a great guess. Value starts to drop off and there seems to be a large group of similar players. 3) Anything could happen, but they value talent not certain picks. 4) Highly likely, I almost expect that to happen.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Apr 23, 2018 16:11:04 GMT -5
I can see them trading up for Rosen if he falls out of the top 10.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 23, 2018 18:30:35 GMT -5
I really want Raashan Evans to be a Patriot. Like really want him.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 25, 2018 7:32:30 GMT -5
Sims latest (last) mock was an interesting one. I like his stuff because he’s original but not for the sake of being original. He clearly has opinions and thinks for himself on players and doesn’t have a sheep following the heard mentality.
He’s got Allen going 1. From before draft season he was my number 1 QB but I’ve let the “experts” spur me on him. Sims reinforced why I liked him and I am back on his bandwagon.
He had Darnold slipping to 17; I never liked him until the same experts molded me. I’m back to thinking he’s a useless bust. This isn’t guy who has lousy mechanics, turns the ball over and wasn’t a winner in college. Sure there are some good qualities about him but there’s way too much hype and not enough substance for me.
He has the Pats taking Carlton Davis (CB) from Auburn at 23 and Kolton Miller (LT) from UCLA at 31. He compares Davis to Sherman. Calls him he best man to man big corner (6’1) in the draft. Played a lot of man in the SEC. I wouldn’t hate a pick like that, but I’d prefer to walk away with Evans and Miller with those picks and take my chances that a good corner is still there with the first second round pick. And if they like Davis that much then I’d prefer they do the unprecedented and trade up a little in the second round and take him.
Basically if the Patriots ever walked out of the second round with Evans and a LT, DB and QB that fit into this breakdown, I might actually have a wet dream Friday night.
LB: Evans, Evans and Evans
LT: Miller or Connor Williams (or McGlinchey if the unthinkable happened)
DB: Carlton Davis (Auburn), Mike Hughes (UCF), Josh Jackson (Iowa), Justin Reid Stanford
QB: Lamar Jackson, Mason Rudolph or Kyle Lauletta
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 25, 2018 8:00:50 GMT -5
Thank the gods both Gronk and Brady have made it 100% known they will play in 2018. I didn't want to draft a TE out of just need, only if the value is great.
Patriots signed another OT which is highly weird if they plan on drafting one high.
Not enough substance for Darnold,but there is for Allen? Darnold is just like Allen physically, he checks every box and was very good playing against high quality talent. I'd trade up for Darnold in two seconds, but he's going top 5.
I like Carlton Davis, but that's not good value. Its not crazy, just go Evans then Davis.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Apr 25, 2018 8:18:48 GMT -5
If I was a betting man, I'd put my money on a edge rusher or linebacker going in the first pick of the draft.
BB's highest picks ever seems to be on defense with the one exception being Nate Soldier at OT that one year.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 25, 2018 9:17:36 GMT -5
Thank the gods both Gronk and Brady have made it 100% known they will play in 2018. I didn't want to draft a TE out of just need, only if the value is great. Patriots signed another OT which is highly weird if they plan on drafting one high. Not enough substance for Darnold,but there is for Allen? Darnold is just like Allen physically, he checks every box and was very good playing against high quality talent. I'd trade up for Darnold in two seconds, but he's going top 5. I like Carlton Davis, but that's not good value. Its not crazy, just go Evans then Davis. I’m with ya, I’d go Evans first too no doubt. And yea I like Allen better. I’m not a Darnold fan. He’s never impressed me. And surely some of my Allen preference could be that I’ve been in him somewhat for a while ever since seeing a great profile on him. I like his intangibles, determination and work ethic. He’s taken a different path and I like that part of him. Quarterback play needs certain mindsets and my intrigue with him could be misplaced but it’s my feeling on it. We may never know because both could end up with teams like the Browns and Jets and have no chance or one could end up in a god situation but I’d prefer my team to have Allen at this point. I’m really not super high on any of the top 4 QBs this year. Oh and just to address the substance part. I don’t believe I ever says Allen had all this substance that Darnold didn’t. Darnold was in a position to do things that Allen wasn’t. Like throw the ball to competent players. Yes that came with better opposition too and it’s not Darnolds fault he was better as a high school player. It’s obvious with Allen you have to adjust things based on his competition, environment (He played in terrible weather) and talent around him. It’s not easy and I’m by no means an expert.
|
|
|
Post by beasleyrockah on Apr 25, 2018 10:42:27 GMT -5
I think Kolton Miller is a poor fit for the Patriots current needs. He's a long term high upside prospect due to his athleticism but he's easily the most raw option for LT among the top 2 round guys. The Patriots already have a quality developmental tackle option in Garcia, and while they could use more depth at tackle their actual "need" is in the form of a 2018 starting caliber LT, and by almost all accounts Miller is not that guy by September. If Wynn slips to #23 I wonder if Bill would play him at LT for a year before kicking him inside to replace Shaq Mason, who will inevitably get paid a lot more money next offseason than Bill would pay.
This draft, more than any I can remember, is not about landing players at positions of top immediate need...it's simply about landing the best football players for this system over the next 4-5 seasons. The Patriots roster is going to turn over in a big way very soon. I understand why fans look at immediate need, but for most positions the rookie year contributions will be the least productive season from these draft picks. The team can't afford to take lesser players just because their position matches up with the current depth chart. I count QB, RB, WR, TE, OT, OG, DE, DT, LB, CB, S as spots that could be a big need by the next draft, and since Bill drafts more for year two contributions than year one I could see any of those position being selected in the first round if the right player is on the board (although Ridley is the only guy I could see them picking in the 1st as a WR, and I don't think any RB's/TE's will be worth it).
My linebacker target is Fred Warner (most likely at #43), or Leighton Vander Esch if his medicals check out.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Apr 25, 2018 11:59:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 25, 2018 17:48:41 GMT -5
Thank the gods both Gronk and Brady have made it 100% known they will play in 2018. I didn't want to draft a TE out of just need, only if the value is great. Patriots signed another OT which is highly weird if they plan on drafting one high. Not enough substance for Darnold,but there is for Allen? Darnold is just like Allen physically, he checks every box and was very good playing against high quality talent. I'd trade up for Darnold in two seconds, but he's going top 5. I like Carlton Davis, but that's not good value. Its not crazy, just go Evans then Davis. I’m with ya, I’d go Evans first too no doubt. And yea I like Allen better. I’m not a Darnold fan. He’s never impressed me. And surely some of my Allen preference could be that I’ve been in him somewhat for a while ever since seeing a great profile on him. I like his intangibles, determination and work ethic. He’s taken a different path and I like that part of him. Quarterback play needs certain mindsets and my intrigue with him could be misplaced but it’s my feeling on it. We may never know because both could end up with teams like the Browns and Jets and have no chance or one could end up in a god situation but I’d prefer my team to have Allen at this point. I’m really not super high on any of the top 4 QBs this year. Oh and just to address the substance part. I don’t believe I ever says Allen had all this substance that Darnold didn’t. Darnold was in a position to do things that Allen wasn’t. Like throw the ball to competent players. Yes that came with better opposition too and it’s not Darnolds fault he was better as a high school player. It’s obvious with Allen you have to adjust things based on his competition, environment (He played in terrible weather) and talent around him. It’s not easy and I’m by no means an expert. www.footballperspective.com/the-trouble-with-finding-comparisons-for-josh-allen/That article is basically how I feel about Allen. You can't get a comp for him. If he goes #1 or even top 5 it's something that's never been done. Maybe he's the exception and he becomes great. There is that chance, but I'm a stats guy. Production is by far the best indicator for future NFL success. Many more players every year become great NFL player without the measurables than do raw athletes that all of a sudden just put it together in the NFL. With Allen we hear he didn't have a jump in stats because he lost a lot of very good players. NFL quality type players, two players got drafted last year. OK I get that, but why was he bad in 2016 with those players? He's like taking a pitcher first overall because he has the fastest fastball in the draft, lets say 105 MPH. Great Kid, great work ethic, Tim Tebow type guy. Yet he has no other pitches, no control, no command and barely any feel for pitching. He's a college guy, so he has had development time, he's not 18. That just doesn't happen and for good reason. QBs get overdrafted, almost all of them. It's just the way it is. Most important position in the game, you basically can't win without one. I don't think Darnold is a true # 1 talent like Manning, Ryan, and Luck. Very few are. At the same time he checks about every box you could want in a QB. He needs to sit a year and learn. He only started for 2 years, so he's not a finished product. He has very good production, great size, a very good arm and has great intangibles. Like after throwing in his pro day he flew out to throw for a couple of college teammates at a 2nd USC pro day. He dealt with the presure of being the number one pick for most of the year. Notre Dame and it's great D killed USC this year, but he bounced back and just kept winning games for them. He's my overall favorite QB this year, but I also really like Mayfield and Rosen. I would gamble on Jackson later in first round of the draft, he is just a rare athlete and has great upside. I also like Rudolph, but he's a good notch below those 4 in my book. After you get buy those guys I'd consider Allen. The risk reward starts to make sense in the second round.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Apr 25, 2018 18:30:49 GMT -5
I think Rosen does have the talent of a #1 but it's just his weirdness and unlikeability that is holding him back. I'd love for Brady to teach him a few things about leading while he's holding a clipboard.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Apr 25, 2018 18:41:20 GMT -5
After reading that about Allen how could any GM think it would be wise to pick him top 10?
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 25, 2018 19:33:21 GMT -5
I think Rosen does have the talent of a #1 but it's just his weirdness and unlikeability that is holding him back. I'd love for Brady to teach him a few things about leading while he's holding a clipboard. I wouldn't say a bad word if the Browns took Rosen #1. There's enough talent there that it makes sense. He has legit issues though like health and production. Three year starter yet he only played in 3 more games than Darnold did in two years. 59 TD's in 3 years to 57 for Darnold in two years. Completion percentage was rather low his first two years given his talent and the talent surrounding him. Comments by former coach of having to keep his interest in football and that he would take Darnold over Rosen That's a lot more than just weirdness and unlikability. Which frankly all by itself is an issue at QB, where you need to lead your team. He's a lot like Darnold and a lot of QBs, he needs the right team and time. I do like the arm talent though and he's a very smart guy.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Apr 26, 2018 6:44:10 GMT -5
www.weei.com/blogs/lucy-burdge/thursday-s-mashup-rob-gronkowski-says-he-s-excited-2018-season-super-pliable-video Make sure to watch the video Per Mike Florio Gronk has wanted a new contract numerous times before. He is one of the most dominant offensive players in the league and has been for a while but he hasn't been paid like one. Good for the Pats but not so good for him, even given the injury history. For the the final 2 years of his contract he has a cap hit of 11 and 12 million. Would he sign a 3 to 4 year deal that guaranteed more money but the Pats could keep the cap hit around 12? Would that make him happy and motivated? What if the TB12 method along with a motivated Gronk means he stays healthier for 4 more years? That could happen but he is just so big and takes so many big hits because the db knows that he is going to get run over or taken for a bus ride if he doesn't blow Gronk up. Those seam routes make me freakn nervous every game because he gets blown up so often. That could be the reason his career ends, either by a hit or him saying I have had enough. But.. he says he is super super pliable. I think it would be good for the teams image, both with fans and players but making him happy is important also. Can he go 3 probably yes. Does he want to?
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Apr 26, 2018 6:53:25 GMT -5
Just don't get bitten by a shark!
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 26, 2018 6:58:02 GMT -5
I’m with ya, I’d go Evans first too no doubt. And yea I like Allen better. I’m not a Darnold fan. He’s never impressed me. And surely some of my Allen preference could be that I’ve been in him somewhat for a while ever since seeing a great profile on him. I like his intangibles, determination and work ethic. He’s taken a different path and I like that part of him. Quarterback play needs certain mindsets and my intrigue with him could be misplaced but it’s my feeling on it. We may never know because both could end up with teams like the Browns and Jets and have no chance or one could end up in a god situation but I’d prefer my team to have Allen at this point. I’m really not super high on any of the top 4 QBs this year. Oh and just to address the substance part. I don’t believe I ever says Allen had all this substance that Darnold didn’t. Darnold was in a position to do things that Allen wasn’t. Like throw the ball to competent players. Yes that came with better opposition too and it’s not Darnolds fault he was better as a high school player. It’s obvious with Allen you have to adjust things based on his competition, environment (He played in terrible weather) and talent around him. It’s not easy and I’m by no means an expert. www.footballperspective.com/the-trouble-with-finding-comparisons-for-josh-allen/That article is basically how I feel about Allen. You can't get a comp for him. If he goes #1 or even top 5 it's something that's never been done. Maybe he's the exception and he becomes great. There is that chance, but I'm a stats guy. Production is by far the best indicator for future NFL success. Many more players every year become great NFL player without the measurables than do raw athletes that all of a sudden just put it together in the NFL. With Allen we hear he didn't have a jump in stats because he lost a lot of very good players. NFL quality type players, two players got drafted last year. OK I get that, but why was he bad in 2016 with those players? He's like taking a pitcher first overall because he has the fastest fastball in the draft, lets say 105 MPH. Great Kid, great work ethic, Tim Tebow type guy. Allen wasn’t bad in 2016. He was actually really good as a first year starter. We can agree to disagree here if you want. I’m aware of his numbers. So let’s put that aside. You’ve also left out the most important attributes that Allen has. But again for the sake of discussion let’s put all the QBs aside right now. I’d rather get to the bottom of this: What are the biggest reasons talented QBs fail in the NFL?
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Apr 26, 2018 7:17:47 GMT -5
Will the racist tweets cost Allen today?
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Apr 26, 2018 8:07:38 GMT -5
Baker Mayfield will be the #1 pick.
IMO he will be like Russell Wilson.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 26, 2018 9:46:42 GMT -5
www.footballperspective.com/the-trouble-with-finding-comparisons-for-josh-allen/That article is basically how I feel about Allen. You can't get a comp for him. If he goes #1 or even top 5 it's something that's never been done. Maybe he's the exception and he becomes great. There is that chance, but I'm a stats guy. Production is by far the best indicator for future NFL success. Many more players every year become great NFL player without the measurables than do raw athletes that all of a sudden just put it together in the NFL. With Allen we hear he didn't have a jump in stats because he lost a lot of very good players. NFL quality type players, two players got drafted last year. OK I get that, but why was he bad in 2016 with those players? He's like taking a pitcher first overall because he has the fastest fastball in the draft, lets say 105 MPH. Great Kid, great work ethic, Tim Tebow type guy. Allen wasn’t bad in 2016. He was actually really good as a first year starter. We can agree to disagree here if you want. I’m aware of his numbers. So let’s put that aside. You’ve also left out the most important attributes that Allen has. But again for the sake of discussion let’s put all the QBs aside right now. I’d rather get to the bottom of this: What are the biggest reasons talented QBs fail in the NFL? There isn't just one big reason. If it was that easy teams would have figured it out and there wouldn't be so many busts. There are many reasons. Allen basically sat for two years at Wyoming. His first year as a starter was his third year in College. His stats were impressive? Compared to what? Not to Darnolds stats after sitting only one year at USC. Heck his stats aren't impressive compared to Kizers first year at Notre Dame after sitting only one year. 56% completion is not even close to impressive after sitting for two years given the talent level on that team and the competition he faced. A less than 2 to 1 touchdown to interception ratio isn't impressive. Have you looked at the two QBs he couldn't beat out for two years? Heck at least the 2015 starter posted a 63% completion percentage, then Allen this great talent takes over and posts 56%.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 26, 2018 9:47:37 GMT -5
Baker Mayfield will be the #1 pick. IMO he will be like Russell Wilson. There is hope for the Browns after all.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Apr 26, 2018 10:20:18 GMT -5
The Browns could take Barkley at #1 and still get Mayfield at 4.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 26, 2018 10:44:41 GMT -5
How could you know that?
|
|
|