SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Patriots 2021 Offseason Thread
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 30, 2021 12:45:57 GMT -5
The last two years have been kinda crazy. A poor running game in 2019 hurt the passing. In 2020 poor passing hurt a great running game. You have Harris and Michel running like they did last year and you'll be fine with Mac Jones. He needs that. Yet you never know what Michel you will get and if he can stay healthy. Yet that mix of a one cut Michel versus the power of Harris was awesome last year when both were healthy. The defense gets used to Harris,then you change things up with Michel. Hopefully a reduced role for Michel can keep him healthy.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Apr 30, 2021 12:46:07 GMT -5
BTW - Jones seems like SUCH an "it all makes sense" pick that I have it in my head that BB is going to draft Davis Mills or Kellen Mond today just to mess with us.
All kidding aside, it wouldn't surprise me if he took a late round guy as well (if the "extra" picks aren't used to move up). Feleipe Franks checks a lot of boxes as a 6th/7th rd guy or priority FA.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Apr 30, 2021 12:56:07 GMT -5
One thing on that board I posted:
I had removed Jeremiah Owusu-Koramoah from the Day 1 board bc few of the resources I had used included him on their lists. Kyed had him as a physical fit but, other than that, the others didn't list him.
I wonder how the omissions may have been impacted by his position. He's listed as a LB by most but is he more of a S who now has more limitations than his tape would otherwise suggest. BUT, given how BB likes to employ the Box S, could he be seen as a replacement for Adrian Phillips (with Duggar, the athletic guy, being more all over the field including deep)? And, how about as a Day 2 pick? Certainly one can see why he wouldn't have been a candidate at 15 or even in a trade down to the back 1/2 of the 1st. But what about 46? I have no idea but thought I'd add him to the list of guys.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Apr 30, 2021 13:01:23 GMT -5
So I just watched the video of the Cardinals call with Zaven Collins. Have to admit, as good as I am with the Jones pick, I'm a little bummed about Collins. Again, with no ability to analyze tape, he just seems like a BB guy. What a moment for all these guys.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 30, 2021 13:06:45 GMT -5
BTW - Jones seems like SUCH an "it all makes sense" pick that I have it in my head that BB is going to draft Davis Mills or Kellen Mond today just to mess with us. All kidding aside, it wouldn't surprise me if he took a late round guy as well (if the "extra" picks aren't used to move up). Feleipe Franks checks a lot of boxes as a 6th/7th rd guy or priority FA. What do you see in Franks? He's the polar opposite of Mac Jones.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 30, 2021 13:12:44 GMT -5
One thing on that board I posted: I had removed Jeremiah Owusu-Koramoah from the Day 1 board bc few of the resources I had used included him on their lists. Kyed had him as a physical fit but, other than that, the others didn't list him. I wonder how the omissions may have been impacted by his position. He's listed as a LB by most but is he more of a S who now has more limitations than his tape would otherwise suggest. BUT, given how BB likes to employ the Box S, could he be seen as a replacement for Adrian Phillips (with Duggar, the athletic guy, being more all over the field including deep)? And, how about as a Day 2 pick? Certainly one can see why he wouldn't have been a candidate at 15 or even in a trade down to the back 1/2 of the 1st. But what about 46? I have no idea but thought I'd add him to the list of guys. As everyone knows I'm a diehard Notre Dame fan, yet never saw the top 15 ranking for JOK. Now in the 2nd round that changes things. If he's there at 46 you have to consider him in today's NFL. I don't think he'll be there though.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Apr 30, 2021 13:20:38 GMT -5
BTW - Jones seems like SUCH an "it all makes sense" pick that I have it in my head that BB is going to draft Davis Mills or Kellen Mond today just to mess with us. All kidding aside, it wouldn't surprise me if he took a late round guy as well (if the "extra" picks aren't used to move up). Feleipe Franks checks a lot of boxes as a 6th/7th rd guy or priority FA. What do you see in Franks? He's the polar opposite of Mac Jones. Me? I don't see anything. Don't really care if it's him or not. Just checked some of the boxes that I described above (Kyed's "fit" score, Perry's Protypical Patriot). That's more useful than any analysis I, personally, can provide. Read some other things about him being a type of guy BB might be interested in working with. But the larger point is that I could see them bringing in someone else to work with for a stretch.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Apr 30, 2021 13:26:39 GMT -5
I can see them keeping all 3 of Stidham, Cam and Mac. Hmmm 1st time I realized the Cam, Mac name thing, polar opposites in more ways than 1.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 30, 2021 13:37:15 GMT -5
YES!! And just to expound on that thought. Burrow just like Jones was not thought of as being a top pick before his one breakout season. He had an incredible season surrounded by great talent, just like Jones. Jones actually broke some of Burrows records. So yes many had Jones at 3 but he did not get the same kind of praise as Burrow, sure Burrow is a little better athlete but Jones has been somewhat overlooked based on the talent around him while Burrow seemed to escape that narrative. Either way I am very happy to get him at 15 w.o. having to move up, very fortunate. I think his greatest attributes are exactly what the Pats want their QB to do. Read the D, make the adjustments and the plays the D is giving you, make quick accurate throws. That is what Tom was so good at, not creating but just methodically taking what the D was giving, not getting too greedy downfield. Jones has the make up to be the same player and he is SMART which is important. 4.0 gpa graduating in 3 years and completing, i think, a masters degree. We shall see. edit: And sure having those WR's helped a lot but how many of those throws were on time and in stride allowing them to run and create? 77% completion % is crazy good. In the post-pick highlights reels, I saw quite a few throws where a receiver was schemed to open a window but Jones had perfect touch into the right place where only the receiver could get it; many of his best plays were reminiscent of Tommy (the touch, the pocket movement, smart decisions). He definitely COULD be really good, and I hope he does. I still worry about offensive predictability. At its worse in recent years it was too easy to predict pass vs. run based on personnel and formation, but the mix of schemed and coverage runs from Cam last year helped a bit. Obviously the passing game itself was much more predicable and less successful. the predictability had nothing to do with the QB when Tom was here. I'd say Cam made things even more predictable last year. They just need to use guys like Harris and Michel more in the passing game to be less predictable. You don't need a mobile QB to run an RPO.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 30, 2021 13:43:30 GMT -5
Do you think he's "Bill's guy" or do you think if Fields had been available at 15 Belichick would have chose Fields instead? Who do you think ultimately will be the better QB? The only thing I know for sure is that Belichick didn't want to spend draft capital to move up to get Fields. Yeah I think he's Bill's guy, he's not like other teams when they need a QB and they'll just take whatever one they can get. If he liked Fields he should and likely would have traded up. The only thing that's scary with Mac Jones is what you don't see. After I first watched him Nesmith tape came to mind. The tape was awesome, yet how easy everything was scared me. Bill already said Newton's the starter, he'll deal with it if Stidham and Jones show they are ready. Which is smart, I'm a big believer in giving guys time. Let him adjust before you throw him into the fire. I don't know, so much of that depends on how the team develops them and uses them. Fields is a crazy athlete, so his bar is crazy high. I don't like the fit with the Bears though, I didn't like how they used Trubisky. That wasn't a creative offense, I thought the 49ers and Patriot type offense would be better for him. Use his accuracy and allow him to grow. So I'll say Mac Jones because I know the Patriots offense fits him. Watch more tape if you can't find anything Mac Jones didn't do that wasn't easy. There were A LOT of wide open receivers, don't get me wrong, but there was also a good amount of defense manipulation and throwing into tight windows where only his guys could get it. Believe me, I'm not down playing certain questions based on talent, but this guy played against top competition and made plays. He wasn't just tossing to open receivers all the time.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 30, 2021 13:55:38 GMT -5
I believe they like Mac Jones more than Fields. I also believe Mac Jones will be the better QB... He was my original guy at 15, then I thought he'd never be there so I moved on. I felt Fields was going to be a bust, but then I started talking myself into him when rumors were swirling about the Pats interest. I'm no expert QB evaluator though so it's really off of feel from watching them the few times I watched them play. So Mac Jones will probably suck and Fields will be in the HOF>
|
|
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Apr 30, 2021 14:38:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 30, 2021 15:26:48 GMT -5
Yeah I think he's Bill's guy, he's not like other teams when they need a QB and they'll just take whatever one they can get. If he liked Fields he should and likely would have traded up. The only thing that's scary with Mac Jones is what you don't see. After I first watched him Nesmith tape came to mind. The tape was awesome, yet how easy everything was scared me. Bill already said Newton's the starter, he'll deal with it if Stidham and Jones show they are ready. Which is smart, I'm a big believer in giving guys time. Let him adjust before you throw him into the fire. I don't know, so much of that depends on how the team develops them and uses them. Fields is a crazy athlete, so his bar is crazy high. I don't like the fit with the Bears though, I didn't like how they used Trubisky. That wasn't a creative offense, I thought the 49ers and Patriot type offense would be better for him. Use his accuracy and allow him to grow. So I'll say Mac Jones because I know the Patriots offense fits him. Watch more tape if you can't find anything Mac Jones didn't do that wasn't easy. There were A LOT of wide open receivers, don't get me wrong, but there was also a good amount of defense manipulation and throwing into tight windows where only his guys could get it. Believe me, I'm not down playing certain questions based on talent, but this guy played against top competition and made plays. He wasn't just tossing to open receivers all the time. I'm talking conditions being easy. I can find Mac Jones wasn't sacked a lot, if I also had amount of hurries and QB hits you'd get a better picture. It wasn't just great talent, it was the combination was so good with coaching Mac Jones wasn't pressured like other QBs. Difference in making a great hard throw with a clean pocket versus one when your hurried and then also get hit a bunch after. How a QB responds to that, you don't see it, no D could do it to that offense. Sure give Mac some props, a QB can help reduce it, no QB makes it go away to his level. He's going to get hit in the NFL like he never did in College, much more under pressure throws. Maybe he's fine when that happens, yet I don't know because it never happened in College.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 30, 2021 15:45:35 GMT -5
What do you see in Franks? He's the polar opposite of Mac Jones. Me? I don't see anything. Don't really care if it's him or not. Just checked some of the boxes that I described above (Kyed's "fit" score, Perry's Protypical Patriot). That's more useful than any analysis I, personally, can provide. Read some other things about him being a type of guy BB might be interested in working with. But the larger point is that I could see them bringing in someone else to work with for a stretch. Sorry just had to ask as he was one of the first QBs I crossed off because he didn't fit our offense.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Apr 30, 2021 16:17:56 GMT -5
Me? I don't see anything. Don't really care if it's him or not. Just checked some of the boxes that I described above (Kyed's "fit" score, Perry's Protypical Patriot). That's more useful than any analysis I, personally, can provide. Read some other things about him being a type of guy BB might be interested in working with. But the larger point is that I could see them bringing in someone else to work with for a stretch. Sorry just had to ask as he was one of the first QBs I crossed off because he didn't fit our offense. Fair question. Edit - and to be clear, the exercise is based on comparison of physical and statistical traits to those of QBs selected previously. With both his work and Kyed's, the idea is not to pick who they think would be the right pick but to use historical evidence to see who BB might think is. It's an approach with some limitations sure but also some merit. BB could easily see a guy who has never played a particular way but feels has the ability to convert with some development. Perry did admit that the QB position would be tough since there has never been the percieved need. But at the backend of the draft, the need isnt a factor so hed probably feel more comfortable with the historical record of prototypes. FWIW - based on physical traits and historical path, both Kyed and Perry thought he was the best fit at QB. Not to be a starter of course. And, to your point, they're ignoring the tape. But that's their way of attempting to learn what BB is looking for. That was, in turn, my focus.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Apr 30, 2021 16:59:11 GMT -5
You have to love how they rushed to make the Pick. There was no debate, no trade talk, etc. They just rushed the card in. Mac Jones tape is great. I'm going to trust Bill. The lack of game tape with him under pressure does scare me though. You know how he does with crazy talent and time to throw, he looks great. No NFL QB will get what he had at College though. Only QB I studied who didn't have games under duress, he's going to face more pressure in a single NFL game than he did in a whole season at Bama. That just had to be said. I loved that aspect and I think it sends a message. I have a really good feeling about this pick!! He emulates what Tom was best at, but yes he did it with superior talent. He will be a high end game manager with accuracy which is exactly what BB wants. Patriots vs Bucs SB
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 30, 2021 17:26:06 GMT -5
I'm talking conditions being easy. I can find Mac Jones wasn't sacked a lot, if I also had amount of hurries and QB hits you'd get a better picture. It wasn't just great talent, it was the combination was so good with coaching Mac Jones wasn't pressured like other QBs. Difference in making a great hard throw with a clean pocket versus one when your hurried and then also get hit a bunch after. How a QB responds to that, you don't see it, no D could do it to that offense. Sure give Mac some props, a QB can help reduce it, no QB makes it go away to his level. He's going to get hit in the NFL like he never did in College, much more under pressure throws. Maybe he's fine when that happens, yet I don't know because it never happened in College. Asking because I know you watch a lot of tape - how much pressure did Lance see? It just seems strange that Jones coming from the SEC is getting hammered for having it too easy when Lance comes from DII. More than Mac Jones, yet he's the polar opposite player. A bunch of games he ran it more than passed it. He was rolling out throwing passes every game. He wasn't just sitting in a pocket. That might be the best collection of talent we've every seen from Bama and that's saying something. I want to see Mac Jones practice tape going against that Bama D.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 30, 2021 18:24:59 GMT -5
Assuming Wilson is good, the Jets are killing this draft so far.
|
|
cdj
Veteran
Posts: 15,884
|
Post by cdj on Apr 30, 2021 18:30:25 GMT -5
Assuming Wilson is good, the Jets are killing this draft so far. Agreed but they are done picking for a bit now. They’re going for quality over depth
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 30, 2021 18:36:53 GMT -5
Traded up to 38...
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 30, 2021 18:37:48 GMT -5
Traded two 4s... wow
|
|
|
Post by kingofthetrill on Apr 30, 2021 18:38:03 GMT -5
Cmon Trevon Moehrig!!!
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 30, 2021 18:39:55 GMT -5
Barmore - guys a beast - thought he’d be a first round pick. Like it.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 30, 2021 18:41:21 GMT -5
The Patriots traded the 46th, 122nd and 139th picks to Cincinnati for the right to Alabama DL Christian Barmore at 38.
Quality over quantity!
Part of me is sad it’s not a WR but I love Barmore.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 30, 2021 18:53:20 GMT -5
Round 1: Pick 15 (15) - QB Mac Jones Round 2: Pick 6 (38) - DT Christian Barmore
Remaining Picks: Round 3: Pick 33 (96) Round 4: Pick 15 (120) Round 5: Pick 33 (177) Round 6: Pick 4 (188) Round 6: Pick 13 (197) Round 7: Pick 15 (242)
|
|
|