SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
2019 Celtics Offseason Thread
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 23, 2019 9:23:10 GMT -5
Age 31, 27, and 26 seasons. 9th person on the bench? You're talking about mid-level guy for one starter, and Veteran minimum for another starter. Then a whole bench of Veteran minimum guys and one pick 54 second round guy. They'd wish they could get guys like Rubio for the bench. It's your dream team, so I hope it happens. I think they would prefer those 3 versus Rubio. You can find depth from anywhere. Probably the easiest thing to do in the NBA is to fill the rest of the roster like that. The hardest thing to do is to find two top 5 players in the league and put them on the same team. I hope it doesn't happen, they'll be favorites for years and it'll be sickening because it's New York. Why do you keep acting like anyone said Rubio over those three? I'm likely Irving's critic on this board and even I have never once said that. Rubio was brought up if he leaves. A way to change the culture and style. If you are talking about 9th man and on sure depth isn't crazy hard on the back of a roster if you have a good GM. Finding five of your top eight players with only a mid-level exception is crazy hard. You have no contracts to trade, you have no bird rights to overpay guys, you have no young guys that can get better. It could take a few years to fill out that roster and even then could limit them for years if they aren't smart. Just like the Heat and Cavs rosters limited those LeBron teams. Now we agree on that. I don't have David as a top five guy though. Top 5 guys are Superstar, not guys that only make the playoffs two out of seven years. They would only have one year to convince him to resign. A team with three alpha scorers that all have major questions about their abilities to play team ball and no depth. Like I really want to see that and I'm not worried. Talent is great, but you need team play and Irving is one of the worst fits as PG with Durant and Davis. I know you think that's crazy and will only believe it when you get to see it because you seem to have forgotten those great LeBron teams losing to teams like the Mavs, Spurs, and Warriors pre Durant where they had way more talent and still lost. Nevermind the East is as strong as it has been in years.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 23, 2019 9:31:19 GMT -5
Was Rozier good in his role this year? Nope, still went 12-2 when he started. His 82 games stats from last year when he started a lot more games were some of the better ones on the team.
Come on he played what 86 minutes in five playoff games and you really think he is the reason for our disappointing season? Raise your hand if you really believe that if Rozier didn't play against the Bucks it changes anything? The two biggest issues were clearly Irving and Hayward. I'd love to know how he effected either of those guys.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on May 23, 2019 13:53:41 GMT -5
2nd team All NBA for Kyrie.
Despite the atrocious showing in the 2nd round, I agree with the voting here.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on May 23, 2019 22:11:24 GMT -5
Did anyone watch the game? Gotta say, the Bucks put up a textbook example on how NOT to guard an NBA superstar when Kawhi was going supernova in the 4th. They never double, they never denied him the ball, they switch Lopez onto him, seriously it was atrocious. We'll see if Giannis is ready to be the face of the league in the next two games. It did not look good tonight.
When I saw Budenholzer complaining about Drake of all things I knew things were going south for the Bucks. He's shook and they're self-destroying right now.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on May 24, 2019 8:04:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 24, 2019 9:25:08 GMT -5
How is Klay Thompson not an all NBA guy?
If you had a choice would you take Thompson or Irving?
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 25, 2019 11:25:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 27, 2019 8:44:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 27, 2019 8:56:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on May 28, 2019 11:11:01 GMT -5
Just saw this mock draft and I like our chances for drafting at least 2 solid players. I love how fiery Washington is, he'd be such a perfect fit for a team that needs a more aggressive mentality. For the next pick, there's a very good chance one of Herro, Keldon Johnson or NAW is going to be there. For the third pick you can even take a longer bet and reach a bit, you can go full random like Lecque or my personal favorite Luka Samanic. Samanic is an athletic, long and skillful young euro. We badly need an euro.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 28, 2019 22:23:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on May 28, 2019 23:29:04 GMT -5
Thybulle is apparently a messianic defender, can't be too mad there even if he had a terrible shooting season. Getting Washington and Keldon Johnson would be awesome. That being said, I still hope they take NAW. They need a PG.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 29, 2019 2:41:18 GMT -5
I wouldn't be upset about Thybulle, just more of how do you play certain guys together? You'd have Baynes and Williams, then Smart and Thybulle as basically defenders. I won't trust Smarts shooting till he does it again. It's scary how good the D could be, but also how bad your scoring could be.
Now Washington and Johnson would help with that, both are much more two way type players. They have limited upsides compared to some players. Yet the upside is still very good starter type players. Like I don't get Johnson dropping, which according to mocks he is. You get him at 22 and that is a great pick. Those guys are the type of players that fill out Championship teams.
Yet no swing for the fences type pick? Like most mocks have Little there at 14. I'm not the biggest fan of guys like him, very boom or bust type player. Yet he's like Brown, high recruit, elite athlete, but had a disappointing year. Yet his upside is massive. I'd fully expect Danny to gamble on one guy like him if he makes three picks.
Which brings me to my next point, we will make some trades. No matter what happens, within the next few years trades will happen. I just wish I knew what Danny was thinking, would make picking players easier. Like if your trading Tatum or Brown, Little is a much better fit.
Crazy interesting draft the more you dive into it. Danny has a million different options.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on May 29, 2019 10:09:10 GMT -5
Reading O'Connor's Draft evaluation, Thybulle doesn't seem to be a BAD offensive player just a timid/deferential one. Says he's an above avg 3Pt shooter (though last year's stats doesn't indicate that) and good free throw shooter.
Says his issues are that he flares his elbow when he shoots (fixable) and at the rim finishing (needs to develop 1-foot athleticism).
Doesn't seem like he'll ever be a go-to-go (no s@#!) but not an offensive dead spot either.
His strengths (according to that one report) just screams Danny
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 29, 2019 14:39:37 GMT -5
I read the Ringer report on Thybulle and it seems very kind for a four year senior that maxed out at 12 points per 40 minutes as a Junior. Not a ton of reports on him as ESPN and nbadraft.net don't have Bio's for him. From what I've got he just doesn't have the feel for the offensive game. He can shoot some three's, good FT shooter, yet he gets very few and that likely won't change. Decent passer, won't kill you, but not a playmaker. Outside of that it's almost a nothing. It sounds like watching Semi, who for the most part is a three point shot or nothing type guy. Yet Semi showed a lot more in College than Thybulle did.
You can always dream on a guy getting better, it happens. The great unknown of sports drafts. Yet Thybulle sure looks like a guy that will really help your D and hurt your offense. Kinda like a better shooting Roberson. Yet I fear those rather good College shooting numbers don't fully translate to the pros. Was above 50% on two point shots, 35% on three's and 75% from the line, yet maxed out at 11.2 points per game in four years. Like that is a huge red flag when it comes to offensive upside. The plus is he knows his limitations and doesn't force a ton, yet his offensive feel is just not there.
Not a horrible pick, a very safe pick. He's ready to play now, he doesn't need years to develop. His D and hustle fit the team culture. It makes sense, he's likely a 10 year NBA veteran. Just a little weird on a team that already has Smart and he's signed long-term. I bet it would be crazy fun watching those two play D together, but I don't think I would want to watch that offense.
I do have to say I'm a little skeptical on the promise. He's a senior, not some under the radar guy that played one year. You know who he is, you have 135 plus games of College tape. You promise him so he stops workouts? Not the type of guy that jumps up the rankings normally this time of year.
|
|
|
Post by ramireja on May 29, 2019 15:57:37 GMT -5
Looking at Thybulle's stats from last year and I'm wondering: It must be incredibly rare for a guy with meaningful playing time to average more combined steals + blocks (Thybulle: 5.8 combined) than rebounds + assists (Thubulle: 5.2 combined).
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on May 30, 2019 14:41:00 GMT -5
Thybulle kind of takes me back to the discussion of extending Smart or Rozier. At the time, I argued that Smart's defense is elite and you should always take a player with an elite skill over another who is merely good at everything. I still think so and guys who are great at something will always have a role in a NBA team. Who knows, they may even develop some semblance of an offensive game like Smart did.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 31, 2019 11:29:43 GMT -5
www.theringer.com/nba-draft/2019/5/30/18646024/2019-nba-mock-draft-2-0-full-first-round-mockInteresting live mock from guys that know what they are talking about. Washington, Hayes and Bol seems crazy unlikely from a they'll even be there point of view. Then also your taking two centers and a PF. Yet it makes sense in that Washington is that great fit safe player, Hayes is an upside guy who's a great athlete, and Bol who's a guy I couldn't pass up at 22. If the draft goes that way I can see Danny doing that. Yet Porter, Johnson and Dort would have to be in the discussion. On paper you need a guard who can score even if Irving stays and Rozier leaves. I really like Johnson and Dort, but getting a Bol at 22 has me giddy. I couldn't pass that up what he could become.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on May 31, 2019 13:02:34 GMT -5
Steve Kyler (Basketball Insiders) suggesting that Boston is NOT operating like a team that expects to keep Kyrie and go after AD. Hears multiple close to the team that think KI is more than out the door and they are moving forward with that in mind.
Specifically:
Steve Kyler Retweeted Christian Tams MS RD I can help a little... The Celtics have been actively exploring trades, and draft scenarios for players that would better lineup with a future built around Tatum and Brown... sources close to the team are skeptical that they can get Irving back but remain open to re-signing him.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on May 31, 2019 18:39:24 GMT -5
Steve Kyler (Basketball Insiders) suggesting that Boston is NOT operating like a team that expects to keep Kyrie and go after AD. Hears multiple close to the team that think KI is more than out the door and they are moving forward with that in mind. Specifically: Steve Kyler Retweeted Christian Tams MS RD I can help a little... The Celtics have been actively exploring trades, and draft scenarios for players that would better lineup with a future built around Tatum and Brown... sources close to the team are skeptical that they can get Irving back but remain open to re-signing him. It would be negligent to approach it any other way even if you expected Kyrie to return. What do they expect Danny to just go with one angle?
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 31, 2019 23:10:15 GMT -5
Well it's kinda big news no? Instead of making moves to try and convince him to stay. It was the hard part of this off-season. Lots of trades made at draft before you know and frankly each path requires different types of players.
Like in the draft, no Irving and guys like Porter Jr., Langford, Dort, and even a guy like Edwards might be guys to target. Guards that dominate the ball and wouldn't fit well with Irving. Yet we are going to need play making and scoring now.
Overall I'm glad Danny is taking this path, it's the smart play.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Jun 1, 2019 3:42:24 GMT -5
Well it's kinda big news no? Instead of making moves to try and convince him to stay. It was the hard part of this off-season. Lots of trades made at draft before you know and frankly each path requires different types of players. Like in the draft, no Irving and guys like Porter Jr., Langford, Dort, and even a guy like Edwards might be guys to target. Guards that dominate the ball and wouldn't fit well with Irving. Yet we are going to need play making and scoring now. Overall I'm glad Danny is taking this path, it's the smart play. It literally might not be the path though. Danny doesn't always show his cards until they're dealt. Rumors are just rumors until they become final.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Jun 1, 2019 3:44:54 GMT -5
Steve Kyler (Basketball Insiders) suggesting that Boston is NOT operating like a team that expects to keep Kyrie and go after AD. Hears multiple close to the team that think KI is more than out the door and they are moving forward with that in mind. Specifically: Steve Kyler Retweeted Christian Tams MS RD I can help a little... The Celtics have been actively exploring trades, and draft scenarios for players that would better lineup with a future built around Tatum and Brown... sources close to the team are skeptical that they can get Irving back but remain open to re-signing him. It would be negligent to approach it any other way even if you expected Kyrie to return. What do they expect Danny to just go with one angle? Yeah Danny is smart. He's not going to just plan for one thing to happen. KG and Ray Allen were the FALLBACK options after not getting Durant in the draft all that time ago. Critical off-season that could affect the Celtics next 5 years is potentially this off-season.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jun 1, 2019 8:06:01 GMT -5
Well it's kinda big news no? Instead of making moves to try and convince him to stay. It was the hard part of this off-season. Lots of trades made at draft before you know and frankly each path requires different types of players. Like in the draft, no Irving and guys like Porter Jr., Langford, Dort, and even a guy like Edwards might be guys to target. Guards that dominate the ball and wouldn't fit well with Irving. Yet we are going to need play making and scoring now. Overall I'm glad Danny is taking this path, it's the smart play. This is precisely how people over react. It just says Danny is discussing trades and draft scenarios for this situation. It doesn’t say exclusively and it doesn’t say he’s not discussing trades and draft scenarios for a situation they keep him or ones in which they aren’t sure so they play both sides. It’s as much of a story as you want it to be, but for me it’s a non story considering I’d fully expect Danny to do this: he’s thorough and well prepared for multiple situations.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jun 1, 2019 8:07:42 GMT -5
Well it's kinda big news no? Instead of making moves to try and convince him to stay. It was the hard part of this off-season. Lots of trades made at draft before you know and frankly each path requires different types of players. Like in the draft, no Irving and guys like Porter Jr., Langford, Dort, and even a guy like Edwards might be guys to target. Guards that dominate the ball and wouldn't fit well with Irving. Yet we are going to need play making and scoring now. Overall I'm glad Danny is taking this path, it's the smart play. It literally might not be the path though. Danny doesn't always show his cards until they're dealt. Rumors are just rumors until they become final. It may not be his path but I doubt it’s a true rumor either. It’s legitimately part of what he should be exploring even if he’s pretty confident Kyrie is coming back. Until a guy like him is signed you prepared for everything.
|
|
|